Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Characterization of Laminated Composites: A Review

References

• Naebe, M.; Abolhasani, M. M.; Khayyam, H.; Amini, A.; Fox, B. Crack Damage in Polymers and Composites: A Review. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 31–69. DOI: 10.1080/15583724.2015.1078352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.; Prashant, K. Elements of Fracture Mechanics, McGraw Hill Education: India; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P.; Blackman, B. R. K.; Brunner, A. J. Standard Test Methods for Delamination Resistance of Composite Materials: Current Status. Appl. Compos. Mater. 1998, 5, 345–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM. D5528-01: Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites 1. Am. Stand. Test. Methods 2014, 03, (Reapproved 2007), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• D7905/D7905M-14; ASTM D7905/D7905M-14. Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. ASTM B. Stand. 2014, 15.03, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-X.; Nakata, M.; Takao, Y.; Matsubara, T. Experimental Investigation on Test Methods for Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Testing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2009, 40, 1447–1455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekrényes, A.; Uj, J. Mode-II Fracture in E-Glass-Polyester Composite. J. Compos. Mater. 2005, 39, 1747–1768. DOI: 10.1177/0021998305051120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D5045-99. Standard Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials. ASTM B. Stand. 1999, 1–9. DOI: 10.1520/D5045-99
   Google Scholar
• Quan, D.; Urdániz, J. L.; Ivanković, A. Enhancing Mode-I and Mode-II Fracture Toughness of Epoxy and Carbon Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites Using Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Mater. Des. 2018, 143, 81–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, N. J. Matrix Resin Effects in Composite Delamination: Mode I Fracture Aspects. In Toughened Composites: ASTM STP 937, Hunston, D. L., Moulton, R. J., Johnston, N. J., Bascom, W. D., Eds.; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1987; pp 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C.; Ben Jar, P.-Y.; Cheng, J.-J. R. Internal-Notched Flexure Test for Measurement of Mode II Delamination Resistance of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers. J. Compos. 2013, 2013, 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2013/695862.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sugahara, T.; Hamada, H. A Study on the Failure Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Thermosetting and Thermoplastic Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 99, 162–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelal, N. R.; Donaldson, S. L. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Hybrid-Stitched Carbon Fiber Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2018, 37, 1131–1141. DOI: 10.1177/0731684418787642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmurugan, R.; Solaimurugan, S. Improvements in Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and in-Plane Mechanical Properties of Stitched Glass/Polyester Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 61–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J.; Brast, A.; Scharr, G. Z-Pin Insertion Process for Through-Thickness Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 53, 173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S.; Zeng, X.; Long, A. Experimental Assessment of the Mechanical Behaviour of 3D Woven Composite T-Joints. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 154, 108–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. D. K.; Sun, X.; Tong, L.; Luo, Q.; Katzos, A.; Rispler, A. A New ENF Test Specimen for the Mode II Delamination Toughness Testing of Stitched Woven CFRP Laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 2007, 41, 1743–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. Y.; Yan, W.; Yu, X. Y.; Mai, Y. W. Experimental Study on Effect of Loading Rate on Mode I Delamination of Z-Pin Reinforced Laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1294–1301. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, H.; Kim, Y. Mode I Fracture Toughness of Carbon-Glass/Epoxy Interply Hybrid Composites. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 1955–1962. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-015-0416-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainol Abidin, M. S.; Herceg, T.; Greenhalgh, E. S.; Shaffer, M.; Bismarck, A. Enhanced Fracture Toughness of Hierarchical Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Carbon Fibre Epoxy Composites with Engineered Matrix Microstructure. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 170, 85–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.; Oh, E.; Hahn, H. T.; Lee, K. H. Enhancement of Fracture Toughness of Hierarchical Carbon Fiber Composites via Improved Adhesion between Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Fibers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 71, 72–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskizeybek, V.; Yar, A.; Avcı, A. CNT-PAN Hybrid Nanofibrous Mat Interleaved Carbon/Epoxy Laminates with Improved Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 157, 30–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H.; Du, X.; Liu, H. Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Mai, Y. W. Delamination Toughening of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Laminates by Hierarchical Carbon Nanotube-Short Carbon Fiber Interleaves. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 140, 46–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, N.; Huang, Y.; Liu, H. Y.; Gao, J.; Mai, Y. W. Improvement of Interlaminar Fracture Toughness in Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites with Carbon Nanotubes/Polysulfone Interleaves. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 140, 8–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, X.; Kravchenko, O. G.; Pedrazzoli, D.; Manas-Zloczower, I. Manas-Zloczower, I. Effect of Polycarbonate Film Surface Morphology and Oxygen Plasma Treatment on Mode I and II Fracture Toughness of Interleaved Composite Laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 105, 138–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. F.; Jang, B. Z. Fracture Behaviour of Interleaved Fiber-Resin Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1991, 41, 77–97. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90054-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljarrah, M. T.; Abdelal, N. R. Improvement of the Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber Composite Reinforced with Electrospun Nylon Nanofiber. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, J. S.; Daniel, I. M. Hybrid Nanoreinforced Carbon/Epoxy Composites for Enhanced Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Life. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 65, 47–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K. K.; Singh, R. K.; Kumar, P. Toughness of Adhesive Bonded Interface under Static and Dynamic Loads – An Experimental Study. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 601–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floros, I. S.; Tserpes, K. I.; Löbel, T. Mode-I, Mode-II and Mixed-Mode I + II Fracture Behavior of Composite Bonded Joints: Experimental Characterization and Numerical Simulation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 78, 459–468. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda, T.; Narita, F. Fracture Behavior and Crack Sensing Capability of Bonded Carbon Fiber Composite Joints with Carbon Nanotube-Based Polymer Adhesive Layer under Mode I Loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 146, 26–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, F.; Rikards, R.; Wang, H. Computational Analysis of Interlaminar Fracture of Laminated Composites. Int. J. Fract. 1997, 86, 37–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanteria, D.; Lazzeri, L.; Panettieri, E.; Mariani, U.; Rigamonti, M. Experimental Characterization of the Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of a Woven and a Unidirectional Carbon/Epoxy Composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 142, 20–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K.; Velmurugan, R.; Joshi, M. Numerical and Experimental Study of Multimode Failure Phenomena in GFRP Laminates of Different Lay-Ups. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 2018, 23, 87–99. DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1308784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, J.; Shin, K.; Hwang, T. Effect of Temperature on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Filament-Wound Carbon/Epoxy Composites. Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. A 2015, 39, 491–497. DOI: 10.3795/KSME-A.2015.39.5.491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Seah, L. K.; Chai, G. B. Delamination Growth Behavior of a Woven E-Glass/Bismaleimide Composite in Seawater Environment. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 106, 332–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, D. T. S.; Avila, A. F. A Methodology for Quality Control Evaluation for Laminated Composites Manufacturing. J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2005, 27, 248–254.
   Google Scholar
• Shivakumar, K. N.; Panduranga, R.; Skujins, J.; Miller, S. Assessment of Mode-II Fracture Tests for Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2015, 34, 1905–1925. DOI: 10.1177/0731684415602335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertsen, H.; Ivens, J.; Peters, P.; Wevers, M.; Verpoest, I. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CFRP Influenced by Fibre Surface Treatment: Part 1. Experimental Results. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1995, 54, 133–145. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00048-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhukar, M. S.; Drzal, L. T. Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effect on Composite Mechanical Properties: IV. Mode I and Mode II Fracture Toughness of Graphite/Epoxy Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 1992, 26, 936–968. DOI: 10.1177/002199839202600701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P.; Moulin, C.; Kausch, H. H.; Fischer, M. Measurement of GIc and GIIc in Carbon/Epoxy Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1990, 39, 193–205. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90041-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuboki, T.; Gallagher, E.; Jar, P. Y. B.; Cheng, J. J. R. A New Method to Quantify Delamination Resistance of Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP) under Transverse Loading. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2005, 12, 93–108. DOI: 10.1007/s10443-004-6205-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. K. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness: The Long and Winding Road to Standardization. Compos. Part B Eng. 1998, 29, 57–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi, S.; Kinloch, A. J.; Williams, J. G. The Effects of Geometry, Rate and Temperature on the Mode I, Mode II and Mixed-Mode I/II Interlaminar Fracture of Carbon-Fibre/Poly(Ether-Ether Ketone) Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 1990, 24, 918–956. DOI: 10.1177/002199839002400902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrier, A.; Godara, A.; Rochez, O.; Mezzo, L.; Luizi, F.; Gorbatikh, L.; Lomov, S. V.; VanVuure, A. W.; Verpoest, I. Verpoest, I. The Effect of Adding Carbon Nanotubes to Glass/Epoxy Composites in the Fibre Sizing and/or the Matrix. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 532–538. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, S. S.; Wang, W.; Williams, M. R.; Wardle, B. L. Multi-Scale Interlaminar Fracture Mechanisms in Woven Composite Laminates Reinforced with Aligned Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 100, 128–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmand-Ashtiani, E.; Cugnoni, J.; Botsis, J. Specimen Thickness Dependence of Large Scale Fiber Bridging in Mode I Interlaminar Fracture of Carbon Epoxy Composite. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2015, 55, 58–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F.; Huang, D. D.; Du, X. Improving the Delamination Resistance of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites by Brushing and Abrading of the Woven Fabrics. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 257–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrieh, M. M.; Heidari-Rarani, M. Effect of Stacking Sequence on R-Curve Behavior of Glass/Epoxy DCB Laminates with 0°//0° Crack Interface. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 529, 265–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P.; Casari, P.; Carlsson, L. A. Influence of Fibre Volume Fraction on Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Glass/Epoxy Using the 4ENF Specimen. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 295–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compston, P.; Jar, P. Y. B. Influence of Fibre Volume Fraction on the Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of a Glass-Fibre/Vinyl Ester Composite. Appl. Compos. Mater. 1999, 6, 353–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, M. S.; Czekanski, A.; Zhu, Z. H. Characterization of Carbon Nanotube Enhanced Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Woven Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2017, 131–132, 480–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, S. S.; de Villoria, R. G.; Wardle, B. L. Interlaminar and Intralaminar Reinforcement of Composite Laminates with Aligned Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 20. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirkhosravi, M.; Pishvar, M.; Altan, M. C. Improving Laminate Quality in Wet Lay-up/Vacuum Bag Processes by Magnet Assisted Composite Manufacturing (MACM). Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 98, 227–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyagawa, H.; Chiaki Sato, K. I. Effect of Fiber Orientation on Mode I Fracture Toughness of CFRP. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 115, 3295–3302. DOI: 10.1002/app.30233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godara, A.; Mezzo, L.; Luizi, F.; Warrier, A.; Lomov, S. V.; van Vuure, A. W.; Gorbatikh, L.; Moldenaers, P.; Verpoest, I. Influence of Carbon Nanotube Reinforcement on the Processing and the Mechanical Behaviour of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 2914–2923. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugrul Seyhan, A.; Tanoglu, M.; Schulte, K. Mode I and Mode II Fracture Toughness of E-Glass Non-Crimp Fabric/Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Modified Polymer Based Composites. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2008, 75, 5151–5162. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuhammadi, K.; Alfano, M.; Yang, Y.; Lubineau, G. Analysis of Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Damage Mechanisms in Composite Laminates Reinforced with Sprayed Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Mater. Des. 2014, 53, 921–927. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. T.; Rhee, K. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Hui, D.; Lau, A. K. T. Property Enhancement of a Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite by Using Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 1257–1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, D.; Pal, R.; Kapoor, G.; Stabenau, M. Lightweight Composite Materials Processing; Elsevier Ltd: India, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wallenberger, F. T.; Watson, J. C.; Hong, L. Glass Fibers. ASM Hanb. 2001, 21, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hollaway, L. C. Key Issues in the Use of Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in the Rehabilitation and Retrofitting of Concrete Structures. In Service Life Estimation and Extension of Civil Engineering Structures, Karbhari, V. M., Lee, L. S., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, 2011; pp 3–74.
   Google Scholar
• Paluvai, N. R.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S. K. Synthesis and Modifications of Epoxy Resins and Their Composites: A Review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2014, 53, 1723–1758. DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2014.919658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickel, J. M.; Nagarajan, M. Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composites: From Formulation to Application. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2012, 3, 122–136. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00090.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santrach, D. Industrial Applications and Properties of Short Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Plastics. Polym. Compos. 1982, 3, 239–244. DOI: 10.1002/pc.750030410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasufuku, S. Application of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Plastics to Electrical and Electronic Apparatus in Japan. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 1994, 10, 8–15. DOI: 10.1109/57.259976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, H. Carbon Fibre in Automotive Applications. Mater. Des. 1997, 18, 349–355. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00076-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, G. B. Interlaminar Effects in Fiber-Reinforced Plastics – A Review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 1975, 5, 23–53. DOI: 10.1080/03602557508063092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. U.; Kim, J. K. Impact and Delamination Failure of Multiscale Carbon Nanotube-Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Review. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 2011, 12, 115–133. DOI: 10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.2.115.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhang, Z.; Friedrich, K. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and CAI Strength of Fibre-Reinforced Composites with Nanoparticles – A Review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 86, 26–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Escalante, H. J.; Alvarez-Castillo, A.; Valadez-Gonzalez, A.; Herrera-Franco, P. J. Effect of Fiber-Matrix Adhesion on the Fracture Behavior of a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic-Modified Epoxy Matrix. Carbon Lett. 2016, 19, 47–56. DOI: 10.5714/CL.2016.19.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikards, R.; Buchholz, F.-G.; Bledzki, A. K.; Wacker, G.; Korjakin, A. Mode I, Mode II, and Mixed-Mode I/II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of GFRP Influenced by Fiber Surface Treatment. Mech. Compos. Mater. 1996, 32, 439–462. DOI: 10.1007/BF02313863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marieta, C.; Schulz, E.; Irusta, L.; Gabilondo, N.; Tercjak, A.; Mondragon, I. Evaluation of Fiber Surface Treatment and Toughening of Thermoset Matrix on the Interfacial Behaviour of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Cyanate Matrix Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2189–2197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johar, M.; Low, K. O.; Israr, H. A.; Wong, K. J. Mode I and Mode II Delamination of a Chopped Strand Mat E-Glass Reinforced Vinyl Ester Composite. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2018, 47, 391–397. DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2018.1515287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharmawan, F.; Simpson, G.; Herszberg, I.; John, S. Mixed Mode Fracture Toughness of GFRP Composites. Compos. Struct. 2006, 75, 328–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, P.; Aubry, J.; Pascal, F.; Marguet, S.; Ferrero, J. F.; Dorival, O. Influence of the Stacking Sequence and Crack Velocity on Fracture Toughness of Woven Composite Laminates in Mode I. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2014, 131, 340–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishvar, M.; Amirkhosravi, M.; Altan, M. C. Magnet Assisted Composite Manufacturing : A Novel Fabrication Technique for High-Quality Composite Laminates. Polym. Compos. 2017, 40, 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, A. F.; Robinson, P.; Pinho, S. Effect of Variation in Fibre Volume Fraction on Modes I and II Delamination Behaviour of 5HS Woven Composites Manufactured by RTM. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 2368–2375. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebaey, T. A.; Blanco, N.; Costa, J.; Lopes, C. S. Characterization of Crack Propagation in Mode I Delamination of Multidirectional CFRP Laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 1251–1256. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. C.; Davidson, B. D.; Polaha, J. J. Effect of Remote Ply Orientation on the Perceived Mode I and Mode II Toughness of θ/θ and θ/−θ Interfaces. Appl. Compos. Mater. 1998, 5, 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari-Rarani, M.; Sayedain, M. Finite Element Modeling Strategies for 2D and 3D Delamination Propagation in Composite DCB Specimens Using VCCT, CZM and XFEM Approaches. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2019, 103, 102246. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, E.; Soliman, E.; Kandil, U.; Taha, M. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CFRP Laminates Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Polymers 2015, 7, 1020. DOI: 10.3390/polym7061020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X. J.; Hurez, A.; Verchery, G. On the Determination of Delamination Toughness by Using Multidirectional DCB Specimens. Polym. Test. 2010, 29, 658–666. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfred Franklin, V.; Christopher, T. Fracture Energy Estimation of DCB Specimens Made of Glass/Epoxy: An Experimental Study. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 412601. DOI: 10.1155/2013/412601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty, M. R.; Vijay Kumar, K. R.; Sudhir, S.; Raghu, P.; Madhuranath, A. D.; Rao, R. M. V. G. K. Effect of Fibre Orientation on Mode-I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Glass Epoxy Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2000, 19, 606–620. DOI: 10.1177/073168440001900801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. H.; Lee, C. S.; Hwang, W. Effect of Crack Propagation Directions on the Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon/Epoxy Composite Materials. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2001, 8, 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar, K.; Farouk, N.; Arumugam, V. Effect of Fiber Orientation on Mode-I Delamination Resistance of Glass/Epoxy Laminates Incorporated with Milled Glass Fiber Fillers. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2018, 199, 61–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharratzadeh, M.; Shokrieh, M. M.; Salamat-Talab, M. Effect of Interface Fiber Angle on the Mode I Delamination Growth of Plain Woven Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2018, 98, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alif, N.; Carlsson, L. A.; Boogh, L. The Effect of Weave Pattern and Crack Propagation Direction on Mode I Delamination Resistance of Woven Glass and Carbon Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 1998, 29, 603–611. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00014-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joan, G.; Funk, J. W. D. The Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Graphite/Epoxy Composites; NASA TP-2950; NASA Langley Research Center: Hampton, VA, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Johar, M.; Israr, H. A.; Low, K. O.; Wong, K. J. Numerical Simulation Methodology for Mode II Delamination of Quasi-Isotropic Quasi-Homogeneous Composite Laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51, 3955–3968. DOI: 10.1177/0021998317695414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P.; Kausch, H. H.; Williams, J. G.; Kinloch, A. J.; Charalambides, M. N.; Pavan, A.; Moore, D. R.; Prediger, R.; Robinson, I.; Burgoyne, N.; et al. Round-Robin Interlaminar Fracture Testing of Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Exopy and PEEK. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1992, 43, 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90003-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, J. J. M.; Marques, E. A. S.; Campilho, R. D. S. G.; da Silva, L. F. M. Mode I Fracture Toughness of CFRP as a Function of Temperature and Strain Rate. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51, 3315–3326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, J. J. M.; Marques, E. A. S.; Campilho, R. D. S. G.; da Silva, L. F. M. Mode II Fracture Toughness of CFRP as a Function of Temperature and Strain Rate. Compos. Part B Eng 2017, 114, 311–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, M. Measuring the Rate-Dependent Mode I Fracture Toughness of Composites – A Review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 81, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, G. C.; Starbuck, J. M.; Fellers, J. F.; Simunovic, S.; Boeman, R. G. The Effect of Loading Rate on the Fracture Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 899–904. DOI: 10.1002/app.21535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrese, A.; Insausti, N.; Mujika, F.; Perez-Galmés, M.; Renart, J. A Novel Experimental Procedure to Determine the Cohesive Law in ENF Tests. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 170, 42–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrieh, M. M.; Salamat-Talab, M.; Heidari-Rarani, M. Dependency of Bridging Traction of DCB Composite Specimen on Interface Fiber Angle. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2017, 90, 22–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aveiga, D.; Ribeiro, M. L. A Delamination Propagation Model for Fiber Reinforced Laminated Composite Materials. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 2018, 1861268. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1861268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. F.; Jacobsen, T. K. Large-Scale Bridging in Composites: R-Curves and Bridging Laws. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 1998, 29, 1443–1451. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00025-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manshadi, B. D.; Vassilopoulos, A. P.; Botsis, J. A Combined Experimental/Numerical Study of the Scaling Effects on Mode I Delamination of GFRP. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 83, 32–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X.; Ridha, M.; Chen, B. Y.; Tan, V. B. C.; Tay, T. E. On Cohesive Element Parameters and Delamination Modelling. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2019, 206, 278–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincheira, G.; Ferrada, N.; Hinojosa, J.; Montecino, G.; Torres, L.; Saavedra, K. A Study of Interlaminar Properties for a Unidirectional Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite. Proc. IMECHE. 2018, 223, 348–357. DOI: 10.1177/1464420718816731.
   Google Scholar
• Arrese, A.; Carbajal, N.; Vargas, G.; Mujika, F. A New Method for Determining Mode II R-Curve by the End-Notched Flexure Test. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2010, 77, 51–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gracia, J.; Boyano, A.; Arrese, A.; Mujika, F. A New Approach for Determining the R-Curve in DCB Tests without Optical Measurements. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2015, 135, 274–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gracia, J.; Boyano, A.; Arrese, A.; Mujika, F. Analysis of the DCB Test of Angle-Ply Laminates Including Residual Stresses. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2018, 94, 197–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahani, A. R.; Abolfathitabar, R.; Shooshtar, H. On the Validity of LEFM Methods to Investigate the Fracture Behavior of Angle-Ply Laminates. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 160, 249–253. (June 2018), DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, A. J.; Blackman, B. R. K.; Davies, P. A Status Report on Delamination Resistance Testing of Polymer–Matrix Composites. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2008, 75, 2779–2794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C.; Jar, P.-Y. B.; Cheng, J.-J. R. Internal-Notched Flexure Test for Measurement of Mode II Delamination Resistance of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers. J. Compos. 2013, 2013, 695862. DOI: 10.1155/2013/695862.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K.; Kageyama, K.; Hojo, M. Prestandardization Study on Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Test for CFRP in Japan. Composites 1995, 26, 257–267. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(95)93669-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, P.; Wang, J.; Davalos, J. F. Analysis of Tapered ENF Specimen and Characterization of Bonded Interface Fracture under Mode-II Loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2003, 40, 1865–1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann, M. H. G.; Sumfleth, J.; Gojny, F. H.; Quaresimin, M.; Fiedler, B.; Schulte, K. Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Composites with Enhanced Mechanical and Electrical Properties – Benefits and Limitations of a Nanoparticle Modified Matrix. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006, 73, 2346–2359. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, B. R. K.; Brunner, A. J.; Williams, J. G. Mode II Fracture Testing of Composites: A New Look at an Old Problem. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006, 73, 2443–2455. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Morais, A. B.; Pereira, A. B. Application of the Effective Crack Method to Mode I and Mode II Interlaminar Fracture of Carbon/Epoxy Unidirectional Laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2007, 38, 785–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romhány, G.; Szebényi, G. Interlaminar Crack Propagation in MWCNT/Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2009, 3, 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. H.; Davidson, B. D. Mode II Fracture Toughness Evaluation Using a Four Point Bend End Notched Flexure Test. Plast. Rubb. Compos. 1999, 28, 401–406. DOI: 10.1179/146580199101540565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. D. K.; Sun, X.; Tong, L.; Luo, Q.; Katzos, A.; Rispler, A. A New ENF Test Specimen for the Mode II Delamination Toughness Testing of Stitched Woven CFRP Laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 2007, 41, 1743–1772. DOI: 10.1177/0021998306069890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maikuma, H.; Gillespie, J. W.; Wilkins, D. J. Mode II Interlaminar Fracture of the Center Notch Flexural Specimen under Impact Loading. J. Compos. Mater. 1990, 24, 124–149. DOI: 10.1177/002199839002400201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caimmi, F.; Frassine, R.; Pavan, A. A New Jig for Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Testing of Composite Materials under Quasi-Static and Moderately High Rates of Loading. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2006, 73, 2277–2291. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikards, R. Interlaminar Fracture Behaviour of Laminated Composites. Comput. Struct. 2000, 76, 11–18. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00148-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchetti, F.; Grouve, W. J. B.; Warnet, L. L.; Fernandez Villegas, I. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of 5HS Carbon/PEEK Laminates. A Comparison between DCB, ELS and Mandrel Peel Tests. Polym. Test. 2018, 66, 13–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunatha, C. M.; Chandra, A. R. A.; Jagannathan, N. Fracture and Fatigue Behavior of Polymer Nanocomposites—A Review. J. Indian Inst. Sci., 2015, 95, 249–266. DOI: 10.1179/2055033215Y.0000000007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deep, V.; Rana, S.; Jin, H.; Chaurasia, A.; Mcleskey, J. T.; Sekkarapatti, M.; Gopal, N.; Whan, J. Progress in Polymer Science Functionalization of Carbon Nanomaterials for Advanced Polymer Nanocomposites : A Comparison Study between CNT and Graphene. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 67, 1–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, D. G.; Kinloch, I. A.; Young, R. J. Progress in Materials Science Mechanical Properties of Graphene and Graphene-Based Nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 75–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peponi, L.; Puglia, D.; Torre, L.; Valentini, L.; Kenny, J. M. Processing of Nanostructured Polymers and Advanced Polymeric Based Nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng: R Rep. 2014, 85, 1–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Cui, L.; Liu, J. Review of Functionalization, Structure and Properties of Graphene/Polymer Composite Fibers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 87, 29–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima, S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. DOI: 10.1038/354056a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, V. K.; Gries, T.; Veit, D.; Quadflieg, T.; Mohr, B.; Kolloch, M. Effect of Nanomaterial on Mode I and Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Woven Carbon Fabric Reinforced Polymer Composites. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2017, 180, 73–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, P. C.; Siddiqui, N. A.; Marom, G.; Kim, J. K. Dispersion and Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes for Polymer-Based Nanocomposites: A Review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1345–1367. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqel, A.; El-Nour, K. M. M. A.; Ammar, R. A. A.; Al-Warthan, A. Carbon Nanotubes, Science and Technology Part (I) Structure, Synthesis and Characterisation. Arab. J. Chem. 2012, 5, 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubarak, N. M.; Abdullah, E. C.; Jayakumar, N. S.; Sahu, J. N. An Overview on Methods for the Production of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 1186–1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, S.; Fahim, A.; Arifin, T.; Hosur, M. V.; Rahman, M. M.; Tyson, J. D.; Jeelani, S. Optimization of Mechanical and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Epoxy and E-Glass/Epoxy Composites Using NH2-MWCNTs, Acetone Solvent and Combined Dispersion Methods. Compos. Struct. 2014, 110, 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. M.; Zainuddin, S.; Hosur, M. V.; Malone, J. E.; Salam, M. B. A.; Kumar, A.; Jeelani, S. Improvements in Mechanical and Thermo-Mechanical Properties of e-Glass/Epoxy Composites Using Amino Functionalized MWCNTs. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 2397–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, M. C.; Lin, Y. C.; Wu, C. L. Effect of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Addition on Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Laminate. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2011, 19, 131–140. DOI: 10.1177/0967391111019002-313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, B.; Gojny, F. H.; Wichmann, M. H. G.; Nolte, M. C. M.; Schulte, K. Fundamental Aspects of Nano-Reinforced Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 3115–3125. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M.; Park, Y.; Bin; Okoli, O. I.; Zhang, C. Processing, Characterization, and Modeling of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Multiscale Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 335–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman, E.; Kandil, U.; Taha, M. R. Improved Strength and Toughness of Carbon Woven Fabric Composites with Functionalized MWCNTs. Materials 2014, 7, 4640–4657. DOI: 10.3390/ma7064640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gojny, F. H.; Wichmann, M. H. G.; Köpke, U.; Fiedler, B.; Schulte, K. Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy-Composites: Enhanced Stiffness and Fracture Toughness at Low Nanotube Content. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 2363–2371. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gojny, F. H.; Wichmann, M. H. G.; Fiedler, B.; Schulte, K. Influence of Different Carbon Nanotubes on the Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Matrix Composites – A Comparative Study. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2300–2313. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K.; Shukla, M. Three-Phase Carbon Fiber Amine Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes Epoxy Composite: Processing, Characterisation, and Multiscale Modeling. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2014/837492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq, F.; Shifa, M.; Baloch, R. A. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Multi-Scale Carbon Nanotubes–Carbon Fiber–Epoxy Composite. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 43, 5937–5948. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-018-3091-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujika, F.; Vargas, G.; Ibarretxe, J.; De Gracia, J.; Arrese, A. Influence of the Modification with MWCNT on the Interlaminar Fracture Properties of Long Carbon Fiber Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 1336–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-González, J. A.; Rubio-González, C.; Meneses-Nochebuena, C. A.; González-García, P.; Licea-Jiménez, L. Enhanced Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites Modified with Sprayed Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Interfaces 2017, 24, 883–896. DOI: 10.1080/09276440.2017.1302279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-González, J. A.; Rubio-González, C. Influence of Sprayed Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Mode I and Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2018, 3046, 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2018.1458510.
   Google Scholar
• Karapappas, P.; Vavouliotis, A.; Tsotra, P.; Kostopoulos, V.; Paipetis, A. Enhanced Fracture Properties of Carbon Reinforced Composites by the Addition of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 977–985. DOI: 10.1177/0021998308097735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J.; Bian, L. Influence of Agglomeration Parameters on Carbon Nanotube Composites. Acta Mech. 2017, 228, 2207–2217. DOI: 10.1007/s00707-017-1820-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F.; Park, C.; Jin Yun, G. An Extended Mori-Tanaka Micromechanics Model for Wavy CNT Nanocomposites with Interface Damage. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2019, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1562135.
   Google Scholar
• Cividanes, L. D. S.; Simonetti, E. A. N.; de Oliveira, J. I. S.; Serra, A. A.; Carlos de Souza Barboza, J.; Thim, G. P. The Sonication Effect on CNT-Epoxy Composites Finally Clarified. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 1964–1973. DOI: 10.1002/pc.23767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inam, F.; Peijs, T. Transmission Light Microscopy of Carbon Nanotubes-Epoxy Nanocomposites Involving Different Dispersion Methods. Adv. Compos. Lett. 2006, 15, 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. C.; Dikshit, V. Enhancing Interlaminar Fracture Characteristics of Woven CFRP Prepreg Composites through CNT Dispersion. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 665–675. DOI: 10.1177/0021998311410472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakre, P. R.; Lagoudas, D. C.; Riddick, J. C.; Gates, T. S.; Frankland, S. J. V.; Ratcliffe, J. G.; Zhu, J.; Barrera, E. V. Investigation of the Effect of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Woven Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 45, 1091–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, C.; Fernandez, E.; Salas, A.; Naya, F.; Molina-Aldereguiá, J.; Melendrez, M. F.; Flores, P. Multiscale Characterization of Nanoengineered Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Effect of Carbon Nanotubes on the out-of-Plane Mechanical Behavior. J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 9809702. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9809702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboori, B.; Ayatollahi, M. R. Experimental Fracture Study of MWCNT/Epoxy Nanocomposites under the Combined out-of-Plane Shear and Tensile Loading. Polym. Test 2017, 59, 193–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inam, F.; Wong, D. W. Y.; Kuwata, M.; Peijs, T. Multiscale Hybrid Micro-Nanocomposites Based on Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Fibers. J. Nanomater. 2010, 2010, 1–12. DOI: 10.1155/2010/453420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, M.; Sharma, S.; Mehta, R. Pristine and Amino Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Glass Fiber Epoxy Composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 76, 92–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z. Interfacial Improvement of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites Using a Simple Process for Depositing Commercially Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes on the Fibers. Carbon 2013, 52, 109–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermansaravi, M.; Pol, M. H. Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Carbon Nanotubes on Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Laminated Composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E797–E806. DOI: 10.1002/pc.24246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, B.; Guan, J.; Mirjalili, V.; Zhang, Y.; Chun, L.; Hubert, P.; Simard, B.; Kingston, C. T.; Bourne, O.; Johnston, A. Enhancement of Mechanical Performance of Epoxy/Carbon Fiber Laminate Composites Using Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1569–1578. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, R. B.; Chatterjee, S.; Singh, B. P. Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on Carbon Fibre Substrates to Produce Hybrid/Phenolic Composites with Improved Mechanical Properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 1608–1615. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepple, K. L.; Sanborn, G. P.; Lacasse, P. A.; Gruenberg, K. M.; Ready, W. J. Improved Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber Composite Functionalized with Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2008, 46, 2026–2033. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Q.; He, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, R.; Hu, P.; Yan, Y.; Sritharan, T. Chemically and Uniformly Grafting Carbon Nanotubes onto Carbon Fibers by Poly(Amidoamine) for Enhancing Interfacial Strength in Carbon Fiber Composites. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 5928–5931. DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16723a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falzon, B. G.; Hawkins, S. C.; Huynh, C. P.; Radjef, R.; Brown, C. An Investigation of Mode I and Mode II Fracture Toughness Enhancement Using Aligned Carbon Nanotubes Forests at the Crack Interface. Compos. Struct. 2013, 106, 65–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. J.; Wardle, B. L.; John Hart, A. Joining Prepreg Composite Interfaces with Aligned Carbon Nanotubes. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2008, 39, 1065–1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroujeni, A. Y.; Al-Haik, M. S. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Hybrid Carbon Fiber-Carbon Nanotubes-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/pc.25054.
   Google Scholar
• Du, X.; Liu, H.; Xu, F.; Zeng, Y.; Mai, Y. Flame Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes onto Carbon Fiber Woven Fabric and Improvement of Interlaminar Toughness of Composite Laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 101, 159–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abot, J. L.; Song, Y.; Schulz, M. J.; Shanov, V. N. Novel Carbon Nanotube Array-Reinforced Laminated Composite Materials with Higher Interlaminar Elastic Properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 2755–2760. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veedu, V. P.; Cao, A.; Li, X.; Ma, K.; Soldano, C.; Kar, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Ghasemi-Nejhad, M. N. Multifunctional Composites Using Reinforced Laminae with Carbon-Nanotube Forests. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 457–462. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasaee, M.; Bond, I. P.; Trask, R. S.; Greenhalgh, E. S. Mode II Interfacial Toughening through Discontinuous Interleaves for Damage Suppression and Control. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 121–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H.; Kim, H.; Hang, S.; Cheong, S. K. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composite Laminates with CNT-Enhanced Nonwoven Carbon Tissue Interleave. Compos. Sci. Technol 2012, 73, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar