References
- Qiu, Z. Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, X. M. Natural Bone Tissue and Its Biomimetic. In Mineralized Collagen Bone Graft Substitutes; Elsevier Ltd, 2019; Vol. 10, 1-22.
- Zhang, K.; Wang, S.; Zhou, C.; Cheng, L.; Gao, X.; Xie, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Weir, M. D.; Reynolds, M. A.; et al. Advanced Smart Biomaterials and Constructs for Hard Tissue Engineering and Regeneration. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 31, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-018-0032-9.
- Chocholata, P.; Kulda, V.; Babuska, V. Fabrication of Scaffolds for Bone-Tissue Regeneration. Materials (Basel) 2019, 12, 568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040568.
- Hu, X.; Li, W.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Parungao, R.; Zheng, S.; Liu, T.; Nie, Y.; Wang, H.; Song, K. A Biomimetic Cartilage Gradient Hybrid Scaffold for Functional Tissue Engineering of Cartilage. Tissue Cell. 2019, 58, (April), 84–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2019.05.001.
- Putnam, A. J.; Mooney, D. J. Tissue Engineering Using Synthetic Extracellular Matrices. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 601–603.
- Oladapo, B. I.; Daniyan, I. A.; Ikumapayi, O. M.; Malachi, O. B.; Malachi, I. O. Microanalysis of Hybrid Characterization of PLA/CHA Polymer Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Polym. Test 2020, 83, 106341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106341.
- Silva, M.; Ferreira, F. N.; Alves, N. M.; Paiva, M. C. Biodegradable Polymer Nanocomposites for Ligament/Tendon Tissue Engineering. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2020, 18, 23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-019-0556-1.
- Vandghanooni, S.; Eskandani, M. Natural Polypeptides-Based Electrically Conductive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 706–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.249.
- Zhou, X.; Liu, P.; Nie, W.; Peng, C.; Li, T.; Qiang, L.; He, C.; Wang, J. Incorporation of Dexamethasone-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles into Mineralized Porous Biocomposite Scaffolds for Improving Osteogenic Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 116–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.237.
- Yi, H.; Ur Rehman, F.; Zhao, C.; Liu, B.; He, N. Recent Advances in Nano Scaffolds for Bone Repair. Bone Res. 2016, 4, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2016.50.
- Raucci, M. G.; Guarino, V.; Ambrosio, L. Biomimetic Strategies for Bone Repair and Regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater. 2012, 3, 688–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb3030688.
- Rakhmatia, Y. D.; Ayukawa, Y.; Furuhashi, A.; Koyano, K. Current Barrier Membranes: Titanium Mesh and Other Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Applications. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2013, 57, 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001.
- Caballé-Serrano, J.; Munar-Frau, A.; Ortiz-Puigpelat, O.; Soto-Penaloza, D.; Peñarrocha, M.; Hernández-Alfaro, F. On the Search of the Ideal Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2018, 10, e477–e483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54767.
- Hu, C.; Ashok, D.; Nisbet, D. R.; Gautam, V. Bioinspired Surface Modification of Orthopedic Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 2019, 219, 119366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119366.
- Swetha, M.; Sahithi, K.; Moorthi, A.; Srinivasan, N.; Ramasamy, K.; Selvamurugan, N. Biocomposites Containing Natural Polymers and Hydroxyapatite for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.03.015.
- Zou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Q. Biomimetic Mineralization on Natural and Synthetic Polymers to Prepare Hybrid Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 178, 222–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.004.
- Reiniati, I.; Hrymak, A. N.; Margaritis, A. Recent Developments in the Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose Fibers and Nanocrystals. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 510–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1189871.
- Liu, W.; Du, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, K.; Liu, H.; Xie, H.; Zhang, X.; Si, C. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Composite Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Review. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7536–7562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125.
- Klinthoopthamrong, N.; Chaikiawkeaw, D.; Phoolcharoen, W.; Rattanapisit, K.; Kaewpungsup, P.; Pavasant, P.; Hoven, V. P. Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Conjugated with Plant-Derived Osteopontin: Preparation and Its Potential for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 51–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.158.
- Abeer, M. M.; Mohd Amin, M. C. I.; Martin, C. A Review of Bacterial Cellulose-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Their Biochemistry, Current Approaches and Future Prospects. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 66, 1047–1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12234.
- Saska, S.; Barud, H. S.; Gaspar, A. M. M.; Marchetto, R.; Ribeiro, S. J. L.; Messaddeq, Y. Bacterial Cellulose-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites for Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Biomater. 2011, 2011, 175362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/175362.
- Coelho, F.; Cavicchioli, M.; Specian, S. S.; Scarel-Caminaga, R. M.; de Aquino Penteado, L.; de Medeiros, A. I.; de Lima Ribeiro, S. J.; de Oliveira Capote, T. S. Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Functionalized with Hydroxiapatite and anti-Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2: A Promising Material for Bone Regeneration. PLoS One. 2019, 14, e0221286–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221286.
- Ingole, V. H.; Vuherer, T.; Maver, U.; Kokol, V.; Vinchurkar, A.; Ghule, A. V. Mechanical Properties and Cytotoxicity of Differently Structured Nanocellulose-Hydroxyapatite Based Composites for Bone Regeneration Application. Nanomaterials 2019, 10, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010025.
- Grande, C. J.; Torres, F. G.; Gomez, C. M.; Carmen Bañó, M. Nanocomposites of Bacterial Cellulose/Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 1605–1615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022.
- Wan, W.-K.; Millon, L. Poly (Vinyl Alcohol)-Bacterial Cellulose Nanocomposite, 2005.
- Luz, E. P. C. G.; Chagas, B. S. d.; Almeida, N. T. d.; Borges, M. d F.; Andrade, F. K.; Muniz, C. R.; Castro-Silva, I. I.; Teixeira, E. H.; Popat, K.; Rosa, M. d F.; Vieira, R. S. Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membranes with Strontium Release for Guided Bone Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 20, 31968–31968.
- Luz, E. P. C. G.; Chaves, P. H. S.; Vieira, L. d A. P.; Ribeiro, S. F.; Borges, M. d F.; Andrade, F. K.; Muniz, C. R.; Infantes-Molina, A.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Rosa, M. d F.; Vieira, R. S. In Vitro Degradability and Bioactivity of Oxidized Bacterial Cellulose-Hydroxyapatite Composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 237, 116174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116174.
- Luz, E. P. C. G.; Borges, M. d F.; Andrade, F. K.; Rosa, M. d F.; Infantes-Molina, A.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Vieira, R. S. Strontium Delivery Systems Based on Bacterial Cellulose and Hydroxyapatite for Guided Bone Regeneration. Cellulose 2018, 25, 6661–6679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2008-8.
- Rastogi, A.; Banerjee, R. Statistical Optimization of Bacterial Cellulose Production by Leifsonia Soli and Its Physico-Chemical Characterization. Process Biochem 2020, 91, 297–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.12.021.
- Fan, X.; Gao, Y.; He, W.; Hu, H.; Tian, M.; Wang, K.; Pan, S. Production of Nano Bacterial Cellulose from Beverage Industrial Waste of Citrus Peel and Pomace Using Komagataeibacter Xylinus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 1068–1072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.062.
- Jagannath, A.; Kalaiselvan, A.; Manjunatha, S. S.; Raju, P. S.; Bawa, A. S. The Effect of PH, Sucrose and Ammonium Sulphate Concentrations on the Production of Bacterial Cellulose (Nata-de-Coco) by Acetobacter Xylinum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 2593–2599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9781-8.
- Qiu, K.; Netravali, A. N. A Review of Fabrication and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose Based Nanocomposites. Polym. Rev. 2014, 54, 598–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2014.896018.
- Eslahi, N.; Mahmoodi, A.; Mahmoudi, N.; Zandi, N.; Simchi, A. Processing and Properties of Nanofibrous Bacterial Cellulose-Containing Polymer Composites: A Review of Recent Advances for Biomedical Applications. Polym. Rev 2020, 60, 144–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.1663210.
- Pacheco, G.; de Mello, C. V.; Chiari-Andréo, B. G.; Isaac, V. L. B.; Ribeiro, S. J. L.; Pecoraro, É.; Trovatti, E. Bacterial Cellulose Skin masks-Properties and sensory tests. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018, 17, 840–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12441.
- Nishi, Y.; Uryu, M.; Yamanaka, S.; Watanabe, K.; Kitamura, N.; Iguchi, M.; Mitsuhashi, S. The Structure and Mechanical Properties of Sheets Prepared from Bacterial Cellulose - Part 2 Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Sheets and Their Applicability to Diaphragms of Electroacoustic Transducers. J. Mater. Sci. 1990, 25, 2997–3001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584917.
- Trigona, C.; Graziani, S.; Pasquale, G.; Di; Pollicino, A.; Nisi, R.; Licciulli, A. Green Energy Harvester from Vibrations Based on Bacterial Cellulose. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020, 20, 136–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010136.
- Vilela, C.; Silvestre, A. J. D.; Figueiredo, F. M. L.; Freire, C. S. R. Nanocellulose-Based Materials as Components of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 20045–20074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA07466J.
- Shah, J.; Brown, R. M. Towards Electronic Paper Displays Made from Microbial Cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 66, 352–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1756-6.
- Tang, N.; Zhang, S.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. An Ultrathin Bacterial Cellulose Membrane with a Voronoi-Net Structure for Low Pressure and High Flux Microfiltration. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 17851–17859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr06028f.
- Huang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, Z.; Li, X. Amino-Functionalized Graphene Oxide for Cr(VI), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) Removal from Industrial Wastewater. Open Chem. 2020, 18, 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0009.
- Peng, B.; Yao, Z.; Wang, X.; Crombeen, M.; Sweeney, D. G.; Tam, K. C. Cellulose-Based Materials in Wastewater Treatment of Petroleum Industry. Green Energy Environ 2020, 5, 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.09.003.
- Gao, G.; Ji, K.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Dai, X.; Zhi, B.; Cao, Y.; Liu, D.; Wu, M.; Li, G.; Ma, T. Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery through Deep Profile Control Using a Conditional Bacterial Cellulose-Producing Strain Derived from Enterobacter Sp. FY-07. Microb. Cell Fact 2020, 19, 1–11.
- Corujo, V. F.; Cerrutti, P.; Foresti, M. L.; Vázquez, A. Production of Bacterial Nanocellulose from Non-Conventional Fermentation Media. In Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposites Based on Cellulosic Reinforcements; Elsevier Inc., 2016, 39–59.
- Gorgieva, S.; Trcek, J. Bacterial Cellulose: Production, Modification and Perspectives in Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1352, 1–20.
- Qin, G.; Panilaitis, B. J.; Kaplan, Z. S. D. L. A Cellulosic Responsive “Living” membrane. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 100, 40–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.019.
- Campano, C.; Balea, A.; Blanco, A.; Negro, C. Enhancement of the Fermentation Process and Properties of Bacterial Cellulose: A Review. Cellulose 2016, 23, 57–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0.
- Schramm, M.; Hestrin, S. Factors Affecting Production of Cellulose at the Air/Liquid Interface of a Culture of Acetobacter Xylinum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1954, 11, 123–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-11-1-123.
- Souza, E. F.; Furtado, M. R.; Carvalho, C. W. P.; Freitas-Silva, O.; Gottschalk, L. M. F. Production and Characterization of Gluconacetobacter Xylinus Bacterial Cellulose Using Cashew Apple Juice and Soybean Molasses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 285–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180.
- Kurosumi, A.; Sasaki, C.; Yamashita, Y.; Nakamura, Y. Utilization of Various Fruit Juices as Carbon Source for Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Acetobacter Xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76, 333–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.009.
- Khattak, W. A.; Khan, T.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M. W.; Khan, S.; Wahid, F.; Park, J. K. Production, Characterization and Biological Features of Bacterial Cellulose from Scum Obtained during Preparation of Sugarcane Jaggery (Gur). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 8343–8349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1936-7.
- Budhiono, A.; Rosidi, B.; Taher, H.; Iguchi, M. Kinetic Aspects of Bacterial Cellulose Formation in Nata-de-Coco Culture System. Carbohydr. Polym. 1999, 40, 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00050-8.
- Torgbo, S.; Sukyai, P. Fabrication of Microporous Bacterial Cellulose Embedded with Magnetite and Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 237, 121868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121868.
- Duarte, E. B.; das Chagas, B. S.; Andrade, F. K.; Brígida, A. I. S.; Borges, M. F.; Muniz, C. R.; Souza Filho, M.; de, S. M.; Morais, J. P. S.; Feitosa, J. P. A.; Rosa, M. F. Production of Hydroxyapatite–Bacterial Cellulose Nanocomposites from Agroindustrial Wastes. Cellulose 2015, 22, 3177–3187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0734-8.
- Abol-Fotouh, D.; Hassan, M. A.; Shokry, H.; Roig, A.; Azab, M. S.; Kashyout, A. E. H. B. Bacterial Nanocellulose from Agro-Industrial Wastes: Low-Cost and Enhanced Production by Komagataeibacter Saccharivorans MD1. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14.
- Bayir, E.; Celtikoglu, M. M.; Sendemir, A. The Use of Bacterial Cellulose as a Basement Membrane Improves the Plausibility of the Static in Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1002–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.257.
- Yin, N.; Chen, S. Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Tang, L.; Yang, J. X.; Wang, H. P. Biomimetic Mineralization Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite Bacterial Cellulose Nanocomposites. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2011, 21, 472–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60085-9.
- Yamanaka, S.; Watanabe, K.; Kitamura, N.; Iguchi, M.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Nishi, Y.; Uryu, M. The Structure and Mechanical Properties of Sheets Prepared from Bacterial Cellulose. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24, 3141–3145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139032.
- Guhados, G.; Wan, W.; Hutter, J. L. Measurement of the Elastic Modulus of Single Bacterial Cellulose Fibers Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir 2005, 21, 6642–6646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/la0504311.
- Hsieh, Y. C.; Yano, H.; Nogi, M.; Eichhorn, S. J. An Estimation of the Young’s Modulus of Bacterial Cellulose Filaments. Cellulose 2008, 15, 507–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9206-8.
- Shah, N.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khattak, W. A.; Park, J. K. Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Composites: A Multipurpose Advanced Material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1585–1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018.
- Gorgieva, S. Bacterial Cellulose as a Versatile Platform for Research and Development of Biomedical Materials. Processes 2020, 8, 624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050624.
- Favi, P. M.; Ospina, S. P.; Kachole, M.; Gao, M.; Atehortua, L.; Webster, T. J. Preparation and Characterization of Biodegradable Nano Hydroxyapatite–Bacterial Cellulose Composites with Well-Defined Honeycomb Pore Arrays for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Cellulose 2016, 23, 1263–1282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0867-4.
- Czaja, W.; Krystynowicz, A.; Bielecki, S.; Brown, R. M. Microbial Cellulose-the Natural Power to Heal Wounds$. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 145–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035.
- Czaja, W. K.; Young, D. J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R. M. The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060620d.
- Gutierrez, E.; Burdiles, P. A.; Quero, F.; Palma, P.; Olate-Moya, F.; Palza, H. 3D Printing of Antimicrobial Alginate/Bacterial-Cellulose Composite Hydrogels by Incorporating Copper Nanostructures. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2019, 5, 6290–6299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01048.
- Aki, D.; Ulag, S.; Unal, S.; Sengor, M.; Ekren, N.; Lin, C. C.; Yılmazer, H.; Ustundag, C. B.; Kalaskar, D. M.; Gunduz, O. 3D Printing of PVA/Hexagonal Boron Nitride/Bacterial Cellulose Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater. Des. 2020, 196, 109094.
- Pang, M.; Huang, Y.; Meng, F.; Zhuang, Y.; Liu, H.; Du, M.; Ma, Q.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Chen, L.; et al. Application of Bacterial Cellulose in Skin and Bone Tissue Engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 122, 109365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109365.
- Jr, N, A.; Ab, N. Bone Formation over a TiAl6V4 (IMZ) Implant Placed into an Extraction Socket in Association with Membrane Therapy (Gengiflex). Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1993, 4, 106–110.
- Zhang, L.; Tang, P.; Xu, M.; Zhang, W.; Chai, W.; Wang, Y. Effects of Crystalline Phase on the Biological Properties of Collagen-Hydroxyapatite Composites. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 2189–2199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.042.
- An, J.; Leeuwenburgh, S.; Wolke, J.; Jansen, J. Mineralization Processes in Hard Tissue: Bone. In Biomineralization and Biomaterials: Fundamentals and Applications; Elsevier Ltd, 2016, 129–146.
- Cox, S. C.; Jamshidi, P.; Grover, L. M.; Mallick, K. K. Preparation and Characterisation of Nanophase Sr, Mg, and Zn Substituted Hydroxyapatite by Aqueous Precipitation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 35, 106–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.015.
- Wang, P.; Li, C.; Gong, H.; Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, K. Effects of Synthesis Conditions on the Morphology of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Produced by Wet Chemical Process. Powder Technol. 2010, 203, 315–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.05.023.
- Mohd Pu'ad, N. A. S.; Koshy, P.; Abdullah, H. Z.; Idris, M. I.; Lee, T. C. Syntheses of Hydroxyapatite from Natural Sources. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01588.
- Sadat-Shojai, M.; Khorasani, M. T.; Dinpanah-Khoshdargi, E.; Jamshidi, A. Synthesis Methods for Nanosized Hydroxyapatite with Diverse Structures. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 7591–7621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012.
- Cahyaningrum, S. E.; Herdyastuty, N.; Devina, B.; Supangat, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Powder by Wet Precipitation Method. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 299, 1-6.
- Caccioti, I. Cationic and Anionic Substitutions in Hydroxyapatite. In Handbook of Bioceramics and Biocomposites; Springer, 2016, 145–211.
- Bigi, A.; Boanini, E.; Capuccini, C.; Gazzano, M. Strontium-Substituted Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 1009–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2006.07.074.
- Cacciotti, I. Multisubstituted Hydroxyapatite Powders and Coatings: The Influence of the Codoping on the Hydroxyapatite Performances. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 1864–1884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13229.
- Garley, A.; Hoff, S. E.; Saikia, N.; Jamadagni, S.; Baig, A.; Heinz, H. Adsorption and Substitution of Metal Ions on Hydroxyapatite as a Function of Crystal Facet and Electrolyte PH. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019, 123, 16982–16993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02808.
- Rajabnejadkeleshteri, A.; Kamyar, A.; Khakbiz, M.; Bakalani, Z. L.; Basiri, H. Synthesis and Characterization of Strontium Fluor-Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles for Dental Applications. Microchem. J 2020, 153, 104485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104485.
- Stumpf, T. R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Cao, X. In Situ and Ex Situ Modifications of Bacterial Cellulose for Applications in Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 82, 372–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121.
- Wang, X.; Xu, S.; Zhou, S.; Xu, W.; Leary, M.; Choong, P.; Qian, M.; Brandt, M.; Xie, Y. M. Topological Design and Additive Manufacturing of Porous Metals for Bone Scaffolds and Orthopaedic Implants: A Review. Biomaterials 2016, 83, 127–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012.
- Rodrigues, A. C.; Fontão, A. I.; Coelho, A.; Leal, M.; Soares da Silva, F. A. G.; Wan, Y.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M. Response Surface Statistical Optimization of Bacterial Nanocellulose Fermentation in Static Culture Using a Low-Cost Medium. N. Biotechnol. 2019, 49, 19–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2018.12.002.
- Tas, A. C. Synthesis of Biomimetic Ca-Hydroxyapatite Powders at 37 °C in Synthetic Body Fluids. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1429–1438.
- Lamboni, L.; Xu, C.; Clasohm, J.; Yang, J.; Saumer, M.; Schäfer, K. H.; Yang, G. Silk Sericin-Enhanced Microstructured Bacterial Cellulose as Tissue Engineering Scaffold towards Prospective Gut Repair. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 102, (April), 502–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.043.
- Zimmermann, K. A.; Leblanc, J. M.; Sheets, K. T.; Fox, R. W.; Gatenholm, P. Biomimetic Design of a Bacterial Cellulose/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite for Bone Healing Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2011, 31, 43–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.10.007.
- Kokubo, T.; Takadama, H. How Useful is SBF in Predicting in Vivo Bone Bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2907–2915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017.
- Bohner, M.; Lemaitre, J. Can Bioactivity Be Tested in Vitro with SBF Solution? Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2175–2179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008.
- Jalota, S.; Bhaduri, S. B.; Tas, A. C. Effect of Carbonate Content and Buffer Type on Calcium Phosphate Formation in SBF Solutions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 697–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-9680-1.
- Tajudin, M. H. M.; Tapsir, Z.; Ismail, L. H.; Saidin, S. Formation of Carbonated Apatite Layer in 1.5× Simulated Body Fluid at Different Refreshing Time. KEM 2016, 705, 304–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.705.304.
- Bertoli, I. R.; Filgueira, M.; Ferreira, L. M.; de Sousa, L. L.; Mariano, N. A.; Ramos, A. S.; Nunes, C. A.; Santos, C. d.; Ramos, E. C. T. Microstructure and Corrosion Behavior in SBF Medium of Spark Plasma Sintered Ti-XZr-20Si-10B (x = 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 at.-%) Alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 797, 1157–1162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.196.
- Xing, C.; Ge, S.; Huang, B.; Bo, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, Z. Biomimetic Synthesis of Hierarchical Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Fibers in Large-Scale. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 1572–1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.02.018.
- Hutchens, S. A.; Benson, R. S.; Evans, B. R.; O'Neill, H. M.; Rawn, C. J. Biomimetic Synthesis of Calcium-Deficient Hydroxyapatite in a Natural Hydrogel. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 4661–4670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.032.
- Arkharova, N. A.; Severin, A. V.; Khripunov, A. K.; Krasheninnikov, S. V.; Tkachenko, A. A.; Orekhov, A. S.; Davydova, G. A.; Rakova, E. V.; Klechkovskaya, V. V. Composite Films Based on Bacterial Cellulose and Nanocrystals of Hydroxyapatite: Morphology. Polym. Sci. Ser. A. 2019, 61, 650–658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X1905002X.
- Bayir, E.; Bilgi, E.; Hames, E. E.; Sendemir, A. Production of Hydroxyapatite–Bacterial Cellulose Composite Scaffolds with Enhanced Pore Diameters for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Cellulose 2019, 26, 9803–9817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02763-9.
- Ahn, S.; Shin, Y. M.; Kim, S. E.; Jeong, S. I.; Jeong, J.; Park, J.; Gwon, H. Characterization of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Bacterial Cellulose Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 2015, 955, 948–955.
- Ran, J.; Jiang, P.; Liu, S.; Sun, G.; Yan, P.; Shen, X.; Tong, H. Constructing Multi-Component Organic/Inorganic Composite Bacterial Cellulose-Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite Double-Network Scaffold Platform for Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 78, 130–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.062.
- Atila, D.; Karataş, A.; Evcin, A.; Keskin, D.; Tezcaner, A. Bacterial Cellulose-Reinforced Boron-Doped Hydroxyapatite/Gelatin Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Cellulose 2019, 26, 9765–9785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02741-1.
- Saska, S.; Pigossi, S. C.; Oliveira, G. J. P. L.; Teixeira, L. N.; Capela, M. V.; Gonçalves, A.; De Oliveira, P. T.; Messaddeq, Y.; Ribeiro, S. J. L.; Gaspar, A. M. M.; Marchetto, R. Biopolymer-Based Membranes Associated with Osteogenic Growth Peptide for Guided Bone Regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 13, 035009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aaaa2d.
- Kumbhar, J. V.; Jadhav, S. H.; Bodas, D. S.; Barhanpurkar-Naik, A.; Wani, M. R.; Paknikar, K. M.; Rajwade, J. M. In Vitro and in Vivo Studies of a Novel Bacterial Cellulose-Based Acellular Bilayer Nanocomposite Scaffold for the Repair of Osteochondral Defects. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2017, 12, 6437–6459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S137361.
- Pigossi, S. C.; De Oliveira, G. J. P. L.; Finoti, L. S.; Nepomuceno, R.; Spolidorio, L. C.; Rossa, C.; Ribeiro, S. J. L.; Saska, S.; Scarel-Caminaga, R. M. Bacterial Cellulose-Hydroxyapatite Composites with Osteogenic Growth Peptide (OGP) or Pentapeptide OGP on Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Calvarial Defect Model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2015, 103, 3397–3406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35472.
- Chen, P.-Y.; Lai, J.-T. Mechanical Analysis of Biocomposite Materials from Bacterial Cellulose and Hydroxyapatite. J. Med. Bioeng. 2013, 2, 228–231.
- Yang, S.; Leong, K. F.; Du, Z.; Chua, C. K. The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering. Part I. Traditional Factors. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7, 679–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/107632701753337645.
- Goodman, S. B.; Pajarinen, J.; Yao, Z.; Lin, T. Inflammation and Bone Repair: From Particle Disease to Tissue Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00230.
- Bahney, C. S.; Zondervan, R. L.; Allison, P.; Theologis, A.; Ashley, J. W.; Ahn, J.; Miclau, T.; Marcucio, R. S.; Hankenson, K. D. Cellular Biology of Fracture Healing. J. Orthop. Res. 2019, 37, 35–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24170.
- Hasan, A.; Byambaa, B.; Morshed, M.; Cheikh, M. I.; Shakoor, R. A.; Mustafy, T.; Marei, H. E. Advances in Osteobiologic Materials for Bone Substitutes. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018, 12, 1448–1468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2677.
- Ramani, D.; Sastry, T. P. Bacterial Cellulose-Reinforced Hydroxyapatite Functionalized Graphene Oxide: A Potential Osteoinductive Composite. Cellulose 2014, 21, 3585–3595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0313-4.
- Wang, J.; Wan, Y.; Han, J.; Lei, X.; Yan, T.; Gao, C. Nanocomposite Prepared by Immobilising Gelatin and Hydroxyapatite on Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibres. Micro Nano Lett. 2011, 6, 133–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2010.0209.
- Jing, W.; Chunxi, Y.; Yizao, W.; Honglin, L.; Fang, H.; Kerong, D.; Yuan, H. Laser Patterning of Bacterial Cellulose Hydrogel and Its Modification with Gelatin and Hydroxyapatite for Bone Tissue Engineering. Soft Mater. 2013, 11, 173–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2011.611204.
- Saska, S.; Teixeira, L. N.; de Castro Raucci, L. M. S.; Scarel-Caminaga, R. M.; Franchi, L. P.; dos Santos, R. A.; Santagneli, S. H.; Capela, M. V.; de Oliveira, P. T.; Takahashi, C. S.; et al. Nanocellulose-Collagen-Apatite Composite Associated with Osteogenic Growth Peptide for Bone regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 467–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.086.
- Yang, M.; Zhen, W.; Chen, H.; Shan, Z. Biomimetic Design of Oxidized Bacterial Cellulose-Gelatin-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites. J. Bionic Eng. 2016, 13, 631–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60334-7.
- Jiang, P.; Ran, J.; Yan, P.; Zheng, L.; Shen, X.; Tong, H. Rational Design of a High-Strength Bone Scaffold Platform Based on in Situ Hybridization of Bacterial Cellulose/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Framework and Silk Fibroin Reinforcing Phase. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 107–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2017.1403149.
- Li, M.; Xiong, P.; Yan, F.; Li, S.; Ren, C.; Yin, Z.; Li, A.; Li, H.; Ji, X.; Zheng, Y.; Cheng, Y. An Overview of Graphene-Based Hydroxyapatite Composites for Orthopedic Applications. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.001.
- Nicoara, A. I.; Stoica, A. E.; Ene, D.; Vasile, B. S.; Holban, A. M.; Neacsu, I. A. In Situ and Ex Situ Designed Hydroxyapatite : Bacterial Cellulose Materials with Biomedical Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 4793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214793.
- Bharadwaz, A.; Jayasuriya, A. C. Recent Trends in the Application of Widely Used Natural and Synthetic Polymer Nanocomposites in Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 110, (January), 110698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110698.
- Saleem, M.; Rasheed, S.; Yougen, C. Silk Fibroin/Hydroxyapatite Scaffold: A Highly Compatible Material for Bone Regeneration. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2020, 21, 242–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2020.1748520.
- Hurtel-Lemaire, A. S.; Mentaverri, R.; Caudrillier, A.; Cournarie, F.; Wattel, A.; Kamel, S.; Terwilliger, E. F.; Brown, E. M.; Brazier, M. The Calcium-Sensing Receptor is Involved in Strontium Ranelate-Induced Osteoclast Apoptosis New Insights into the Associated Signaling Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 575–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801668200.
- Saidak, Z.; Marie, P. J. Strontium Signaling: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications in Osteoporosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 136, 216–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.07.009.
- Marx, D.; Rahimnejad Yazdi, A.; Papini, M.; Towler, M. A Review of the Latest Insights into the Mechanism of Action of Strontium in Bone. Bone Rep. 2020, 12, 100273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100273.
- Meunier, P. J.; Roux, C.; Seeman, E.; Ortolani, S.; Badurski, J. E.; Spector, T. D.; Cannata, J.; Balogh, A.; Lemmel, E. M.; Pors-Nielsen, S.; et al. The Effects of Strontium Ranelate on the Risk of Vertebral Fracture in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 459–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022436.
- Reginster, J. Y.; Seeman, E.; De Vernejoul, M. C.; Adami, S.; Compston, J.; Phenekos, C.; Devogelaer, J. P.; Curiel, M. D.; Sawicki, A.; Goemaere, S.; et al. Strontium Ranelate Reduces the Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 2816–2822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1774.
- Canalis, E.; Hott, M.; Deloffre, P.; Tsouderos, Y.; Marie, P. J. The Divalent Strontium Salt S12911 Enhances Bone Cell Replication and Bone Formation in Vitro. Bone 1996, 18, 517–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(96)00080-4.
- Marie, P. J.; Ammann, P.; Boivin, G.; Rey, C. Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Potential of Strontium in Bone. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2001, 69, 121–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002230010055.
- Delannoy, P.; Bazot, D.; Marie, P. J. Long-Term Treatment with Strontium Ranelate Increases Vertebral Bone Mass without Deleterious Effect in Mice. Metabolism 2002, 51, 906–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2002.33360.
- Baron, R.; Tsouderos, Y. In Vitro Effects of S12911-2 on Osteoclast Function and Bone Marrow Macrophage Differentiation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 450, 11–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02040-X.
- Fromigue, O.; Haÿ, E.; Barbara, A.; Marie, P. J. Essential Role of Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells (NFAT)-Mediated Wnt Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation Induced by Strontium Ranelate. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 25251–25258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.110502.