Policy Implementation Under Class Action-Based Reform of State Child Welfare Agencies: The Cases of Washington State and New Jersey

References

• Barrett, S. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration, 82(2), 249–262. doi:10.1111/padm.2004.82.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1981). Policy and action: Essays on the implementation of public policy. London, England: Meutheun. Braam 101. (2007). Seattle, WA: Columbia Legal Services. Retrieved from http://braamkids.org/552.html
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2005a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: May 16, 2005. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2005b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 27–28, 2005. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2005c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: September 15–16, 2005. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2006a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: July 26, 2006. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2006b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: September 26, 2006. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2006c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 12, 2006. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2007a). Braam settlement monitoring report #3: Covering the performance period ending: December 31, 2006. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2007b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: February 28, 2007. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2007c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 5-6, 2007. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2007d). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: September 10-11, 2007. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2007e). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 10, 2007. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2008a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: March 17-18, 2008. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2008b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 23, 2008. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2008c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: October 6, 2008. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2008d). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 8, 2008. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2009a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: March 23, 2009. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2009b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 15, 2009. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2009c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 7, 2009. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2010a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: March 9, 2010. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2010b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 22, 2010. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2010c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: September 28, 2010. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2010d). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 6, 2010. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2011a). Braam settlement monitoring report #10 revised to incorporate updated data in June and October 2011: Covering the performance period ending: December 31, 2009. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2011b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: March 14, 2011. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2011c). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 6, 2011. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2012a). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: June 4, 2012. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2012b). Minutes: Braam oversight panel: December 3, 2012. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2013a). Braam revised settlement and exit agreement monitoring report July-December 2012 (Report #4 under revised Braam settlement and exit agreement) final monitoring report of Braam oversight panel: Covering the performance period July 1, 2012-December 31, 2012. Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://columbialegal.org/BraamV.Washington
   Google Scholar
• Braam Oversight Panel. (2013b). Historical record of the work of the Braam oversight panel (December 2004-June 2013). Seattle, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://braamkids.org/media/
   Google Scholar
• Braam settlement implementation plan. (2006). Retrieved from http://braamkids.org/ImpPlanFeb06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 317–336. doi:10.1080/01900690701590587
   Google Scholar
• Calista, D. J. (1986). Linking Policy Intention and Policy Implementation: The Role of the Organization in the Integration of Human Services. Administration & Society, 18(2), 263–286. doi:10.1177/009539978601800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. (2000). Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 502–520. doi:10.1111/psj.2000.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2007a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period I monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: January 1-June 30, 2007. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2007b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period II monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: January 1-June 30, 2008. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2008a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period III monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: July 1-December 31, 2007. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2008b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period IV monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: January 1-June 30, 2008. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2009a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period V monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: July 1-December 31, 2008. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2009b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period VI monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine: January 1-June 30, 2009. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2010a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period VII monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie, July 1-December 31, 2009. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2010b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period VIII monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: January 1-June 30, 2010. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2011a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period IX monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: July 1-December 31, 2010. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2011b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period X monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: January 1-June 30, 2011. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2012a). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period XI monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: July 1-December 31, 2011. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2012b). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period XII monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: January 1-June 30, 2012. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2013). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period XIII monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: July 1, 2012-March 31, 2013. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2014). Progress of the New Jersey Department of Children and Families period XIV monitoring report for Charlie and Nadine H. v. Christie: April 1-December 31, 2013. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cssp.org/publications/child-welfare/class-action-reform
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. C., III. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Organizational Responses to Social Policy: The Case of Welfare Reform. Administration in Social Work, 34, 148–167. doi:10.1080/03643101003608976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., & Brock, T. (1991). Implementation of social policy revisited. Administration & Society, 22(4), 451–479. doi:10.1177/009539979102200404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy. Governance in theory and in practice. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. L., & Kaufman, L. (2003, June 25). New Jersey deal grants panel powerful role in foster care. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/25/nyregion/new-jersey-deal-grants-panel-powerful-role-in-foster-care.html
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosanovich, A., Joseph, R. M., & Hasbargen, K. (2005). Child welfare consent decrees: Analysis of thirty-five court actions from 1995-2005. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public services. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. (1990). Weber’s action theory and Lowi’s policy types in formation and action and implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 18(4), 887–905. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1990.tb00859.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2004). Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “managing for results” reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 219–243. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Jersey Dept. of Human Services. (2004). A new beginning: The future of child welfare in New Jersey. Trenton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Child Welfare Panel. (2004). Report on “immediate actions” required under the settlement of child welfare class action litigation for the period July-December 2003. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Child Welfare Panel. (2005a). Period I monitoring report: June 9, 2004 to December 31, 2004. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Child Welfare Panel. (2005b). Period II monitoring report: January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2004). The theory-practice issue in policy implementation research. Public Administration, 82(2), 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Implementation (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–108). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, N. (1995). The competitive deuvery of social services: Implications for program implementation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54(3), 353–363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1995.tb01144.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003846
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5, 481–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar