SLC9B1 methylation predicts fetal intolerance of labor

References

• Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, et al. Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstetrical Gynecol Sur. 2003;58:337–350. doi:10.1097/01.OGX.0000066802.19138.AE.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauberger CW, Chauhan SP. Emergency cesarean section and the 30-minute rule: definitions. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:221–226. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1103033. PMID:19031352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmans MG. How to diagnose intrapartum fetal distress? Eur J Obstet Gynecol,Reproduct Biol.1998;79:119–121. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00271-6. PMID:9720826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning S, Garite TJ. Management of fetal distress. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26:259–74. doi:10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70073-5. PMID:10399760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D. Society of O, Gynaecologists of C, British Columbia Perinatal Health P. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29:S3–S56. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32615-9. PMID:17845745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maso G, Piccoli M, De Seta F, Parolin S, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67:65–79. PMID:25411863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S, Ross S, Sauve R. Cesarean section and subsequent stillbirth, Is confounding by indication responsible for the apparent association? An updated cohort analysis of a large perinatal database. PloS one. 2015;10:e0136272. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136272. PMID:26331274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling LS, Henriksen TB, Ulrichsen H, et al. Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 1994;73:129–135. doi:10.3109/00016349409013415. PMID:8116351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzouina S, Boubkraoui Mel M, Mrabet M, et al. Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:197. doi:10.11604/pamj.2016.23.197.7401. PMID:27347286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silberstein T, Sheiner E, Salem SY, et al. Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis. The Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine: the Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2017;30(3):257–260.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen A, Garnier Y, Berger R. Dynamics of fetal circulatory responses to hypoxia and asphyxia. Eur J Obstet, Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 1999;84:155–172. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00325-X. PMID:10428339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLennan AH, Thompson SC, Gecz J. Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:779–788. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.034. PMID:26003063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, et al. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:1249–1252. doi:10.1007/s12098-008-0245-9. PMID:19190880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccella S, Colombo GF, Bulgheroni CM, et al. First-trimester maternal serum screening and the risk for fetal distress during labor. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(166): e1–e6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valino N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, et al. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35–37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol the Official J Inter Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:203–209. doi:10.1002/uog.15663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CM, Ralph JL, Wright ML, et al. DNA methylation as a biomarker for preeclampsia. Biol Res Nurs. 2014;16:409–20. doi:10.1177/1099800413508645. PMID:24165327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Farrell WE, Haworth KE, et al. Maternal genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in gestational diabetes shows distinctive disease-associated changes relative to matched healthy pregnancies. Epigenetics: Official J DNA Methylation Soc. 2016. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1080/15592294.2016.1166321.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster DG, Alexander RT. Traditional and emerging roles for the SLC9 Na+/H+ exchangers. Pflugers Arch. 2014;466:61–76. doi:10.1007/s00424-013-1408-8. PMID:24337822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donowitz M, Ming Tse C, Fuster D. SLC9/NHE gene family, a plasma membrane and organellar family of Na(+)/H(+) exchangers. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34:236–251. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.05.001. PMID:23506868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar PL, James PF. Identification and characterization of methylation-dependent/independent DNA regulatory elements in the human SLC9B1 gene. Gene. 2015;561:235–248. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2015.02.050. PMID:25701605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye G, Chen C, Han D, et al. Cloning of a novel human NHEDC1 (Na+/H+ exchanger like domain containing 1) gene expressed specifically in testis. Mol Biol Rep. 2006;33:175–180. doi:10.1007/s11033-006-0010-y. PMID:16850186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium GT. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:580–585. doi:10.1038/ng.2653. PMID:23715323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based Map Human Proteome Sci. 2015;347:1260419.
   Google Scholar
• Patel J, Landers K, Mortimer RH, et al. Regulation of hypoxia inducible factors (HIF) in hypoxia and normoxia during placental development. Placenta. 2010;31:951–7. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2010.08.008. PMID:20869770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltepe E, Saugstad OD. Oxygen in health and disease: regulation of oxygen homeostasis–clinical implications. Pediatric Res. 2009;65:261–268. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e31818fc83f. PMID:18852690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera EA, Krause B, Ebensperger G, et al. The placental pursuit for an adequate oxidant balance between the mother and the fetus. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:149. doi:10.3389/fphar.2014.00149. PMID:25009498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy E, Eisner DA. Regulation of intracellular and mitochondrial sodium in health and disease. Circ Res. 2009;104:292–303. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.189050. PMID:19213964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omo-Aghoja L. Maternal and fetal Acid-base chemistry: a major determinant of perinatal outcome. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4:8–17. doi:10.4103/2141-9248.126602. PMID:24669324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gravett C, Eckert LO, Gravett MG, et al. Brighton Collaboration Non-reassuring fetal status Working G. Non-reassuring fetal status: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2016;34:6084–6092. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.043. PMID:27461459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma KJ, Esakoff TF, Guillet A, et al. Pregnancies complicated by both preeclampsia and growth restriction between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2016:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Raicevic S, Cubrilo D, Arsenijevic S, et al. Oxidative stress in fetal distress: potential prospects for diagnosis. Oxidative Med Cell Longevity. 2010;3:214–218. doi:10.4161/oxim.3.3.12070. PMID:20716946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfield RT, Kilaru V, Smith AK, et al. CpGassoc: an R function for analysis of DNA methylation microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1280–1281. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts124. PMID:22451269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics: Official J DNA Methylat Soc. 2013;8:203–209. doi:10.4161/epi.23470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M, et al. A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:189–96. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts680. PMID:23175756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome biology. 2013;14:R115. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. PMID:24138928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformat. 2012;13:86. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-86. PMID:22568884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinius LE, Acevedo N, Joerink M, et al. Differential DNA methylation in purified human blood cells: implications for cell lineage and studies on disease susceptibility. PloS one. 2012;7:e41361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041361. PMID:22848472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A, et al. ChAMP: 450k Chip Analysis Methylation Pipeline. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:428–430. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt684. PMID:24336642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guintivano J, Arad M, Gould TD, et al. Antenatal prediction of postpartum depression with blood DNA methylation biomarkers. Mol Psychiatr. 2014;19:560–567. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.62. PMID:23689534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, CC YW, Volta M, et al. A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:293. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-293. PMID:23631413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar