Genome-wide oxidative bisulfite sequencing identifies sex-specific methylation differences in the human placenta

References

• Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, et al. The "Great Obstetrical Syndromes" are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:193-201. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009. PMID:21094932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker DJ. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. Bmj. 1990;301:1111. 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1111. PMID:2252919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg PE, Tucker G, Scheil W, et al. Sexual dimorphism in adverse pregnancy outcomes – a retrospective australian population study 1981-2011. PloS one. 2016;11:e0158807. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158807. PMID:27398996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton AM, Avila L, Penaherrera MS, et al. Inactive X chromosome-specific reduction in placental DNA methylation. Human Molecular Genetics. 2009;18:3544-52. 10.1093/hmg/ddp299. PMID:19586922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowden AL, Sibley C, Reik W, et al. Imprinted genes, placental development and fetal growth. Hormone Research. 2006;65(Suppl 3):50-8. 10.1159/000091506. PMID:16612114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randhawa R, Cohen P. The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in prenatal growth. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2005;86:84-90. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2005.07.028. PMID:16165387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada H, Okae H, Toh H, et al. Allele-specific methylome and transcriptome analysis reveals widespread imprinting in the human placenta. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2016;99:1045-58. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.021. PMID:27843122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder DI, Blair JD, Lott P, et al. The human placenta methylome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:6037-42. 10.1073/pnas.1215145110. PMID:23530188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco-Miotto T, Mayne BT, Buckberry S, et al. Recent progress towards understanding the role of DNA methylation in human placental development. Reproduction. 2016;152:R23-30. 10.1530/REP-16-0014. PMID:27026712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaccioli F, Lager S, Sovio U, et al. The pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: investigating the relationship between serial prenatal ultrasonography, biomarkers, placental phenotype and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Placenta. 2016;59(Supplement 1):S17–S25. 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.10.011.
   Google Scholar
• Pasupathy D, Dacey A, Cook E, et al. Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2008;8:51. 10.1186/1471-2393-8-51. PMID:19019223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, et al. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386:2089-97. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2. PMID:26360240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris RA, Wang T, Coarfa C, et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1097-105. 10.1038/nbt.1682. PMID:20852635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird A, Taggart M, Frommer M, et al. A fraction of the mouse genome that is derived from islands of nonmethylated, CpG-rich DNA. Cell. 1985;40:91-9. 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90312-5. PMID:2981636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MD, He Y, Whitaker JW, et al. Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature. 2015;523:212-6. 10.1038/nature14465. PMID:26030523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assenov Y, Muller F, Lutsik P, et al. Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data with RnBeads. Nature Methods. 2014;11:1138-40. 10.1038/nmeth.3115. PMID:25262207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin T, Cook D, Lawrence M. ggbio: an R package for extending the grammar of graphics for genomic data. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R77. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r77. PMID:22937822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roadmap Epigenomics C, Kundaje A, Meuleman W, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518:317-30. 10.1038/nature14248. PMID:25693563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass SU, Landsberger N, Wolffe AP. DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation. Current Biology: CB. 1997;7:157-65. 10.1016/S0960-9822(97)70086-1. PMID:9395433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard DT, Berry AA, Jennings RE, et al. An integrative transcriptomic atlas of organogenesis in human embryos. eLife. 2016;5. 10.7554/elife.15657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich M, Gama-Sosa MA, Huang LH, et al. Amount and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in human DNA from different types of tissues of cells. Nucleic Acids Research. 1982;10:2709-21. 10.1093/nar/10.8.2709. PMID:7079182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuke C, Shimabukuro M, Petronis A, et al. Age related changes in 5-methylcytosine content in human peripheral leukocytes and placentas: an HPLC-based study. Annals of Human Genetics. 2004;68:196-204. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2004.00081.x. PMID:15180700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton AM, Price EM, Jones MJ, et al. Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Human Molecular Genetics. 2015;24:1528-39. 10.1093/hmg/ddu564. PMID:25381334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migeon BR. X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms and genetic consequences. Trends in Genetics : TIG. 1994;10:230-5. 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90169-4. PMID:8091502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp AJ, Stathaki E, Migliavacca E, et al. DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. Genome Research. 2011;21:1592-600. 10.1101/gr.112680.110. PMID:21862626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Davies JJ, Wittig D, et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37:853-62. 10.1038/ng1598. PMID:16007088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi P, Huen K, Dave V, et al. Sex differences in DNA methylation assessed by 450 K BeadChip in newborns. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:911. 10.1186/s12864-015-2034-y. PMID:26553366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin E, Smeester L, Bommarito PA, et al. Sexual epigenetic dimorphism in the human placenta: implications for susceptibility during the prenatal period. Epigenomics. 2017;9:267-78. 10.2217/epi-2016-0132. PMID:28234023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Pastor WA, Shen Y, et al. The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PloS one. 2010;5:e8888. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008888. PMID:20126651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor C, Ruzov A, Meehan R, et al. Enzymatic approaches and bisulfite sequencing cannot distinguish between 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA. BioTechniques. 2010;48:317-9. 10.2144/000113403. PMID:20569209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth MJ, Branco MR, Ficz G, et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science. 2012;336:934-7. 10.1126/science.1220671. PMID:22539555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth MJ, Ost TW, Beraldi D, et al. Oxidative bisulfite sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nature Protocols. 2013;8:1841-51. 10.1038/nprot.2013.115. PMID:24008380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Park HJ, Dasari S, et al. CPAT: Coding-Potential Assessment Tool using an alignment-free logistic regression model. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:e74. 10.1093/nar/gkt006. PMID:23335781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Liu F, Xu X, et al. Replicated association between the European GWAS locus rs10503253 at CSMD1 and schizophrenia in Asian population. Neurosci Lett. 2017;647:122-8. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.039. PMID:28344127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus DM, Elliott GS, Chute H, et al. CSMD1 is a novel multiple domain complement-regulatory protein highly expressed in the central nervous system and epithelial tissues. J Immunol. 2006;176:4419-30. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4419. PMID:16547280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal M, Holliday DL, Morrison EE, et al. Loss of CSMD1 expression disrupts mammary duct formation while enhancing proliferation, migration and invasion. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:283-92. 10.3892/or.2017.5656. PMID:28534981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regal JF, Gilbert JS, Burwick RM. The complement system and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Mol Immunol. 2015;67:56-70. 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.030. PMID:25802092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnenborg R, Robertson WB, Brosens I, et al. Review article: trophoblast invasion and the establishment of haemochorial placentation in man and laboratory animals. Placenta. 1981;2:71-91. 10.1016/S0143-4004(81)80042-2. PMID:7010344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou S, Lee HM, Qin H, et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of multiple individuals reveals complementary roles of promoter and gene body methylation in transcriptional regulation. Genome Biol. 2014;15:408. 10.1186/s13059-014-0408-0. PMID:25074712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger F. Trim Galore!: a wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. 2012. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/.
   Google Scholar
• Simon A. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1571-2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167. PMID:21493656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Siegmund KD, Laird PW, et al. Bis-SNP: combined DNA methylation and SNP calling for Bisulfite-seq data. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R61. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r61. PMID:22784381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297-303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110. PMID:20644199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS, Furey TS, et al. The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:D493-6. 10.1093/nar/gkh103. PMID:14681465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MD, Schmitz RJ, Ecker JR. 'Leveling' the playing field for analyses of single-base resolution DNA methylomes. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2012;28:583-5. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.012. PMID:23131467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Wang Z. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:671-82. 10.1038/nrg3068. PMID:21897427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. PMID:23618408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012;9:357-9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. PMID:22388286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:e108. 10.1093/nar/gkt214. PMID:23558742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. PMID:19505943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166-9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. PMID:25260700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. PMID:25516281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841-2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. PMID:20110278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:290-5. 10.1038/nbt.3122. PMID:25690850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts A, Pimentel H, Trapnell C, et al. Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2325-9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr355. PMID:21697122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappalainen I, Almeida-King J, Kumanduri V, et al. The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research. Nat Genet. 2015;47:692-5. 10.1038/ng.3312. PMID:26111507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar