X-ray irradiation induces subtle changes in the genome-wide distribution of DNA hydroxymethylation with opposing trends in genic and intergenic regions

References

• Bochtler M, Kolano A, Xu GL. DNA demethylation pathways: additional players and regulators. BioEssays. 2017;39(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue A, Zhang Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science. 2011;334(6053):194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji D, Lin K, Song J, et al. Effects of Tet-induced oxidation products of 5-methylcytosine on Dnmt1-and DNMT3a-mediated cytosine methylation. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10(7):1749–1752.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res. 2007;67(3):946–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito S, D’alessio AC, Taranova OV, et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science. 2011;333(6047):1300–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y-F, Li B-Z, Li Z, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science. 2011;333(6047):1303–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao T, Cheng R, Revelo M, et al. Hydroxymethylation as a novel environmental biosensor. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen L, Li X, Yan L, et al. Whole-genome analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and 5-methylcytosine at base resolution in the human brain. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):R49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong M, Sun D, Luo M, et al. Large conserved domains of low DNA methylation maintained by Dnmt3a. Nat Genet. 2014;46(1):17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla A, Sehgal M, Singh TR. Hydroxymethylation and its potential implication in DNA repair system: a review and future perspectives. Gene. 2015;564(2):109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantidze OL, Razin SV. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA repair: a new player or a red herring? Cell Cycle. 2017;16(16):1499–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancey P-B, Ecsedi S, Lambert M-P, et al. TET-catalyzed 5-hydroxymethylation precedes HNF4A promoter choice during differentiation of bipotent liver progenitors. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9(1):264–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iurlaro M, Ficz G, Oxley D, et al. A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruijt CG, Gnerlich F, Smits AH, et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy) methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell. 2013;152(5):1146–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impey S, Pelz C, Tafessu A, et al. Proton irradiation induces persistent and tissue-specific DNA methylation changes in the left ventricle and hippocampus. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarena V, Sant DW, Huff TC, et al. cAMP signaling regulates DNA hydroxymethylation by augmenting the intracellular labile ferrous iron pool. Elife. 2017;6:e29750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abilmazhinova A, Zhabagin M, Rakhimova S, et al. Gene expression and methylation profiles as a biomarker for human radiation exposure. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Maierhofer A, Flunkert J, Dittrich M, et al. Analysis of global DNA methylation changes in primary human fibroblasts in the early phase following X-ray irradiation. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rithidech KN, Jangiam W, Tungjai M, et al. Induction of chronic inflammation and altered levels of DNA hydroxymethylation in somatic and germinal tissues of CBA/CaJ mice exposed to 48Ti ions. Front Oncol. 2016;6:155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M, Melo A, Costa L, et al. Global and gene-specific DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in human skin exposed and not exposed to sun radiation. An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(6):793–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu S, Wu H, Zhang H, et al. DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation in melanoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(44):78163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin S-G, Jiang Y, Qiu R, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is strongly depleted in human cancers but its levels do not correlate with IDH1 mutations. Cancer Res. 2011;71(24):7360–7365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Liu L, Chen X, et al. Decrease of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through downregulation of TET1. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr BA, Haffner MC, Nelson WG, et al. Decreased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with neural progenitor phenotype in normal brain and shorter survival in malignant glioma. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer GP, S-G J, Kadam S. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and its potential roles in development and cancer. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013;6(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spans L, Van Den Broeck T, Smeets E, et al. Genomic and epigenomic analysis of high-risk prostate cancer reveals changes in hydroxymethylation and TET1. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):24326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chouliaras L, Mastroeni D, Delvaux E, et al. Consistent decrease in global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(9):2091–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters N, Dieriks BV, Lill C, et al. Global changes in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in Alzheimer’s disease human brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(6):1334–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Yang Y, Lin X, et al. Genome-wide loss of 5-hmC is a novel epigenetic feature of Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(18):3641–3653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez F, Dündar F, Diel S, et al. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucl Acids Res. 2014;42(1):187–191.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Wu X, Zhou Y, et al. Decoding the dynamic DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation landscapes in endodermal lineage intermediates during pancreatic differentiation of hESC. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(6):2883–2900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462(7271):315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Zhang X. dbSUPER: a database of super-enhancers in mouse and human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;44(D1):D164–D171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favorov A, Mularoni L, Cope LM, et al. Exploring massive, genome scale datasets with the GenometriCorr package. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich M, Ehrlich KC. DNA cytosine methylation and hydroxymethylation at the borders. Epigenomics. 2014;6(6):563–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, et al. Genome-wide analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine distribution reveals its dual function in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2011;25(7):679–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Chavez L, Chang X, et al. Distinct roles of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet2 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111(4):1361–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang AP, Sugai C, Maunakea AK. High-throughput sequencing offers new insights into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Biomol Concepts. 2016;7(3):169–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponnaluri VC, Ehrlich KC, Zhang G, et al. Association of 5-hydroxymethylation and 5-methylation of DNA cytosine with tissue-specific gene expression. Epigenetics. 2017;12(2):123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocker MT, Tuorto F, Raddatz G, et al. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET2 maintains the active state of the mammalian HOXA cluster. Nat Commun. 2012;3:818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sérandour AA, Avner S, Oger F, et al. Dynamic hydroxymethylation of deoxyribonucleic acid marks differentiation-associated enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(17):8255–8265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terragni J, Zhang G, Sun Z, et al. Notch signaling genes: myogenic DNA hypomethylation and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Epigenetics. 2014;9(6):842–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsumagari K, Baribault C, Terragni J, et al. Early de novo DNA methylation and prolonged demethylation in the muscle lineage. Epigenetics. 2013;8(3):317–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois-Chevalier J, Oger F, Dehondt H, et al. A dynamic CTCF chromatin binding landscape promotes DNA hydroxymethylation and transcriptional induction of adipocyte differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(17):10943–10959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann A, Ivanek R, Murr R, et al. Transcription factor occupancy can mediate active turnover of DNA methylation at regulatory regions. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(12):e1003994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teif VB, Beshnova DA, Vainshtein Y, et al. Nucleosome repositioning links DNA (de)methylation and differential CTCF binding during stem cell development. Genome Res. 2014 Aug;24(8):1285–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Terragni J, Borgaro JG, et al. High-resolution enzymatic mapping of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2013;3(2):567–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Huang J-H, Zeng Q-H, et al. Increased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and ten-eleven translocation protein expression in ultraviolet B-irradiated HaCaT Cells. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(5):594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:13033997. 2013:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Wang L-G, He Q-Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(14):2382–2383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson M org. Hs. eg. db: Genome Wide Annotation for Human (R package version 3.0. 0). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium EP. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu H, Fang X. A brief review on the human encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE) project. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013;11(3):135–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14(2):178–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Anders S, Kim V, et al. RNA-Seq workflow: gene-level exploratory analysis and differential expression. F1000Res. 2015;4:1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, et al. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang S, Li W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(16):2184–2185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 2015;4:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley MA, Larson JL, Chaivorapol C, et al. ReportingTools: an automated result processing and presentation toolkit for high-throughput genomic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(24):3220–3221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi H, Huang X, Muruganujan A, et al. PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from gene ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45(D1):D183–D189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury B, Seetharam A, Wang Z, et al. A study of alterations in DNA epigenetic modifications (5mC and 5hmC) and gene expression influenced by simulated microgravity in human lymphoblastoid cells. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar R, Domrachev A, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucl Acids Res. 2002;30(1): 207–210.
   Google Scholar