Application of Recombination -Induced Tag Exchange (RITE) to study histone dynamics in human cells

References

• Bondarenko VA, Steele LM, Újvári A, et al. Nucleosomes can form a polar barrier to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell. 2006;24:469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong BE, van Noort J. Overcoming chromatin barriers. Elife. 2019;8. DOI:10.7554/eLife.50761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Carey M, Workman JL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128:707–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber CM, Ramachandran S, Henikoff S. Nucleosomes are context-specific, H2A.Z-modulated barriers to RNA polymerase. Mol Cell. 2014;53:819–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapier CR, Cairns BR. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:273–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer P. Organization and regulation of gene transcription. Nature. 2019;573:45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolle M, Workman JL, Venkatesh S. reSETting chromatin during transcription elongation. Epigenetics. 2013;8:10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolle M, Venkatesh S, Gogol MM, et al. Chromatin remodelers Isw1 and Chd1 maintain chromatin structure during transcription by preventing histone exchange. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:884–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh S, Smolle M, Li H, et al. Set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 suppresses histone exchange on transcribed genes. Nature. 2012;489:452–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terweij M, van Leeuwen F. Histone exchange: sculpting the epigenome. Front Life Sci. 2013;7:63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei Q, Huang J, Chen W, et al. Regulation of DNA replication-coupled histone gene expression. Oncotarget. 2017;8. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.21887
   Google Scholar
• Hamiche A, Shuaib M. Chaperoning the histone H3 family. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2012;1819(3–4):230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer PV, Gu Y, Liu WH, et al. Mechanistic insights into histone deposition and nucleosome assembly by the chromatin assembly factor-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:9907–9917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibahara K-I, Stillman B. Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell. 1999;96:575–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Cook PR. Kinetics of core histones in living human cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:1341–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiriet C, Hayes JJ. Histone dynamics during transcription: exchange of H2a/H2b dimers and H3/H4 tetramers during pol II elongation. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2006;41:77–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmad K, Henikoff S. The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1191–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray-Gallet D, Woolfe A, Vassias I, et al. Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol Cell. 2011;44:928–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderman JI, Orsi GA, Hughes KT, et al. Nucleosome-depleted chromatin gaps recruit assembly factors for the H3.3 histone variant. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012;109:19721–19726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz BE. Transcriptional activation triggers deposition and removal of the histone variant H3.3. Genes Dev. 2005;19:804–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagami H, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G, et al. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell. 2004;116:51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg AD, Banaszynski LA, Noh K-M, et al. Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell. 2010;140:678–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, Noh K-M, et al. Daxx is an H3.3-specific histone chaperone and cooperates with ATRX in replication-independent chromatin assembly at telomeres. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2010;107:14075–14080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray-Gallet D, Quivy J-P, Scamps C, et al. HIRA is critical for a nucleosome assembly pathway independent of DNA synthesis. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1091–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drane P, Ouararhni K, Depaux A, et al. The death-associated protein DAXX is a novel histone chaperone involved in the replication-independent deposition of H3.3. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1253–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maze I, Wenderski W, Noh K-M, et al. Critical role of histone turnover in neuronal transcription and plasticity. Neuron. 2015;87:77–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvardovskiy A, Schwämmle V, Kempf SJ, et al. Accumulation of histone variant H3.3 with age is associated with profound changes in the histone methylation landscape. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9272–9289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, et al. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science. 2007;315:1405–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamai A, Imoberdorf RM, Strubin M. Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication. Mol Cell. 2007;25:345–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufiange A, Jacques P-É, Bhat W, et al. Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol Cell. 2007;27:393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radman-Livaja M, Verzijlbergen KF, Weiner A, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of ancestral histone protein inheritance in budding yeast. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Zhang Z, Xu M, et al. H3.3-H4 Tetramer splitting events feature cell-type specific enhancers. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(6):e1003558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraushaar DC, Jin W, Maunakea A, et al. Genome-wide incorporation dynamics reveal distinct categories of turnover for the histone variant H3.3. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim O, Hung J-H, Cedeno RJ, et al. A system for genome-wide histone variant dynamics in ES cells reveals dynamic MacroH2A2 replacement at promoters. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hödl M, Basler K. Transcription in the absence of histone H3.3. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1221–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang C-W, Shibata Y, Starmer J, et al. Histone H3.3 maintains genome integrity during mammalian development. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1377–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nashun B, Hill PW, Smallwood SA, et al. Continuous histone replacement by Hira is essential for normal transcriptional regulation and de novo DNA methylation during mouse oogenesis. Mol Cell. 2015;60:611–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H-T, Farran CAE, Xing QR, et al. Global H3.3 dynamic deposition defines its bimodal role in cell fate transition. Nat Commun. 2018;9. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03904-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Q, Banaszynski LA, Geng F, et al. Histone variant H3.3–mediated chromatin remodeling is essential for paternal genome activation in mouse preimplantation embryos. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:3829–3838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney K, Mailler J, Wenda JM, et al. Differential expression of histone H3.3 genes and their role in modulating temperature stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2018;209:551–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaszynski LA, Wen D, Dewell S, et al. Hira-dependent histone H3.3 deposition facilitates PRC2 recruitment at developmental loci in ES cells. Cell. 2013;155:107–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada A, Okada S, Konno D, et al. Chd2 interacts with H3.3 to determine myogenic cell fate. Embo J. 2012;31:2994–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada A, Maehara K, Sato Y, et al. Incorporation of histone H3.1 suppresses the lineage potential of skeletal muscle. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;43:775–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen BTK, Bush KM, Barrilleaux BL, et al. Histone H3.3 regulates dynamic chromatin states during spermatogenesis. Development. 2014;141:3483–3494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jullien J, Astrand C, Szenker E, et al. HIRA dependent H3.3 deposition is required for transcriptional reprogramming following nuclear transfer to Xenopus oocytes. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2012;5. DOI:10.1186/1756-8935-5-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura T, Smith M, Kanno T, et al. Inducible deposition of the Histone variant H3.3 in interferon-stimulated genes. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:12217–12225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschbeck M, Hake SB. Variants of core histones and their roles in cell fate decisions, development and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:299–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal RB, Henikoff S. Capturing the dynamic epigenome. Genome Biol. 2010;11:218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha M, Kraushaar DC, Zhao K. Genome-wide analysis of H3.3 dissociation reveals high nucleosome turnover at distal regulatory regions of embryonic stem cells. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2014;7(1). DOI:10.1186/1756-8935-7-38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deal RB, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science. 2010;328:1161–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton AM, Mariluz G-R, Mieczkowski J, et al. Enhancer regions show high histone H3.3 turnover that changes during differentiation. eLife. 2016;5. DOI:10.7554/eLife.15316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terweij M, van Welsem T, van Deventer S, et al. Recombination-Induced Tag Exchange (RITE) cassette series to monitor protein dynamics in saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3. 2013;3:1261–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzijlbergen KF, Menendez-Benito V, van Welsem T, et al. Recombination-induced tag exchange to track old and new proteins. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2010;107:64–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzijlbergen KF, van Welsem T, Sie D, et al. A barcode screen for epigenetic regulators reveals a role for the NuB4/HAT-B histone acetyltransferase complex in histone turnover. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audergon PNCB, Catania S, Kagansky A, et al. Restricted epigenetic inheritance of H3K9 methylation. Science. 2015;348:132–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos D, Frederiks F, Terweij M, et al. Progressive methylation of ageing histones by Dot1 functions as a timer. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:956–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan H, Serra-Cardona A, Hua X, et al. The Mcm2-Ctf4-Polα axis facilitates parental histone H3-H4 transfer to lagging strands. Mol Cell. 2018;72. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes AL, Hughes CE, Henderson KA, et al. Selective sorting and destruction of mitochondrial membrane proteins in aged yeast. eLife. 2016;5. DOI:10.7554/eLife.13943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi L, Prasad P, Ekwall K, et al. The Paf1 complex factors Leo1 and Paf1 promote local histone turnover to modulate chromatin states in fission yeast. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:1673–1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson JP, Shukla M, Menendez-Benito V, et al. A nucleosome turnover map reveals that the stability of histone H4 Lys20 methylation depends on histone recycling in transcribed chromatin. Genome Res. 2015;25:872–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Gan H, Serra-Cardona A, et al. A mechanism for preventing asymmetric histone segregation onto replicating DNA strands. Science. 2018;361:1386–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan S, Pokhrel S, Palani S, et al. Counteracting h3k4 methylation modulators set1 and jhd2 co-regulate chromatin dynamics and gene transcription. Nat Commun. 2016;7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radman-Livaja M, Quan TK, Valenzuela L, et al. A key role for Chd1 in histone H3 dynamics at the 3′ ends of long genes in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using crispr/cas systems. Science. 2013;15:819-823.
   Google Scholar
• Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockemeyer D, Soldner F, Beard C, et al. Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human escs and ipscs using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:851-857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pchelintsev NA, Mcbryan T, Rai TS, et al. Placing the HIRA histone chaperone complex in the chromatin landscape. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1012–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho S, Raposo AC, Martins FB, et al. Histone methyltransferase SETD2 coordinates FACT recruitment with nucleosome dynamics during transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(5):2881–2893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galic H, Vasseur P, Radman-Livaja M. The budding yeast heterochromatic SIR complex resets upon exit from stationary phase. bioRxiv. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer NH, Leverich CK, Fitzgibbon MP, et al. Identification of long-lived proteins retained in cells undergoing repeated asymmetric divisions. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111:14019–14026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deventer S, Menendez-Benito V, van Leeuwen F, et al. N-terminal acetylation and replicative age affect proteasome localization and cell fitness during aging. J Cell Sci. 2014;128:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menendez-Benito V, van Deventer S, Jimenez-Garcia V, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of organelle and macromolecular complex inheritance. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012;110:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengefeld J, Yen E, Chen X, et al. Spatial cues and not spindle pole maturation drive the asymmetry of astral microtubules between new and preexisting spindle poles. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29:10–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyama BH, Drigo RAE, Lev-Ram V, et al. Visualization of long-lived proteins reveals age mosaicism within nuclei of postmitotic cells. J Cell Biol. 2018;218:433–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran V, Lim C, Xie J, et al. Asymmetric division of Drosophila male germline stem cell shows asymmetric histone distribution. Science. 2012;338:679–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung HK, Jacobs CL, Huo Y, et al. Tunable and reversible drug control of protein production via a self-excising degron. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs CL, Badiee RK, Lin MZ. StaPLs: versatile genetically encoded modules for engineering drug-inducible proteins. Nat Methods. 2018;15:523–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar