TET family regulates the embryonic pluripotency of porcine preimplantation embryos by maintaining the DNA methylation level of NANOG

References

• Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16(1):6–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33(Suppl):245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson KD, Wolffe AP. DNA methylation in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2000;1(1):11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007;447(7143):425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P. Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell. 2007;128(4):747–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, et al. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(24):13734–13738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaitseva I, Zaitsev S, Alenina N, et al. Dynamics of DNA-demethylation in early mouse and rat embryos developed in vivo and in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74(10):1255–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Jeong YS, Shin ST, et al. Dynamic DNA methylation reprogramming: active demethylation and immediate remethylation in the male pronucleus of bovine zygotes. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(9):2523–2533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, et al. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature. 2000;403(6769):501–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald J, Engemann S, Lane N, et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr Biol. 2000;10(8):475–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Inoue A, He J, et al. Tet3 and DNA replication mediate demethylation of both the maternal and paternal genomes in mouse zygotes. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(4):459–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo F, Li X, Liang D, et al. Active and passive demethylation of male and female pronuclear DNA in the mammalian zygote. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(4):447–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, et al. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2002;241(1):172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos F, Dean W. Epigenetic reprogramming during early development in mammals. Reproduction. 2004;127(6):643–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science (New York, NY). 2009;324(5929):930–935.
   Google Scholar
• Ito S, D’Alessio AC, Taranova OV, et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1129–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science. 2011;333(6047):1303–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti A, Drohat AC. Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(41):35334–35338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu TP, Guo F, Yang H, et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature. 2011;477(7366):606–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal K, Jin SG, Pfeifer GP, et al. Reprogramming of the paternal genome upon fertilization involves genome-wide oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(9):3642–3647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh KP, Yabuuchi A, Rao S, et al. Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8(2):200–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawlaty MM, Ganz K, Powell BE, et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9(2):166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quivoron C, Couronne L, Della Valle V, et al. TET2 inactivation results in pleiotropic hematopoietic abnormalities in mouse and is a recurrent event during human lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(1):25–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko M, Bandukwala HS, An J, et al. Ten-Eleven-Translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(35):14566–14571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawlaty MM, Breiling A, Le T, et al. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev Cell. 2013;24(3):310–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawlaty MM, Breiling A, Le T, et al. Loss of tet enzymes compromises proper differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell. 2014;29(1):102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, et al. Typical demethylation events in cloned pig embryos. Clues on species-specific differences in epigenetic reprogramming of a cloned donor genome. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(43):39980–39984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer GS, Dindot S, Friend TH, et al. Hierarchical phenotypic and epigenetic variation in cloned swine. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(2):430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Chavez L, Chang X, et al. Distinct roles of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet2 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(4):1361–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K, Christensen J, Helin K. DNA methylation: TET proteins-guardians of CpG islands? EMBO Rep. 2011;13(1):28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata K, Yamazaki T, Miki H, et al. Centromeric DNA hypomethylation as an epigenetic signature discriminates between germ and somatic cell lineages. Dev Biol. 2007;312(1):419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor WA, Pape UJ, Huang Y, et al. Genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2011;473(7347):394–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, et al. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature. 2011;473(7347):398–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, et al. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2011;473(7347):389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg JM, Ghosh S, Lackford BL, et al. Acute depletion of Tet1-dependent 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels impairs LIF/Stat3 signaling and results in loss of embryonic stem cell identity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(8):3364–3377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K, Christensen J, Pedersen MT, et al. TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature. 2011;473(7347):343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Lienhard M, Pastor WA, et al. Simultaneous deletion of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet3 increases transcriptome variability in early embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(31):E4236–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi FT, Kim H, Lu W, et al. Ten-eleven translocation 1 (Tet1) is regulated by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (Ogt) for target gene repression in mouse embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(29):20776–20784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose RJ, Bird AP. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31(2):89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Liu Y, Jiang L, et al. Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation. Genes Dev. 2014;28(19):2103–2119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Hamm J, Whitworth K, et al. Dynamics of TET family expression in porcine preimplantation embryos is related to zygotic genome activation and required for the maintenance of NANOG. Dev Biol. 2014;386(1):86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Mittal SA, Chongtham J, et al. Hypoxia-mediated epigenetic regulation of stemness in brain tumor cells. Stem Cells. 2017;35(6):1468–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festuccia N, Osorno R, Halbritter F, et al. Esrrb is a direct Nanog target gene that can substitute for Nanog function in pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11(4):477–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijk EW, Du Puy L, Van Tol HT, et al. Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals. Dev Dyn. 2008;237(4):918–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall VJ, Christensen J, Gao Y, et al. Porcine pluripotency cell signaling develops from the inner cell mass to the epiblast during early development. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(8):2014–2024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Puy L, Lopes SM, Haagsman HP, et al. Analysis of co-expression of OCT4, NANOG and SOX2 in pluripotent cells of the porcine embryo, in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology. 2011;75(3):513–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei S, Ryu J, Wen K, et al. Increased and prolonged human norovirus infection in RAG2/IL2RG deficient gnotobiotic pigs with severe combined immunodeficiency. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yugo DM, Heffron CL, Ryu J, et al. Infection dynamics of hepatitis E virus in wild-type and immunoglobulin heavy chain knockout JH (-/-) gnotobiotic piglets. J Virol. 2018;92(21). DOI:10.1128/JVI.01208-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth KM, Lee K, Benne JA, et al. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos. Biol Reprod. 2014;91(3):78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos F, Hyslop L, Stojkovic P, et al. Evaluation of epigenetic marks in human embryos derived from IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2387–2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh RS, Ostrup O, Ostrup E, et al. DNA methylation in porcine preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and produced by in vitro fertilization, parthenogenetic activation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Epigenetics. 2011;6(2):177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulka J, Fulka H, Slavik T, et al. DNA methylation pattern in pig in vivo produced embryos. Histochem Cell Biol. 2006;126(2):213–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332(6163):459–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather RS. Nuclear control of early embryonic development in domestic pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1993;48:17–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, et al. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod. 2002;66(1):112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar