The hypomethylation of imprinted genes in IVF/ICSI placenta samples is associated with concomitant changes in histone modifications

References

• Messerlian C, Gaskins AJ. Epidemiologic approaches for studying assisted reproductive technologies: design, methods, analysis and interpretation. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017;4(2):124–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spaan M, van den Belt-dusebout AW, van den Heuvel-eibrink MM, et al. Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(4):740–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaraviciute G, Kauser M, Bhattacharya S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of DNA methylation levels and imprinting disorders in children conceived by IVF/ICSI compared with children conceived spontaneously. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(6):840–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19:87–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:73–85e1-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. Maternal and live-birth outcomes of pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:35141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choux C, Carmignac V, Bruno C, et al. The placenta: phenotypic and epigenetic modifications induced by Assisted Reproductive Technologies throughout pregnancy. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7(1):87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angiolini E, Fowden A, Coan P, et al. Regulation of placental efficiency for nutrient transport by imprinted genes. Placenta. 2006;27(27 Suppl A):S98–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson-Smith AC, Moore T, Detmar J, et al. Epigenetics and imprinting of the trophoblast – a workshop report. Placenta. 2006; 27(Suppl A):S122–6. DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2006.01.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monk D. Genomic imprinting in the human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):S152–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portha B, Fournier A, Kioon MD, et al. Early environmental factors, alteration of epigenetic marks and metabolic disease susceptibility. Biochimie. 2014;97(97):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rugg-Gunn PJ. Epigenetic features of the mouse trophoblast. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(1):21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohan-Ghadr H-R, Kadam L, Jain C, et al. Potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in regulation of trophoblast differentiation, migration, and invasion in the human placenta. Cell Adh Migr. 2016;10(1–2):126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy AC, Chapman H, George EM. Acute hypoxia and chronic ischemia induce differential total changes in placental epigenetic modifications. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(6):766–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat B, Mahajan A, Bagga R, et al. Epigenetic modifications at DMRs of placental genes are subjected to variations in normal gestation, pathological conditions and folate supplementation. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):40774.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barouki R, Melen E, Herceg Z, et al. Epigenetics as a mechanism linking developmental exposures to long-term toxicity. Environ Int. 2018;114(114):77–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choux C, Binquet C, Carmignac V, et al. The epigenetic control of transposable elements and imprinted genes in newborns is affected by the mode of conception: ART versus spontaneous conception without underlying infertility. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(2):331–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk D, Morales J, den Dunnen JT, et al. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for reporting methylation aberrations in imprinted domains. Epigenetics. 2018;13(2):117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umlauf D, Goto Y, Cao R, et al. Imprinting along the Kcnq1 domain on mouse chromosome 7 involves repressive histone methylation and recruitment of Polycomb group complexes. Nat Genet. 2004;36(12):1296–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahangiri M, Shahhoseini M, Movaghar B. H19 and MEST gene expression and histone modification in blastocysts cultured from vitrified and fresh two-cell mouse embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(5):559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk D, Arnaud P, Apostolidou S, et al. Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(17):6623–6628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau T, Ferdynus C, Quantin C, et al. [Liveborn birth-weight of single and uncomplicated pregnancies between 28 and 42 weeks of gestation from Burgundy perinatal network]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008;37(6):589–596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson JM, Irgens LM, Skjaerven R, et al. Placenta weight percentile curves for singleton deliveries. BJOG. 2007;114(6):715–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katari S, Turan N, Bibikova M, et al. DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(20):3769–3778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelissen EC, Dumoulin JC, Daunay A, et al. Placentas from pregnancies conceived by IVF/ICSI have a reduced DNA methylation level at the H19 and MEST differentially methylated regions. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(4):1117–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancourt RC, Harris HR, Michels KB. Methylation levels at imprinting control regions are not altered with ovulation induction or in vitro fertilization in a birth cohort. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):2208–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camprubi C, Iglesias-Platas I, Martin-Trujillo A, et al. Stability of genomic imprinting and gestational-age dynamic methylation in complicated pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technologies. Biol Reprod. 2013;89:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan N, Katari S, Gerson LF, et al. Inter- and intra-individual variation in allele-specific DNA methylation and gene expression in children conceived using assisted reproductive technology. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(7):e1001033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahangiri M, Shahhoseini M, Movaghar B. The effect of vitrification on expression and histone marks of Igf2 and Oct4 in blastocysts cultured from two-cell mouse embryos. Cell J. 2018;19:607–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Vu TH, Ulaner GA, et al. IVF results in de novo DNA methylation and histone methylation at an Igf2-H19 imprinting epigenetic switch. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11(9):631–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold DR, Gaspar RC, da Rocha CV, et al. Nuclear transfer alters placental gene expression and associated histone modifications of the placental-specific imprinted gene pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 2 (PHLDA2) in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017; 29:458–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier AL, Lopes FL, Darricarrere N, et al. Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1653–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier AL, McGraw S, Lopes FL, et al. Modulation of imprinted gene expression following superovulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;388:51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GE, Ishida M, Demetriou C, et al. The role and interaction of imprinted genes in human fetal growth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015; 370:20140074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamad MF. Quantification of histones and protamines mRNA transcripts in sperms of infertile couples and their impact on sperm’s quality and chromatin integrity. Reprod Biol. 2019;19:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiavnicka M, Garcia-Alvarez O, Ulcova-Gallova Z, et al. H3K4me2 accompanies chromatin immaturity in human spermatozoa: an epigenetic marker for sperm quality assessment. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020;66(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar