Molecular signatures identified by integrating gene expression and methylation in non-seminoma and seminoma of testicular germ cell tumours

References

• Shen H, Shih J, Hollern DP, et al. Integrated molecular characterization of testicular germ cell tumors. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3392–3406.
   Google Scholar
• Litchfield K, Levy M, Orlando G, et al. Identification of 19 new risk loci and potential regulatory mechanisms influencing susceptibility to testicular germ cell tumor. Nat Genet. 2017;49(7):1133–1140. .
   Google Scholar
• Vasdev N, Moon A, Thorpe AC. Classification, epidemiology and therapies for testicular germ cell tumours. Int J Dev Biol. 2013;57(2–4):133–139.
   Google Scholar
• Costa AL, Lobo J, Jeronimo C, et al. The epigenetics of testicular germ cell tumors: looking for novel disease biomarkers. Epigenomics. 2017;9(2):155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Litchfield K, Levy M, Huddart RA, et al. The genomic landscape of testicular germ cell tumours: from susceptibility to treatment. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(7):409–419. .
   Google Scholar
• Buljubasic R, Buljubasic M, Bojanac AK, et al. Epigenetics and testicular germ cell tumors. Gene. 2018;661:22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Facchini G, Rossetti S, Cavaliere C, et al. Exploring the molecular aspects associated with testicular germ cell tumors: a review. Oncotarget. 2018;9(1):1365–1379. .
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Kim P, Jia P, et al. Distinct telomere length and molecular signatures in seminoma and non-seminoma of testicular germ cell tumor. Brief Bioinform. 2018;20(4):1502–1512. .
   Google Scholar
• Qin G, Mallik S, Mitra R, et al. MicroRNA and transcription factor co-regulatory networks and subtype classification of seminoma and non-seminoma in testicular germ cell tumors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):852. .
   Google Scholar
• Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(7):484–492.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao YM, Widschwendter M, Teschendorff AE. A systems-level integrative framework for genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data identifies differential gene expression modules under epigenetic control. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(16):2360–2366.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Huang K. Pan-cancer analysis of frequent DNA co-methylation patterns reveals consistent epigenetic landscape changes in multiple cancers. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(Suppl 1):1045.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay S, Mallik S. Integrating multiple data sources for combinatorial marker discovery: a study in tumorigenesis. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. Volume: 15, Issue: 2, page: 673–687, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Mallik S, Mukhopadhyay A, Maulik U, et al., Integrated analysis of gene expression and genome-wide DNA methylation for tumor prediction: an association rule mining-based approach. Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2013 IEEE Symposium on; 2013:Singapore, Singapore, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Maulik U, Mallik S, Mukhopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay, S. Analyzing large gene expression and methylation data profiles using StatBicRM: statistical biclustering-based rule mining. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0119448.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Liu Z, Zhang Z, et al. Multiple network algorithm for epigenetic modules via the integration of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):72. .
   Google Scholar
• Hao X, Luo H, Krawczyk M, et al. DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of common cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(28):7414–7419. .
   Google Scholar
• Bhadra T, Mallik S, Bandyopadhyay S. Identification of multi-view gene modules using mutual information based hypograph mining. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2019;49(6):1119–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Mallik S, Zhao Z. Graph- and rule-based learning algorithms: a comprehensive review of their applications for cancer type classification and prognosis using genomic data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;21(2):368–394.
   Google Scholar
• Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):559.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang QH, Wang YD, Hao YY, et al. miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D98–D104.
   Google Scholar
• Ruepp A, Kowarsch A, Theis F. PhenomiR: microRNAs in human diseases and biological processes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;822:249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Qiu C, Tu J, et al. HMDD v2.0: a database for experimentally supported human microRNA and disease associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Databaseissue):D1070–4.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao X, Sherman BT, Huang da W, et al. DAVID-WS: a stateful web service to facilitate gene/protein list analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(13):1805–1806. .
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini YYH. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57(1): 12. Series B.
   Google Scholar
• Beishline K, Azizkhan-Clifford J. Sp1 and the ‘hallmarks of cancer’. Febs J. 2015;282(2):224–258.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner MS, Wajner SM, Maia AL. The role of thyroid hormone in testicular development and function. J Endocrinol. 2008;199(3):351–365.
   Google Scholar
• Jia P, Zheng S, Long J, et al. dmGWAS: dense module searching for genome-wide association studies in protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(1):95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Jia P, Zhao Z. VarWalker: personalized mutation network analysis of putative cancer genes from next-generation sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(2):e1003460.
   Google Scholar
• Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Databaseissue):D108–10. .
   Google Scholar
• V, Bell GW, Nam JW, et al. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 2015;4:e05005.
   Google Scholar
• Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, et al. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Databaseissue):D149–53. .
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz M, Iovino N, Unnerstall U, et al. The role of site accessibility in microRNA target recognition. Nat Genet. 2007;39(10):1278–1284. .
   Google Scholar
• Hsu SD, Lin FM, Wu WY, et al. miRTarBase: a database curates experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D163–9. .
   Google Scholar
• Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(9):5116–5121.
   Google Scholar
• Mallik S S., Mukhopadhyay A. A Survey and Comparative Study of Statistical Tests for Identifying Differential Expression from Microarray Data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2014;11(1):95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Greenbaum D, Lu H X, et al. Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet. 2004;20(6):227–231. .
   Google Scholar