A simple, rapid, interpretable, actionable and implementable digital PCR based mortality index

References

• Rapsang AG, Shyam DC. Scoring systems in the intensive care unit: a compendium. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:220.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins JD, Smith BD, Vance RN, et al. Risk classification in life insurance. Springer Science & Business Media. Netherlands: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fraga MF, Esteller M. Epigenetics and aging: the targets and the marks. Trends Genet. 2007;23:413–418.
   Google Scholar
• Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. Plos One. 2011;6(6):e14821.
   Google Scholar
• Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49(2):359–367.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):3156.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Schöttker B, Florath I, et al. Smoking-associated DNA methylation biomarkers and their predictive value for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Env Health Perspect. 2015;124:67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Saum K-U, Schöttker B, et al. Methylomic survival predictors, frailty, and mortality. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:339.
   Google Scholar
• Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:573.
   Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):208.
   Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Bizet M, et al. A comprehensive overview of Infinium HumanMethylation450 data processing. Brief Bioinform. 2013;15:929–941.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y-A, Lemire M, Choufani S, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8:203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani E, Shenhav L, Schweiger R, et al. Genome-wide methylation data mirror ancestry information. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2017;10(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert RA, Terry N, Erwin C, et al. Methylation array data can simultaneously identify individuals and convey protected health information: an unrecognized ethical concern. Clin Epigenetics. 2014;6(1):28.
   Google Scholar
• Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(2):303.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert R, Beach SRH, Lei M-K, et al. Array-based epigenetic aging indices may be racially biased. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(6):685.
   Google Scholar
• Issa J-P. Aging and epigenetic drift: a vicious cycle. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Martin GM. Epigenetic drift in aging identical twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10413–10414.
   Google Scholar
• Field AE, Robertson NA, Wang T, et al. DNA methylation clocks in aging: categories, causes, and consequences. Mol Cell. 2018;71:882–895.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert RA, Gunter TD, Beach SR, et al. MAOA methylation is associated with nicotine and alcohol dependence in women. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;147B:565–570.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert R, Dogan M, Beach SRH, et al. AHRR methylation predicts smoking status and smoking intensity in both saliva and blood DNA. Am J of Genet. 2019;183:51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert R, Miller S, Noel A, et al. A four marker digital PCR toolkit for detecting heavy alcohol consumption and the effectiveness of its treatment. J Insur Med. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17849/insm-48-1-1-1.1
   Google Scholar
• Park SL, Patel YM, Loo LWM, et al. Association of internal smoking dose with blood DNA methylation in three racial/ethnic populations. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10(1):110.
   Google Scholar
• Mills JA, Beach S, Dogan M, et al. A direct comparison of the relationship of epigenetic aging and epigenetic substance consumption markers to mortality in the Framingham heart study. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(1):51.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers JC, Loh M, Lehne B, et al. Epigenome-wide association of DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood from Indian Asians and Europeans with incident type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(7):526–534.
   Google Scholar
• Soriano-Tárraga C, Jiménez-Conde J, Giralt-Steinhauer E, et al. Epigenome-wide association study identifies TXNIP gene associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sustained hyperglycemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;25(3):609–619.
   Google Scholar
• Florath I, Butterbach K, Heiss J, et al. Type 2 diabetes and leucocyte DNA methylation: an epigenome-wide association study in over 1,500 older adults. Diabetologia. 2016;59(1):130–138.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan MV, Beach SRH, Philibert RA. Genetically contextual effects of smoking on genome wide DNA methylation. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2017;174:595–607.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel-Hurtado O, Guest R, Stevenage SV, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers and linear/logistic regression to explore the relationship between hand dimensions and demographic characteristics. Plos One. 2016;11:e0165521.
   Google Scholar
• Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. Points of significance: statistics versus machine learning. Nature Methods. 2018;15(04):233–234
   Google Scholar
• Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan M, Beach S, Simons R, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for predicting the risk for five-year incident coronary heart disease in the Framingham heart study via machine learning. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(12):641.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan MV, Grumbach IM, Michaelson JJ, et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic prediction of coronary heart disease in the Framingham Heart Study. PloS One. 2018;13:e0190549.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan MV, Knight S, Dogan T, et al. External validation of integrated genetic-epigenetic biomarkers for predicting incident coronary heart disease. (In Submission).
   Google Scholar
• Garrison RJ, Castelli WP, Feinleib M, et al. The association of total cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma lipoprotein cholesterol levels in first degree relatives and spouse pairs. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110(3):313–321.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Cleveland MJ, et al. Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: a panel study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86:517–529.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes K, Andersen A, Papworth E, et al. Refinement of cg05575921 demethylation response in nascent smoking. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Wong CC, Volta M, et al. A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao CW, Vasan RS. Cohort profile: the Framingham Heart Study (FHS): overview of milestones in cardiovascular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(6):1800–1813.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1972;34:187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–2546.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied survival analysis: regression modelling of time to event data (1999). Eur Orthodontic Soc. 1999;561–562.
   Google Scholar
• Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19:716–723.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell FE Jr. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. New York, NY: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bonferroni CE, Bonferroni C, Bonferroni C Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita’. 1936.
   Google Scholar
• Ogutu JO, Schulz-Streeck T, Piepho H-P. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions. BMC Proc. 2012;6:S10.
   Google Scholar
• Vasanthakumar A, Davis JW, Idler K, et al. Harnessing peripheral DNA methylation differences in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to reveal novel biomarkers of disease. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Quantitative comparison of DNA methylation assays for biomarker development and clinical applications. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:726.
   Google Scholar
• Health, U.S.D.o. & Services, H. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Miller S, Mills JA, Long J, et al. Comparison of the predictive power of DNA methylation with carbohydrate deficient transferrin for heavy alcohol consumption. (In Submission).
   Google Scholar
• Philibert R, Miller S, Noel A, et al. A Four Marker Digital PCR Toolkit for Detecting Heavy Alcohol Consumption and the Effectiveness of Its Treatment. Journal of Insurance Medicine. 2019;48(1):90–102
   Google Scholar
• Dupras C, Beck S, Rothstein MA, et al. Potential (mis) use of epigenetic age estimators by private companies and public agencies: human rights law should provide ethical guidance. Environ Epigenet. 2019;5:dvz018.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan MV, Xiang J, Beach SRH, et al. Ethnicity and Smoking-Associated DNA Methylation Changes at HIV Co-Receptor GPR15. Front Psychiatry. 2015;6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00132
   Google Scholar
• Philibert R, Dogan M, Noel A, et al. Genome-wide and digital polymerase chain reaction epigenetic assessments of alcohol consumption. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018;177(5):479–488.
   Google Scholar
• Huan T, Joehanes R, Song C, et al. Genome-wide identification of DNA methylation QTLs in whole blood highlights pathways for cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4267.
   Google Scholar
• Bellentani S. The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2017;37:81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tharwat A. Classification assessment methods. Appl Comput Inf. 2020. [ahead-of-print ahead-of-print]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
   Google Scholar