Epigenetic targeting of transposon relics: beating the dead horses of the genome?

References

• Bousios A, Gaut BS. Mechanistic and evolutionary questions about epigenetic conflicts between transposable elements and their plant hosts. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016;30:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Cosby RL, Chang N-C, Feschotte C. Host–transposon interactions: conflict, cooperation, and cooption. Genes Dev. 2019;33:1098–1116.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan DJ. Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution. Trends Genet. 1989;5:103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Todorovska E. Retrotransposons and their role in plant—genome evolution. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2007;21:294–305.
   Google Scholar
• Goodier JL. Restricting retrotransposons: a review. Mob DNA. 2016;7(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-016-0070-z.
   Google Scholar
• Grandi N, Tramontano E. Human endogenous retroviruses are ancient acquired elements still shaping innate immune responses. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2039.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstiel JP. Birth, school, work, death, and resurrection: the life stages and dynamics of transposable element proliferation. Genes (Basel). 2019;10:336.
   Google Scholar
• Cogoni C, Macino G. Post-transcriptional gene silencing across kingdoms. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000;10:638–643.
   Google Scholar
• Girard A, Hannon GJ. Conserved themes in small-RNA-mediated transposon control. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:136–148.
   Google Scholar
• Cuerda-Gil D, Slotkin RK. Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat Plants. 2016;2:16163.
   Google Scholar
• Brennecke J, Aravin AA, Stark A, et al. Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell. 2007;128:1089–1103.
   Google Scholar
• Weick E-M, A E. Miska, piRNAs: from biogenesis to function. Development. 2014;141:3458–3471.
   Google Scholar
• Nandini VB. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), derived insertional polymorphism as a tool of marker systems for molecular plant breeding. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47:3155–3167.
   Google Scholar
• Nuzhdin SV. Transposable elements and genome evolution. In: McDonald JF, editor. Georgia genetics review. Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2000. p. 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Zemach A, Kim MY, Hsieh P-H, et al. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell. 2013;153:193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud H, Do T, Du J, et al. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Baulcombe DC. Transposon age and non-CG methylation. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1221.
   Google Scholar
• Bousios A, Diez CM, Takuno S, et al. A role for palindromic structures in the cis-region of maize Sirevirus LTRs in transposable element evolution and host epigenetic response. Genome Res. 2016;26:226–237.
   Google Scholar
• Bonasio R, Tu S, Reinberg D. Molecular signals of epigenetic states. Science. 2010;330:612–616.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira FK, Heredia F, Sarazin A, et al. A role for RNAi in the selective correction of DNA methylation defects. Science. 2009;323:1600–1604.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang D-L, Huang H, et al. Epigenetic memory marks determine epiallele stability at loci targeted by de novo DNA methylation. Nat Plants. 2020;6:661–674.
   Google Scholar
• Molinier J. To be, or not to be, remethylated. Nat Plants. 2020;6:606–607.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. PNAS. 2007;104:8597–8604.
   Google Scholar
• Bird A. The selfishness of law-abiding genes. Trends Genet. 2020;36:8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hollister JD, Gaut BS. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res. 2009;19:1419–1428.
   Google Scholar
• Gray YH. It takes two transposons to tango: transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements. Trends Genet. 2000;16:461–468.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan HD, Sutherland HGE, Martin DIK, et al. Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat Genet. 1999;23:314–318.
   Google Scholar
• Martin A, Troadec C, Boualem A, et al. A transposon-induced epigenetic change leads to sex determination in melon. Nature. 2009;461:1135–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Saito K, Nishida KM, Mori T, et al. Specific association of Piwi with rasiRNAs derived from retrotransposon and heterochromatic regions in the Drosophila genome. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2214–2222.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh T-F, Ibarra CA, Silva P, et al. Genome-wide demethylation of arabidopsis endosperm. Science. 2009;324:1451–1454.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Sarazin A, Bowler C, et al. Genome-wide evidence for local DNA methylation spreading from small RNA-targeted sequences in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:6919–6931.
   Google Scholar
• Bourque G, Burns KH, Gehring M, et al. Ten things you should know about transposable elements. Genome Biol. 2018;19:199.
   Google Scholar
• Maumus F, Quesneville H. Ancestral repeats have shaped epigenome and genome composition for millions of years in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4104.
   Google Scholar
• Batista RA, Moreno-Romero J, Qiu Y, et al. The MADS-box transcription factor PHERES1 controls imprinting in the endosperm by binding to domesticated transposons. eLife. 2019;8:e50541.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YCG, Karpen GH. Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution. eLife. 2017;6:e25762.
   Google Scholar
• Stritt C, Gordon SP, Wicker T, et al. Recent activity in expanding populations and purifying selection have shaped transposable element landscapes across natural accessions of the Mediterranean grass brachypodium distachyon. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:304–318.
   Google Scholar
• Maumus F, Quesneville H. Impact and insights from ancient repetitive elements in plant genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016;30:41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra CA, Feng X, Schoft VK, et al. Active DNA demethylation in plant companion cells reinforces transposon methylation in gametes. Science. 2012;337:1360–1364.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Ferguson AA, Jiang N. What makes up plant genomes: the vanishing line between transposable elements and genes. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2016;1859:366–380.
   Google Scholar
• Osakabe A, Jamge B, Axelsson E, et al. The chromatin remodeler DDM1 prevents transposon mobility through deposition of histone variant H2A.W. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23:391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Lonnig W-E, Saedler H. Chromosome rearrangements and transposable elements. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:389–410.
   Google Scholar
• Lim JK, Simmons MJ. Gross chromosome rearrangements mediated by transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays. 1994;16:269–275.
   Google Scholar
• Mérel V, Boulesteix M, Fablet M, et al. Transposable elements in Drosophila. Mob DNA. 2020;11:23.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov DA, Aminetzach YT, Davis JC, et al. Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:880–892.
   Google Scholar
• Evgen’ev M, Zelentsova H, Mnjoian L, et al. Invasion of Drosophila virilis by the Penelope transposable element. Chromosoma. 2000;109:350–357.
   Google Scholar
• Delprat A, Negre B, Puig M, et al. The Transposon Galileo generates natural chromosomal inversions in Drosophila by ectopic recombination. PLOS ONE. 2009;4:e7883.
   Google Scholar
• Yu C, Han F, Zhang J, et al. A transgenic system for generation of transposon Ac/Ds-induced chromosome rearrangements in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125:1449–1462.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella G, Hashimoto K, Busch A, et al. Recombination of repeat elements generates somatic complexity in human genomes . bioRxiv 2021. DOI:10.1101/2020.07.02.163816.
   Google Scholar
• Kent TV, Uzunović J, Wright SI. Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2017;372:20160458.
   Google Scholar
• Termolino P, Cremona G, Consiglio MF, et al. Insights into epigenetic landscape of recombination-free regions. Chromosoma. 2016;125:301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Myers S, Freeman C, Auton A, et al. A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1124–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Mirouze M, Lieberman-Lazarovich M, Aversano R, et al. Loss of DNA methylation affects the recombination landscape in Arabidopsis. PNAS. 2012;109:5880–5885.
   Google Scholar
• Zamudio N, Barau J, Teissandier A, et al. DNA methylation restrains transposons from adopting a chromatin signature permissive for meiotic recombination. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1256–1270.
   Google Scholar
• Okita AK, Zafar F, Su J, et al. Heterochromatin suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements at centromeres by repressing Tfs1/TFIIS-dependent transcription. Commun Biol. 2019;2:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Marand AP, Jansky SH, Zhao H, et al. Meiotic crossovers are associated with open chromatin and enriched with Stowaway transposons in potato. Genome Biol. 2017;18:203.
   Google Scholar
• Guo C, Spinelli M, Ye C, et al. Genome-wide comparative analysis of miniature inverted repeat transposable elements in 19 arabidopsis thaliana ecotype accessions. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2634.
   Google Scholar
• Hermant C, Torres-Padilla M-E. TFs for TEs: the transcription factor repertoire of mammalian transposable elements. Genes Dev. 2021;35:22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan IK, Rogozin IB, Glazko GV, et al. Origin of a substantial fraction of human regulatory sequences from transposable elements. Trends Genet. 2003;19:68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Miao B, Fu S, Lyu C, et al. Tissue-specific usage of transposable element-derived promoters in mouse development. Genome Biol. 2020;21:255.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram V, Cheng Y, Ma Z, et al. Widespread contribution of transposable elements to the innovation of gene regulatory networks. Genome Res. 2014;24:1963–1976.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson ME, Ludvik Brattås P, Gustafsson C, et al. Activation of neuronal genes via LINE-1 elements upon global DNA demethylation in human neural progenitors. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3182.
   Google Scholar
• Denli AM, Narvaiza I, Kerman BE, et al. Primate-specific ORF0 contributes to retrotransposon-mediated diversity. Cell. 2015;163:583–593.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton EA, Rishishwar L, Huang T-C, et al. An atlas of transposable element-derived alternative splicing in cancer. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2020;375:20190342.
   Google Scholar
• Le TN, Miyazaki Y, Takuno S, et al. Epigenetic regulation of intragenic transposable elements impacts gene transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:3911–3921.
   Google Scholar
• Dolinoy DC. The agouti mouse model: an epigenetic biosensor for nutritional and environmental alterations on the fetal epigenome. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:S7–S11.
   Google Scholar
• Williams BP, Pignatta D, Henikoff S, et al. Methylation-sensitive expression of a DNA demethylase gene serves as an epigenetic rheostat. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005142.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YCG. The role of piRNA-mediated epigenetic silencing in the population dynamics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005269.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Slotte T. The Role of Small RNA-Based Epigenetic Silencing for Purifying Selection on Transposable Elements in Capsella grandiflora. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:2911–2920.
   Google Scholar
• Penterman J, Zilberman D, Huh JH, et al. DNA demethylation in the Arabidopsis genome. PNAS. 2007;104:6752–6757.
   Google Scholar
• Saze H, Shiraishi A, Miura A, et al. Control of genic DNA methylation by a jmjC domain-containing protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2008;319:462–465.
   Google Scholar
• Espinas NA, Tu LN, Furci L, et al. Transcriptional regulation of genes bearing intronic heterochromatin in the rice genome. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1008637.
   Google Scholar
• Saze H, Kitayama J, Takashima K, et al. Mechanism for full-length RNA processing of Arabidopsis genes containing intragenic heterochromatin. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2301.
   Google Scholar
• Walter M, Teissandier A, Pérez-Palacios R, et al. An epigenetic switch ensures transposon repression upon dynamic loss of DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. eLife. 2016;5:e11418.
   Google Scholar
• Maupetit-Mehouas S, Vaury C. Transposon reactivation in the germline may Be useful for both transposons and their host genomes. Cells. 2020;9:1172.
   Google Scholar
• Olovnikov I, Chan K, Sachidanandam R, et al. Bacterial argonaute samples the transcriptome to identify foreign DNA. Mol Cell. 2013;51:594–605.
   Google Scholar
• Shpiz S, Ryazansky S, Olovnikov I, et al. Euchromatic transposon insertions trigger production of novel Pi- and Endo-siRNAs at the target sites in the Drosophila germline. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004138.
   Google Scholar
• Song J, Liu J, Schnakenberg SL, et al. Variation in piRNA and transposable element content in strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:2786–2798.
   Google Scholar
• Ronsseray S, Lehmann M, Anxolabehere D. The maternally inherited regulation of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster can be elicited by two P copies at cytological site 1a on the X chromosome. Genetics. 1991;129:501–512.
   Google Scholar
• Rozhkov NV, Hammell M, Hannon GJ. Multiple roles for Piwi in silencing Drosophila transposons. Genes Dev. 2013;27:400–412.
   Google Scholar
• Zanni V, Eymery A, Coiffet M, et al. Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:19842–19847.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison CE, Kagda MS, Cao W. Telomeric TART elements target the piRNA machinery in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000689.
   Google Scholar
• Luo S, Lu J. Silencing of transposable elements by piRNAs in Drosophila: an evolutionary perspective. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2017;15:164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Zemach A, Kim MY, Silva P, et al. Local DNA hypomethylation activates genes in rice endosperm. PNAS. 2010;107:18729–18734.
   Google Scholar
• Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MTA, et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell. 2012;151:194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez G, Panda K, Köhler C, et al. Silencing in sperm cells is directed by RNA movement from the surrounding nurse cell. Nat Plants. 2016;2:16030.
   Google Scholar
• Anzelon TA, Chowdhury S, Hughes SM, et al. Structural basis for piRNA-targeting . bioRxiv. 2020. DOI:10.1101/2020.12.07.413112.
   Google Scholar
• Fei Y, Nyikó T, Molnar A. Non-perfectly matching small RNAs can induce stable and heritable epigenetic modifications and can be used as molecular markers to trace the origin and fate of silencing RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:1900–1913.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert C, Feschotte C. Horizontal acquisition of transposable elements and viral sequences: patterns and consequences. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;49:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert C, Schaack S, Pace JK, et al. A role for host-parasite interactions in the horizontal transfer of DNA transposons across animal phyla. Nature. 2010;464:1347–1350.
   Google Scholar
• Obbard DJ, Gordon KHJ, Buck AH, et al. The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liang W, Tang T. Constant conflict between Gypsy LTR retrotransposons and CHH methylation within a stress-adapted mangrove genome. New Phytol. 2018;220:922–935.
   Google Scholar
• Lisch D. Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lisch D, Slotkin RK. Strategies for silencing and escape: the ancient struggle between transposable elements and their hosts. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2011;292:119–152.
   Google Scholar
• Lisch D, Bennetzen JL. Transposable element origins of epigenetic gene regulation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14:156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Moelling K, Broecker F. Viruses and evolution – viruses first? A personal perspective. Front Microbiol. 2019;10. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00523.
   Google Scholar
• Chiba S, Kondo H, Tani A, et al. Widespread endogenization of genome sequences of non-retroviral RNA viruses into plant genomes. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(7):e1002146.
   Google Scholar
• Horie M, Honda T, Suzuki Y, et al. Endogenous non-retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes. Nature. 2010;463:84–87.
   Google Scholar
• Chu H, Jo Y, Cho WK. Evolution of endogenous non-retroviral genes integrated into plant genomes. Curr Plant Biol. 2014;1:55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Palatini U, Miesen P, Carballar-Lejarazu R, et al. Comparative genomics shows that viral integrations are abundant and express piRNAs in the arboviral vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:512.
   Google Scholar
• Sun YH, Xie LH, Zhuo X, et al. Domestic chickens activate a piRNA defense against avian leukosis virus. eLife. 2017;6. DOI:10.7554/eLife.24695.
   Google Scholar
• Petit M, Mongelli V, Frangeul L, et al. piRNA pathway is not required for antiviral defense in Drosophila melanogaster. PNAS. 2016;113:E4218–E4227.
   Google Scholar
• Denkena J, Johannes F, Colomé-Tatché M. Region-level epimutation rates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity. 2021. 127: 190–202. DOI:10.1101/2020.08.18.255919.
   Google Scholar
• Jeggo PA, Holliday R. Azacytidine-induced reactivation of a DNA repair gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:2944–2949.
   Google Scholar
• Ashapkin VV, Kutueva LI, Vanyushin BF. Epigenetic variability in plants: heritability, adaptability, evolutionary significance. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2016;63:181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Pignatta D, Novitzky K, Satyaki PRV, et al. A variably imprinted epiallele impacts seed development. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007469.
   Google Scholar
• Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. Molecular paleontology of transposable elements from Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetica. 1999;107:27–37.
   Google Scholar
• McCue AD, Nuthikattu S, Slotkin RK. Genome-wide identification of genes regulated in trans by transposable element small interfering RNAs. RNA Biol. 2013;10:1379–1395.
   Google Scholar
• Manning K, Tör M, Poole M, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet. 2006;38:948–952.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Kong J, Qin C, et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for somatic inheritance of the spontaneous tomato epimutation Colourless non-ripening. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9192.
   Google Scholar
• Maumus F, Quesneville H. Deep investigation of arabidopsis thaliana junk DNA reveals a continuum between repetitive elements and genomic dark matter. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e94101.
   Google Scholar
• Baduel P, Colot V. The epiallelic potential of transposable elements and its evolutionary significance in plants. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2021;376:20200123.
   Google Scholar