1,261
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Prenatal Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Epigenetic Alterations at Birth Among Children Born to White British and Pakistani Mothers in the Born in Bradford Study

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 1976-1990 | Received 07 Jan 2022, Accepted 29 Jun 2022, Published online: 14 Jul 2022

References

  • Barker D. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(sup6):588S–595S.
  • Raat H, Wijtzes A, Jaddoe VW, et al. The health impact of social disadvantage in early childhood; the Generation R study. Early Hum Dev. 2011;87(11):729–733.
  • Demetriou CA, van Veldhoven K, Relton C, et al. Biological embedding of early-life exposures and disease risk in humans: a role for DNA methylation. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(3):303–332.
  • Simanek AM, Auer PL. Early life socioeconomic disadvantage and epigenetic programming of a pro-inflammatory phenotype: a review of recent evidence. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018;5(4):407–417.
  • Maddock J, Wulaningsih W, Fernandez JC, et al. Associations between body size, nutrition and socioeconomic position in early life and the epigenome: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201672.
  • Perera F, Herbstman J. Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;31(3):363–373.
  • Slopen N, Loucks EB, Appleton AA, et al. Early origins of inflammation: an examination of prenatal and childhood social adversity in a prospective cohort study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;51:403–413.
  • Needham BL, Smith JA, Zhao W, et al. Life course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation in genes related to stress reactivity and inflammation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Epigenetics. 2015;10(10):958–969.
  • Alfano R, Guida F, Galobardes B, et al. Socioeconomic position during pregnancy and DNA methylation signatures at three stages across early life: epigenome-wide association studies in the ALSPAC birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;48(1):30–44.
  • McDade TW, Ryan C, Jones MJ, et al. Social and physical environments early in development predict DNA methylation of inflammatory genes in young adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(29):7611–7616.
  • Stringhini S, Polidoro S, Sacerdote C, et al. Life-course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation of genes regulating inflammation. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1320–1330.
  • Herbstman JB, Wang S, Perera FP, et al. Predictors and consequences of global DNA methylation in cord blood and at three years. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(9):e72824.
  • Coker ES, Gunier R, Huen K, et al. DNA methylation and socioeconomic status in a Mexican-American birth cohort. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10(1):61.
  • Tehranifar P, Wu HC, Fan X, et al. Early life socioeconomic factors and genomic DNA methylation in mid-life. Epigenetics. 2013;8(1):23–27.
  • King K, Murphy S, Hoyo C. Epigenetic regulation of Newborns’ imprinted genes related to gestational growth: patterning by parental race/ethnicity and maternal socioeconomic status. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(7):639–647.
  • King KE, Kane JB, Scarbrough P, et al. Neighborhood and family environment of expectant mothers may influence prenatal programming of adult cancer risk: discussion and an illustrative DNA methylation example. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2016;62(1):87–104.
  • Piyasena C, Cartier J, Provençal N, et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation occur during the first year of life in preterm infants. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016;7:158.
  • Shabalin AA, Aberg KA, van den Oord EJCG. Candidate gene methylation studies are at high risk of erroneous conclusions. Epigenomics. 2015;7(1):13–15.
  • Laubach ZM, Perng W, Cardenas A, et al. Socioeconomic status and DNA methylation from birth through mid-childhood: a prospective study in project viva. Epigenomics. 2019;11(12):1413–1427.
  • Fischbacher CM, Cezard G, Bhopal RS, et al. Measures of socioeconomic position are not consistently associated with ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease in Scotland: methods from the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study (SHELS). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):129–139.
  • Aveyard P, Cheng KK, Manaseki S, et al. The risk of preterm delivery in women from different ethnic groups. Bjog. 2002;109(8):894–899.
  • Bhopal R, Hayes L, White M, et al. Ethnic and socio-economic inequalities in coronary heart disease, diabetes and risk factors in Europeans and South Asians. J Public Health Med. 2002;24(2):95–105.
  • Teitler JO, Reichman NE, Nepomnyaschy L, et al. Comparison of racial and ethnic disparities in low birth weight in the United States and England. Pediatrics. 2007;120(5):e1182–e1189.
  • Uphoff EP, Pickett KE, Wright J. Social gradients in health for Pakistani and White British women and infants in two UK birth cohorts. Ethn Health. 2016;21(5):452–467.
  • Mallicoat B. Estimating social gradients in health for UK mothers and infants of Pakistani origin: Do latent class measures of socioeconomic position help? J Immigr Minor Health. 2020;22(6):1255–1264.
  • Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, et al. Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;42(4):978–991.
  • Noble MM, Wilkinson D, Whitworth K, et al. The English indices of deprivation 2007. London UK: Department for Communities and Local Government, HMSO; 2008.
  • West J, Wright J, Fairley L, et al. Do ethnic differences in cord blood leptin levels differ by birthweight category? Findings from the Born in Bradford cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):249–254.
  • Min JL, Hemani G, Davey Smith G, et al. Meffil: efficient normalization and analysis of very large DNA methylation datasets. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(23):3983–3989.
  • Reinius LE, Acevedo N, Joerink M, et al. Differential DNA methylation in purified human blood cells: implications for cell lineage and studies on disease susceptibility. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41361.
  • Xie C, Leung Y, Chen A, et al. Differential methylation values in differential methylation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(7):1094–1097.
  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–300.
  • Greenberg F, Lewis RA, Potocki L, et al. Multi-disciplinary clinical study of Smith-Magenis syndrome (deletion 17p11.2). Am J Med Genet A. 1996;62(3):247–254.
  • Edelman EA, Girirajan S, Finucane B, et al. Gender, genotype, and phenotype differences in Smith-Magenis syndrome: a meta-analysis of 105 cases. Clin Genet. 2007;71(6):540–550.
  • Lahtinen A, Puttonen S, Vanttola P, et al. A distinctive DNA methylation pattern in insufficient sleep. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1193.
  • Iqbal Z, Willemsen MH, Papon M-A, et al. Homozygous SLC6A17 mutations cause autosomal-recessive intellectual disability with progressive tremor, speech impairment, and behavioral problems. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(3):386–396.
  • Nowak AL, Anderson CM, Mackos AR, et al. Stress during pregnancy and epigenetic modifications to offspring DNA: a systematic review of associations and implications for preterm birth. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020;34(2):134–145.
  • Walsh K, McCormack CA, Webster R, et al. Maternal prenatal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2019;116(48):23996–24005.
  • Elsenbruch S, Benson S, Rücke M, et al. Social support during pregnancy: effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;22(3):869–877.
  • Murphy SK, Adigun A, Huang Z, et al. Gender-specific methylation differences in relation to prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke. Gene. 2012;494(1):36–43.
  • Bale TL. Sex differences in prenatal epigenetic programming of stress pathways. Stress. 2011;14(4):348–356.