Context-dependent CpG methylation directs cell-specific binding of transcription factor ZBTB38

References

• Tirado-Magallanes R, Rebbani K, Lim R, et al. Whole genome DNA methylation: beyond genes silencing. Oncotarget. 2017;8:5629–5637.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg MVC, Bourc’his D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:590–607.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi K, Chen X, Oji A, et al. Large-scale chromatin rearrangements in cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:2384.
   Google Scholar
• Baubec T, Defossez P-A. Reading DNA modifications. J Mol Biol. 2020;S0022-2836(20):30096.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier A, Sasai N, Nakao M, et al. The role of methyl-binding proteins in chromatin organization and epigenome maintenance. Brief Funct Genomics. 2012;11:251–264.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Koehntop BA, Defossez P-A. On how mammalian transcription factors recognize methylated DNA. Epigenetics. 2013;8:131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Héberlé É, Bardet AF. Sensitivity of transcription factors to DNA methylation. Essays Biochem. 2019;63:727–741.
   Google Scholar
• Xuan Lin QX, Sian S, An O, et al. MethMotif: an integrative cell specific database of transcription factor binding motifs coupled with DNA methylation profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D145–D154.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Luo X, Wang J, et al. MeDReaders: a database for transcription factors that bind to methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D146–D151.
   Google Scholar
• Baubec T, Ivánek R, Lienert F, et al. Methylation-dependent and -independent genomic targeting principles of the MBD protein family. Cell. 2013;153:480–492.
   Google Scholar
• Spruijt CG, Gnerlich F, Smits AH, et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell. 2013;152:1146–1159.
   Google Scholar
• Bartke T, Vermeulen M, Xhemalce B, et al. Nucleosome-interacting proteins regulated by DNA and histone methylation. Cell. 2010;143:470–484.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Wang G, Qian J. Transcription factors as readers and effectors of DNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:551–565.
   Google Scholar
• Kribelbauer JF, Laptenko O, Chen S, et al. Quantitative analysis of the DNA methylation sensitivity of transcription factor complexes. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2383–2395.
   Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Morgunova E, Jolma A, et al. Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding specificities of human transcription factors. Science. 2017;356. DOI:10.1126/science.aaj2239.
   Google Scholar
• Hu S, Wan J, Su Y, et al. DNA methylation presents distinct binding sites for human transcription factors. eLife. 2013;2:e00726.
   Google Scholar
• Luo X, Zhang T, Zhai Y, et al. Effects of DNA methylation on TFs in human embryonic stem cells. Front Genet. 2021;12:639461.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo Z, Roy B, Chang YK, et al. Measuring quantitative effects of methylation on transcription factor-DNA binding affinity. Sci Adv. 2017;3:eaao1799.
   Google Scholar
• Quenneville S, Verde G, Corsinotti A, et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol Cell. 2011;44:361–372.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Olanrewaju YO, Zheng Y, et al. Structural basis for Klf4 recognition of methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:4859–4867.
   Google Scholar
• Zandarashvili L, White MA, Esadze A, et al. Structural impact of complete CpG methylation within target DNA on specific complex formation of the inducible transcription factor Egr-1. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:1748–1753.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhortchouk A, Hendrich B, Jørgensen H, et al. The p120 catenin partner Kaiso is a DNA methylation-dependent transcriptional repressor. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1613–1618.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Koehntop BA, Stanfield RL, Ekiert DC, et al. Molecular basis for recognition of methylated and specific DNA sequences by the zinc finger protein Kaiso. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:15229–15234.
   Google Scholar
• Sasai N, Nakao M, Defossez P-A. Sequence-specific recognition of methylated DNA by human zinc-finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:5015–5022.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzov A, Savitskaya E, Hackett JA, et al. The non-methylated DNA-binding function of Kaiso is not required in early Xenopus laevis development. Dev Camb Engl. 2009;136:729–738.
   Google Scholar
• Blattler A, Yao L, Wang Y, et al. ZBTB33 binds unmethylated regions of the genome associated with actively expressed genes. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013;6:13.
   Google Scholar
• Qin S, Zhang B, Tian W, et al. Kaiso mainly locates in the nucleus in vivo and binds to methylated, but not hydroxymethylated DNA. Chin J Cancer Res Chung-Kuo Yen Cheng Yen Chiu. 2015;27:148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Oyinlade O, Wei S, Kammers K, et al. Analysis of KLF4 regulated genes in cancer cells reveals a role of DNA methylation in promoter- enhancer interactions. Epigenetics. 2018;13:751–768.
   Google Scholar
• Filion GJP, Zhenilo S, Salozhin S, et al. A family of human zinc finger proteins that bind methylated DNA and repress transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Pozner A, Hudson NO, Trewhella J, et al. The C-terminal zinc fingers of ZBTB38 are novel selective readers of DNA methylation. J Mol Biol. 2017;430:258–271.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson NO, Whitby FG, Buck-Koehntop BA. Structural insights into methylated DNA recognition by the C-terminal zinc fingers of the DNA reader protein ZBTB38. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:19835–19843.
   Google Scholar
• de Dieuleveult M, Miotto B. DNA methylation and chromatin: role(s) of methyl-CpG-binding protein ZBTB38. Epigenetics Insights. 2018;11:2516865718811117.
   Google Scholar
• Miotto B, Chibi M, Xie P, et al. The RBBP6/ZBTB38/MCM10 axis regulates DNA replication and common fragile site stability. Cell Rep. 2014;7:575–587.
   Google Scholar
• Miotto B, Marchal C, Adelmant G, et al. Stabilization of the methyl-CpG binding protein ZBTB38 by the deubiquitinase USP9X limits the occurrence and toxicity of oxidative stress in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:4392–4404.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal C, de Dieuleveult M, Saint-Ruf C, et al. Depletion of ZBTB38 potentiates the effects of DNA demethylating agents in cancer cells via CDKN1C mRNA up-regulation. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:82.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Xing C, Yan L, et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals the role of ZBTB38 knock-down in human neuroblastoma. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6352.
   Google Scholar
• de Dieuleveult M, Marchal C, Jouinot A, et al. Molecular and clinical relevance of ZBTB38 expression levels in prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:E1106.
   Google Scholar
• Nishii T, Oikawa Y, Ishida Y, et al. CtBP-interacting BTB zinc finger protein (CIBZ) promotes proliferation and G1/S transition in embryonic stem cells via Nanog. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:12417–12424.
   Google Scholar
• Oikawa Y, Omori R, Nishii T, et al. The methyl-CpG-binding protein CIBZ suppresses myogenic differentiation by directly inhibiting myogenin expression. Cell Res. 2011;21:1578–1590.
   Google Scholar
• Kotoku T, Kosaka K, Nishio M, et al. CIBZ regulates mesodermal and cardiac differentiation of by Suppressing T and Mesp1 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34188.
   Google Scholar
• Nishio M, Matsuura T, Hibi S, et al. Heterozygous loss of Zbtb38 leads to early embryonic lethality via the suppression of Nanog and Sox2 expression. Cell Prolif. 2022;55:e13215.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons S, Stevens A, Whatmore A, et al. Role of ZBTB38 genotype and expression in growth and response to recombinant human growth hormone treatment. J Endocr Soc. 2022;6:bvac006.
   Google Scholar
• Jing J, Liu J, Wang Y, et al. The role of ZBTB38 in promoting migration and invasive growth of bladder cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2019;41:1980–1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ding G, Lu W, Zhang Q, et al. ZBTB38 suppresses prostate cancer cell proliferation and migration via directly promoting DKK1 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:998.
   Google Scholar
• Naciri I, Laisné M, Ferry L, et al. Genetic screens reveal mechanisms for the transcriptional regulation of tissue-specific genes in normal cells and tumors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:3407–3421.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton P, Bonnemaire M, Dutailly P, et al. Characterizing short stature by insulin-like growth factor axis status and genetic associations: results from the prospective, cross-sectional, epidemiogenetic EPIGROW study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1122–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Gudbjartsson DF, Walters GB, Thorleifsson G, et al. Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height. Nat Genet. 2008;40:609–615.
   Google Scholar
• Kim -J-J, Lee H-I, Park T, et al. Identification of 15 loci influencing height in a Korean population. J Hum Genet. 2010;55:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Z, Teng Y, et al. An SNP of the ZBTB38 gene is associated with idiopathic short stature in the Chinese Han population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:402–408.
   Google Scholar
• Cho YS, Go MJ, Kim YJ, et al. A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat Genet. 2009;41:527–534.
   Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, et al. A genome-wide association study in 19 633 Japanese subjects identified LHX3-QSOX2 and IGF1 as adult height loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2303–2312.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka N, Koido M, Suzuki A, et al. Eight novel susceptibility loci and putative causal variants in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:1293–1306.
   Google Scholar
• Mead S, Uphill J, Beck J, et al. Genome-wide association study in multiple human prion diseases suggests genetic risk factors additional to PRNP. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:1897–1906.
   Google Scholar
• Han X, Gharahkhani P, Mitchell P, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies novel loci associated with age-related macular degeneration. J Hum Genet. 2020;65:657–665.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin BH, Tickner J, Zhu K, et al. Characterisation of genetic regulatory effects for osteoporosis risk variants in human osteoclasts. Genome Biol. 2020;21:80.
   Google Scholar
• Kote-Jarai Z, Olama AAA, Giles GG, et al. Seven prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified by a multi-stage genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2011;43:785–791.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:215–216.
   Google Scholar
• Yip KY, Cheng C, Bhardwaj N, et al. Classification of human genomic regions based on experimentally determined binding sites of more than 100 transcription-related factors. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R48.
   Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Wen B, et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat Genet. 2009;41:178–186.
   Google Scholar
• Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011;98:288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Grandi FC, Rosser JM, Newkirk SJ, et al. Retrotransposition creates sloping shores: a graded influence of hypomethylated CpG islands on flanking CpG sites. Genome Res. 2015;25:1135–1146.
   Google Scholar
• ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, et al. Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell. 2008;132:422–433.
   Google Scholar
• Zuin J, Dixon JR, van der Reijden MIJA, et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:996–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Varshney D, Vavrova-Anderson J, Oler AJ, et al. SINE transcription by RNA polymerase III is suppressed by histone methylation but not by DNA methylation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6569.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani CJ, Vasanthakumar A, Madzo J, et al. TET1-mediated hydroxymethylation facilitates hypoxic gene induction in neuroblastoma. Cell Rep. 2014;7:1343–1352.
   Google Scholar
• Vural S, Palmisano A, Reinhold WC, et al. Association of expression of epigenetic molecular factors with DNA methylation and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cell lines. Clin Epigenetics. 2021;13:49.
   Google Scholar
• Najafabadi HS, Mnaimneh S, Schmitges FW, et al. C2H2 zinc finger proteins greatly expand the human regulatory lexicon. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:555–562.
   Google Scholar
• Imbeault M, Helleboid P-Y, Trono D. KRAB zinc-finger proteins contribute to the evolution of gene regulatory networks. Nature. 2017;543:550–554.
   Google Scholar
• Fang F, Xu Y, Chew -K-K, et al. Coactivators p300 and CBP maintain the identity of mouse embryonic stem cells by mediating long-range chromatin structure. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio. 2014;32:1805–1816.
   Google Scholar
• Kerppola TK, Curran T. The transcription activation domains of Fos and Jun induce DNA bending through electrostatic interactions. EMBO J. 1997;16:2907–2916.
   Google Scholar
• Koch C, Moll T, Neuberg M, et al. A role for the transcription factors Mbp1 and Swi4 in progression from G1 to S phase. Science. 1993;261:1551–1557.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes NF, Johnson AL, Breeden L, et al. SWI6 protein is required for transcription of the periodically expressed DNA synthesis genes in budding yeast. Nature. 1992;357:505–508.
   Google Scholar
• Grant GD, Brooks L, Zhang X, et al. Identification of cell cycle-regulated genes periodically expressed in U2OS cells and their regulation by FOXM1 and E2F transcription factors. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:3634–3650.
   Google Scholar
• Campanero MR, Armstrong MI, Flemington EK. CpG methylation as a mechanism for the regulation of E2F activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6481–6486.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield ML, Sherlock G, Saldanha AJ, et al. Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:1977–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C-W, Cheng W-C, Chen C-R, et al. Identification of human housekeeping genes and tissue-selective genes by microarray meta-analysis. PloS One. 2011;6:e22859.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer H, Chatail-Hermitte F, Ravassard P, et al. ZENON, a novel POZ Kruppel-like DNA binding protein associated with differentiation and/or survival of late postmitotic neurons. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1713–1729.
   Google Scholar
• Gordân R, Murphy KF, McCord RP, et al. Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R125.
   Google Scholar
• Siggers T, Reddy J, Barron B, et al. Diversification of transcription factor paralogs via noncanonical modularity in C2H2 zinc finger DNA binding. Mol Cell. 2014;55:640–648.
   Google Scholar
• Badis G, Berger MF, Philippakis AA, et al. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science. 2009;324:1720–1723.
   Google Scholar
• Trimarchi JM, Fairchild B, Verona R, et al. E2F-6, a member of the E2F family that can behave as a transcriptional repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:2850–2855.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar R, Tan PPC, Portales-Casamar E, et al. Meta-analysis of human methylomes reveals stably methylated sequences surrounding CpG islands associated with high gene expression. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2014;7:28.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Coskun V, Tao J, et al. Dnmt3a-dependent nonpromoter DNA methylation facilitates transcription of neurogenic genes. Science. 2010;329:444–448.
   Google Scholar
• Harris CJ, Scheibe M, Wongpalee SP, et al. A DNA methylation reader complex that enhances gene transcription. Science. 2018;362:1182–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Cusanovich DA, Pavlovic B, Pritchard JK, et al. The functional consequences of variation in transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004226.
   Google Scholar
• Wong R, Bhattacharya D, Richard Y. ZBTB38 is dispensable for antibody responses. PloS One. 2020;15:e0235183.
   Google Scholar
• Yasui DH, Peddada S, Bieda MC, et al. Integrated epigenomic analyses of neuronal MeCP2 reveal a role for long-range interaction with active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19416–19421.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fiore B, Palena A, Felsani A, et al. Cytosine methylation transforms an E2F site in the retinoblastoma gene promoter into a binding site for the general repressor methylcytosine-binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:2852–2859.
   Google Scholar
• Patel A, Yang P, Tinkham M, et al. DNA conformation induces adaptable binding by Tandem zinc finger proteins. Cell. 2018;173:221–233.e12.
   Google Scholar
• Shen N, Zhao J, Schipper JL, et al. Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding. Cell Syst. 2018;6:470–483.e8.
   Google Scholar
• Samee MAH, Bruneau BG, Pollard KS. A De Novo shape motif discovery algorithm reveals preferences of transcription factors for DNA shape beyond sequence motifs. Cell Syst. 2019;8:27–42.e6.
   Google Scholar
• Bonder MJ, Luijk R, Zhernakova DV, et al. Disease variants alter transcription factor levels and methylation of their binding sites. Nat Genet. 2017;49:131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra A, Mitry D, Wright A, et al. Genome-wide association studies: applications and insights gained in ophthalmology. Eye Lond Engl. 2014;28:1066–1079.
   Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25:2078–2079.
   Google Scholar
• Ji H, Jiang H, Ma W, et al. An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1293–1300.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–589.
   Google Scholar
• Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Ye T, Krebs AR, Choukrallah M-A, et al. seqMINER: an integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e35.
   Google Scholar
• Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, et al. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1551–1566.
   Google Scholar
• Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2011;27:1739–1740.
   Google Scholar
• Tarailo-Graovac M, Chen N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2009; Chapter 4: Unit 4.10.;. DOI:10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25. 25(1).
   Google Scholar
• Deplus R, Blanchon L, Rajavelu A, et al. Regulation of DNA methylation patterns by CK2-mediated phosphorylation of Dnmt3a. Cell Rep. 2014;8:743–753.
   Google Scholar
• Liang K, Woodfin AR, Slaughter BD, et al. Mitotic transcriptional activation: clearance of actively engaged Pol II via transcriptional elongation control in mitosis. Mol Cell. 2015;60:435–445.
   Google Scholar
• Djebali S, Davis CA, Merkel A, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489:101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Oler AJ, Alla RK, Roberts DN, et al. Human RNA polymerase III transcriptomes and relationships to Pol II promoter chromatin and enhancer-binding factors. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:620–628.
   Google Scholar
• Vihervaara A, Sergelius C, Vasara J, et al. Transcriptional response to stress in the dynamic chromatin environment of cycling and mitotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3388–3397.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach RK, Euskirchen G, Rozowsky J, et al. Mapping accessible chromatin regions using Sono-Seq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14926–14931.
   Google Scholar
• Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2011;27:1017–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrou S, Enerbäck S, Carlsson P. Selection of high-affinity binding sites for sequence-specific, DNA binding proteins from random sequence oligonucleotides. Anal Biochem. 1995;229:99–105.
   Google Scholar