Dominant effects of the histone mutant H3-L61R on Spt16-gene interactions in budding yeast

References

• Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997;389(6648):251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L, Wen H, Shi X. The histone variant H3.3 in transcriptional regulation and human disease. J Mol Biol. 2017;429(13):1934–1945.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar VC, Pai R. Genes of the month: H3.3 histone genes: H3F3A and H3F3B. J Clin Pathol. 2021;74(12):753–758.
   Google Scholar
• Szenker E, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G. The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe BR, Maxham LA, Hamey JJ, et al. Histone H3 mutations: an updated view of their role in chromatin deregulation and cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(5):660.
   Google Scholar
• Nacev BA, Feng L, Bagert JD, et al. The expanding landscape of ‘oncohistone’ mutations in human cancers. Nature. 2019;567:473–478.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Li D, Cox SG, et al. Histone H3.3 beyond cancer: germline mutations in Histone 3 Family 3A and 3B cause a previously unidentified neurodegenerative disorder in 46 patients. Sci Adv. 2020;6(49). DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abc9207
   Google Scholar
• Maver A, Cuturilo G, Ruml SJ, et al. Clinical next generation sequencing reveals an H3F3A gene as a new potential gene candidate for microcephaly associated with severe developmental delay, intellectual disability and growth retardation. Balkan J Med Genet. 2019;22(2):65–68.
   Google Scholar
• McBurney KL, Leung A, Choi JK, et al. Divergent residues within histone H3 dictate a unique chromatin structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2016;202(1):341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Duina AA, Rufiange A, Bracey J, et al. Evidence that the localization of the elongation factor Spt16 across transcribed genes is dependent upon histone H3 integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2007;177(1):101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson P, Mitchell V, McClure K, et al. A systematic mutational analysis of a histone H3 residue in budding yeast provides insights into chromatin dynamics. G3 (Bethesda). 2015;5(5):741–749.
   Google Scholar
• Formosa T, Winston F. The role of FACT in managing chromatin: disruption, assembly, or repair? Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(21):11929–11941.
   Google Scholar
• Gurova K, Chang HW, Valieva ME, et al. Structure and function of the histone chaperone FACT - Resolving FACTual issues. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018;1861(9):892–904.
   Google Scholar
• Bhakat KK, Ray S. The facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex: its roles in DNA repair and implications for cancer therapy. DNA Repair (Amst). 2022;109:103246.
   Google Scholar
• Jeronimo C, Robert F. The histone chaperone FACT: a guardian of chromatin structure integrity. Transcription. 2022;1–23. DOI:10.1080/21541264.2022.2069995
   Google Scholar
• Zhou K, Liu Y, Luger K. Histone chaperone FACT facilitates chromatin transcription: mechanistic and structural insights. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020;65:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Orphanides G, LeRoy G, Chang CH, et al. FACT, a factor that facilitates transcript elongation through nucleosomes. Cell. 1998;92(1):105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Jeronimo C, Angel A, Nguyen VQ, et al. FACT is recruited to the +1 nucleosome of transcribed genes and spreads in a Chd1-dependent manner. Mol Cell. 2021;81(17):3542–3559 e3511.
   Google Scholar
• Martin BJE, Chruscicki AT, Howe LJ. Transcription promotes the interaction of the facilitates chromatin transactions (FACT) complex with nucleosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2018;210(3):869–881.
   Google Scholar
• Nyamugenda E, Cox AB, Pierce JB, et al. Charged residues on the side of the nucleosome contribute to normal Spt16-gene interactions in budding yeast. Epigenetics. 2018;13(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bina R, Matalon D, Fregeau B, et al. De novo variants in SUPT16H cause neurodevelopmental disorders associated with corpus callosum abnormalities. J Med Genet. 2020;57(7):461–465.
   Google Scholar
• Winston F, Dollard C, Ricupero-Hovasse SL. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast. 1995;11(1):53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Myers CN, Berner GB, Holthoff JH, et al. Mutant versions of the S. cerevisiae transcription elongation factor Spt16 define regions of Spt16 that functionally interact with histone H3. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e20847.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JB, Edwards MJ, Ozersky SA, et al. Evidence that dissociation of Spt16 from transcribed genes is partially dependent on RNA Polymerase II termination. Transcription. 2019;10(4–5):195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HT, Wharton Ws2nd, Harper JA, et al. A nucleosomal region important for ensuring proper interactions between the transcription elongation factor Spt16 and transcribed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda). 2013;3(6):929–940.
   Google Scholar
• Winston F. Transcription Regulation. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor; 1992. p. 1271–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung V, Chua G, Batada NN, et al. Chromatin- and transcription-related factors repress transcription from within coding regions throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(11):e277.
   Google Scholar
• Tsunaka Y, Fujiwara Y, Oyama T, et al. Integrated molecular mechanism directing nucleosome reorganization by human FACT. Genes Dev. 2016;30(6):673–686.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou K, Zhang N, et al. FACT caught in the act of manipulating the nucleosome. Nature. 2020;577(7790):426–431.
   Google Scholar
• Sivkina AL, Karlova MG, Valieva ME, et al. Electron microscopy analysis of ATP-independent nucleosome unfolding by FACT. Commun Biol. 2022;5(2). DOI:10.1038/s42003-021-02948-8
   Google Scholar