Cut&tag: a powerful epigenetic tool for chromatin profiling

References

• Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291(5507):1304–14. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggers T, Duyzend MH, Reddy J, et al. Non-DNA-binding cofactors enhance DNA-binding specificity of a transcriptional regulatory complex. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):555. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon MJ, Varshavsky A. Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82(19):6470–6474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour DS, Lis JT. In vivo interactions of RNA polymerase II with genes of drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5(8):2009–2018. doi: 10.1128/MCB.5.8.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schaik T, Vos M, Peric-Hupkes D, et al. Cell cycle dynamics of lamina-associated DNA. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e50636. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner GE, Kasinathan S, Xin B, et al. ChEC-seq kinetics discriminates transcription factor binding sites by DNA sequence and shape in vivo. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):8733. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skene PJ, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(5):1006–1019. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Z, Ruan F, Chen W, et al. BIND&MODIFY: a long-range method for single-molecule mapping of chromatin modifications in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 2023;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02896-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya-Okur HS, Janssens DH, Henikoff JG, et al. Efficient low-cost chromatin profiling with CUT&Tag. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(10):3264–3283. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0373-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya-Okur HS, Wu SJ, Codomo CA, et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1930. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09982-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, Kaya-Okur HS, et al. Efficient chromatin accessibility mapping in situ by nucleosome-tethered tagmentation. Elife. 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens DH, Meers MP, Wu SJ, et al. Automated CUT&Tag profiling of chromatin heterogeneity in mixed-lineage leukemia. Nat Genet. 2021;53(11):1586–1596. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00941-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes CT, Thompson JJ, Mitra A, et al. An epigenome atlas of neural progenitors within the embryonic mouse forebrain. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4196. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31793-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Liu Q, Xie S, et al. LncRNA TCONS_00323213 promotes myogenic differentiation by interacting with PKNOX2 to upregulate MyoG in porcine satellite cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):24. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susami K, Ikeda S, Hoshino Y, et al. Genome-wide profiling of histone H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications in individual blastocysts by CUT&Tag without a solid support (NON-TiE-UP CUT&Tag). Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15417-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Halstead MM, Bonnet‐Garnier A, et al. Histone remodeling reflects conserved mechanisms of bovine and human preimplantation development. EMBO Reports. 2023;24(3):24. doi: 10.15252/embr.202255726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdogan-Ozdilek B, Duval KL, Meng FW, et al. Identification of chromatin states during zebrafish gastrulation using CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag. Dev Dyn. 2022;251:729–42. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad K, Henikoff S, Bosco G. The H3.3K27M oncohistone antagonizes reprogramming in drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(7):e1009225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Holmes MJ, White MW, et al. Toxoplasma gondii AP2XII-2 Contributes to Transcriptional Repression for Sexual Commitment. mSphere. 2023;8(2):e0060622. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00606-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu L, Luo Z, Shi Y, et al. A cost-effective tsCuT&Tag method for profiling transcription factor binding landscape. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64(11):2033–2038. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang W, Luan S, Xiang X, et al. Profiling plant histone modification at single-cell resolution using snCuT&Tag. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(3):420–422. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocka J, Swigut T, Xiao H, et al. A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling. Nature. 2006;442(7098):86–90. doi: 10.1038/nature04815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millán-Zambrano G, Burton A, Bannister AJ, et al. Histone post-translational modifications — cause and consequence of genome function. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(9):563–580. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00468-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Qiu T, Wei G, et al. Role of histone post-translational modifications in inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13: doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.852272
   Google Scholar
• Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:669–80. doi: 10.1038/nrg2641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salma M, Andrieu-Soler C, Deleuze V, et al. High-throughput methods for the analysis of transcription factors and chromatin modifications: low input, single cell and spatial genomic technologies. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2023;101:102745. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2023.102745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Hua Y, Yu J, et al. Epigenetic drug library screening reveals targeting DOT1L abrogates NAD(+) synthesis by reprogramming H3K79 methylation in uveal melanoma. J Pharm Anal. 2023;13:24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2022.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumimoto H, Takano A, Igarashi T, et al. Oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor signal-induced histone deacetylation suppresses chemokine gene expression in human lung adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):5087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32177-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):575–580. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Wang W, Wang X, et al. Histone lactylation boosts reparative gene activation post-myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2022;131:893–908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Chai P, Xie M, et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6)A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biol. 2021;22:85. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02308-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galle E, Wong CW, Ghosh A, et al. H3K18 lactylation marks tissue-specific active enhancers. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02775-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SA, Jolma A, Campitelli LF, et al. The human transcription factors. Cell. 2018;172(4):650–665. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papavassiliou KA, Papavassiliou AG. Transcription Factor Drug Targets. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117(12):2693–2696. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XC, Sabath I, Kunduru L, et al. A conserved interaction that is essential for the biogenesis of histone locus bodies. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:33767–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.616466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saisho Y. Beta-cell dysfunction: its critical role in prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2015;6:109–24. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Zhang Z, Ji S, et al. A distinct role of STING in regulating glucose homeostasis through insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(7):119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101848119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Huo Q, Ge C, et al. ZNF143-mediated H3K9 trimethylation upregulates CDC6 by activating MDIG in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2020;80(12):2599–2611. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye B, Shen W, Zhang C, et al. The role of ZNF143 overexpression in rat liver cell proliferation. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08714-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manceau L, Richard Albert J, Lollini PL, et al. Divergent transcriptional and transforming properties of PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 paralogs. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(5):e1009782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Yang R, Li R, et al. Mesenchymal Mycn participates in odontoblastic lineage commitment by regulating Kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) in mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13:78. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02749-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang L, Xiong C, et al. HIRA complex presets transcriptional potential through coordinating depositions of the histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z on the poised genes in mEscs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(1):191–206. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Liu C, Ma B, et al. PA1 participates in the maintenance of blood-testis barrier integrity via cooperation with JUN in the Sertoli cells of mice. Cell Biosci. 2022;12:41. doi: 10.1186/s13578-022-00773-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di XP, Jin X, Ai JZ, et al. YAP/Smad3 promotes pathological extracellular matrix microenviroment-induced bladder smooth muscle proliferation in bladder fibrosis progression. MedComm. 2022;3(2020):e169. doi: 10.1002/mco2.169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng Q, Wang J, Li M, et al. CircSV2b participates in oxidative stress regulation through miR-5107-5p-Foxk1-Akt1 axis in Parkinson’s disease. Redox Biol. 2022;56:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Song F, Lyu H, et al. Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2022;611(7935):387–398. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05365-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long Y, Chong T, Lyu X, et al. FOXD1-dependent RalA-ANXA2-Src complex promotes CTC formation in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02504-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei T, Zhang W, He Y, et al. ZNF276 promotes the malignant phenotype of breast carcinoma by activating the CYP1B1-mediated Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:781. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05223-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Wang X, Hu R, et al. SOX2 regulates paclitaxel resistance of A549 non‑small cell lung cancer cells via promoting transcription of ClC‑3. Oncol Rep. 2022;48(4):48. doi: 10.3892/or.2022.8396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Mi Q, Yan S, et al. Characterization of circSCL38A1 as a novel oncogene in bladder cancer via targeting ILF3/TGF-beta2 signaling axis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:59. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05598-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horie M, Tanaka H, Suzuki M, et al. An integrative epigenomic approach identifies ELF3 as an oncogenic regulator in ASCL1‐positive neuroendocrine carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2023;114:2596–608. doi: 10.1111/cas.15764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yang P, Wang J, et al. p53 directly downregulates the expression of CDC20 to exert anti-tumor activity in mantle cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2023;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40164-023-00381-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter B, Ku WL, Kang JY, et al. Mapping histone modifications in low cell number and single cells using antibody-guided chromatin tagmentation (ACT-seq). Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3747. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11559-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosselin K, Durand A, Marsolier J, et al. High-throughput single-cell ChIP-seq identifies heterogeneity of chromatin states in breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2019;51(6):1060–1066. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0424-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patty BJ, Hainer SJ. Transcription factor chromatin profiling genome-wide using uliCuT&Run in single cells and individual blastocysts. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(5):2633–2666. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00516-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja JM, Corces MR, Pierce SE, et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nat Genet. 2021;53(3):403–411. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00790-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarbell ED, Liu T. HMMRATAC: a hidden Markov ModeleR for ATAC-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(16):e91. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusanovich DA, Daza R, Adey A, et al. Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science. 2015;348:910–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg AB, Roco CM, Muscat RA, et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science. 2018;360(6385):176–182. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartosovic M, Kabbe M, Castelo-Branco G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(7):825–835. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00869-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett DA, Dileep V, Handa T, et al. High-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling by targeted insertion of promoters (TIP-seq). J Cell Bio. 2021;220(12):220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202103078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, et al. Comprehensive Integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–902 e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efremova M, Teichmann SA. Computational methods for single-cell omics across modalities. Nat Methods. 2020;17(1):14–17. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0692-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong H, Luo Y, Wang Q, et al. Single-cell joint detection of chromatin occupancy and transcriptome enables higher-dimensional epigenomic reconstructions. Nat Methods. 2021;18(6):652–660. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01129-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Xiong H, Ai S, et al. CoBATCH for high-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling. Mol Cell. 2019;76:206–16 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Zhang Y, Li YE, et al. Joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse brain. Nat Methods. 2021;18(3):283–292. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01060-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Srivastava A, Mimitou E, et al. Characterizing cellular heterogeneity in chromatin state with scCuT&Tag-pro. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(8):1220–1230. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01250-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Grimm SA, Wade PA. CUT&Tag-BS for simultaneous profiling of histone modification and DNA methylation with high efficiency and low cost. Cell Rep Methods. 2021;1. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100118
   Google Scholar
• Janssens DH, Otto DJ, Meers MP, et al. CUT&Tag2for1: a modified method for simultaneous profiling of the accessible and silenced regulome in single cells. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02642-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan S, Wang Y, Harper NW, et al. Simultaneous profiling of multiple chromatin proteins in the same cells. Mol Cell. 2021;81:4736–46 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meers MP, Llagas G, Janssens DH, et al. Multifactorial profiling of epigenetic landscapes at single-cell resolution using MulTI-Tag. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(5):708–716. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01522-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Hao S, Zhang B, et al. Nanobody-tethered transposition enables multifactorial chromatin profiling at single-cell resolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(6):806–812. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01588-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartosovic M, Castelo-Branco G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(6):794–805. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Bartosovic M, Kukanja P, et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science. 2022;375:681–6. doi: 10.1126/science.abg7216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu T, Ang CE, Zhuang X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell. 2023;186(10):2275–2279. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Deng Y, Kukanja P, et al. Spatial epigenome-transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues. Nature. 2023;616:113–22. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05795-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sen D, Gilbert W. Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications for meiosis. Nature. 1988;334(6180):364–366. doi: 10.1038/334364a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda-Sasa T, Polaczek P, Peng XP, et al. Processing of G4 DNA by Dna2 helicase/nuclease and replication protein a (RPA) provides insights into the mechanism of Dna2/RPA substrate recognition. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(36):24359–24373. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802244200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang H, Yin Z, et al. Ligand-induced native G-quadruplex stabilization impairs transcription initiation. Genome Res. 2021;31(9):1546–1560. doi: 10.1101/gr.275431.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav T, Zhang JM, Ouyang J, et al. TERRA and RAD51AP1 promote alternative lengthening of telomeres through an R- to D-loop switch. Mol Cell. 2022;82:3985–4000 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosiol N, Juranek S, Brossart P, et al. G-quadruplexes: a promising target for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01328-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asamitsu S, Takeuchi M, Ikenoshita S, et al. Perspectives for applying G-Quadruplex structures in neurobiology and neuropharmacology. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijay Kumar MJ, Morales R, Tsvetkov AS. G-quadruplexes and associated proteins in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging. 2023;4:1164057. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1164057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niehrs C, Luke B. Regulatory R-loops as facilitators of gene expression and genome stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(3):167–178. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0206-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Muse T, Aguilera A. R loops: from physiological to pathological roles. Cell. 2019;179:604–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Moyano E, Mergui X, Garcia-Rubio ML, et al. The yeast and human FACT chromatin-reorganizing complexes solve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts. Genes Dev. 2014;28:735–48. doi: 10.1101/gad.234070.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristini A, Groh M, Kristiansen MS, et al. RNA/DNA hybrid interactome identifies DXH9 as a Molecular Player in transcriptional termination and R-Loop-associated DNA Damage. Cell Rep. 2018;23(6):1891–1905. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansel-Hertsch R, Spiegel J, Marsico G, et al. Genome-wide mapping of endogenous G-quadruplex DNA structures by chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(3):551–564. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Varshney D, Simeone A, et al. Promoter G-quadruplex folding precedes transcription and is controlled by chromatin. Genome Bio. 2021;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02346-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng KW, Zhang JY, He YD, et al. Detection of genomic G-quadruplexes in living cells using a small artificial protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(20):11706–11720. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu J, Shao R, Kwong Yung PY, et al. Genome-wide mapping of G-quadruplex structures with CUT&Tag. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(3):e13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui WWI, Simeone A, Zyner KG, et al. Single-cell mapping of DNA G-quadruplex structures in human cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02943-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz LA, Chedin F. High-resolution, strand-specific R-loop mapping via S9.6-based DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing. Nat Protoc. 2019;14:1734–55. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0159-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz LA, Castillo-Guzman D, Chedin F. 2021. Mapping R-Loops and RNA: DNA hybrids with S9.6-based immunoprecipitation methods. J Vis Exp. (174). doi: 10.3791/62455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JY, Zhang X, Fu XD, et al. R-ChIP for genome-wide mapping of R-loops by using catalytically inactive RNASEH1. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(5):1661–1685. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0154-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Wang H, Li C, et al. Genomic profiling of native R loops with a DNA-RNA hybrid recognition sensor. Sci Adv. 2021;7(8). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe3516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedesco M, Giannese F, Lazarevic D, et al. Chromatin velocity reveals epigenetic dynamics by single-cell profiling of heterochromatin and euchromatin. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(2):235–244. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01031-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khyzha N, Henikoff S, Ahmad K. Profiling RNA at chromatin targets in situ by antibody-targeted tagmentation. Nat Methods. 2022;19(11):1383–1392. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01618-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar