Epigenetic landscape of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and associations with gene expression in placenta

References

• Burton GJ, Fowden AL, Thornburg KL. Placental origins of chronic disease. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(4):1509–15. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude NM, Roberts CT, Kalionis B, et al. Growth and function of the normal human placenta. Thromb Res. 2004;114(5–6):397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoots MH, Gordijn SJ, Scherjon SA, et al. Oxidative stress in placental pathology. Placenta. 2018;69:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2018.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. What is the placenta? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):SS6.e1–S6.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima A, Shima T, Tsuda S, et al. Disruption of placental homeostasis leads to preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9):3298. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadovsky Y, Clifton VL, Burton GJ. Invigorating placental research through the “human placenta project”. Placenta. 2014;35(8):527. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.06.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baczkowska M, Zgliczyńska M, Faryna J, et al. Molecular changes on maternal–fetal interface in placental abruption—a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6612. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiling A, Lyko F. Epigenetic regulatory functions of DNA modifications: 5-methylcytosine and beyond. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0016-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(3):204–220. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baubec T, Schubeler D. Genomic patterns and context specific interpretation of DNA methylation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;25:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930–935. doi: 10.1126/science.1170116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi DQ, Ali I, Tang J, et al. New insights into 5hmC DNA modification: generation, distribution and function. Front Genet. 2017;8:100. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman M, Uribe-Lewis S, Yang X, et al. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is a predominantly stable DNA modification. Nat Chem. 2014;6(12):1049–1055. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestor CE, Ottaviano R, Reddington J, et al. Tissue type is a major modifier of the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine content of human genes. Genome Res. 2012;22(3):467–477. doi: 10.1101/gr.126417.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer GP, Szabo PE. Gene body profiles of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine: potential origin, function and use as a cancer biomarker. Epigenomics. 2018;10(8):1029–1032. doi: 10.2217/epi-2018-0066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Liu M. Distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in different human tissues. J Nucleic Acids. 2011;2011:870726. doi: 10.4061/2011/870726
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez Mora JR, Sanchez-Delgado M, Petazzi P, et al. Profiling of oxBS-450K 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in human placenta and brain reveals enrichment at imprinted loci. Epigenetics. 2018;13(2):182–191. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1344803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piyasena C, Reynolds RM, Khulan B, et al. Placental 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine patterns associate with size at birth. Epigenetics. 2015;10(8):692–697. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1062963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green BB, Houseman EA, Johnson KC, et al. Hydroxymethylation is uniquely distributed within term placenta, and is associated with gene expression. FASEB J. 2016;30(8):2874–2884. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600310R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseman EA, Johnson KC, Christensen BC. OxyBS: estimation of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine from tandem-treated oxidative bisulfite and bisulfite DNA. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(16):2505–2507. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118–127. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du P, Zhang X, Huang C-C, et al. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinf. 2010;11(1):587. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyssenroth MA, Peng S, Hao K, et al. Whole-transcriptome analysis delineates the human placenta gene network and its associations with fetal growth. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3878-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 2008;456(7218):53–59. doi: 10.1038/nature07517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen K. Illumina human methylation EPICanno.Ilm10b2.hg19: annotation for Illumina’s EPIC methylation arrays. R package version 0.6.0. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst J, Kellis M. Chromatin-state discovery and genome annotation with ChromHMM. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(12):2478–2492. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518(7539):317–330. doi: 10.1038/nature14248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolchik D, Hinrichs, AS, Furey, TS, et al. The UCSC table browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(90001):493D–496. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh103
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Arenas C, Hernandez-Ferrer C, Vives-Usano M, et al. Identification of autosomal cis expression quantitative trait methylation (cis eQTMs) in children’s blood. Elife. 2022;11:11. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalin AA. Matrix eQTL: ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(10):1353–1358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan V. Placental DNA methylation analysis tools. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Aguet F, Brown, AA, Castel, SE, et al. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550(7675):204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudbridge F, Gusnanto A. Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32(3):227–234. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen BS, Schwartz DA, Yang IV, et al. Comb-p: software for combining, analyzing, grouping and correcting spatially correlated P-values. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(22):2986–2988. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globisch D, Münzel M, Müller M, et al. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song CX, Szulwach KE, Fu Y, et al. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(1):68–72. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunnon K, Hannon E, Smith RG, et al. Variation in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine across human cortex and cerebellum. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0871-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiers H, Hannon E, Schalkwyk LC, et al. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is highly dynamic across human fetal brain development. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4091-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkins OM, Johnson KC, Houseman EA, et al. Genome-wide characterization of cytosine-specific 5-hydroxymethylation in normal breast tissue. Epigenetics. 2020;15(4):398–418. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1695332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wu F, Tan L, et al. Genome-wide regulation of 5hmC, 5mC, and gene expression by Tet1 hydroxylase in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell. 2011;42(4):451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, et al. Genome-wide analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine distribution reveals its dual function in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2011;25(7):679–684. doi: 10.1101/gad.2036011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, et al. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2011;473(7347):389–393. doi: 10.1038/nature09934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri F, Incarnato D, Krepelova A, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies a functional association of Tet1 and Polycomb repressive complex 2 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol. 2013;14(8):R91. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku M, Koche RP, Rheinbay E, et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(10):e1000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senner CE, Chrysanthou S, Burge S, et al. TET1 and 5-hydroxymethylation preserve the stem cell state of mouse trophoblast. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;15(6):1301–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valinluck V, Tsai, HH, Rogstad, DK, et al. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(14):4100–4108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulwach KE, Li X, Li Y, et al. Integrating 5-hydroxymethylcytosine into the epigenomic landscape of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulwach KE, Li X, Li Y, et al. 5-hmC–mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(12):1607–1616. doi: 10.1038/nn.2959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aran D, Sabato S, Hellman A. DNA methylation of distal regulatory sites characterizes dysregulation of cancer genes. Genome Biol. 2013;14(3):R21. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-3-r21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy EM, Goehring GN, Nichols MH, et al. An integrated -omics analysis of the epigenetic landscape of gene expression in human blood cells. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4842-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold PR, Wells AD, Li XC. Diversity and emerging roles of enhancer RNA in regulation of gene expression and cell fate. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:377. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YW, Lee S, Yun J, et al. Chromatin looping and eRNA transcription precede the transcriptional activation of gene in the β-globin locus. Biosci Rep. 2015;35(2). doi: 10.1042/BSR20140126
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Guo Z, Yuan S, et al. Upregulation of B3GNT3 is associated with immune infiltration and activation of NF-κB pathway in gynecologic cancers. J Reprod Immunol. 2022;152:103658. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2022.103658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leca J, Lemonnier F, Meydan C, et al. IDH2 and TET2 mutations synergize to modulate T follicular helper cell functional interaction with the AITL microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(2):323–339.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar