Seasonal change in response of stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit and three phytohormones in three tree species

References

• Berry JA, Beerling DJ, Franks PJ. Stomata: key players in the Earth system, past and present. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NG, Keenan TF, Colin PI, Wang H, Wright IJ, Niinemets Ü, Crous KY, Domingues TF, Guerrieri R, Ishida FY, et al. Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment. Ecol Lett. 2019;22:506–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry JS, Venturas MD, Anderegg WRL, Mencuccini M, Mackay DS, Wang Y, Love DM. Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(6):816–830. doi:10.1111/pce.12852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Pan CZ, Gu SH, Ma QM, Zhang, Yi Q, Li X, Shi K. Stomatal movements are involved in elevated CO2-mitigated high temperature stress in tomato. Physiol Plant. 2019;165(3):569–583. doi:10.1111/ppl.12752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachtman DP, Goodger JQD. Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:281–287. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang Y, Li M, Ding B, Niu H, Yang ZN, Chen XQ, Cao GY, Xie XD. Advances in auxin regulation of plant stomatal development. Chin Bull Bot. 2017;52:235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Nose T, Jikumaru Y, Kamiya Y. ABA inhibits entry into stomatal-lineage development in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 2013;74:448–457. doi:10.1111/tpj.2013.74.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggins J editor. Progress in photosynthesis research. Springer; 1987. p. 221–224.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar RC. The Ball–Berry–Leuning and Tardieu–Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(11):1383–1398. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00909.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. Models of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:42–45. doi:10.1104/pp.125.1.42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R. A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1097–1116. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01035.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA. Height-related trends in stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in a tall conifer. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(1):203–210. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SS, Yang Y, Trishchenko AP, Barr AG, Black TA, McCaughey H. Modeling the response of canopy stomatal conductance to humidity. J Hydrometeorol. 2009;10(2):521–532. doi:10.1175/2008JHM1050.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis PG. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976;273(927):593–610. doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuning R. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18:339–355. doi:10.1111/pce.1995.18.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symposia Society for Experimental Biology. 1977;31:471–505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang YH, Zhou GS. Analysis and quantitative simulation of stomatal conductance of Aneurolepidium chinense. Acta Phytoecologica Sin. 2000;24:739–743.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YH, Gao Q, Jia HK. Leaf-scale drought resistance and tolerance of three plant species in a semi-arid environment: application and comparison of two stomatal conductance models. J Plant Ecol. 2006;30(1):64–70. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Shi XH, Chen ZY, Liu KY, Yang GS, Zhong XH. Effects of different relative humidities on physiological activities of wild grape. Chin J Eco-Agri. 2005;13:65–67.
   Google Scholar
• Soni DK, Ranjan S, Singh R, Khare PB, Pathre UV, Shirke PA. Photosynthetic characteristics and the response of stomata to environmental determinants and ABA in Selaginella bryopteris, a resurrection spike moss species. Plant Sci. 2012;191:43–52. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez TM, Feeley KJ. Increasing humidity threatens tropical rainforests. Front Ecol Evol. 2018;6:68. doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slot M, Winter K. In situ temperature response of photosynthesis of 42 tree and liana species in the canopy of two Panamanian lowland tropical forests with contrasting rainfall regimes. New Phytol. 2017;214(3):1103–1117. doi:10.1111/nph.14469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright IJ, Dong N, Maire V, Prentice IC, Westoby M, Díaz S, Gallagher RV, Jacobs BF, Kooyman R, Law EA, et al. Global climatic drivers of leaf size. Science. 2017;357(6354):917–921. doi:10.1126/science.aal4760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbona V, Perez-Clemente RM, Sanchez-Perez AM, Manzi M, Zandalinas SI, Vives V, Gomez-Cadenas A. Abscisic acid: a versatile phytohormone in plant signaling and beyond. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2015;16(5):413–434. doi:10.2174/1389203716666150330130102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merilo E, Jalakas P, Laanemets K, Mohammadi O, Hrak H, Kollist H, Brosche M. Abscisic acid transport and homeostasis in the context of stomatal regulation. Mol Plant. 2015;8(9):1321–1333. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min MK, Choi EH, Kim JA, Yoon IS, Han S, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim BG. Two clade a phosphatase 2Cs expressed in guard cells physically interact with abscisic acid signaling components to induce stomatal closure in rice. Rice. 2019;12(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12284-019-0297-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin T, Tian QZ, Wang GF, Xiong LM. Lower temperature 1 enhances ABA responses and plant drought tolerance by modulating the stability and localization of C2-Domain ABA-related proteins in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2019;12(9):1243–1258. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao HC, Xu S, Fu W, He XY, Chen W, Ma CL, Li Y, Wu X. Effects of elevated O3 concentration and drought on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Syringa oblate leaves. Jiangsu Agri Sci. 2019;47:186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SC, Li C, ShiS. G, Ma FW. Effects of exogenous aba on leaf anatomy and hormone contents of apple rootstocks. Agri Res Arid Areas. 2019;37:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce JA. Does transpiration control stomatal responses to water vapour pressure deficit?. Plant Cell Environ. 1996;19:131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Snaith PJ, Mansfield TA. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid: can it be defined? Plant Cell Envi. 1982;5(4):309–311. doi:10.1111/pce.1982.5.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Sano T, Tamaoki M, Nakajima N, Kondo N, Hasezawa S. Cytokinin and auxin inhibit abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure by enhancing ethylene production in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(10):2259–2266. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya BR, Assmann SM. Hormone interactions in stomatal function. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69(4):451–462. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9427-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi GH, Wu GX, Zhang GZ. Annual variation of IAA and ABA contents in young apple tree. J Shandong Agri Univ. 1995;2:98–102.
   Google Scholar
• Börner A, Plaschke J, Korzun V, Worland AJ. The relationships between the dwarfing genes of wheat and rye. Euphytica. 1996;89(1):69–75. doi:10.1007/BF00015721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann BS, Kende H. On the role of abscisic-acid and gibberellin in the regulation of growth in rice. Plant Physiol. 1999;99:1156–1161. doi:10.1104/pp.99.3.1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li XM. Response of stomatal conductance of two tree species to vapor pressure deficit in three climate zones. J Arid Land. 2014;6(6):771–781. doi:10.1007/s40333-014-0030-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias MC, Brüggemann W. Differential inhibition of photosynthesis under drought stress inflaveriaspecies with different degrees of development of the C4 syndrome. Photosynthetica (Prague). 2007;45(1):75–84. doi:10.1007/s11099-007-0012-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HM, Long CR, Li JX, Fu XM, Zhou DG, Gao JY, Dong MC, Yue JQ. A study on photosynthetic characteristics and fruiting performance of three lemon varieties in dry-hot valley regions in Yunnan province. J Fruit Sci. 2017;34:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wu XL, Tang Z, Wu Y, Cao JW, Li Q, Ma B, Chen YZ, Sun MH, Li JJ. Diurnal variation regulations of photosynthetic characteristics in two Camellia oleifera cultivars and six related C. oleifera species. Non-wood for Res. 2019;37:101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Huang ZY, Dong XJ. Primary studies on the daily dynamic changes of photosynthesis and transpiration of Salix psammophila. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sin. 2002;22:817–823.
   Google Scholar
• Weng XY, Jiang DA. Regulation of rubisco activity and diurnal changes of photosynthetic rate in rice by ecology factors. J Zhejiang Univ. 2002;28:387–391.
   Google Scholar
• Yang MH, Li ZH, Huang LQ, Yang Y. Photosynthesis change in a day of Ginkgo Biloba. Nonwood Forest Res. 2004;22:15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Zeng XP, Peng SL, Sun GT. Daily variation of gas exchange, stomatal conductance and water use efficiency in summer leaves of Ormosia Pinnata. J Trop Subtropical Bot. 2000;8:35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Héroult A, Lin YS, Bourne A, Medlyn BE, Ellsworth DS. Optimal stomatal conductance in relation to photosynthesis in climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36:262–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02570.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mdelyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, Ellsworth DS, Prentice IC, Barton CVM, Crous KY, Angelis DE, Freeman DE, Wingate PML. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17:2134–2144. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Wang ML, Gao JG, Sheng F, Su XR. Annual dynamic patten of four endogenous hormones in young apple trees. J Shandong Agri Univ. 2000;31:180–182.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error. Br Med J. 1996;312(7047):1654. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison JI, Gifford RM. Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity a comparison of two C3 and two C4 grass species. Plant Physiol. 1983;71:789–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg NJ, Blad BL, Verma SB. Microclimate: the biological environment, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Chang JC, Lin TZ. Gas exchange in litchi under controlled and field conditions. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2007;114:268–274. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2007.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eamus D, Taylor DT, Maccinis-Ng CMO, Shanahan S, DeSilva L. Comparing model predictions and experimental data for the response of stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor to manipulations of cuticular conductance, leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference and temperature: feedback mechanisms are able to account for all observations. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31:269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SQ, Yang ZQ, Wang L, Li J, Zhang MY, Li KW. Effect of high humidity and high temperature interaction on photosynthetic characteristics of greenhouse tomato crops. Chin J Ecol. 2018;37:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu YQ, Yang ZQ. Effects of high temperature and high humidity on stomatal and photosynthesis characteristics of grape leaves in greenhouse. North Hortic. 2017;23:94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Aronne G, De Micco V. Seasonal dimorphism in the Mediterranean Cistus incanus L subsp.incanus. Ann Bot. 2001;87:789–794. doi:10.1006/anbo.2001.1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arve LE, Terfa MT, Gislerød HR, Olsen JE, Torre S. High relative air humidity and continuous light reduce stomata functionality by affecting the ABA regulation in rose leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36:382–392. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02580.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai B. Comparative study on biological characteristics of Plukenetia volubilis L. under different sites condition. Haikou: HaiNan University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fanourakis D. Stomatal response characteristics as affected by long-term elevated humidity levels. PLoS One. 2011;1-182.
   Google Scholar
• Han L, He J, Qi TY, Tian J, Zhan XL. Responses and modeling of canopy stomatal conductance of platycladus orientalis to environmental factors in hedong sandy land, ningxia. Chin J Ecol. 2018;37:2862–2868.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature. 2003;424:901–908. doi:10.1038/nature01843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZZ, Zhao P, Zhao XH, Zhang JX, Zhu LW, Ouyang L, Zhang XY. Impact of environmental factors on the decoupling coefficient and the estimation of canopy stomatal conductance for ever-green broad-leaved tree species. Chin J Plant Ecol. 2018;42(12):1179–1191. doi:10.17521/cjpe.2018.0176.
   Google Scholar
• Prenger JJ, Ling PP. Greenhouse condensation control understanding and using vapor pressure deficit (VPD), Fact Sheet Extension. Columbus: The Ohio State University. AEX-804; 2001. p. 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Chen ZF, Yin LY, Li MQ, Wang LH, Teng WC. Effects of three plant exogenous hormones on the biomass,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,and photosynthetic characteristics of tabebuia chrysantha seedlings. Plant Sci J. 2018;36:745–754.
   Google Scholar
• Jia FL, Wang CP, Liu S, Jiao ZY, Yin WL, Xia XL. Effects of exogenous br and IAA on drought tolerance of populus deltoides ×p. nigra. J Beijing For Univ. 2017;39:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Le J, Liu XG, Yang KZ, Chen XL, Zou JJ, Wang HZ, Wang M, Vanneste S, Miyo M, Tasaka M, et al. Auxin transport and activity regulate stomatal patterning and development. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3090. doi:10.1038/ncomms4090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei DZ, Dai XB, Xu XM, Zhang RX. Several hypotheses on the mechanism of the plant leaf senescence. Guihaia. 1998;18:89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Yan WY, Ye SH, Dong YJ, Jin QS, Zhang XM. Research progress related to plant leaf senescence. Crops. 2010;36:4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ma XL, LI HS. Review of the mechanisms of hybrid rice early aging. Hunan Agr Sci. 2007;3:59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Liang JS. Effects of ABA and vapour pressure deficit on stomatal conductance of sunflower leaves. J YangZhou Univ. 1999;2:41–45.
   Google Scholar