The law of concentrations of crime at place: the case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2009). Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Glencoe, IL: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1973). A theory of the stability of punishment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 198–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. S. (1976). The dynamics of a homeostatic punishment process. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67, 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., & Moitra, S. (1979). An analysis of the time series of the imprisonment rate in the states of the United States: A further test of the stability of punishment hypothesis. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 376–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (2000). The recent rise & fall of American violence. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, A. A., & Bond, B. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46, 577–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1975). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12, 104–125.
   Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1991). Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1999). Theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, S. (1980). Territory in urban settings. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Current theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 179–207). New YorkNY: Plenun.
   Google Scholar
• Bursik, R. J., Jr, & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New YorkNY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 14, pp. 225–256). ChicagoIL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W. J., & Bull, J. L. (1975). Robbery deterrence: An applied behavioral science demonstration-final report. La Jolla, CA: Western Behavioral Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1895[1964]). The rules of sociological method (G. E. G. Catlin, Ed., S. A. Solovay and J. H. Mueller, Trans.). New YorkNY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. E., Gersh, J. S., & Taylor, C. (2000). Finding crime hot spots through repeat address mapping. In V. Goldsmith, P. McGuir, J. H. Mollenkopf, & T. A. Ross (Eds.), Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice (pp. 49–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place. Crime prevention studies (Vol. 4, pp. 1–33). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New YorkNY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police Research Series Paper 98). London: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit; Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5, 141–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groff, E. R., Weisburd, D., & Morris, N. (2009). Where the action is at places: Examining spatio-temporal patterns of juvenile crime at places using trajectory analysis and GIS. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting crime in its place (pp. 61–86). New YorkNY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, E. R., Weisburd, D., & Yang, S.-M. (2010). Is it important to examine crime trends at a local ‘micro’ level? A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New YorkNY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. M. (1951). Quality control handbook. New YorkNY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, D., & Bridges, G. (1997). Measurement error in calls-for-service as an indicator of crime. Criminology, 35, 705–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through environmental design. New YorkNY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, G., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. R. (1988). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. BostonMA: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J., Jr, & Roth, J. A. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding and preventing violence ( Panel on the Understanding and Control of Violent Behavior, Committee on Law and Justice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. J., & Csmith, W. R. (2002). Socioecological models of automotive theft: Integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 304–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncek, D. W. (2000). Schools and crime. In V. Goldsmith, P. G. McGuire, J. H. Mollenkopf, & T. A. Ross (Eds.), Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice (pp. 153–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime ‘hot spots’: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G., & Annan, S. (1994). Drugs and public housing: Toward an effective police response. In D. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 129–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. R., Frazee, S. G., & Davison, E. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38, 489–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B. (1998). Crime and small-scale places: What we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. In R. B. Taylor, G. Bazemore, B. Boland, T. R. Clear, R. P. J. Corbett, J. Feinblatt, G. Berman, M. Sviridoff, & C. Stone (Eds.), Crime and place: Plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 303–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P. (1986). The stability of punishment: A follow-up of Blumstein’s hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, D., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Neighboring and its role in block organizations: An exploratory report. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., & Bruinsma, G. J. N. (Eds.). (2009). Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research. New YorkNY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–735.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S.-M. (2012). The criminology of place. New YorkNY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Maher, L., & Sherman, L. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot spots of crime. In F. Adler & W. Laufer (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory, advances in criminological theory (Vol. 4, pp. 45–69). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Mazerolle, L. G. (2000). Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: Implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quarterly, 3, 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Groff, E. R. (2009). Hot spots of juvenile crime: A longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Telep, C., & Lawton, B. (in press). Could innovations in policing have contributed to the New York City crime drop even in a period of declining police strength? The case of stop, question and frisk as a hot spots policing strategy. Justice Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Worden, R., Bynum, T., & Frank, J. (1994). Police crackdowns on drug abuse and trafficking. In D. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 95–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar