From deployment to debriefing: introducing the D.I.A.M.O.N.D. model of hostage and crisis negotiation

References

• Association of Chief Police Officers, & National Policing Improvement Agency. 2009. Guidance on command and control. London: NPIA. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/acpo_guidance_on_command_and_control_-_2009-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Association of Chief Police Officers, & National Policing Improvement Agency. 2011. The use of negotiators by incident commanders. London: NPIA. Retrieved from http://library.college.police.uk/docs/acpo/National-Negotiators-Briefing-Paper-Final-Locked-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benoliel, J. Q. (1996). Grounded theory and nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 406–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolz, F. A., Jr. (1979). Hostage confrontation and rescue. In R. Kupperman & D. Trent (Eds.), Terrorism: Threat, reality, response (pp. 393–404). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Call, J. A. (2003). The evolution of hostage/barricade crisis negotiation. In H. Hall (Ed.), Terrorism: Strategies for intervention (pp. 69–94). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Call, J. A. (2008). Psychological consultation in hostage/barricade crisis negotiation. In H. Hall (Ed.), Forensic psychology and neuropsychology for criminal and civil cases (pp. 263–288). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006, July). Qualitative research guidelines project. Retrieved from http://www.qualres.org/HomeMaxi-3803.html
   Google Scholar
• College of Policing. (2013). Briefing and debriefing. Retrieved from https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/operations/briefing-and-debriefing/
   Google Scholar
• College of Policing. (2014). National decision model. Retrieved from https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/national-decision-model/the-national-decision-model/
   Google Scholar
• Dalfonzo, V. A., & Romano, S. J. (2003). Negotiation position papers: A tool for crisis negotiators. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 72, 27–31. Retrieved from https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/oct03leb.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A., Kaufmann, G., Smith, R., & Ramesh, C. (1991). Crisis bargaining: A framework for understanding intense conflict. International Journal of Group Tensions, 21, 133−154.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, J. (2003). Hostage barricade database (HOBAS). Quantico, VA: FBI Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Fuselier, G. W. (1981). A practical overview of hostage negotiations (part 1). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 50, 1–11. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/77876NCJRS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giebels, E. (2002). Influencing in hostage negotiations: The table of ten. Dutch Journal of Psychology, 57, 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Giebels, E., & Taylor, P. J. (2010). Communication predictors and social influence in crisis negotiations. In R. Rogan & F. Lanceley (Eds.), Contemporary theory, research and practice of crisis and hostage negotiation (pp. 59–77). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giebels, E., & Noelanders, S. (2004). Crisis negotiations: A multiparty perspective. The Hague, The Netherlands: Universal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. (2010). Modern-day hostage (crisis) negotiation: The evolution of an art form within the policing arena. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(5), 341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A., Brown, S., & Hall, P. (2015). Personality traits and coping styles in UK police officers. Do negotiators differ from their non-negotiator colleagues? Psychology, Crime and Law, 21(4), 347–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R. (2016). A mixed-methodological analysis of police hostage and crisis negotiation in the United Kingdom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.22287.79522
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R. (2017). Understanding the prevalence and situational characteristics of hostage and crisis negotiation in England: An analysis of Norfolk and Suffolk Constabulary negotiator deployment data from January 2015 to December 2016. Confidential consultancy report commissioned by Norfolk Constabulary.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R., Brown, S. J., & Hall, P. (2018). The emotionally intelligent officer? Exploring decision-making style and emotional intelligence in hostage and crisis negotiators and non-negotiator-trained police officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(2), 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R., Brown, S. J., Hall, P., & Bowen, E. (2019a). The self-perceived successful hostage and crisis negotiator profile: A qualitative assessment of negotiator competencies. Police Practice and Research: an International Journal, 20(4), 321–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R., Brown, S. J., Hall, P., & Bowen, E. (2019b). From “sad people on bridges” to “kidnap and extortion”: Understanding the nature and situational characteristics of hostage and crisis negotiator deployments. Journal of Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 12(1), 41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R., Brown, S. J., Hall, P., & Bowen, E. (2019c). “There’s nothing that compares to it”: A grounded theoretical analysis of the experiences of police hostage and crisis negotiators. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(3), 369–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. R. (2007). Saving lives: The S.A.F.E. model for negotiating hostage and crisis incidents. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Crisis Management Group. (2016). The golden hour in crisis events. Retrieved from http://www.icmg.co.il/the-golden-hour-in-crisis-events
   Google Scholar
• Kelln, B., & McMurtry, C. M. (2007). STEPS-Structured tactical engagement process: A model for crisis negotiation. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 7(2), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kent Police. (2014). L11260 Trauma risk incident management (TRIM) policy. Retrieved from http://www.kent.police.uk/about_us/policies/human-resources/sops/l11260.html
   Google Scholar
• Lanceley, F. J. (1999). On-scene guide for crisis negotiators. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, L. B. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245–265). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, T., & Johnson, M. B. (2000). Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 4(1), 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal, D. O., Bowman, D. R., & McClain, B. U. (2009). Introducing the four-phase model of hostage negotiation. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 9(2), 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• McMains, M. (2002). Active listening: The aspirin of negotiations. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 2, 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• McMains, M. J., & Mullins, W. C. (1996). Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and situations in law enforcement and corrections. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• McMains, M. J., & Mullins, W. C. (2001). Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• McMains, M. J., & Mullins, W. C. (2014). Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. (2005). Hostage negotiation: Psychological principles and practices. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 7(4), 277–298. Retrieved from https://www.psychceu.com/miller/Miller_Hostage_Neg.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, L. (2015). Special units policing: Hostage negotiation, undercover, and sex crimes investigation. In S. Freeman Clevenger, L. Miller, B. Moore, & A. Freeman (Eds.), Behind the badge: A psychological treatment manual for law enforcement officers (pp. 184–201). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, W. C. (2002). Advanced communication techniques for hostage negotiators. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 2(1), 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Noesner, G. (1999). Negotiation concepts for commanders. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 68, 6–14. Retrieved from https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/jan99leb.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Noesner, G., & Webster, M. (1997). Crisis intervention: Using active listening skills in negotiations. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66, 13–19. Retrieved from https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/august-1997.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Oostinga, M. S. D., Giebels, E., & Taylor, P. J. (2017). ‘An error is feedback’: The experience of communication error management in crisis negotiations. Police Practice and Research: an International Journal, 19(1), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, J. M., & McCrystle, M. J. (1999). Practical, tactical and legal perspectives of terrorism and hostage-taking. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, G. (1983). Writing the natural way: Using right-brain techniques to release your expressive powers. Los Angeles, CA: J.P. Tarcher.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, R. G., Hammer, M. R., & Van Zandt, C. (1997). Dynamic processes of crisis negotiation: Theory, research and practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103. Retrieved from https://app.shoreline.edu/dchris/psych236/Documents/Rogers.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(1), 63–75. Retrieved from http://www.crec.co.uk/docs/Trustworthypaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slatkin, A. (1996). Enhancing negotiator training: Therapeutic communication. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 65, 1–6. Retrieved from https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/may-1996.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Slatkin, A. (2005). Communication in crisis and hostage negotiations: Practical communication techniques, stratagems, and strategies for law enforcement, corrections and emergency service personnel in managing critical incidents. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Slevin, E., & Sines, D. (2000). Enhancing the truthfulness, consistency, and transferability of a qualitative study: Using a manifold of two approaches. Nurse Researcher, 7(2), 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. (2002). A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 7−48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ury, W. (1991). Getting past no: negotiating with difficult people. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hasselt, V. B., Romano, S. J., & Vecchi, G. M. (2008). Role playing: Applications in hostage and crisis negotiation skills training. Behaviour Modification, 32(2), 248–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchi, G. M. (2009). Conflict and crisis communication: The behavioural influence stairway model and suicide intervention. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 12(2), 32–39. Retrieved from http://www.biomedsearch.com/article/Conflict-crisis-communication-behavioral-influence/218313990.html
   Google Scholar
• Vecchi, G. M., Van Hasselt, V. B., & Romano, S. J. (2005). Crisis (hostage) negotiation: Current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(5), 533–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar