A framework to improve construction processes: Integrating Lean, Green and Six Sigma

References

• American National Standards Institute. 2006. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principle and framework, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Bilec M, Ries R, Matthews H. 2010. Life-cycle assessment modeling of construction processes for buildings. J Infrastruct Syst. 16:199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilec M, Ries R, Matthews H, Sharrard A. 2006. Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction processes. J Infrastruct Syst. 12:207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossink B, Brouwers H. 1996. Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. J Constr Eng Manage. 122:55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celep O, Yong-Woo K, John H, Seungheon H. 2012. Implementing lean Six Sigma: a case study in concrete panel production. Proceedings of IGLC-20, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin Associates. 1998. The Franklin USLCI Library 98. Online at: http://www.fal.com/ and http://www.sylvatica.com/, editor, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Formoso C, Soibelman L, De Cesare C, Isatto E. 2002. Material waste in building industry: main causes and prevention. J Constr Eng Manage. 128:316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg, S, Hischier, R, Nemeck, T, Rebitzer, G, Spielmann, M. (2005). The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework (7 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2005;10:3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett D, Lee J. 2011. Lean construction submittal process. Qual Eng. 23:84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Guggemos A, Horvath A. 2005. Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings. J Infrastruct Syst. 11:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S, Chae M, Im K, Ryu H. 2008. Six Sigma-based approach to improve performance in construction operations. J Manage Eng. 24:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2006. ISO 14040 environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz L, Horman M, Bodenschatz M. 2007. A lean modeling protocol for evaluating green project delivery. Lean Constr J. 3:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lapinski A, Horman M, Riley D. 2006. Lean processes for sustainable project delivery. J Constr Eng Manage. 132:1083–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhu Y, Zhang Z. 2010. An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Building Environ. 45:766–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro R, Maio M, Nawaz M, Ramu G, Zrymiak D. 2008. The certified Six Sigma Green belt. New Delhi, India: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno T. 1990. Toyota production systems: beyond large-scale production, Diamond, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pande P, Neuman R, Cavanaqh R. 2000. The Six Sigma way. How GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualini F, Zawislak P. 2005. Value stream mapping in construction: A case study in a Brazilian construction company. in: Kenley, R. (Ed.), 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference: Proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction, Sydney, pp. 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Pheng L, Hui M. 2004. Implementing and applying Six Sigma in construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 130:482–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon C, Yu A, Jaillon L. 2004 Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econom. 22:461–470.
   Google Scholar
• PRé Consultants. 2008a. SimaPro 7.0, Database Manual, the Franklin US LCI Library. 2.2 Ed. The Netherlands: PRé Consultants and Sylvatica.
   Google Scholar
• PRé Consultants. 2008b. SimaPro7.0 Software. The Netherlands: PRé Consultants and Sylvatica.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas E, Aramvareekul P. 2003. Labor productivity drivers and opportunities in the construction industry. J Manage Eng. 19:78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem O, Solomon J, Genaidy A, Minkarah I. 2006. Lean construction: from theory to implementation. J Manage Eng. 22:168–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer N, Williams B. 2007. Lean for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrard A, Matthews H, Ries R. 2008. Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model. J Infrastruct Syst. 14:327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart A, and Spencer, A. 2006. Six-Sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: a case study. Constr Manage Econom. 24:339–348.
   Google Scholar
• Tam V. 2008. On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management-plan method in construction. Waste Manage. 28:1072–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongco MDC. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. >USA: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. Labor force, employment, & earnings by industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Gross domestic product (GDP) By Industry Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009a. Buildings and their impact on the environmental: a statistical summary. Washington, DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009b. Construction and demolition materials amounts. Washington, DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts (TRACI). Cincinnati, OH: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Fine particle (PM_2.5) designations. Washington, DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar