An empirical study of quality management systems in the Saudi construction industry

References

• Aichouni M. 2013. On the use of the seven basic quality tools for the improvement of the construction industry: a case study of ready mixed concrete production process. Int J Civil Environ Eng IJCEE-IJENS 12(5):31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Avsar S, Bakker M, Bartholomeeusen G, Vanmechelen J. 2006. Six Sigma quality improvement of compaction at NDIA project. Terra et Aqua. 103:14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bin Abu Bakar AH, Bin Ali K, Onyeizu E. 2011. Total quality management practices in large construction companies: a case of Oman. World Appl Sci J. 15(2):285–296.
   Google Scholar
• Brunn S. 2011. An overview of the Gulf countries’ construction industry. New York: Springer. Chapter 47.
   Google Scholar
• Cachadinha NM. 2009. Implementing quality management systems in small and medium construction companies: a contribution to a road map for success. Leadership Manage Eng. Jan:32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey V, Willar D. 2010. Construction performance and organisational culture. In: CIB World Congress 2010: Building a Better Tomorrow, 10–13 May, the Lowry, Salford Quays.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Hernandez DJ, Aspinwall EM. 2005. Improvement tools in the UK construction industry. Constr Manage Econ. 23:965–977.
   Google Scholar
• Hoonakker P, Carayona P, Loushine T. 2010. Barriers and benefits of quality management in the construction industry: an empirical study. Total Q Manage Bus Excel. 21(9):953–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Finance Corporation – World Bank. 2010. Doing Business. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/11857/DB13_Full%20report.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa K. 1982. Guide to quality control. New York: Asian Productivity Organization, UNIPUB.
   Google Scholar
• Karim K, Marosszeky M, Kumaraswamy M. 2005. Organizational effectiveness model for quality management systems in the Australian construction industry. Total Q Manage Bus Excel. 16(6):793–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KACST. 2009. Strategic priorities for building and construction technology. Report. Ryadh: KACST.
   Google Scholar
• Landin A. 2000. Impact of quality management in the Swedish construction process. Report TVBP–00/1010. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Landin A, Nilsson C-H. 2001. Do quality systems really make a difference?” Build Res Inf. 29(1):12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low SP, Hennie FO. 1997. The effective maintenance of quality management systems in the construction industry. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 14(8):768–790.
   Google Scholar
• Nankana AN. 2005. The seven magnificent: simple, quick and cost effective tools for continuous improvement. India: New Age International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nyomek L. 2010. The integration of quality management system in construction industry [ PhD dissertation]. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland J, Marosszeky M. 2006. Total quality in the construction supply chain. Oxford, UK: Butter-Heinmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega I, Bisgaard S. 2000. Quality improvement in the construction industry: three systematic approaches. Quality management and technology reports series, Report 10. Sweden: University of St. Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• Pheng LS, Teo JA. 2004. Implementing total quality management in construction firms. J Manage Eng. 20(1):8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReVelle JB, Margetts DN. 2010. home builders guide to continuous improvement: schedule, quality, customer satisfaction, cost and safety. London: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Said I, Ayub ARa, Razaki AA, Kooi TK. 2006. Factors affecting construction organization quality management system in the Malaysian construction industry. Available from: http://eprints.usm.my/16080/1/Ilias_Said_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sdiri Y. 2010. Facteurs de Succès de l`implantation de l`ISO 9000 dans les entreprises de construction au Canada [ PhD thesis]. Canada: Quebec University.
   Google Scholar
• Spasojevic VK, Djurdjevic T, Dondur N, Klarin NM, Tomic B. 2013. An empirical examination of the impact of quality tools application on business performance: evidence from Serbia. Total Q Manage Bus Excel. 24(5–6):607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tari JJ, Sbater V. 2004. Quality tools and techniques: are they necessary for quality management. Int J Prod Manage. 92:267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk AM. 2006. ISO 9000 in construction: an examination of its application in Turkey. Build Environ. 41(4):501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willar D, Coffey V, Trigunarsyah B. 2010. An examination of factors influencing effective and continuous improvement of Indonesian contractors’ quality management systems. In: Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management. Vol. 1. China: China Architecture & Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willar D, Coffey V, Trigunarsyah B. 2011. Quality management system and construction performance. In: IEEE International Conference on Quality and Reliability (ICQR), 14–17 Sept, Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar