Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature

References

• [ABS] Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2004. 8731.0 Building approvals, Australia – March 2004 key figures [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 25]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats
   Google Scholar
• [ABS] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010. Australia's environment: issues and trends, Jan 2010. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• ACT Government. 2011. ACT waste management strategy: towards a sustainable Canberra – reducing waste and recovering resources to achieve a sustainable, carbon-neutral Canberra 2011–2025. Canberra: ACT Government.
   Google Scholar
• Building Commission. 2004. The barriers to best practice in the design, engineering, construction and operation of green buildings. Melbourne: Building Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Chini AR. 2001. Deconstruction and materials reuse: technology, economic, and policy. CIB Publication 266, Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction Meeting CIB World Building Congress, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Chiveralls K, Palmer J, Zillante G, Zuo J, Wilson L, Pullen S. 2012. Reconsidering sustainable building and design: lessons from China, Germany and Australia. Adelaide, SA: International Society for Ecological Economics, University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree L, Hes D. 2009. Sustainability uptake in housing in metropolitan Australia: an institutional problem, not a technological one. Housing Studies. 24:203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DETR] Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 2000. Building a better quality of life – a strategy for more sustainable construction. London: Eland House.
   Google Scholar
• [DEWHA] Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 2010. National waste policy: less waste, more resources. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Dong B, Wilkinson SJ. 2007. Practitioner perceptions of sustainability in the Building Code of Australia. In: Proceedings of the Australian Institute of Building Surveyors (AIBS) 2007 International Conference, Adelaide. Sydney: AIBS.
   Google Scholar
• [DSEWPAC] Department of Sustainability, Energy, Water, Population and Communities. 2012. Construction and demolition waste guide – recycling and re-use across the supply chain. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the committee of the regions, Energy Efficiency Plan 2011, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon TJ. 2002. Technological and institutional ‘lock-in'as a barrier to sustainable innovation. London: Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd. 2011. Construction and demolition waste status report: management of construction and demolition waste in Australia. Report prepared for the Department of Sustainability Environment, Water, Population and the Communities, and Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hradil P, Talja A, Wahlström M, Huuhka S, Lahdensivu J, Pikkuvirta J. 2014. Re-use of structural elements: environmentally efficient recovery of building components VTT Technology 200. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J Royal Soc Med. 96:118–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann S, Crocker R. 2013. Designing for zero waste: consumption, technologies and the built environment. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li RYM, Du H. 2015. Sustainable construction waste management in Australia: a motivation perspective. In Construction Safety and Waste Management. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12430-8
   Google Scholar
• Lu W, Yuan H. 2011. A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Manag. 31:1252–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris S. 2013. Improving energy efficient, sustainable design and construction in Australia – learning from Europe. In: Development, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DOEAEC), editor. Melbourne: International Specialised Skills Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani M, Glass J, Price AD. 2006. Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation. Waste Resource Manag. 159:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani M, Glass J, Price AD. 2008. Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. Waste Manag. 28:1147–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed R, Mills A. 2007. Identifying the drivers behind housing preferences of first-time owners. Property Manag. 25:225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Reed RG. 2008. The relationship between sustainability and housing value. In: Developing real estate markets in Africa: Proceedings of the 8th Annual African Real Estate Society Conference, 2008 Aug 13–15; Johannesburg. AFRES.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler K, Swingle P. 2006. OSWER innovations pilot: building deconstruction and reuse. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oswer/
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, Tam VW, Tam C, Drew D. 2004. Mapping approach for examining waste management on construction sites. J Constr Eng Manag. 130:472–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart P, Robinson J, Low S. 2012. The business case for Sustainable Design – the City of Melbourne CH2 Project. Constr Econ Build. 5:58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VW. 2008. On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management-plan method in construction. Waste Manag. 28:1072–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam VW, Kotrayothar D, Loo Y-C. 2009. On the prevailing construction waste recycling practices: a South East Queensland study. Waste Manag Res. 27:167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo MMM, Loosemore M, Masosszeky M, Karim K. 2000. Operatives attitudes towards waste on a construction project. Paper presented at: Annual Conference – ARCOM; Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas D, Ding G, Crews K. 2012. Sustainable timber use in the Australian housing market: are consumers willing to pay the price. Int J Housing Sci Appl. 36:221.
   Google Scholar
• Udawatta N, Zuo J, Chiveralls K, Zillante G. 2015a. Attitudinal and behavioural approaches to improving waste management on construction projects in Australia: benefits and limitations. Int J Constr Manag. 15:137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udawatta N, Zuo J, Chiveralls K, Zillante G. 2015b. Improving waste management in construction projects: an Australian study. Resources, Conservation Recycling: 101:73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J-Y, Kang X-P, Wing-Yan Tam V. 2008. An investigation of construction wastes: an empirical study in Shenzhen. J Eng Des Tech. 6:227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore R, Knafl K. 2005. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Advanced Nursing. 52:546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Shen L. 2011. Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Manag. 31:670–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar