Key features of a project alliance and their impact on the success of an apartment renovation: a case study

References

• Abrahams A, Cullen A. 1998. Project alliances in the construction industry. Aust Constr Law Newsl. 62:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• ACA. 1999. Relationship contracting. Optimising project outcomes. North Sydney: Australian Contractors Association.
   Google Scholar
• AIA. 2007. Integrated project delivery: a guide. American Institute of Architects. Available from: https://www.aiacontracts.org/resources/64146-integrated-project-delivery-a-guide
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M. 2000. Civil engineering management in the new millennium. Civil Eng. 138(2):73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell J. 1999. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education and social science. 3rd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan R, Biklen S. 1998. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. 3rd ed. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen M, Marshall N. 2000. Building partnerships: case studies of client-contractor collaboration in the UK construction industry. Constr Manage Econ. 18(7):819–832.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe L, Jahre M, Swärd A. 2010. Partnering relationships in construction: a literature review. J Purch Supply Manage. 16(4):239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Zhang G, Xie Y, Jin X. 2012. Overview of alliancing research and practice in the construction industry. Archi Eng Des Manage. 8(2):103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng E, Li H, Love P, Irani Z. 2004. Strategic alliances: a model for establishing long-term commitment to inter-organizational relations in construction. Build Environ. 39(4):459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung S. 2010. Relational contracting for construction excellence: principles, practices and case studies. Constr Manage Econ. 28(7):805–806.
   Google Scholar
• Costa AA, Tavares LV. 2012. Social e-business and the satellite network model: innovative concepts to improve collaboration in construction. Automat Constr. 22:387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa AA, Tavares LV. 2013. Advanced multicriteria models to promote quality and reputation in public construction e-marketplaces. Automat Constr. 30:205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng BS. 2003. Partner analysis and alliance performance. Scand J Manage. 19(3):279–308.
   Google Scholar
• Davis P, Love P. 2011. Alliance contracting: adding value through relationship development. Eng Const Arch Manage. 18(5):444–461.
   Google Scholar
• DIRD. 2015. National alliance contracting guidelines. Guide to alliance contracting. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• DIT. 2015. National alliance contracting guidelines. Guide to alliance contracting. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Department of Infrastructure and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Doloi H. 2009. Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success. Constr Manage Econ. 27(11):1099–1109.
   Google Scholar
• DTF. 2006. Project alliancing: practitioners’ guide. Victoria: Department of Treasury and Finance.
   Google Scholar
• DTF. 2009. In pursuit of additional value. A benchmarking study into alliancing in the Australian public sector. Melbourne: Department of Treasury and Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev. 14(4):532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2004. Directive 2004/18/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts. Official J Eur Union. L134–L135.
   Google Scholar
• Fulford R, Standing C. 2014. Construction industry productivity and the potential for collaborative practice, Int J Project Manage. 32(2):315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadde L, Dubois A. 2010. Partnering in the construction industry – problems and opportunities. J Purchas Supply Manage. 16(4):254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green S, Lenard D. 1999. Organising the project procurement process. In: Rowlinson S, McDermott P, editors. Procurement systems: a guide to best practice. Spon: London; p. 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey D, Lewis M. 2007. Public private partnerships: the worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson E. 2003. All research is interpretive!. J Bus Indus Mark. 18(6):482–492.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck A, Walker D, Hampson K, Peters R. 2004. Project alliancing at national museum of Australia – collaborative process. J Constr Eng Manage. 130(1):143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque SM, Green R, Keogh W. 2004. Collaborative relationships in the UK upstream oil and gas industry: critical success and failure factors. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 1/2004, 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies M, Graham B, Rowlinson S, Cheung Y, Satchell A. 2006. Project alliances in the Australian construction industry: a case study of a water treatment project. In: McDermott P, Khalfan M, editors. Symposium on CIB W92: sustainability and value through construction procurement, 29 Nov–2 Dec; Digital World Centre, Salford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors A. 2004. Trust in project relationships – inside the black box, Int J Project Manage. 22(3):175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Knott T. 1996. No business as usual: an extraordinary North Sea result. London: The British Petroleum Co.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 1998. Project alliances in the construction industry. Sydney: NSW Department of Public Works & Services.
   Google Scholar
• Laan A, Noorderhaven N, Voordijk H, Dewulf G. 2011. Building trust in construction partnering projects: an exploratory case-study. J Purchas Supply Manage. 17(2):98–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä P. 2009. Project alliance. The competitive single target-cost approach. VTT research notes 2472. Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä P. 2011. Towards the use of project alliance: joint development of a team selection procedure as an example of steps taken. MISBE2011 – International Conference: Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment; Jun 20–23; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä P. 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Constr Manage Econ. 30(1):57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä P, Petäjäniemi P. 2012. Alliance contracting – one for all and all for one. European Infrastructure Procurement Symposium; May 7–8; Copenhagen, Denmark: Netlipse.
   Google Scholar
• Lai E. 2011. Collaboration: a literature review. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren P, Erikson PE. 2009. Effects of collaboration in projects on construction project performance. Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Yan H. 2007. An empirical study on incentives of strategic partnering in China: views from construction companies. Int J Project Manage. 25(3):241–249.
   Google Scholar
• MEE. 2007. Act on public contracts 348/2007. Finland: Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Meng X. 2012. The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction, Int J Project Manage. 30(2):188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Gallagher B. 2012. The impact of incentive mechanisms on project performance. Int J Project Manage. 30(3):352–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morwood R, Scott D, Pitcher I. 2008. Alliancing. A participant's guide. Brisbane: Maunsell AECOM.
   Google Scholar
• Naoum S. 2003. An overview into the concept of partnering. Int J Project Manage. 21(1):71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Niesniemi H. 2016. The transaction cost in project alliances [master's thesis]. Espoo: Aalto University, School of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin R, Fairweather V, Guy S. 1999. Construction claims: prevention and resolution. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sakal M. 2005. Project alliancing: a relational contract mechanism for dynamic projects. Lean Constr J. 2(1):67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Scott B. 2001. Partnering in Europe. Incentive based alliancing for projects. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Steen R. 1994. Five steps to resolving construction disputes without litigation. J Manage Eng. 10(4):19–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang L, Shen Q, Cheng E. 2010. A review of studies on public–private partnership projects in the construction industry. Int J Project Manage. 28(7):683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P, Sanders S. 1998. Partnering continuum. J Manage Eng. 14(5):73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilasini N, Neitzert T, Rotimi J, Windapo A. 2012. A framework for subcontractor integration in alliance contracts. Int J Constr Supply Chain Manage. 2(1):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Walker D, Hampson K, editors. 2008. Procurement strategies: a relationship-based approach. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Walker DHT, Harley J, Mills A. 2015. Performance of project alliancing in Australasia: a digest of infrastructure development from 2008 to 2013. Constr Econ Build. 15(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker D, Johannes D. 2003. Construction industry joint venture behavior in Hong Kong – designed for collaborative results?. Int J Project Manage. 21(1):39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S. 2010. The impact of collaborative working on construction project performance [Doctoral thesis]. Northumbria: Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung J, Cahn A, Chan D. 2007. The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept. Int J Project Manage. 25(3):219–231.
   Google Scholar