Managing critical drivers for building information modelling implementation in the Singapore construction industry: an organizational change perspective

References

• AIACC. 2014. Integrated project delivery: an updated working definition. Sacramento (CA): American Institute of Architects, California Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alshaher AAF. 2013. The Mckinsey 7S model framework for e-learning system readiness assessment. Int J Adv Eng Technol. 6(5):1948–1966.
   Google Scholar
• Aranda-Mena G, Crawford J, Chevez A, Froese T. 2009. Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM? Int J Managing Projects Bus. 2(3):419–434.
   Google Scholar
• Arayici Y, Coates P, Koskela L, Kagioglou M, Usher C, O'Reilly K. 2011. BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices. Struct Surv. 29(1):7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Austin MJ, Ciaassen J. 2008. Impact of organizational change on organizational culture. J Evidence-Based Soc Work. 5(1):321–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Autodesk. 2012. A framework for implementing a BIM business transformation. San Rafael (CA): Autodesk.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar N, Kang Y, Ahmad IU. 2014. Factors influencing integrated project delivery in publicly owned construction projects: an information modelling perspective. Procedia Eng. 77:213–221.
   Google Scholar
• BCA. 2013. Singapore BIM guide version 2. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority.
   Google Scholar
• BCA. 2016. Reaching new milestones with design for manufacturing and assembly. Build smart Singapore: Building Constr Auth.
   Google Scholar
• Belay AM. 2009. Design for manufacturability and concurrent engineering for product development. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 25:240–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein PG, Pittman JH. 2004. Barriers to the adoption of building information modelling in the building industry. Autodesk.
   Google Scholar
• Bikson TK, Eveland JD. 1990. The interplay of work group structures and computer support. In: Galegher J, Kraut R, Egido C, editors. Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; p. 245–289.
   Google Scholar
• Binder A. 1984. Restrictions on statistics imposed by method of measurement: some reality, much mythology. J Crim Justice. 12(5):467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blismas N, Pasquire C, Gibb A. 2006. Benefit evaluation for offsite production in construction. Const Manage Econ. 24(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas N, Wakefield R. 2009. Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Const Innov. 9(1):72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbitt HR Jr, Behling OC. 1981. Organizational behavior: a review of the literature. JHigher Educ. 5:29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler AD. 1962. Strategic and structure: chapters in the history of American industrial enterprise. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chelson DE. 2010. The effects of building information modeling on construction site productivity. [ Doctoral dissertation]. College Park (MD): University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng JC, Lu Q. 2015. A review of the efforts and roles of the public sector for BIM adoption worldwide. J Inform Technol Constr. 20:442–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua DK, Yeoh JK. 2015. Understanding the science of virtual design and construction: what it takes to go beyond building information modelling. In: O'Brien WJ, Ponticelli S, editors. Proceedings of the 2015 International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering; 2015 Jun 21–23; Austin (TX):
   Google Scholar
• Croteau AM, Bergeron F. 2009. Interorganizational governance of information technology. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2009 Jan 05–08; Waikoloa (HI); Washington (DC): IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg T, Hokkanen P, Newman M. 2016. How Business strategy and technology impact the role and the tasks of CIOs: an evolutionary model. IntJ IT/Bus Align Gov (IJITBAG). 7(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg T. 2016. The creation of inter-organisational IT governance for social welfare and healthcare IT-lessons from a case study. Int J Netw Virtual Organisations. 16(1):38–71.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GB, Lee AS, Nickles KR, Chatterjee S, Hartung R, Wu Y. 1992. Diagnosis of an information system failure: a framework and interpretive process. Inform Manage. 23(5):293–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haes S, Van Grembergen W, Gemke D, Thorp J. 2012. Inter-organizational governance of information technology: learning from a global multi-business-unit environment. Int J IT/Bus Align Gov. 3(1):27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• El Asmar M, Hanna AS, Loh WY. 2013. Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(11):04013012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Reed D, Khanzode A, Ashcraft H. 2014. A simple framework for integrated project delivery. In: Kalsaas BT, Koskela L, Saurin TA, editors. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction; 2014 Jun 25–27; Oslo (Norway).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M. 2008. Reshaping the life cycle process with virtual design and construction methods. In: Brandon P, Kocatürk T, editors. Virtual futures for design, construction and procurement. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing Ltd; p. 104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gao J, Fischer M. 2006. Case studies on the implementation and impacts of virtual design and construction (VDC) in Finland. Stanford (CA): Stanford University, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb A, Isack F. 2003. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Build Res Inform. 31(2):146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JM. 2005. The eight ‘S's of successful strategy execution. J Change Manage. 5(1):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhao X, Goh KJ. 2014. Investigating the client-related rework in building projects: the case of Singapore. Int J Project Manage. 32:698–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Jiang X. 2015. Core self-evaluation and life satisfaction: the person-environment fit perspective. Pers Individ Differ. 75:68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Wang Z. 2014. Entrepreneurial intention and outcome expectancy: evidence from South Korea and China. Contemp Manage Res. 10:251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Juan YK, Lai WY, Shih SG. 2017. Building information modeling acceptance and readiness assessment in Taiwanese architectural firms. J Civil Eng Manage. 23(3):356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasimu MA, Roslan BA, Fadhlin BA. 2012. Knowledge management models in civil engineering construction firms in Nigeria. Interdiscip JContemp Res Bus. 4(6):936–950.
   Google Scholar
• Kent DC, Becerik-Gerber B. 2010. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(8):815–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanzode A, Fisher M, Reed D. 2007. Challenges and benefits of implementing virtual design and construction technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems on large healthcare project. In: Proceedings of the 24th CIB W78 Conference; 2007 June 27–29. Maribor (Slovenia).
   Google Scholar
• Khosrowshahi F, Arayici Y. 2012. Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 19(6):610–635.
   Google Scholar
• Kiani I, Sadeghifam AN, Ghomi SK, Marsono AKB. 2015. Barriers to implementation of Building Information Modeling in scheduling and planning phase in Iran. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 9(5):91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz J, Fischer M. 2012. Virtual design and construction: themes, case studies and implementation suggestions. Stanford (CA): Stanford University, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering;
   Google Scholar
• Kwon TH, Zmud R. 1987. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In: Boland R, Hirschheim R, editors. Critical issues in information systems research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; p. 227–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lam SW. 2014. The Singapore BIM roadmap [Internet]. Available from: http://bimsg.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/BIM-SYMPOSIUM_MR-LAM-SIEW-WAH_Oct-13-v6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt HJ. 1965. Applied organizational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In: March J, editor. Handbook of organizations. Chicago (IL): Rand McNally; p.1144–1170.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Lu W, Huang T. 2009. Rethinking project management and exploring virtual design and construction as a potential solution. Constr Manage Econ. 27(4):363–371.
   Google Scholar
• Liao L, Teo EAL, Low SP. 2017. A project management framework for enhanced productivity performance using building information modelling. Constr Econ Build. 17(3):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low SP. 1998. Managing total service quality: a systemic view. Manag Ser Qual. 8(1):34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Newman M. 2008. Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model. Eur J Inf Syst. 17(6):589–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane A, Stehle J. 2014. DfMA: engineering the future. In: Proceedings of Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) Shanghai International Conference; 2014 Sept 16-19; Shanghai (China).
   Google Scholar
• Michel A, By RT, Burnes B. 2013. The limitations of dispositional resistance in relation to organizational change. Manage Decis. 51(4):761–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GA. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 63(2):81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. 2014. Budget 2014 – opportunities for the future, assurance for our seniors. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Mistry V. 2008. Benchmarking e-learning: trialling the “MIT90s” framework. Benchmarking: Int J. 15(3):326–340.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell G. 2013. Selecting the best theory to implement planned change: improving the workplace requires staff to be involved and innovations to be maintained. Nurs Manage. 20(1):32–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikakhtar A, Hosseini AA, Wong KY, Zavichi A. 2015. Application of lean construction principles to reduce construction process waste using computer simulation: a case study. Int J Ser Operat Manage. 20(4):461–480.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo-del-Val M, Martínez-Fuentes C, Roig-Dobón S. 2012. Participative management and its influence on organizational change. Manage Decis. 50(10):1843–1860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal A, Hewage KN. 2013. Building information modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects. Automat Constr. 31:204–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price AD, Chahal K. 2006. A strategic framework for change management. Constr Manage Econ. 24(3):237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjbari M. 2013. A model in information management system using interior relation layers. Global J Sci Eng Technol. 5:108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rockart JF, Scott Morton MS. 1984. Implications of changes in information technology for corporate strategy. Interfaces. 14(1):84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross K, Cartwright P, Novakovic O. 2006. A guide to modern methods of construction. Bucks: NHBC Foundation, IHS BRE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker S. 2000. Toward a methodology for managing information systems implementation: a social constructivist perspective. Informing Sci. 3(4):195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sattineni A, Mead K. 2013. Coordination guidelines for virtual design and construction. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction; 2013 Aug 11–15; Montreal (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Scott Morton M. 1991. The corporation of the 1990s: information technology and organisational transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selvaraj P, Radhakrishnan P, Adithan M. 2009. An integrated approach to design for manufacturing and assembly based on reduction of product development time and cost. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 42(1–2):13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith C, Norton B, Ellis D. 1992. Leavitt's diamond and the flatter library: a case study in organizational change. Library Manage. 13(5):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P. 2014. BIM implementation – global strategies. Procedia Eng. 85:482–492.
   Google Scholar
• Teo AL, Heng PSN. 2007. Deployment framework to promote the adoption of automated quantities taking-off system. In: Zou PXW, Newton S, Wang J, editors. Proceedings of CRIOCM 2007 International Research Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. 8–13 August 2007; Sydney (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Teo AL. 2008. Online survey: factors deterring the development of automated quantity taking-off system. In: Proceedings of CIB W055 – W065 Joint International Symposium; 2008 Nov 15–17; Dubai (United Arab Emirates).
   Google Scholar
• Teo EAL, Chan SL, Tan PH. 2007. Empirical investigation into factors affecting exporting construction services in SMEs in Singapore. J Constr Eng Manage. 133(8):582–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdecho MJ, Alfaro-Saiz JJ, Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Ortiz-Bas A. 2012. A multi-criteria approach for managing inter-enterprise collaborative relationships. Omega. 40:249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigand D. 2007. Building on Leavitt's diamond model of organizations: the organizational interaction diamond model and the impact of information technology on structure, people, and tasks. In: Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2007 Aug 10–12. Keystone (CO).
   Google Scholar
• Wilfling S, Baumoel U. 2011. A comprehensive information model for business change projects. In: Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2011 Aug 4–8; Detroit (MI).
   Google Scholar
• Won J, Lee G, Dossick C, Messner J. 2013. Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(11):04013014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahrizan Z, Ali NM, Haron AT, Marshall-Ponting A, Hamid ZA. 2013. Exploring the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in the Malaysian construction industry: a qualitative approach. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2(8):384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Hwang BG, Lee HN. 2016. Identifying critical leadership styles of project managers for green building projects. Int J Constr Manage. 16(2):150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Hwang BG, Low SP. 2014. Enterprise risk management implementation in construction firms: an organizational change perspective. Manage Dec. 52(5):814–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar