Key performance indicators of value management in the Sri Lankan construction industry

References

• Abdullah R, Arabiyyat AR. 2016. The possibility of applying value engineering: case of Municipality of Al-Salt. Manage Sci Eng. 10(1):38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Al-gahtani K, Al-sulaihi I, Al Rashed R, Batarfi A. 2015. Key performance indicators for value management in Saudi construction industry. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage. 4(11):54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Altunışık R, Coşkun R, Bayraktaroğlu S, Yıldırım E. 2004. Research methods in social sciences. Sakarya (Turkey): Sakarya Bookstore
   Google Scholar
• Borg WR, Gall M. 1979. Educational research: an introduction. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe LE, Jahre M. 2009. Balancing value creating logics in construction. Const Manage Econ. 27(7):695–704
   Google Scholar
• Çelik T, Kamali S, Arayici Y. 2017. Social cost in construction projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 64:77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhabra J, Tripathi B. 2014. Value engineering: a vital tool for improving cost & productivity. Int J Indus Eng Technol. 4(6):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. 2nd ed. California (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee CE. 2009. Value management in the construction industry: what does it entail and is it a worthwhile practice? [dissertation]. University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell ‘Isola AJ. 1997. Value engineering practical applications: for design, construction, maintenance and operations. New York (NY): R.S. Means Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas MF. 2008. Value and risk management: a guide to best practice. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ekanayake EMK, Perera BAKS. 2016. Appropriate delay analysis techniques to analyse delays in road construction projects in Sri Lanka. Built Environ Project Asset Manage. 6(5):521–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt S, Sander D, Christoffersen AK. 2005. The value universe: defining a value-based approach to lean construction. 13th Annual Conference of the International Group on Lean Construction (IGLC), 19–21 July. Sydney, Australia, International Group on Lean Construction. p. 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes MT. 2015. Value analysis: going into a further dimension. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res. 5(2):781–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong PS, Shen QP, Cheng EW. 2001. A framework for benchmarking the value management process. Benchmarking Int J. 8(4):306–316.
   Google Scholar
• Ford DN, Lander DM, Voyer JJ. 2002. A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction projects. Const Manage Econ, 20(4):343–351.
   Google Scholar
• Gidado K. 2004. Enhancing the prime contractor's pre-construction planning. J Const Res. 5(1):87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gliem JA, Gliem RR. 2003. Calculating interpreting and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus (COLO): Ohio State University. p. 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Haponava T, Al‐Jibouri S. 2009. Identifying key performance indicators for use in control of pre‐project stage process in construction. Int J Product Perform Manage. 58(2):160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ilayaraja, K, Eqyaabal MZ. 2015. Value engineering in construction. Indian J Sci Technol. 8(32):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jaapar A, Endut I, Bari N, Takim R. 2012. The impact of value management implementation in Malaysia. J Sustain Dev. 2(2):210.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. 2004. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 33(7):14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Karunasena G, Gamage KR. 2017. A decision-making formula for value engineering applications in the Sri Lankan construction industry. J Financ Manage Property Const. 22(1):77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly J, Male S. 1993. Value management in design and construction: the economic management of projects. London (UK): Spon Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly J, Male S, Graham D. 2004. Value management of construction projects. London (UK): Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Koops L, Van Loenhout C, Bosch-Rekveldt M, Hertogh M, Bakker H. 2017. Different perspectives of public project managers on project success. Eng Const Archit Manage. 24(6):1294–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari CR. 2004. Research methodology: methods and techniques. 3rd ed. New Delhi (India): New Age International Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• KPI Group. 2000. KPI Report for the Minister for Construction, London.
   Google Scholar
• Leung M, Ng ST, Cheung SO. 2002. Improving satisfaction through conflict stimulation and resolution in value management in construction projects. J Manage Eng. 18(2):68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin G, Shen Q. 2006. Critical appraisal of performance measurement in value management. Int J Const Manage. 6(2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lin G, Shen Q. 2007. Measuring the performance of value management studies in construction: critical review. J Manage Eng. 23(1):2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin G, Shen QP. 2010. Development of performance measurement framework for value management studies in construction. In: Ruwanpura J, Mohamed Y, Lee S, editors. Proceedings of Construction Research Congress 2010; May 8–10. Banff (AB): ASCI. p. 1000–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Lin G, Shen GQ, Sun M, Kelly J. 2011. Identification of key performance indicators for measuring the performance of value management studies in construction. J Const Eng Manage. 137(9):698–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke MB. 1994. Management of value in the British construction industry. London: SAVE International.
   Google Scholar
• Male S, editor. 1998. The value management benchmark: A good practice framework for clients and practitioners. London (UK): Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsuo M, Killen CP. 2014. Value management in project portfolios: identifying and assessing strategic value. Project Manage J. 45(5):56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir F, Pinnington A. 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. Int J Project Manage. 32(2):202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsen T, Reg D. 2011.Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neely A, Adams C, Kennerley M. 2002. The performance prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing business success. New Jersey (NJ): Finacial Times. p. 159–160.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman WL. 2011. Social Research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oke A, Aigbavboa C. 2017. The concept of value management. Sustainable Value Management for Construction Projects. p. 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer A, Kelly J, Male S. 1996. Holistic appraisal of value engineering in construction in United States. J Const Eng. 122(4):324–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera S, Karunasena G, Selvadurai K. 2006. Application of value management in construction. Built-Environ Sri Lanka. 4(1):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Potts K, Ankrah N. 2013. Construction cost management: learning from case studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rad KM, Yamini, OA. 2016. The methodology of using value engineering in construction projects management. Civil Eng J. 2(6):262–269.
   Google Scholar
• Ramly ZM, Lin TG. 2016. Performance measurement of value management. In Shen GQ, Yu AT, editors. Value management in construction and real estate: methodology and applications. New York (NY): Routledge. p. 138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rangelova F, Traykova M. 2014. Value management in construction project. Applied Conference with International Participation Project Management in Construction, Sofia, Bulgaria, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy. p. 429–434.
   Google Scholar
• Roszkowska E. 2013. Rank ordering criteria weighting methods – a comparative overview. Optim Studia Ekonomiczne. 5(65):14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Salem-Mhamdia AB, Ghadhab BB. 2012. Value management and activity based costing model in the Tunisian restaurant. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 24(2):269–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JRA, Lippke L, Pope P. 1998. PROC FACTOR: a tool for extracting hidden gems from a mountain of variables. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary (NC), SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• SAVE International. 1998. Function: definition and analysis. www.value-eng.org/pdf_docs/monographs/funcmono.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SAVE International. (2007, June). Value standard and the Body of Knowledge. SAVE International Value Standard. www.value-eng.org/pdf_docs/monographs/vmstd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shen GQP, Liu G. 2003. Critical success factors for value management studies in construction. J Const Eng Manage. 129(5):485–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen GQP, Yu AT. 2012. Value management: recent developments and way forward. Const Innov. 12(3):264–271.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, GQP, Yu, AT, editors. 2016. Value management in construction and real state: methodology and applications. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. 2003. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. New York (NY): SAGE. p. 3–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tharuk D. 1992. Research methodology in social sciences. New Delhi (India): Deep and Deep Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L. 2012. Value engineering application in construction project management. 2012 International Conference on Industrial Control and Electronics Engineering (ICICEE), 23–25 August, Xi'an, China, IEEE. p. 1265–1268.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Sunindijo RY, Dainty ARJ. 2014. A mixed methods research design for bridging the gap between research and practice in construction safety. Safe Sci. 70:316–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar