Cost control in megaprojects: efficacy, tools and techniques, key knowledge areas and project comparisons

References

• Acebes F, Pajares J, Galán JM, López-Paredes A. 2014. A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics. Int J Proj Manage. 32:423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adoko MT, Mazzuchi TA, Sarkani S. 2016. Developing a cost overrun predictive model for complex systems development projects. Proj Manage J. 46:111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jibouri SH. 2003. Monitoring systems and their effectiveness for project cost control in construction. Int J Proj Manage. 21:145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D. 2014. Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy. 69:43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth A. 2013. Cost studies of buildings. 5th edition. London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barreras AJ. 2011. Risk management: Monte Carlo simulation in cost estimating [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/monte-carlo-simulation-cost-estimating-6195. [accessed 2018 April 14].
   Google Scholar
• Barraza GA, Back WE, Mata F. 2000. Probabilistic monitoring of project performance using SS-curves. J Construct Eng Manage. 126:142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCA S. 2017. Construction infonet [Online]. Available: https://www.bca.gov.sg/Infonet/construction_infonet.html. [accessed 2017 February 25].
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Rekveldt M, Jongkind Y, Mooi H, Bakker H, Verbraeck A. 2011. Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. Int J Proj Manage. 29:728–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston University School of Public Health, U. S. 2017. When to use a nonparametric test [Online]. Available: http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/BS/BS704_Nonparametric/BS704_Nonparametric2.html. [accessed 2018 April 26].
   Google Scholar
• Brikstats Consulting 2016. Saudi Arabia 2016 Construction Outlook: Compare Rising Mega-Project Opportunities with increasing project risks. Saudi Arabia: Brikstats Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann C, Brezinski H, Erbe A. 2016. Innovation in construction megaprojects. J Construct Eng Manage. 142:04016059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callegari C, Szklo A, Schaeffer R. 2018. Cost overruns and delays in energy megaprojects: how big is big enough? Energy Policy. 114: 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarelli CC, Flyvbjerg B, Molin EJE, van Wee B. 2010. Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Explanations and their theoretical embeddedness. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res. 10:5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarelli CC, van Wee B, Molin EJE, Flyvbjerg B. 2012. Different cost performance: different determinants? The case of cost overruns in Dutch transport infrastructure projects. Transp Policy. 22:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SL, Park M. 2005. Project cost estimation using principal component regression. Construct Manage Econ. 23:295–304.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves MS, de Araújo CCS, Teixeira LR, Rosa DV, Glória I Jr., Nior I., Nogueira CD. 2016. A new approach to managing lessons learned in PMBoK process groups: the ballistic 2.0 model. Int J Inf Syst Proj Manage. 4:27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y-M, Yu C-H, Wang H-T. 2011. Short-interval dynamic forecasting for actual S-curve in the construction phase. J Construct Eng Manage. 137: 933–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo HJ, Tommelein ID, Ballard G, Zabelle TR. 1999. WorkPlan: constraint-based database for work package scheduling. J Construct Eng Manage. 125:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua DKH, Nguyen TQ, Yeoh KW. 2013. Automated construction sequencing and scheduling from functional requirements. Autom Construct. 35:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costin A, Pradhananga N, Teizer J. 2012. Leveraging passive RFID technology for construction resource field mobility and status monitoring in a high-rise renovation project. Autom Construct. 24: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC. 2018. Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. Build Environ. 130:74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies A, Gann D, Douglas T. 2009. Innovation in megaprojects: systems integration at London Heathrow terminal 5. Cali Manage Rev. 51:101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloi H. 2013. Cost overruns and failure in project management: understanding the roles of key stakeholders in construction projects. J Construct Eng Manage. 139: 267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming QW, Koppelman JM. 2000. Earned value project management. Newton Square (PA): Project Mangement Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B. 2014a. Megaproject planning and management: essential readings., Vols 1–2. Cheltenham (UK)/Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B. 2014b. What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Proj Manage J. 45:6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. 2003a. Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Holm MKS, Buhl SL. 2002. Underestimating costs in Public Works Projects: error or lie? J Am Plan Assoc. 68:279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Holm MKS, Buhl SL. 2003b. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transp Rev. 23:71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Holm MKS, Buhl SL. 2004. What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects? Transp Rev. 24:3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster JJ, Barkus E, Yavorsky C. 2005. Understanding and using advanced statistics: a practical guide for students. London (UK): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin J. 2000. A guide to project management body of knowledge. Newton Square (PA): Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gharaibeh HM. 2014. Cost control in mega projects using the Delphi method. J Manage Eng. 30:4001–4024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giezen M. 2012. Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. Int J Proj Manage. 30:781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblin C. 2011. Cost controlling measures and cost forecasting [Online]. Available: https://chamblin.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/cost-controlling-measures-and-cost-forecasting/.[accessed 2018 April 13].
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Selstead G, Mahoney JP. 1992. Cost overruns on State of Washington construction contracts. Transp Res Rec. 1351, 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chan APC, Le Y. 2015a. Understanding the determinants of program organization for construction megaproject success: case study of the Shanghai expo construction. J Manage Eng. 31: 05014019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chan APC, Le, Y, Jin RZ. 2015b. From construction megaproject management to complex project management: bibliographic analysis. J Manage Eng. 31:04014052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Shan M, Phua H, Chi S. 2017a. An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustainability. 9:1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Shan M, Supa’at NNB. 2017b. Green commercial building projects in Singapore: critical risk factors and mitigation measures. Sustain Cities Soc. 30:237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Shan M, Tan EK. 2016. Investigating reworks in green building construction projects: magnitude, influential factors, and solutions. Int J Environ Res. 10:499–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Woo S. 2004. Flexible work breakdown structure for integrated cost and schedule control. J Construct Eng Manag. 130:616–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keung C, Shen L. 2017. Network strategy for contractors’ business competitiveness. Construct Manag Econ. 35:482–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korytárová J, Hromádka V. 2014. The economic evaluation of megaprojects – social and economic impacts. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 119:495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Le Y, Shan M, Chan AP, Hu Y. 2014. Investigating the causal relationships between causes of and vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector. J Construct Eng Manag. 140:05014007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt RE, Kunz JC. 1985. Using knowledge of construction and project management for automated schedule updating. Proj Manag J. 16:57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Lu Y, Taylor JE, Han Y. 2018. Bibliographic and comparative analyses to explore emerging classic texts in megaproject management. Int J Proj Manag. 36:342–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang LY. 2015. Parliament: system to scrutinise high value public projects working well, says Josephine Teo [Online]. Singapore: The Straits Times. Available: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parliament-system-to-scrutinise-high-value-public-projects-working-well-says-josephine-teo. [accessed 2016 November 08].
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore MJ, Pollack-Johnson B, Smith CA. 2001. Project management in construction: software use and research directions. J Construct Eng Manag. 127:101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Zeng S, Ma H, Zeng R, Tam VWY. 2017. An indicator system for evaluating megaproject social responsibility. Int J Proj Manag. 35:1415–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Cui Z, Yang X, Skitmore M. 2018. Experimental investigation of the impact of risk preference on construction bid markups. J Manag Eng. 34 :04018003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez del Puerto C, Shane JS. 2014. Keys to success in megaproject management in Mexico and the United States: case study. J Construct Eng Manag. 140. :B5013001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Zeng S, Lin H, Chen H, Shi JJ. 2017. The societal governance of megaproject social responsibility. Int J Proj Manag. 35:1365–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangiafico SS. 2016. One-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test [Online]. Available: http://rcompanion.org/handbook/F_02.html. [accessed 2018 April 26].
   Google Scholar
• McDonald JH. 2014. Wilcoxon signed-rank test [Online]. Available: http://www.biostathandbook.com/wilcoxonsignedrank.html. [accessed 2018 April 26].
   Google Scholar
• Merrow EW. 2003. Mega-field developments require special tactics, risk management. Offshore. 63:90–92.
   Google Scholar
• Navon R. 2005. Automated project performance control of construction projects. Autom Construct. 14:467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally SW. 2011. Construction methods and management. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Olaniran OJ, Love PED, Edwards D, Olatunji OA, Matthews J. 2016. Cost overruns in hydrocarbon megaprojects: a critical review and implications for research. Proj Manag J. 46:126–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaniran OJ, Love PED, Edwards DJ, Olatunji O, Matthews J. 2017. Chaos theory: implications for cost overrun research in hydrocarbon megaprojects. J Construct Eng Manag. 143:05016020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawale YA, Sun M. 2010. Cost and time control of construction projects: inhibiting factors and mitigating measures in practice. Construct Manag Econ. 28:509–526.
   Google Scholar
• Oliomogbe GO, Smith NJ. 2013. Value in megaprojects. Organ Technol Manag Construct. 4, 617–624.
   Google Scholar
• Ostoiić-Škomrlj N, Raduiković M. 2012. S-curve modelling in early phases of construction projects. Gradjevinar. 64:647–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman AAE. 2013. Challenges of mega construction projects in developing countries. Organ Technol Manag Construct. 5:730–746.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu EK, Chan AP, Shan M. 2017. Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: an overview. Science Eng Ethics. 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parth FR. 2014. Planning and controlling megaprojects [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/planning-controlling-megaprojects-9289. [accessed 2018 April 13].
   Google Scholar
• Peyret F, Tasky R. 2003. Asphalt quality parameters traceability using electronic tags and GPS. Nist Spec Publ Sp. 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Pilcher R. 1994. Project cost control in construction. Boston (MA): Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Platz S. 2018. S-curve analysis vs. earned value analysis [Online]. Available: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/scurve-analysis-vs-earned-value-analysis-37055.html. [accessed 2018 April 14].
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute, U. S. 2017. Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square (PA): Project Management Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reichel CW. 2006. Earned value management systems (EVMS): “you too can do earned value management.” [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/earned-value-management-systems-analysis-8026. [accessed 2018 April 14].
   Google Scholar
• Roberts AC, Christopoulos GI, Car J, Soh C-K, Lu M. 2016. Psycho-biological factors associated with underground spaces: what can the new era of cognitive neuroscience offer to their study? Tunnelling Undergr Space Technol. 55:118–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet W, Bertolini L, Giezen M. 2013. Complexity and uncertainty: problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? Int J Urban Reg Res. 37:1984–2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroop S, Allopi D. 2006. Enhancing project planning and cost management on infrastructure projects. 2006 PMSA International Conference, 2006. Johannesburg, South Africa: Project Management South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Shan M, Chan AP, Le Y, Hu Y, Xia B. 2016. Understanding collusive practices in Chinese construction projects. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 143:05016012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan M, Hwang BG, Wong KSN. 2017. A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks. Tunnelling Undergr Space Technol. 70:19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Yan H, Fan H, Wu Y, Zhang Y. 2017a. An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design. Build Environ. 124:388–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Zhang Z, Zhang X. 2017b. Key factors affecting green procurement in real estate development: a China study. J Cleaner Prod. 153:372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha PP, Burns LA, Shields DR. 2013. Magnitude of construction cost and schedule overruns in public work projects. J Construct Eng. 2013:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki M. 2016. The making and impacts of a classic text in megaproject management: the case of cost overrun research. Int J Proj Manag. 36:362–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki M. 2018. Five steps to control megaproject costs [Online]. Available: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/five-steps-to-control-megaproject-costs/article28329237/. [accessed 2018 April 13].
   Google Scholar
• Sun C, Jiang S, Skibniewski MJ, Man Q, Shen L. 2017. A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 23:764–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Xu H, Jiao L, Ochoa JJ, Shen L. 2017. A study of best practices in promoting sustainable urbanization in China. J Environ Manag. 193:8–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thas O, Rayner J, Best D. 2005. Tests for symmetry based on the one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank statistic. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 34:957–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touran A, Wiser EP. 1992. Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables. J Construct Eng Manag. 118:258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2017. Singapore GDP [Online]. Available: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/singapore/gdp. [accessed 2017 May 15].
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2013. Reports to Congressional Committees, NASA Assessments of Selected Large-Scale Projects. Washington (DC).
   Google Scholar
• University of Minnesota, U. S. 2018. Types of statistical tests [Online]. Available: https://cyfar.org/types-statistical-tests. [accessed 2018 April 26].
   Google Scholar
• Valle JA, Soares CAP. 2006. The use of EVA: earned value analysis in the cost management of construction projects [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/earned-value-analysis-cost-management-construction-8203. [Accessed 14 April 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Wu G, Zhao X, Zuo J, Zillante G. 2018. Effects of contractual flexibility on conflict and project success in megaprojects. Int J Confl Manag. 29:253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Yu ATW, Shen L. 2017. Investigating the determinants of contractor’s construction and demolition waste management behavior in Mainland China. Waste Manag. 60:290–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong C. 2013. Mega Building Projects in S’pore bring golden opportunities [Online]. Available: http://www.asiaone.com/singapore/mega-building-projects-spore-bring-golden-opportunities. [accessed 2018 February 11].
   Google Scholar
• Yu ATW, Wu Y, Shen J, Zhang X, Shen L, Shan L. 2015. The key causes of urban-rural conflict in China. Habitat Int. 49:65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Z, Ahola T, Le Y, Xie J. 2017. Governmental governance of megaprojects: the case of EXPO 2010 Shanghai. Proj Manag J. 48:37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Singhaputtangkul N. 2016. Effects of firm characteristics on enterprise risk management: case study of Chinese construction firms operating in Singapore. J Manag Eng. 32:05016008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Mi C. 2017. Social responsibility research within the context of megaproject management: trends, gaps and opportunities. Int J Proj Manag. 35:1378–1390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Chua D. 2012. Monte Carlo simulation based bankability analysis of the Public-Private Partnership project. The Twenty-fifths KKCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, pp. 444–447. Busan, Korea: BEXCO. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST).
   Google Scholar