A study on variation-specific disputes that arise in road projects in Sri Lanka: a qualitative approach

References

• Acharya NK, Dai Lee Y, Man Im H. 2006. Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 13(6):543–566.
   Google Scholar
• Allen M. 2012. Global construction disputes: moving in the right direction. London: EC Harris
   Google Scholar
• Amoatey CT, Anson BA. 2017. Investigating the major causes of scope creep in real estate construction projects in Ghana. J Facil Manage. 15(4):393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain FM, Assaf S, Pheng LS. 2004. Causes of discrepancies between design and construction. Archit Sci Rev. 47(3):237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Arain FM, Low SP. 2007. Modelling for management of variations in building projects. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 14(5):420–433.
   Google Scholar
• Alaryan A, Elbeltagi E, Elshahat A, Dawood M. 2014. Causes and effects of change orders on construction projects in Kuwait. Int J Eng Res Appl. 4(7):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bhadmus RT, Ayodele IO, Namadi AS. 2015. The causes of variation order of construction industry in Nigeria. Proceedings of the Academic Conference of African Scholar Publications & Research International on African Sustainable Development; May 7; Gombe, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Barman A, Charoenngam C. 2017. Decisional uncertainties in construction projects as a cause of disputes and their formal legal interpretation by the courts: review of legal cases in the United Kingdom. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolu Eng Constr. 9(3)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassioni HA, El-Razek MEA, El-Salam WAA. 2012. Avoiding claims in Egyptian construction projects: a quantitative survey. Proceedings of 3rd EPPM International Conference Engineering, Project and Production Management; Sep 10–12; Brighton: University of Brighton. p. 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Berg BL. 2009. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. New York (NY): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux D. 1981. From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In: Biography and society: the life history approach in the social sciences. London: Sage; p. 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bin-Ali AZ. 2008. Causes and steps to minimize variations in construction projects [master’s thesis]. Malaysia: University Technology Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Bogamuwa MMJC. 2006. How Sri Lankan contractors correct the winners curse [undergraduate thesis]. Moratuwa, Sri Lanka: University of Moratuwa.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow D, Vasilopoulos R. 1995. The new CCDC 2: facilitating dispute resolution of construction projects. Construction Law Journal. 11(2):95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Central bank of Sri Lanka. 2018. Annual Report 2017; [accessed 2018 September 01]. https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/sites/default/files/cbslweb_documents/publications/annual_report/2017/en/1_Preliminary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Hsu SC. 2007. Hybrid ANN-CBR model for disputed change orders in construction projects. Autom Constr. 17(1):56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Suen HHC, Ng STT, Leung ML. 2004. Convergent views of neutrals and users about alternative dispute resolution. ASCE J Manage Eng. 20(3):88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Yiu TW. 2006. Are construction disputes inevitable? IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 53(3):456–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Pang HY. 2014. Conceptualising construction disputes. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Colin J, Langford D, Kennedy P. 1996. The relationship between construction procurement strategies and construction contract conflicts. Proceedings of the CIB W-92 Procurement Symposium, North Meets West; Jan14–16; Durban, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Clough RH, Sears GA. 1994. Construction contracting. 6th ed. New York (NY): Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Cushman RF, Loulakis MC. 2001. Design-build contracting handbook. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Aspen Law & Business.
   Google Scholar
• Dennys N, Clay R. 2015. Hudson's building and engineering contracts. 13th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson OD, Gerryshom M, Wanyona G. 2015. Variations in civil engineering construction projects in Kenya: causes and effects. Int J Eng Res Technol. 4(2):1124–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Du J, El-Gafy M, Zhao D. 2015. Optimization of change order management process with object-oriented discrete event simulation: Case study. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(4)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykstra A. 2011. Construction project management: a complete introduction. 1st ed. San Francisco (CA): Kirshner Publishing Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton WW. 2008. Recommended contract practices for underground construction. USA: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.
   Google Scholar
• El-Adaway I, Fawzy S, Allard T, Runnels A. 2016. Change order provisions under national and international standard forms of contract. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 8(3)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt S. 2002. Architectural technology. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Arain F, Al-Raee S. 2010. Causes of variation orders in construction projects in the Gaza Strip. J Civ Eng Manage. 16(4):540–551.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk ER. 1997. Construction project administration. 5th ed. New Jersey (NJ): Prentice-Hall
   Google Scholar
• Halwatura RU, Ranasinghe NPNP. 2013. Causes of variation orders in road construction projects in Sri Lanka. ISRN Constr Eng. 1. 2013
   Google Scholar
• Herren RV, Cooper EL. 2000. Agricultural mechanics: fundamentals & applications. 4th ed. Bostan (MA): Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibbs W. 2012. Construction change: Likelihood, severity, and impact on productivity. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 4(3):67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim NHB. 2006. Variation orders in University Technology Malaysia construction projects [master’s thesis]. Johor Bahru, Malaysia: University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jayalath C. 2012. Limitations and hypothesis underlying the use of interpretation rules in construction contracts revisited. Filed in Construction Management Guide. Dec10, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jayalath C. 2013. Arguing construction claims. Colombo: Godage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim MA, Loong LJ. 2002. A study on variations in sewage construction projects. J Technol. 37:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Keane P, Sertyesilisik B, Ross AD. 2010. Variations and change orders on construction projects. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 2(2):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Khanzadi M, Nasirzadeh, Dashti MS. 2017. Fuzzy cognitive map approach to analyze causes of change orders in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(2)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari CR, 2004. Reasearch Methodology: methods and techniques . New delhi: New Age International Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy M. 1997. Conflicts, claims and disputes. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 4(2):95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakye AA. 1997. Construction project administration in practice 1st ed. Boston (MA): Addison Wesley
   Google Scholar
• Lee MJ, Choi MS, Kim YS. 2010. Attitudes of engineers related to prevention of change order claims. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 9(1):87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love P, Davis P, Ellis J, On Cheung S. 2010. Dispute causation: identification of pathogenic influences in construction. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 17(4):404–423.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien JJ. 1998. Construction change orders. NewYork (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mhando YB, Mlinga RS, Alinaitwe HM. 2017. Quantitative analysis of the effects of variations in public building projects. Int J Constr Eng Manage. 6(1):22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mahamid I. 2017. Effect of change orders on rework in highway projects in Palestine. J Financ Manage Prop Constr. 22(1):62–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malewana MVGC. 2009. Learning processes of construction project teams in Sri Lanka [undergraduate thesis]. Moratuwa, Sri Lanka: University of Moratuwa.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. 2018. Annual Report 2017 – Ministry of Finance Sri Lanka; [accessed 2018 September 01]. http://www.treasury.gov.lk/documents/10181/12870/2017.pdf/2bce4f3d-ebde-4409-b2b5-c8a0801b3edc
   Google Scholar
• Mitropoulos P, Howell G. 2001. Model for understanding preventing and resolving project disputes. ASCE J Constr Eng Manage. 127(3):223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed AA. 2001. Analysis and management of change orders for combined sewer over flow construction projects [undergraduate thesis]. Detroit (MI): Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Moselhi O, Assem I, El-Rayes K. 2005. Changes orders impact on labour productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(3):354–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyewobi LO, Jimoh R, Ganiyu BO, Shittu AA. 2016. Analysis of causes and impact of variation order on educational building projects. J Facil Manage. 14(2):139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton E, Appelbaum S. 2003. The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News. 26(5): 60-71.
   Google Scholar
• Perera BAKS, Dhanasinghe I, Rameezdeen R. 2009. Risk management in road construction: The case of Sri Lanka. Int J Strategic Prop Manage. 13(2):87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyantha THS, Karunasena G, Rodrigo VAK. 2011. Causes, nature and effects of variations in highways. Built Environ Sri Lanka. 9:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Punch KF. 2005. Introduction to social research – quantitative & qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Raji B, Mohemed AAA, Oseni UA. 2015. Reforming the legal framework for construction dispute resolution in Nigeria: a preliminary literature survey. Int J Bus EconLaw. 6(4)
   Google Scholar
• Road Development Authority [RDA] 2018. National Road Master Plan. Road Development Authority (RDA). [accessed 2018 September 01]. http://www.rda.gov.lk/supported/noticeboard/publications/cep1_2&4/Final%20EIAR%20-%20CEP%20Sections%201,2&4%20-%20Volume%20I%20-%20Main%20Report%20-%20English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reichard DD, Norwood CL. 2001. Analysing the cumulative impact of changes. Morgantown (WV): AACE International Transactions.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran U. 2003. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. 4th ed. New York (NY): Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Sergeant M, Wieliczko M. 2014. Construction contract variations (Construction Practice Series). London: Informa Law from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha M, Waya AS. 2009. Dispute Causation in Construction Projects. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng. 2278(1684):54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shipton C, Hughes W, Tutt D. 2014. Change management in practice: An ethnographic study of changes to contract requirements on a hospital project. Constr Manage Econ. 32(7-8):787–803.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha PP, Shrestha KK, Kandie TK. 2017. Effects of COs on the cost and schedule of rural road maintenance projects. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 9(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha PP, Maharjan R. 2018. Effects of change orders on cost growth, schedule growth, and construction intensity of large highway projects. J Leg Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 10(3)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ssegawa JK, Mfolwe KM, Makuke B, Kutua B. 2002. Construction variations: a scourge or a necessity. Proceedings of the 1st CIB-W107 International Conference on Creating a Sustainable Construction Industry in Developing Countries. Cape Town, South Africa: CIB; p. 11–13
   Google Scholar
• Sunday OA. 2010. Impact of variation orders on public construction projects. In: Egbu C, editor. Proceedings 26th Annual ARCOM Conference; Sep 6–8; Leeds, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management; p. 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Veenendaal JA. 1998. Analyzing the impact of change orders on a schedule. J Cost Eng. 40(9):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron BD. 2006. Scope for improvement: a survey of pressure points in Australian construction and infrastructure projects. A report prepared for the Australian Constructors Association by Blake Dawson Waldron Lawyers. Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yiu KTW, Cheung SO. 2007. Behavioral transition: a framework for construction conflict-tension relationships. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 54(3):498–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zaneldin EK. 2006. Construction claims in United Arab Emirates: types, causes, frequency. Int J Project Manage. 24(5):453–459.
   Google Scholar
• Zulkfili O, Omran A, Foo CK. 2009. The potential effects of variation orders in construction projects. J Eng. 7(2):1584–2665.
   Google Scholar