Futuristic evaluation of building energy simulation model with comparison of conventional villas

References

• Alawneh R. 2018. Assessing the consideration of water and energy efficiency in green buildings to achieve United Nations sustainable development goals in Jordan. Building and Environment. 146:119–132.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineering (ASHRAE STANDARD 90.1-2010) I-P Edition. ISSN 1041-2336.
   Google Scholar
• Balramdas, Meher P, Behera S, Rath B, Dash S, Choudhary P. 2016. A comparison between normal building and green building: a case study approach. IRJET. 3:402–450.
   Google Scholar
• Bian Y, Ma Y. 2017. Analysis of daylight metrics of side-lit room in Canton, Sount China: a comparison between daylight autonomy and daylight factor. Energy Build. 138:347–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan H, Krinkel D. 1982. A microcomputer program for daylighting design. Proceedings of the Seventh National Passive Solar Conference, Knoxville, TN. p. 405–410.
   Google Scholar
• Chan EHW, Qian QK, Lam PTI. 2009. The market for green building in developed Asian cities—the perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy. 37(8):3061–3070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau CK, Tse MS, Chung KY. 2010. A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Build Environ. 45(11):2553–2561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung W. 2011. Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies. Appl. Energy. 88(5):1470–1479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwaikat LN, Ali KN. 2018. The economic benefits of a green building – evidence from Malaysia. JBE. 18:448–453.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, et al. 2013. Green for growth. Building magazine. [accessed 2013 Feb 17]. http://www.building.co.uk/story.aspx?story-Code=5048252.
   Google Scholar
• Global Action Plan. 2006. UK schools carbon footprint scoping study. Stockholm Environment Institute. [accessed 2013 July 31]. http://www.sdcommission.org.uk/data/files/publications/GAP-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Green Building Council Green Homes Rating System (Version 2.0) Abridged Reference Guide April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jones P, Ceng, Mcibse M, Turner RN, Browne J. 2000. Energy benchmarks for public sector buildings in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of CIBSE National Conference, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Paulos E. 2009. Indoor air: measuring and visualizing indoor air quality. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• LaRosa LE. 2002. Buckley, and real-time indoor and outdoor measurements of black carbon in an occupied house: an examination of sources. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 52(1):41–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee ZH. 2013. An overview of global warming in South East Asia: CO2 emission status, efforts done and barriers. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev. 28:71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann S, Lechtenfeld T. 2015. The effect of drought on health outcomes and health expenditures in rural Vietnam. World Dev. 2(72):432–448.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A. 2011. The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ. 70(7):1344–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meenakshi Sharma. 2018. Development of a green building sustainability model for green buildings in India. JCLP. 190:538–551.
   Google Scholar
• Mokal AB, Shaikh AI, Raundal S, Prajapati SJ, Phatak UJ. 2015. Green building materials-a way towards sustainable construction. IJAIEM. 4(4):256–308.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code of India. 2005. Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Neil Adger W. 1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Dev. 27(2):249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen KQ. 2008. Impacts of a rise in electricity tariff on prices of other products in Vietnam. Energy Policy. 36(8):3145–3149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oduyemi O, Okoroh M. 2016. Building performance modelling for sustainable building design. IJSBE. 5:461–469.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G. 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater. 23(1):28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S. 2010. Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ. 70(2):434–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzlaff R. 2010. Developing policies for green buildings: what can the United States learn from the Netherlands. Sust Sci Practice Policy. 6(1):29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Samari M, Ghodrati N, Esmaeilifar R, Olfat P, Shafiei M. 2013. The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in Malaysia. Modern Appl Sci. 7(2):1.
   Google Scholar
• Sev A. 2009. How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development: a conceptual framework. Sust Dev. 17(3):161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehabi A, DeForest N, McNeil A, Masanet E, Greenblatt J, Lee ES, Masson G, Helms BA, Milliron DJ. 2013. The light harvesting potential of dynamic daylighting windows. Energy Build. 66:415–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen LY, Tam VWY. 2002. Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry. Int J Project Manag. 20(7):535–543.
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, Yan H, Fan H, Wu Y, Zhang Y. 2017. An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design. Build Environ. 66:415–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RM, Anandarajah G, Liyanage MH. 2009. Factors affecting CO2 emission from the power sector of selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Energy Policy. 37(6):2375–2384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam CM, Tam VWY, Tsui WS. 2004. Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong. Int J Project Manag. 22(7):563–571.
   Google Scholar
• Thilakaratne R, Lew V. 2011. Is LEED leading Asia?: An analysis of global adaptation and trends. Procedia Eng. 21:1136–1144.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme-10-YFP-Sustainable Buildings and Construction Programme. 2018. http://web.unep.org/10yfp/programmes/sustainable-buildings-and-construction-programme.
   Google Scholar
• Vangimalla PR, Olbina SJ, Issa RR, Hinze J. 2011. Validation of Autodesk Ecotect Accuracy for thermal and daylighting simulations. Winter Simulation Conference.
   Google Scholar