The impact of quality management systems on construction performance in the North West of England

References

• Abdirad H, Nazari A. 2015. Barriers to effective implementation of quality management systems in public design projects in Iran. Architect Eng Design Manage. 11(6):457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MC. 2014. Exploring the potential of integration quality assessment system in construction (Qlassic) With ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS). Int J Quality Res. 8(1):73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ahzahar N, Karim NA, Hassan SH, Eman J. 2011. A study of contribution factors to building failures and defects in construction industry. 2nd Int Building Control Conf. 20(1):249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Aichouni M, Messaoudene NA, Al-Ghonamy A, Touahmia M. 2014. An empirical study of quality management systems in the Saudi construction industry. Int J Construct Manage. 14(3):181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Almusharraf A, Whyte A. 2016. Task-based defect management: anatomical classification. Built Environ Project Asset Manage. 6(3):345–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awny Z. 2015. The opportunity of applying models of quality management system in public construction enterprises. Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Exacte Si Economice. 2(82):212–216.
   Google Scholar
• Banwell SH. 1964. The placing and management of contracts for building and civil engineering work: report of the Committee. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Bossom AC. 1934. Building to the skies: the romance of the skyscraper. London: Studio.
   Google Scholar
• Breja SK, Banwet DK, Iyer KC. 2011. Quality strategy for transformation: a case study. TQM J. 23(1):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini A. 2011. Integrating lean thinking into ISO 9001: a first guideline. Lean Six Sigma J. 2(2):96–117.
   Google Scholar
• CITB. 2017. North West. Available: http://www.citb.co.uk/research/construction-skills-network/north-west/. Last accessed 29/08/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dadhich P, Genovese A, Kumar N, Acquaye A. 2015. Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: a case study. Int J Production Econ. 164:271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan SJ. 1998. Rethinking construction. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Egan SJ. 2002. Rethinking construction 2002: achievements, next steps, getting involved’. London: The Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou J. 2010. Verification of a building defect classification system for housing. Structural Survey. 28(5):370–383.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman JC. 2014. Team coordination and dynamics: two central issues. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 23(5):355–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernad JMC, Gaya CG. 2013. Methodology for implementing Document Management Systems to support ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems. Procedia Eng. 63(1):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2013. Construction 2025. Industry strategy: government and industry in partnership. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Hoonaker P, Carayon P, Loushine T. 2010. Barriers and benefits of quality management in the construction industry: an empirical study. Total Quality Manage Business Excellence. 21(9):953–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingmond M, Ågren R. 2015. Unravelling causes of defects in construction. Construct Innovation. 15(2):198–218.
   Google Scholar
• Jraisat L, Jreisat L, Hattar C. 2015. Quality in construction management: An exploratory study. Int J Qual & Reliability Mgmt. 33(7):920–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotane I. 2015. Evaluating the importance of financial and non-financial indicators for the evaluation of company’s performance. Manage Theory Studies Rural Business Infrastruct Develop. 37(1):80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuei CH, Lu MH. 2013. Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Manage Business Excellence. 24(1–2):62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai HH, Lin CL. Lo, W 2016. A study on performance of three levels quality management system and the satisfaction of implementing construction quality of public construction in Taiwan. Int Conf Appl Syst Innovation. 1(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Latham SM. 1994. Constructing the team. London: HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D, Lim T, Arditi D. 2011. An expert system for auditing quality management systems in construction. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng. 26(8):612–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong T, Zakuan N, Saman M, Ariff M, Tan C. 2014. Using project performance to measure effectiveness of quality management system maintenance and practices in construction industry. Sci World J. 1(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Love PE, Edwards DJ, Irani Z, Walker DH. 2009. Project pathogens: the anatomy of omission errors in construction and resource engineering project. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 56(3):425–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mane PP, Patil JR. 2015. Quality management system at construction project: a questionnaire survey. Int J Eng Res Appl. 5(3):126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Z, Gatto K. 2014. Wood panelized roof subpurlin hanger construction defect assessment and load testing to establish defect tolerances. J Struct Design Construct. 20(1):401–405.
   Google Scholar
• Mills A, Love PE, Williams P. 2009. Defect costs in residential construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(1):12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne MJ, Adler RW. 1999. Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Acc Auditing Accountability J. 12(2):237.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar CA, Rosli MZ, Zuhairi AH, Rahman A. 2010. Quality cost in the construction industry – preliminary findings in Malaysia. J Design Built Environ. 6(1):29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mydin MAO, Othman NA, Sani NMD. 2014. A prospective study on building quality: relationship between workmanship quality and common building defects of low-cost construction projects. MATEC Web Conf. 17(1):01001.
   Google Scholar
• Naoum S. 2007. Dissertation research and writing for construction students. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth.
   Google Scholar
• Pabedinskaitė A, Vitkauskas R. 2011. The implementation of quality management principles in Lithuanian enterprises. Econ Manage. 7(4):252–257.
   Google Scholar
• Parmet A. 2013. Quality management safety professionals in construction quality control. Professional Saf. 58(5):10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Patil BS, Ullagaddi PB, Jugati DG. 2012. An investigation of factors impelling effective and continuous improvement of Indian Construction Industries Quality Management Systems. IEEE-International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM-2012) 1(1):405–410.
   Google Scholar
• Potter S. 2006. Doing postgraduate research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran S, Clarke B, Andrews R. 2012. Quality management in construction. Professional Saf. 57(11):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei AR, Çelik T, Baalousha Y. 2011. Performance measurement in a quality management system. Sci Iranica. 18(3):742–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Gómez H, Gharbi A, Kenné JP. 2013. Production and quality control policies for deteriorating manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res. 51(11):3443–3462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šaulinskas L, Paliulis N, Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I. 2013. Theoretical and practical aspects of logistic quality management system documentation development process. CE. 7(4):57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. 2012. Research methods for business students. 6th ed. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Simon SE. 1944. The placing and management of contracts. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas N, Ekambaram P, Mohan K. 2012. Costs and benefits of ISO9000-based quality management systems to construction contractors. CEB. 8(2):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstenholme A. 2009. Never waste a good crisis. London: Constructing Excellence.
   Google Scholar