Mediating effect of job satisfaction on the organizational commitment of civil engineers and architects

References

• Akar C, Yıldırım TY. 2008. The Relationships among organizational commitment, job satisfaction and role stressors of managers: an area application in White meat sector with structural equation model. J Econ Admin Sci. 10(2):97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Aydoğmuş C. 2011. The impacts of follower psychological empowerment and perceptions of transformational leadership on the relationship between follower personality and job satisfaction [PhD Thesis]. Ankara: Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, 339p.
   Google Scholar
• Bademci V. 2005. Tests are not reliable: sample size for efficient cautions and reliability studies for measurement safety. Gazi Univ Fac Indus Arts Educ J. 17:33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bakan İ. 2011. Fundamentals of organizational strategies: organizational commitment, concept, theory, causes and consequences. Ankara: Gazi Publication, 343p.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh GS, Roberts RM. 1994. Professional and organizational commitment among engineers: conflicting or complementing? IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 41(2):108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau G. 1985. The measurement and prediction of career commitment. J Occupat Psychol. 58(4):277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau G, Paul A, St. John N. 1993. On developing a general index of work commitment. J Vocat Behav. 42(3):298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown H, Hume C, ChinAPaw M. 2009. Validity and reliability of instruments to assess potential mediators of children’s physical activity: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 12(5):539–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Bureau of Labor and Statistics. 2017. Economic news release. [accessed 2018 Mar 28]. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t18.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Burger JM. 2006. Personality. Istanbul: Kaknüs Publication, 796p.
   Google Scholar
• Çapık C. 2014. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci. 17(3):196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Carr PG, Garza JM, Vorster M. 2002. Relationship between personality traits and performance for engineering and architectural professionals providing design services. J Manage Eng. 18(4):158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik G. 2013. Relationship between personality traits, organizational commitment and job satisfaction of Turkish construction industry professionals [PhD Thesis]. Cukurova University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, 338p.
   Google Scholar
• Charter RA, Feldt LS. 2002. The importance Reliability as it relates true score confidence intervals. Measure Eval Counsel Develop. 35:104–112. Vol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT. 2006. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics. 67(4):331–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(3):7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Choi D, Oh IS, Colbert AE. 2015. Understanding organizational commitment: a meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five factor model of personality and culture. J Appl Psychol. 26:587–595.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou TY, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH. 2011. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transport Res E. 47:822–836.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A. 2007. Dynamics between occupational and organizational commitment in the context of flexible labor markets: a review of the literature and suggestions for a future research agenda. Bremen: Bremen University, Institute Technology and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Davis K, Newstrom JW. 1989. Human behaviorist work. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande SP, Fu W. 2012. Antecedents of organizational commitment in a Chinese construction company. J Bus Ethics. 109:301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter F, Aker J, Wright WA. 1997. Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care: the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Anesthesiology. 87(4):865–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole C, Schroeder RG. 2001. The impact of various factors on the personality, job satisfaction and turnover intentions of professional accountants. Manag Audit J. 16(4):234–245.
   Google Scholar
• Erdheim J, Wang M, Zickar MJ. 2006. Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Person Individ Differ. 41(5):959–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabi B, Lacoursière R, Raymond L. 2015. Impact of high-performance work systems on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention to quit in Canadian organizations. Int J Manpower. 36(5):772–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather NT, Rauter KA. 2004. Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. J Occupat Organizat Psychol. 77(1):81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu W, Deshpande SP. 2014. The impact of caring climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a China’s insurance company. J Bus Ethics. 124(2):339–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Eracleous A, Chamorro‐Premuzic T. 2009. Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. J Manag Psych. 24(8):765–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Petrides KV, Jackson CJ, Cotter T. 2002. Do personality factors predict job satisfaction? Person Individ Differ. 33(8):1325–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse JH. 1971. An investigation of the role of career salience in vocational behavior. J Behav. 1:209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Güney S. 2000. Behavioral sciences. Ankara: Nobel Publication, 568p.
   Google Scholar
• Hall DT. 1971. A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings. Organiz Behav Hum Perform. 6(1):50–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts RM, Heager KW. 2008. Modern human relations at work. Mason, OH: Thomson South Western.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan R. 2008. Personality psychology for organizational researchers. In: Schneider B, Smith DB, editors. Personality and organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ho Hung M. 2007. Exploring the relationships between employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility, personality, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment [Master thesis]. Industrial and Information Management, 81s.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. 2008. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model Ffit. Electr J Busin Res Methods. 6(1):53–60.
   Google Scholar
• İnanç BY, Yerlikaya EE. 2008. Personality theories. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications, 348p.
   Google Scholar
• John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. 1991. The Big Five Inventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkley, CA: University of California, Berkley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/∼johnlab/bfi.htm.
   Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S. 1999. The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement and theoretical perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 71s.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson HM, Singh A. 1998. The personality of civil engineers. J Manag Eng. 14(4):45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge T, Heller D, Mount MK. 2002. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 87(3):530–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca SB. 2001. The effect of job satisfaction on organizational commitment and an application [PhD thesis]. Pamukkale University, Institute of Social Sciences, Denizli, 200p.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapoğlu E. 2000. The relationship between job dissatisfaction and leaving, in architectural offices [PhD Thesis]. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 159p.
   Google Scholar
• Kweon AM, Ha M, Kyung KH, Hee JS. 2015. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention among male nurses. J Kor Acad Nurs Adminis V. 21(2):203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard H, Lin J. 2004. Career, family and work environment determinants of organizational commitment among women in the Australian construction industry. Constr Manag Econ. 22(4):409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Leung MY, Chen D, Yu J. 2008. Demystifying modereta variables of the interrelationships among affective commitment, job performance, and job satisfaction of construction professionals. J Constr Eng Manag. 134(12):963–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung MY, Chong A, Ng ST, Cheung MCK. 2004. Demystifying stakeholders’ commitment and its impacts on construction projects. Constr Manag Econ. 22(7):701–715.
   Google Scholar
• Locke EA. 1976. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: Dunnette M, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology.Chicago: Rand McNally; p. 1293–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmöller JB. 1989. Latent variable path modelling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Love P, Edwards D, Wood E. 2011. Loosening the Gordian knot: the role of emotional intelligence in construction. Eng Const Arch Man. 18(1):50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lu KY, Lin PL, Wu CM, Hsieh YL, Chang YY. 2002. The relationships among turnover intentions, professional commitment, and job satisfaction of hospital nurses. J Profess Nurs. 18(4):214–219. Vol.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon DW. 1944. The structure of personality. In: McVicker Hunt J, editor. Personality and the behavior disorders. Vol. 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; p. 3–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu C, Fabi B, Lacoursière R, Raymond L. 2016. The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover. J Manag Organiz. 22(1):113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzler K, Renzl B. 2010. Personality traits, employee satisfaction and affective commitment. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 18(5):589–598.
   Google Scholar
• Mccrea RR, Costa PT. 1986. Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology. Am Psychol. 41:1001–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccrea RR, Costa PT. 2003. Personality in adulthood. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ. 1991. Three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Res Manag Rev. 1(1):61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovıtch L, Topolnytsky L. 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J Vocat Behav. 61(1):20–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow P, Wirth R. 1989. Work commitment among salaried professionals. J Vocat Behav. 34(1):40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount M, Ilies R, Johnson E. 2006. Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors. The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Person Psychol. 59:591–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnukka J. 2008. Customers’ purchase intentions as a reflection of price perception. J Prod Brand Mgt. 17(3):188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Munro BH. 2005. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; p. 351–376.
   Google Scholar
• Naquin SS, Holton EF. 2002. The effects of personality, affectivity, and work commitment on motivation to improve work through learning. Hum Res Dev Quart. 13(4):357–376.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric methods. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan ED. 2011. Organizational structure and job satisfaction from personality perspective. Istanbul: Beta Publication; 168p.
   Google Scholar
• Panaccio A, Vandenberghe C. 2012. Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: the mediating role of positive and negative affective states. J Vocat Behav. 80(3):647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peryön Information Management Platform. 2012. Employee turnover survey. http://finans.mynet.com/. [accessed date 2018 March 28].
   Google Scholar
• Saeed I, Waseem M, Sikander S, Rizwan M. 2014. The relationship of turnover intention with job satisfaction, job performance, leader member exchange, emotional intelligence and organizational commitment. Int J Learn Dev. 4(2):246–256.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. 2006. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res. 99(6):323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. 2010. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Taylor & Francis; 457p.
   Google Scholar
• Schwepker CH. 2001. Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. J Bus Res. 54(1):39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevimli F, İşcan ÖF. 2005. Job satisfaction in terms of individual and business environmental factors. Ege Acad Rev. 5(1):55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Moser R, Henke M. 2012. Multidimensional supply performance framework: a conceptual development and empirical analysis. Int J Prod Econom. 138(1):26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidique SF, Lupi F, Joshi SV. 2010. The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Res Conserv Recycl. 54(3):163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Gupta B. 2015. Job involvement, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and team commitment: a study of generational diversity. Benchmarking. 22(6):1192–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengül CM. 2008. The analysis of the relationship between personality, job satisfaction and organizational behavior of organizational employees [PhD thesis]. Celal Bayar University, Institute of Social Sciences, Manisa, 152p.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek ÖF. 2007. Introduction to structural equation modelling, basic principles and applications of Lısrel. Vol. 212. Ankara: Ekinoks Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Suveren B. 1998. A research on the relationship between job characteristics and job satisfaction in the construction sector [Master thesis]. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 69p.
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. 2018. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 48(6):1273–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarigan V, Ariani DW. 2015. Empirical study relations job satisfaction. Organizational commitment, and turnover intention. Adv Manag Appl Econom. 5(2):21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Meyer JP. 1993. Job Satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention and turnover: path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Person Psychol. 46(2):259–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union of Chamber of Turkish Engineers and Architects. https://www.tmmob.org.tr/icerik/tmmob-uye-sayisi-510-bini-asti. UCTEA statistics [accessed date 2018 Nov 16].
   Google Scholar
• Uyan G. 2002. Research between teachers work values, personality properties and job satisfactions: an investigation undertaken by an official and private educational body to the ministry of education [Master Thesis]. Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 194p.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele W. 2009. The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. Int Rev Administ Sci. 75(1):11–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz CF, Strcikland OL, Lenz ER. 2010. Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 632p.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang X. 2012. Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus: methods and applications. West Susex: John Wiley & Sons; 478p.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss DJ, Davis RV, England GW, Lofguist LH. 1967. Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire, Minnesota studies vocational rehabilitations: xxii. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington; 119s.
   Google Scholar
• Yang F, Chang C. 2008. Emotional labour, job satisfaction and organizational commitment amongst clinical nurses: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 45(6):879–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeuk T, May M, Korczynski M, Frenkel SJ. 2002. Organizational and occupational commitment: knowledge workers in large corporations. J Manag Stud. 39(6):775–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz B. 1999. The relationship of organizational structure to job satisfaction in architectural offices [Master thesis]. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 91p.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Thye SR. A 2002. Dual process model of organizational commitment: job satisfaction and organizational support. Work Occupat. 29(1):97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksekbilgili Z, Akduman G. 2017. Meaningfulness of job and labor turnover relation. International Social Research Congress, 20–22 April, Istanbul; p. 67–76.
   Google Scholar