Improvement measures to achieve sustainable construction labour performance

References

• Abdul Kadir MR, Lee WP, Jaafar MS, Sapuan SM, Ali AAA. 2005. Factors affecting construction labour productivity for Malaysian residential projects. Struct Sur. 23(1):42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad SBS, Mazhar MU, Bruland A, Andersen BS, Langlo JA, Torp O. 2018. Labour productivity statistics: a reality check for the Norwegian construction industry. Int J Construct Manag. 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1462443.
   Google Scholar
• Bassioni HA, Price AD, Hassan TM. 2004. Performance measurement in construction. J Manag Eng. 20(2):42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatham SM, Anumba CJ, Thorpe A, Hedges IW. 2004. KPÌs – a critical appraisal of their use in construction. Benchmarking. 11(1):93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Buzby CM, Gerstenfeld A, Voss LE, Zeng AZ. 2002. Using lean principles to streamline the quotation process: a case study. Industr Manag Data Syst. 102:513–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. London: SagePublications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Suen HC, Cheung KK. 2004. PPMS: a web-based construction project performance monitoring system. Autom Construct. 13(3):361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Gutmann ML, Hanson W. 2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs. United States of America: Sage Publications. p. 209–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cross KF, Lynch RL. 1988. The “SMART” way to define and sustain success. Natl Prod Rev. 8:23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum PM, Maloney WF, Srinivasan C. 2009. Latent structures of the factors affecting construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(5):397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum PM, Maloney WF. 2007. Analysis of craft workers' and foremen's perceptions of the factors affecting construction labour productivity. Constr Manag Econ. 25(11):1139–1152.
   Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum PM. 2011a. Differences in perspectives regarding labor productivity between spanish-and english-speaking craft workers. J Constr Eng Manage. 137(9):689–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum PM. 2012. Generational differences on craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting labour productivity. Can J Civ Eng. 39(9):1018–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum PM. 2011b. Generational difference in craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their labour productivity. Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2011, CSCE 2011, Ottawa (ON). p. 2050–2060.
   Google Scholar
• Dolage D, Chan P. 2013. Productivity in construction - a critical review of research. Eng: J Inst Eng, Sri Lanka. 46(4).
   Google Scholar
• Durdyev S, Mbachu J. 2011. On-site labour productivity of New Zealand construction industry: Key constraints and improvement measures. Constr Econ Building. 11(3):18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. 1998. Rethinking construction. London: Dept. of the Environment, Transport and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev. 36(2):90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EL-Mashaleh MS, Edward Minchin R, JR, O’Brien WJ. 2007. Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking. J Manage Eng. 23(1):10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Mustafa ZA, Mayer PE. 2007. Factors affecting labour productivity in building projects in the Gaza strip. J Civil Eng Manage. 13(4):245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey M, Blanchet D. 2013. Beyond GDP: measuring welfare and assessing sustainability. United States of America: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin DA. 1994. Building a learning organization. Business Credit – New York. 96:19–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoddousi P, Poorafshar O, Chileshe N, Hosseini MR. 2015. Labour productivity in Iranian construction projects perceptions of chief executive officers. Int J Productivity Perf Manag. 64(6):811–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles T, King L, DE Lacey S. 2013. The timing of the literature review in grounded theory research: an open mind versus an empty head. Ans Adv Nurs Sci. 36(2):E29–E40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi A. 2002. Performance measurement and government productivity. Work Study. 51(2):63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TJ. 2011. The triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Rev. 86:4.
   Google Scholar
• Helliwell JF, Huang H, Wang S. 2017. The social foundations of world happiness. World Happiness Report 2017, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Horta IM, Camanho AS, DA Costa JM. 2010. Performance assessment of construction companies integrating key performance indicators and data envelopment analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(5):581–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta IM, Camanho AS, DA Costa JM. 2012. Performance assessment of construction companies: A study of factors promoting financial soundness and innovation in the industry. Int J Prod Econ. 137(1):84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM, Al Balushi RA, Raveendranath PK. 2015. Determinants of construction labour productivity in Oman. Int J Constr Manag. 15(4):332–344.
   Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM, Bitar CG. 2012. Factors affecting construction labor productivity in Kuwait. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(7):811–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM, Younes JH. 2014. Principle factors contributing to construction delays in the State of Qatar. Int J Constr Project Manag. 6:39.
   Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM. 2015. Factors influencing labour productivity in Bahrain’s construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. 15(1):94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Nortan DP. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performances. Harvard Business Rev. 70:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan DP, Eiler RG, Jones CR. 1989. Are your performance measures obsolete? Strat Finance. 70:45.
   Google Scholar
• Khahro SH, Ali TH, Memon NA, Memon ZA. 2016. Improving labour productivity: An attribute case study of building sector projects in Pakistan. Int J Appl Eng Res. 11:11121–11125.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S-Y, Huynh T-A. 2008. Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. Int J Project Manag. 26:758–769.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lam S, Tang C. 2003. Motivation of survey employees in construction projects. J Geospatial Eng. 5:61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Latham M. 1994. Constructing the team. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert LB. 2007. Asking questions of the data: memo writing in the grounded. (Vol. 1). London, UK: Sage Publications. p. 245–264.
   Google Scholar
• Mahamid I. 2013. Contractors perspective toward factors affecting labor productivity in building construction. Eng Const Arch Man. 20(5):446–460.
   Google Scholar
• March JG, Sutton RI. 1997. Crossroads—organizational performance as a dependent variable. Org Sci. 8(6):698–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell BH. 1991. Performance measurement for world class manufacturing: a model for American companies. New York, USA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonough W, Braungart M. 2002. Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corp Environ Strat. 9(3):251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnally HE, Havers JA. 1967. Labor productivity in the construction industry. J Constr Div. 93:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mctague B, Jergeas G. 2002. Productivity improvements on Alberta major construction projects: Phase I-Back to basics. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli P, Mari L. 2014. The theory and practice of performance measurement. Manag Account Res. 25(2):147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misni F, Lee LS. 2017. A review on strategic, tactical and operational decision planning in reverse logistics of green supply chain network design. JCC. 05(08):83.
   Google Scholar
• Mirsky R, Songer AD. 2009. Beyond sustainability: The contractor's role in regenerative system design. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2009: Building a Sustainable Future.
   Google Scholar
• Naoum SG. 2016. Factors influencing labor productivity on construction sites: A state-of-the-art literature review and a survey. Int J Productivity Perf Manag. 65(3):401–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon R, Sacks R. 2007. Assessing research issues in automated project performance control (APPC). Automation Constr. 16(4):474–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely A, Adams C. 2001. The performance prism perspective. J Cost Manag. 15:7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Neely A, Bourne M. 2000. Why measurement initiatives fail. Measuring Business Excellence. 4(4):3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K. 2005. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 25:1228–1263.
   Google Scholar
• Norway S. 2018. Construction, structural business statistics [Online]. Norway. [accessed 2018 Feb 15]. https://www.ssb.no/en/bygg-bolig-og-eiendom/statistikker/stbygganl
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2010. Construction industry. OECD J Competition Law Policy.
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2017a. OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD 2017b. Organization for economic co-operation and development [Online]. [Accessed 2017 Jun 01]. https://data.oecd.org/natincome/value-added-by-activity.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff C. 1992. The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: an organizational level analysis. J Appl Psychol. 77(6):963.
   Google Scholar
• Panas A, Pantouvakis J. 2010. Evaluating research methodology in construction productivity studies. Built Hum Environ Rev. 3:63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson M, Warr P, West M. 2004. Organizational climate and company productivity: the role of employee affect and employee level. J Occup Organ Psychol. 77(2):193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Pilateris P, Mccabe B. 2003. Contractor financial evaluation model (CFEM). Can J Civ Eng. 30(3):487–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai AS, Joshi A, Rao KS. 2002. Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment. Int J Project Manag. 20:165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. 1934. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1959). However many white swans we count, Popper argues, we cannot with certainty say that all swans are white. But if we see one black swan, we can confidently say that “not all swans are white.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin J, Fayek AR, Meade G, Haas C, Manseau A. 2008. Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry. Can J Civ Eng. 35(9):894–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rognlie M. 2016. Deciphering the fall and rise in the net capital share: accumulation or scarcity?. Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2015(1):1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas EM, Aramvareekul P. 2003. Labor productivity drivers and opportunities in the construction industry. J Manag Eng. 19(2):78–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitz A. 2013. The triple bottom line: how today's best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Hanges PJ, Smith DB, Salvaggio AN. 2003. Which comes first: employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? J Appl Psychol. 88(5):836.
   Google Scholar
• Singh H, Motwani J, Kumar A. 2000. A review and analysis of the state‐of‐the‐art research on productivity measurement. Ind Manag Data Syst. 100:234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skibniewski MJ, Ghosh S. 2009. Determination of key performance indicators with enterprise resource planning systems in engineering construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern S, Wares A, Orzell S, O’Sullivan P. 2015. Social progress index 2014 methodological report. [accessed April], 4, p. 691–705.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J. P. 2009. The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Tangen S. 2005. Demystifying productivity and performance. Int J Productivity Perf Manag. 54(1):34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Maloney WF, Horner RMW, Smith GR, Handa VK, Sanders SR. 1990. Modeling construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manag. 116(4):705–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toor SUR, Ogunlana SO. 2010. Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPI) for large-scale public sector development projects. Int J Project Manag. 28(3):228–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GP. 1996. A survey and taxonomy of strategy-related performance measures for manufacturing. Int J Operations Prod Manag. 16:42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack JP, Jones DT. 1996. Lean thinking. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yeung JF, Chan AP, Chiang Y, Chan DW. 2010. A critical review of performance measurement in construction. J Facilities Manag. 8(4):269–284.
   Google Scholar