A model for prioritizing outsourceable activities in universities through an integrated fuzzy-MCDM method

References

• Abdul Halim H, Ahmad NH, Ho CF, Ramayah T. 2017. The outsourcing dilemma on decision to outsource among small and medium enterprises in Malaysia. Glob Bus Rev. 18(2):348–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Salim B. 2007. Decision models for manufacturing outsourcing [Ph. D dissertation]. University of Nebraska, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Amini S. 2013. A framework for outsourcing decision-makings in municipalities: case study of Shiraz Municipality [MA thesis]. Shiraz (Iran): Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Darestani-Farahani A. 2013. Decision-making with multiple criteria. Tehran: Kian Academic Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Aron R, Singh JV. 2005. Getting offshoring right. Harvard Bus Rev. 83(12):135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Mohammad A, Al-Hammad A, Al-Nehmi A. 2011. Factors affecting outsourcing decisions of maintenance services in Saudi Arabian universities. Prop Manage. 29(2):195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert B, Rivard S, Patry M. 2004. A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing. Inf Manage. 24(7):688–700.
   Google Scholar
• Azar A, Rajabzadeh A. 2012. Applied decision-making: the MADM approach. Tehran: Danesh Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci. 17(4):141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CT, Lin CT, Huang SF. 2006. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ. 102(2):289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LY, Wang T. 2009. Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. Int J Prod Econ. 120(1):233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang T, Wu C. 2011. Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Syst Appl. 38(10):13216–13222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Lee F. 2010. Outsourcing reverse logistics of high-tech manufacturing firms by using a systematic decision-making approach: TFT-LCD sector in Taiwan. Ind Market Manage. 39(7):1111–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi BC, Chung K. 2016. Min–max regret version of a scheduling problem with outsourcing decisions under processing time uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res. 252(2):367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry AZ. 2014. Application outsourcing governance model [Master’s thesis in information]. Linnaeus University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman CW, Ackoff RL. 1954. An approximate measure of value. J Oper Res Soc Am. 2(2):172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deni W, Sudana O, Sasmita A. 2013. Analysis and implementation fuzzy multi-attribute decision making SAW method for selection of high achieving students in faculty level. Int J Comput Sci. 10(2):674–680.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnejad S, Mousavi SM, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Heydar M. 2012. Evaluating high risks in large-scale projects using an extended VIKOR method under a fuzzy environment. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 3(3):463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Espino-Rodríguez TF, Ramírez-Fierro JC. 2018. Outsourcing performance in hotels: evaluating partnership quality. Sustainability. 10(8):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira FAF, Ilander G, Ferreira JJM. 2019. MCDM/A in practice: methodological developments and real-world applications. Manage Decis. 57(2):295–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foogooa R. 2008. IS outsourcing - a strategic perspective. Bus Process Manag J. 14(6):858–864.
   Google Scholar
• Graf M, Mudambi SM. 2005. The outsourcing of IT enabled business process: a conceptual model of the location decision. J Int Manage. 11(2):253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JV. 2006. Essays on Manufacturing Outsourcing John Vincent Gray [Ph. D thesis]. University of North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg PS, Greenberg RH, Antonucci YL. 2008. The role of trust in the governance of business process outsourcing relationships. Bus Process Manage J. 14(5):593–608.
   Google Scholar
• Grobbelaar S. 2007. R & D in the national system of innovation: A system dynamic model [Ph. D thesis, engineering management]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F. 2013. A fuzzy group Electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci. 51(1):414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho W, He T, Lee CKM, Emrouznejad A. 2012. Strategic logistics outsourcing: an integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl. 39(12):10841–10850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Liou JH, Chuang Y. 2013. Integrating DANP and modified grey relation theory for the selection of an outsourcing provider. Expert Syst Appl. 40(6):2297–2304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamuriwo DS, Baden-Fuller C. 2016. Knowledge integration using product R&D outsourcing in biotechnology. Res Policy. 45(5):1031–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi-Gavareshki MH. 2007. A model of outsourcing decisions (manufacturing/purchasing). Fourth International Conference on Quality Management; 2007 Dec 19; Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya T, Kahraman C. 2011. Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl. 38(6):6577–6585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili K, Azizzadeh F, Adhami A. 2014. Investigating the relationship between outsourcing and performance based on Balanced Score Card (Case study: Ilam Post Office). J Data Envelop Anal Decis Sci. 1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kremic T, Tukel OI, Rom WO. 2006. Outsourcing decision support: a survey of benefits, risks, and decision factors. Supp Chain Manage. 11(6):467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Walsh P. 2011. SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport. Sport Manage Rev. 14(4):361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y-T, Lin C-L, Yu H-C, Tzeng G-H. 2010. A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: a case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl. 37(7):4796–4804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou JH, Chuang Y. 2010. Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Syst Appl. 37(5):3755–3761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi S, Shabani M. 2012. An integrated model for ranking regional development of case study, Mazandaran Provincial Health Department. Sci J Manage Syst. 13(28):7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mehregan MR, Salami H, Khajeh M. 2011. An MADM model for outsourcing business processes using AHP technique. J Dev Evol Manage. 6:17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Meng H. 2005. A decision Framework for Product Global outsourcing in small and medium-sized companies [Master’s thesis]. University of Windsor, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Moghimi M, Taghizadeh Yazdi M. 2017. Applying multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for economic ranking of Tehran-22 districts to establish financial and commercial centers (case: City of Tehran). J Urban Econ Manage. 5(20):39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi A, Paleshi A. 2005. A decision making model for outsourcing. Fourth International Conference on Industrial Engineering; 2005 July 14; Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey V, Bansal V. 2004. A decision-making framework for IT outsourcing using the analytic hierarchy process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics; 2004 Oct 14; Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Patil S, Patil YS. 2014. A review on outsourcing with a special reference to telecom operations. Soc Behav Sci. 133:400–416.
   Google Scholar
• Pirannejad A, Salami H, Mollaee A. 2010. Outsourcing priorities of government functions: analytic network process. Afr J Bus Manage. 4(8):1723–1735.
   Google Scholar
• Pires A, Chang N, Martinho G. 2011. An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setubal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour Conserv Recy. 56(1):7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourtaheri M, Sojasi Qidari H, Sadeghlu T. 2011. Measurement and priority social sustainability in rural regions with using TOPSIS-FUZZY technique based on order preference by similarity to a fuzzy ideal solution (case study: Khodabandeh Country rurals in central part). J Rural Res. 1(1):1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pouya A, Zoaram A. 2015. Problem solution of supplier selection using combined model of fuzzy Delphi analytical hierarchy- Vikor. Hum Resour Manage Res. 4(4):23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority, resource allocation. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barros J. 2007. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh MJ. 2011. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl. 38(10):12160–12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A. 1976. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis (IN): Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Tavari M, Sookhkian MA, Mirnezhad SA. 2008. Identifying and prioritizing factors affecting productivity of human resources through MADM. Ind Manage. 1(1):71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Tayauova G. 2012. Advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing: analysis of outsourcing practices of Kazakhstan banks. Soc Behav Sci. 41:188–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tipmontian J, Suryaprakasa RK, Rajmohan M. 2012. Integrating fuzzy Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process for the selection of post-harvest technology. Eur J Sci Res. 80(2):244–259.
   Google Scholar
• Tjader Y, May JH, Shang J, Vargas LG, Gao N. 2014. Firm-level outsourcing decision making: a balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model. J Prod Econ. 147:614–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2011. Economic development in Africa report 2011. Fostering industrial development in Africa in the new global environment; Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Vahdani B, Hadipou H, Salehi Sadaghiani J, Amiri M. 2010. Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 47(9-12):1231–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaxevanou A, Konstantopoulos N. 2015. Models referring to outsourcing theory. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 175:572–578.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer G, Seuring S. 2008. Information needs in the outsourcing lifecycle. Ind Manage Data Syst. 108(1):107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Huang J. 2000. A decision model for IS outsourcing. Int J Inf Manage. 20(3):225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 8(3):338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zebardast E. 2001. Application of analysis hierarchical process in urban and regional planning. Honar Ha Ye Ziba. 10:13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Chan AHS. 2017. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: a proposed theoretical framework. Work. 56(1):9–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar