Environmental impact assessment model for buildings’ construction activities

References

• Ali AAM, Negm AM, Bady MF, Ibrahim MGE. 2015. Environmental life cycle assessment of a residential building in Egypt: a case study. Procedia Technol. 19:349–356.
   Google Scholar
• Ali AAM, Negm AM, Bady MF, Ibrahim MGE, Suzuki M. 2016. Environmental impact assessment of the Egyptian cement industry based on a life-cycle assessment approach: a comparative study between Egyptian and Swiss plants. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 18(4):1053–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali AAM, Negm AM, Bady MF, Ibrahim MGE. 2014. Moving towards an Egyptian national life cycle inventory database. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 19(8):1551–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilec M, Robert RH, Scott M, Aurora L. 2006. Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction processes. J Infrastruct Syst. 12(4):207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau CK, Yik FWH, Hui WK, Liu HC, Yu HK. 2007. Environmental impacts of building materials and building services components for commercial buildings in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod. 15(18):1840–1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Klijn-Chevalerias M, Javed S. 2017. The Dutch approach for assessing and reducing environmental impacts of building materials. Build Environ. 111(4):147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi E. 2009. Lecture notes on construction project management. Mansoura University, Egypt. http://osp.mans.edu.eg/elbeltagi/Management.html.
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe P, Ding G. 2014. Greenhouse gas emissions from excavation on residential construction sites. Aust J Constr Econ Build. 14(4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gangolells M, Miquel C, Santiago G, Núria F, Xavier R, Alba F. 2009. A methodology for predicting the severity of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings. Build Environ. 44(3):558–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggemos A, Arpad H. 2005. Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings. J Infrastruct Syst. 11(2):93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah R, Roser M. 2019. CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann BG, Kroeze C, Jawjit W. 2007. Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. J Clean Prod. 15(18):1787–1796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Geoffrey Q, Yong F, William SL, Chao M. 2014. Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: a case study in China. J Clean Prod. 33(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain MU, Poon CS. 2018. Global warming potential and energy consumption of temporary works in building construction: a case in Hong Kong. Build Environ. 142(6):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Geneva, Switzerland [accessed 2018 Oct 3]. https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5
   Google Scholar
• Ji YB, Li K, Liu G, Shrestha A, Jing J. 2018. Comparing greenhouse gas emissions of precast in-situ and conventional construction methods. J Clean Prod. 173(5):124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippiatt B. 1998. Building for environmental and economic sustainability (BEES). 4th ed. Gaithersburg, USA: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhu Y, Zhang Z. 2010. An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Build Environ. 45(3):766–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi I, Alreshaid K. 2005. Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Project Manage. 23(7):564–572.
   Google Scholar
• Mao C, Shen Q, Shen L, Tang L. 2013. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: two case studies of residential projects. Energy Build. 66(2):165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthias F, Atsushi I, Reginald BH, Kim C, Hans K. 2006. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 80(2):453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Roh S, Tae S, Suk SJ, Ford G. 2017. Evaluating the embodied environmental impacts of major building tasks and materials of apartment buildings in Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 73(5):135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandanayake M, Lokuge W, Zhang G, Setunge S, Thushar Q. 2018. Greenhouse gas emissions during timber and concrete building construction—a scenario based comparative case study. Sustain Cities Soc. 38(3):91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandanayake M, Zhang G, Setunge S. 2016. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings – two case studies. Build Environ. 95:189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo S. 2002. International review of environmental assessment tools and databases. Brisbane: CRC for Construction Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. 2018. The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 48(6):1273–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha SH, Ibrahim MGE, Ali AAM. 2017. Steel as a sustainable choice towards the green building concept. Sustain Dev Plan. 210:123–134.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Washington, DC. 2009. Potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the construction sector [accessed 2018 May 7]. http://archive.epa.gov/sectors/web/pdf/construction-sector-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Heath LS. 2008. The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy. 32(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan H, Shen Q, Fan LCH, Wang Y, Zhang L. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: a case study of One Peking in Hong Kong. Build Environ. 45(4):949–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wu X, Yang X, Zhu Y. 2006. BEPAS – a life cycle building environmental performance assessment model. Build Environ. 41(5):669–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar