Towards a decision support for modular integrated construction: an integrative review of the primary decision-making actors

References

• Arcadis. 2018. Tackling costs in the digital age: international construction costs. Amsterdam, Netherlands; [accessed 2019 Apr 14]. https://www.arcadis.com/media/F/1/E/%7BF1E33F46-EA9C-4F75-A642-E0E0F31420BD%7DInternational-Construction-Costs-2018-Arcadis-Updated_001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S, Lukkad M, Ahmad I. 2012. Modular v. stick-built construction: Identification of critical decision-making factors. 48th Annual Conference of Associated Schools of Construction. Associated Schools of Construction, Fort Collins, p. 8. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2012/paper/CPRT202002012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S, Lukkad MY, Ahmad I. 2013. An investigation of critical factors and constraints for selecting modular construction over conventional stick-built technique. Int J Constr Educ Res. 9(3):203–225.
   Google Scholar
• Azman MNA, Ahamad MSS, Majid TA, Yahaya AS, Hanafi MH. 2014. Statistical evaluation of pre-selection criteria for industrialized building system (IBS). J Civ Eng Manag. 19(Suppl 1):S131–S140.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JD. 2016. The purpose, process, and methods of writing a literature review. 103(3):265–269.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB. 2000. Design rules: the power of modularity. Vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB. 1997. Managing in an age of modularity. Harv Bus Rev. 75(5):84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataglin FS, Viana DD, Formoso CT, Bulhões IR. 2017. Application of BIM for supporting decision-making related to logistics in prefabricated building systems. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC); Greece: Heraklion. p. 71–78
   Google Scholar
• Blismas NG. 2007. Off-site manufacture in Australia: current state and future directions. Brisbane, Australia; [accessed 2019 Apr 23]. http://www.construction-innovation.info/images/pdfs/Publications/Industry_publications/Off-site_manufacture_in_Australia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas NG, Pasquire C, Gibb A. 2006. Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction. Constr Manag Econ. 24(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas NG, Pendlebury M, Gibb AGF, Pasquire C. 2005. Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Archit Eng Des Manag. 1(3):153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn E. 2016. Deciding when to use modular construction. Pharm Technol. 40(6):45–46.
   Google Scholar
• Carriker M, Langar S. 2014. Factors affecting large scale modular construction projects. 50th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. Associated Schools of Construction; Fort Collins, p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Okudan GE, Riley DR. 2010. Decision support for construction method selection in concrete buildings: prefabrication adoption and optimization. Autom Constr. 19(6):665–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JO. 2014. Links between modularization critical success factors and project performance [dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW. 2019. Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Constr Manag. 19(2):93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Choi JO, O’Connor JT, Kim TW. 2016. Recipes for cost and schedule successes in industrial modular projects: qualitative comparative analysis. J Constr Eng Manag. 142(10):04016055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JO, O’Connor JT, Kwak YH, Shrestha BK. 2019. Modularization business case analysis model for industrial projects. J Manag Eng. 35(3):04019004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement R. 1989. Deciding when to use modular construction. Chem Eng. 96(8):169–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Council. 2018. About modular integrated construction. p. 1–7; [accessed 2019 Jun 3]. www.cic.hk/eng/main/mic/whatsmic/aboutmic/.
   Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Institute. 1992. MODEX: automated decision support system for modular construction. Austin, TX; [accessed 2019 Jun 15]. https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/29_1_more.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. 1998. Rethinking construction: the report of the construction task force. Construction Task Force. UK Government.
   Google Scholar
• Elnaas E. 2014. The decision to use off-site (OSM) systems for house building projects in the UK [dissertation]. University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Elnaas H, Ashton P, Gidado K. 2013. A decision evaluation model to choose between manufacturing off-site or on-site methods for construction of house building projects. In: Smith S., Ahiaga-Dagbui D. (eds) Procs 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, p. 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Elnaas H, Gidado K, Ashton P. 2018. Factors and drivers effecting the decision of using off-site manufacturing (OSM) systems in house building industry. EPPM. 4(1):51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner AE, Zoloedova V, Kibert CJ. 2017. Conference Report 2017: State-of-the-Art of Modular Construction. Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser N, Race GL, Kelly R, Winstanley A, Hancock P. 2015. An offsite guide for the building and engineering services sector. Loughborough.
   Google Scholar
• Gao S, Low SP, Nair K. 2018. Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA): a preliminary study of factors influencing its adoption in Singapore. Archit Eng Des Manag. 14(6):440–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb AGF. 1999. Off-site fabrication: prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularization. 1st ed. Latheronwheel: Whittles Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb A. 2001. Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research. Constr Manag Econ. 19(3):307–315.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb AGF, Isack F. 2001. Client drivers for construction projects. Eng Const Arch Manag. 8(1):46–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb AGF, Isack F. 2003. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Build Res Inf. 31(2):146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodier C, Gibb A. 2007. Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Constr Manag Econ. 25(6):585–595.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling J, Pero M, Schoenwitz M, Towill D, Cigolini R. 2016. Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: an international perspective. J Constr Eng Manag. 142(11)04016011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas CT, Fagerlund WR. 2002. Preliminary research on prefabrication, pre-assembly, modularization and off-site fabrication in construction. Austin, TX. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/10883.
   Google Scholar
• Hammad AW, Akbarnezhad A, Wu P, Wang X, Haddad A. 2019. Building information modelling-based framework to contrast conventional and modular construction methods through selected sustainability factors. J Clean Prod. 228:1264–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort B, Lindgren J, Larsson B, Emmitt S. 2014. Success factors related to industrialized building in Sweden. Paper presented at the CIB International Conference on Construction in a Changing World,. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, Kandalana, Sri Lanka, p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu PY, Angeloudis P, Aurisicchio M. 2018. Optimal logistics planning for modular construction using two-stage stochastic programming. Autom Constr. 94(May):47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Shan M, Looi KY. 2018. Knowledge-based decision support system for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction. Autom Constr. 94(July):168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagoda K, Samaranayake P. 2017. An integrated framework for ERP system implementation. Int J Acc & Info Manag. 25(1):91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela L, Ballard G. 2003. What should we require from a production system in construction? Construction Research Congress March 19-21, 2003. American Society of Civil Engineers, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lau A. 2011. Critical success factors in managing modular production design: Six company case studies in Hong Kong, China, and Singapore. J Eng Technol Manag. 28(3):168–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Kim YS. 2017. Analysis of cost-increasing risk factors in modular construction in Korea using FMEA. KSCE J Civ Eng. 21(6):1999–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing J, Brege S. 2018. Industrialized building companies’ business models: multiple case study of Swedish and North American companies. J Constr Eng Manag. 144(2):05017019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CZ, Xue F, Li X, Hong J, Shen GQ. 2018. An Internet of Things-enabled BIM platform for on-site assembly services in prefabricated construction. Autom Constr. 89(February):146–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Li K, Zhao D, Mao C. 2017. Business model innovation and its drivers in the Chinese construction industry during the shift to modular prefabrication. J Manag Eng. 33(3):04016051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, Shen Q, Pan W, Ye K. 2015. Major barriers to off-site construction: the developer’s perspective in China. J Manag Eng. 31(3):04014043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, Xie F, Hou L, Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. 2016. Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China. Habitat Int. 57:215–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw Hill Construction. 2011. Prefabrication and Modularization: Increasing Productivity in the Construction Industry. Bedford, MA; [accessed 2019 Jun 15]. https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/el/economics/Prefabrication-Modularization-in-the-Construction-Industry-SMR-2011R.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw Hill Construction. 2013. Safety Management in the Construction Industry: Identifying Risks and Reducing Accidents to Improve Site Productivity and Project ROI. Bedford, MA; [accessed 2019 Jan 30]. https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/SafetyManagementinConstructionSMR-2013_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. 2017. Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. New York, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Modular Building Institute. 2017. Modular advantage for the commercial modular construction industry: the offsite construction issue. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Kim KP, Tam VWY, Rahnamayiezekavat P. 2018. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Tam VW, Dumrak J, Mohamed S. 2018. Leagile strategies for optimizing the delivery of prefabricated house building projects. Int J Constr Manag. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Murtaza MB, Fisher DJ. 1994. Neuromodex—neural network system for modular construction decision making. J Comput Civ Eng. 8(2):221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtaza MB, Fisher DJ, Skibniewski MJ. 1993. Knowledgment-based approach to modular construction decision support. J Constr Eng Manag. 119(1):115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Dainty ARJ, Gibb A. 2012. Establishing and weighting decision criteria for building system selection in housing construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(11):1239–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Gibb AGF, Dainty A. 2008. Leading UK housebuilders’ utilization of offsite construction methods. Build Res Inf. 36(1):56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Gibb AGF, Dainty A. 2007. Perspective of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Constr Manag Econ. 25(2):183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Hon CK. 2018. Modular integrated construction for high-rise buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Munic Eng. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Sidwell R. 2011. Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK. Constr Manag Econ. 29(11):1081–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi A, Olivieri H, Granja AD, Seppänen O. 2018. Categorizing modularization strategies to achieve various objectives of building investments. Constr Manag Econ. 36(1):32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat G. 2008. Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems in the United States. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(3):169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MM. 2014. Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction. J Manag Eng. 30(1):69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentschler C, Mulrooney M, Shahani G. 2016. Modularization: the key to success in today’s market. Hydrocarb Process. 95(12):27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW, Cook CN, Pressey RL, Pullin AS, Runge MC, Salafsky N, Sutherland WJ, Williamson MA. 2018. Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation. Conserv Lett. 11(2):1–12. doi:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scofield R, Potangaroa R, Bell P. 2009. Offsite unplugged: the potential for offsite production in New Zealand, Auckland; [accessed 2019 Jun 15]. http://12219-portal.memberconnex.com/PDFs/CSA/Offsite Unplugged.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scofield R, Wilkinson S, Potangaroa R, Rotimi F. 2009. Driving innovative offsite construction techniques in New Zealand., Auckland; [accessed 2019 Jun 15]. http://www.hera.org.nz/PDFs/CSA/Driving Innovative Offsite Construction Techniques in NZ.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sharafi P, Rashidi M, Samali B, Ronagh H, Mortazavi M. 2018. Identification of factors and decision analysis of the level of modularization in building construction. J Archit Eng. 24(2):04018010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Fagerlund WR, Haas CT, Tatum CB, Vanegas JA. 2005. Considering prework on industrial projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 131(6):723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza MT, da Silva MD, de Carvalho R. 2010. Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?. Einstein (São Paulo). 8(1):102–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoeckl N, Grainger D, Esparon M, Farr M, Larson S, Kennard M, Álvarez-Romero JG, Cattarino L, Adams V, Douglas M, et al. 2016. Integrated models, frameworks and decision support tools to guide management and planning in Northern Australia. Townsville. https://www.nespnorthern.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Review_of_models_final_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan T. 2002. Evaluating environmental decision support tools. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory; [accessed 2019 May 16]. https://www.bnl.gov/isd/documents/30163.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VWY, Tam CM, Zeng SX, Ng W. 2007. Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Build Environ. 42(10):3642–3654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torraco RJ. 2016. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 15(4):404–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triumph Modular Corporation. 2019. Critical success factors for volumetric modular construction. p. 1–5; [accessed 2019 Apr 21]. https://triumphmodular.com/permanent-modular/how-to-start/critical-success-factors/.
   Google Scholar
• Webster J, Watson RT. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. 26(2):xiii–xxiii.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead D. 2013. Searching and reviewing the literature. In: Schneider Z, Whitehead D, editors. Nursing & midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. Maryland Heights, Missouri, United States: Elsevier - Mosby, p. 35–56
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore R, Knafl K. 2005. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 52(5):546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PSP, Whelan B, Holdsworth S. 2018. Are contractors ready for greater use of prefabrication in projects? An empirical analysis on the role of unlearning and counter-knowledge. Int J Constr Manag. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wong PSP, Zwar C, Gharaie E. 2017. Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 143(7):04017020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen G. 2019. Holistic review and conceptual framework for the drivers of offsite construction: a total interpretive structural modelling approach. Buildings. 9(5):117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Mahmud AT. 2019. Critical risk factors in the application of modular integrated construction: a systematic review. Int J Constr Manag.:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Osei-Kyei R. 2019. Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy Build. 190(May):69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria SAS, Gajendran T, Skitmore M, Brewer G. 2018. Key factors influencing the decision to adopt industrialised building systems technology in the Malaysian construction industry: an inter-project perspective. Archit Eng Des Manag. 14(1–2):27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Reed R, Mills A. 2014. Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice. Constr Manag Econ. 32(1–2):40–52.
   Google Scholar