1,349
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Corporate social responsibility practices by leading construction firms in China: a case study

, &

References

  • Barthorpe S. 2010. Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Prop. Manage. 28(1):4–17.
  • Bevan EA, Yung P. 2015. Implementation of corporate social responsibility in Australian construction SMEs. Eng Constr Arch Manage. 22(3):295–311.
  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL. 2007. Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electron J Bus Ethics Organ Stud. 12:5–15.
  • Carroll AB. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz. 34(4):39–48.
  • Chang RD, Zuo J, Soebarto V, Zhao ZY, Zillante G, Gan XL. 2016. Sustainability transition of the Chinese construction industry: practices and behaviors of the leading construction firms. J Manage Eng. 32(4):05016009.
  • Chinese Academy of Social Science. 2015. Introduction of CASS-CSR guidelines. In: Huagang Chen, editor. 4th ed. Beijing, China: Economic & Management Publishing House.
  • Clarkson M. 1994. A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Toronto, Canada. p. 18–19.
  • Cuganesan S, Guthrie J, Ward L. 2010. Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. Account Forum. 34(3-4):169–183.
  • Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage. 15(1):1–13.
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1985. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 19(2):109–134.
  • Deegan C. 2002. Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures. Account Audit Account J. 15(3):282–311.
  • European Commission. 2001. Green paper: promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Fernando S, Lawrence S. 2014. A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. J Theor Account Res. 10(1):149–178.
  • Fifka MS, Pobizhan M. 2014. An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. J Clean Prod. 82:192–201.
  • Frankental P. 2001. Corporate social responsibility–a PR invention? Corp Comm Int J. 6(1):18–23.
  • Freeman RE, Reed DL. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. Calif Manage Rev. 25(3):88–106.
  • Friedman M. 1970 Sep 13. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.
  • Gagné M, Deci EL. 2005. Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 26(4):331–362.
  • Geels FW. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innovation Soc Trans. 1(1):24–40.
  • Geels FW. 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J Transp Geogr. 24:471–482.
  • Global Construction Perspectives, Oxford Economics. 2015. Global construction 2030. A global forecast for the construction industry to 2030 [accessed 2017 Jul 25]. https://gcp.global/uk/downloadable/download/link/id/MC4yOTY4MDAwMCAxNTMyNTExNDM0MTQyNjYxNDU5NTI4NQ,/.
  • Global Reporting Initiative. 2011. Sustainability reporting guidelines and construction and real estate sector supplement. Amsterdam (The Netherlands).
  • Gray R, Owen D, Maunders K. 1987. Corporate social reporting: accounting and accountability. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International.
  • Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1989. Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Account Bus Res. 19(76):343–352.
  • Guthrie J, Parker LD. 1990. Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Adv Public Interest Account. 3:159–175.
  • Guthrie J, Petty R, Ricceri F. 2006. The voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: comparing evidence from Hong Kong and Australia. J Intellect Capital. 7(2):254–271.
  • Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288.
  • International Organisation for Standardization (ISO). 2010. International Standardization Organization (ISO) 26000 social responsibility. Geneva (Switzerland): ISO.
  • Jenkins H, Yakovleva N. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J Clean Prod. 14(3-4):271–284.
  • Jiang WY, Wong JKW. 2016. Key activity areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: a study of China. J Clean Prod. 113:850–860.
  • Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry. J Corp Real Estate. 8(3):134–150.
  • Liao PC, Xia NN, Wu CL, Zhang XL, Yeh JL. 2017. Communicating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of international contractors: content analysis of CSR reporting. J Clean Prod. 156:327–336.
  • Lin L-W. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in China: window dressing or structural change. Berkeley J Int Law. 28:64.
  • Loosemore M, Lim BTH. 2017. Mapping corporate social responsibility strategies in the construction and engineering industry. Constr Manage Econ. 36(2):67–82.
  • Lu WS, Ye M, Flanagan R, Ye KH. 2016. Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business: trends and prospects. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(1):14.
  • Mathews MR. 1993. Socially responsible accounting. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • McWilliams A, Siegel D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strat Manage J. 21(5):603–609.
  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev. 24(4):853–886.
  • Montiel I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: separate pasts, common futures. Organ Environ. 21(3):245–269.
  • Olanipekun AO, Chan APC, Xia B, Adedokun OA. 2017. Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain the levels of motivation for adopting green building. Int J Constr Manage. 18(2):120–131.
  • Oyvind I, Bartlett L, May S. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and communication. In: Øyvind Ihlen, Jennifer Bartlett, Steve May, editors. The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. 1st ed. London (UK): John Wiley and Sons.
  • Patton MQ. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newsbury Park, London, New Dehli: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Pearce D. 2003. Environment and business: socially responsible but privately profitable? London: Profile Books.
  • Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev. 84(12):78–92.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 55(1):68–78.
  • The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 2015. The white book of Chinese CSR report (2015) [accessed 2018 Feb 16]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/tech/2015-12/22/c_128556629.htm.
  • Van Marrewijk M. 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics. 44(2):95–105.
  • Waller DS, Lanis R. 2009. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure of advertising agencies: an exploratory analysis of six holding companies’ annual reports. J Advert. 38(1):109–122.
  • Ward H, Smith NC. 2008. Corporate social responsibilty at a crossroads: futures for CSR in the UK to 2015. IIED. London: Russell Press.
  • Wu CL, Yeh JL, Liao PC, Fang DP. 2015. Benchmarking analysis on corporate social responsibility perception of Chinese international contractors. J CICHE. 27(1):75–80.
  • Xia B, Olanipekun A, Chen Q, Xie L, Liu Y. 2018. Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 195:340–353.
  • Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. London (UK): SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Yin RK. 2017. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Yu PK. 2007. Three questions that will make you rethink the US-China intellectual property debate. J Marshall Rev Intell Prop L. 7:412–432.
  • Zhang Q, Oo BL, Lim BTH. 2019. Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: a review. J Clean Prod. 210:563–584.
  • Zhao ZY, Zhao XJ, Davidson K, Zuo J. 2012. A corporate social responsibility indicator system for construction enterprises. J Clean Prod. 29-30(5):277–289.
  • Zhao ZY, Zhao XJ, Zuo J, Zillante G. 2016. Corporate social responsibility for construction contractors: a China study. J Eng Design Tech. 14(3):614–640.
  • Zhu QH, Zhang QZ. 2015. Evaluating practices and drivers of corporate social responsibility: the Chinese context. J Clean Prod. 100:315–324.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.