Role of awareness in strengthening the relationship between stakeholder management and project success in the construction industry of Pakistan

References

• Aapaoja A, Haapasalo H, Söderström P. 2013. Early stakeholder involvement in the project definition phase: case renovation. ISRN Industr Eng. 2013:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen ES, Birchall D, Arne Jessen S, Money AH. 2006. Exploring project success. Baltic J Manage. 1(2):127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Rubin H. 1956. Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, p. 111–150.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin B, Skitmore M. 2008. Stakeholder management in construction. Construct Manage Econ. 26(6):549–552.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne L, Walker DH. 2006. Visualizing stakeholder influence-two Australian examples. Project Manage J. 37(1):5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Buertey JIT, Amofa D, Atsrim F. 2016. Stakeholder management on construction projects: A key indicator for project success. Am J Civil Eng. 4:10.
   Google Scholar
• Chinyio E, Olomolaiye P. 2010. Introducing stakeholder management. Constr Stakehold Manage. 1:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Davis K. 2014. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. Int J Project Manage. 32(2):189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison AC, Hinkley DV. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer K, Rentala S. 2012. Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 30(4):479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drost EA. 2011. Validity and reliability in social science research. Educ Res Perspect. 38:105.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 18:39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman M, Beale P. 1992. Measuring project success. Proj Manage J. 23(1):8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Guest D. 2014. Employee engagement: a sceptical analysis. J Org Effectiveness. 1(2):141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. 2012. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Market Sci. 40:414–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. Eur Business Rev. 26(2):106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Sarstedt M. 2013. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput Stat. 28:565–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravi A, Coffey V, Trigunarsyah B. 2015. Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. Int J Project Manage. 33(5):985–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ika LA. 2009. Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Manage J. 40(4):6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen JT. 2002. Project stakeholder management. Eng Manage J. 14(4):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Khan AZ, Skibniewski M, Cable JH. 2017. Understanding project stakeholder psychology: The path to effective stakeholder management and engagement. PM World J. 6:2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Krstić N. 2014. Stakeholder management from the business perspective. Megatrend Revija. 11:165–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lavagnon A, Diallo A, Thuillier D. 2011. The empirical relationship between success factors and dimensions: The perspectives of World Bank project supervisors and managers. Int J Managing Projects Bus. 4(4):711–719.
   Google Scholar
• Mascia SD. 2016. Managing difficult stakeholders. PM World J. 4:92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Mcleod L, Doolin B, Macdonell SG. 2012. A perspective‐based understanding of project success. Project Manage J. 43(5):68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. AMR. 22(4):853–886.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan V, Paila AR. 2013. Stakeholder management in infrastructure/construction projects: The role of stakeholder mapping and Social Network Analysis (SNA). Aweshkar Res J. 15:48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mok KY, Shen GQ, Yang RJ. 2017. Addressing stakeholder complexity and major pitfalls in large cultural building projects. Int J Project Manage. 35(3):463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash S, Chinyio E, Gameson R, Suresh S. 2010. The dynamism of stakeholders’ power in construction projects. 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, p. 471–480.
   Google Scholar
• Nauman S, Piracha M. 2016. Project stakeholder management-a developing country perspective. J Qual Technol Manage. 12:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe R. 2003. From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construct Manage Econ. 21(8):841–848.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NH, Skitmore M, Wong JKW. 2009. Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: a study of perception of project managers in state‐owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construct Manage Econ. 27(11):1129–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. 1994. Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology), New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Olander S. 2007. Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construct Manage Econ. 25(3):277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Omondi EF. 2017. Influence of triple constraint management on completion of non-governmental organizations water sanitation and hygiene (wash) projects in Nakuru County, Kenya [Unpublished (Master's Thesis)]. University of Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Pich MT, Loch CH, Meyer AD. 2002. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Manage Sci. 48(8):1008–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirozzi M. 2017a. The stakeholder perspective. PM World J. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pirozzi M. 2017b. The stakeholder perspective.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. 2008. Guide to the project management body of knowledge Project Management Institute. Newton Square, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 22(6):501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 90(5):1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. 2009. Understanding research philosophies and approaches. Res Methods Bus Students. 4:106–135.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D. 2007. Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press. p. 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Susser BS. 2012. How to effectively manage IT project risks. J Manage Bus Res. 2:41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Szwajkowski E. 2000. Simplifying the principles of stakeholder management: The three most important principles. Bus Soc. 39(4):379–396.
   Google Scholar
• Takim R, Adnan H. 2009. Analysis of effectiveness measures of construction project success in Malaysia. ASS. 4(7):74.
   Google Scholar
• Turner R, Zolin R. 2012. Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manage J. 43(5):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Shen GQ, Ho M, Drew DS, Xue X. 2011a. Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. Int J Project Manage. 29(7):900–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L-R, Huang C-F, Wu K-S. 2011b. The association among project manager’s leadership style, teamwork and project success. Int J Project Manage. 29(3):258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar