Modelling labour productivity using SVM and RF: a comparative study on classifiers performance

References

• Abraham A. 2005. Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning. In: Fuzzy systems engineering. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; p. 53–83.
   Google Scholar
• Acton QA. 2012. Advances in machine learning research and application: 2012 edition. Georgia, USA: Scholarly Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Alaghbari W, Al-Sakkaf AA, Sultan B. 2019. Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Yemen. Int J Constr Manage. 19(1):79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Albert M, Schmidt M. 2010. Climate-sensitive modelling of site-productivity relationships for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). For Ecol Manage. 259(4):739–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhuda A, Ahmed MBM. 2019. An approach to estimate the productivity of wind and solar energy in Sudan. Wad Madani, Sudan: University of Gezira.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kofahi Z. 2016. Dynamic modeling approach to quantify change orders impact on labor productivity [Electronic theses and dissertations]. 5288.
   Google Scholar
• Alsugair AM, Al-Qudrah AA. 1998. Artificial neural network approach for pavement maintenance. J Comput Civ Eng. 12(4):249–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zwainy FMS, Abdulmajeed MH, Aljumaily HSM. 2013. Using multivariable linear regression technique for modeling productivity construction in Iraq. OJCE. 03(03):127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Amendolia SR, Cossu G, Ganadu M, Golosio B, Masala G, Mura GM. 2003. A comparative study of k-nearest neighbour, support vector machine and multi-layer perceptron for thalassemia screening. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 69(1-2):13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes R, Gonzalez V. 2015. A production model for construction: a theoretical framework. Buildings. 5(1):209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi D, Tokdemir OB. 1999. Comparison of case-based reasoning and artificial neural networks. J Comput Civ Eng. 13(3):162–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attar A, Gupta A, Desai D. 2012. A study of various factors affecting labour productivity and methods to improve it IOSR. J Mech Civil Eng. 1:11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Auria L, Moro RA. 2008. Support vector machines (SVM) as a technique for solvency analysis. Berlin, Germany: DIW Berlin Library.
   Google Scholar
• Barber QE, Bater CW, Braid AC, Coops NC, Tompalski P, Nielsen SE. 2016. Airborne laser scanning for modelling understory shrub abundance and productivity. For Ecol Manage. 377:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskoro LS, Hara Y, Otsuji Y. 2019. Labor Productivity and Foreign Direct Investment in the Indonesian Manufacturing Sector. Signifikan. 8(1):9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein J, Mishel L, Schmitt J. 1998. The US model: the wages of inequality. In: Wheelock J, Vail J, editors. Work and idleness. Recent economic thought series. Vol. 66. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bingley P, Eriksson T. 2000. Pay spread and skewness, employee effort and firm productivity. Department of Economics, Faculty of Business Administration, Aarhus School. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Bokor O, Florez L, Osborne A, Gledson BJ. 2018. A framework for modelling masonry construction using hybrid simulation approaches.
   Google Scholar
• Boussabaine A, Duff AR. 1996. An expert‐simulation system for construction productivity forecasting: conformation method used to illustrate the uncertainty associated with expert’s knowledge. Build Res Inf. 24(5):279–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. 1984. Classification and regression trees. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Card D. 1999. The causal effect of education on earnings. In: Handbook of labor economics. Vol. 3. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier; p. 1801–1863.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng M-Y, Wibowo DK, Prayogo D, Roy AF. 2015. Predicting productivity loss caused by change orders using the evolutionary Fuzzy support vector machine inference model. J Civil Eng Manage. 21(7):881–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloi H. 2007. Twinning motivation, productivity and management strategy in construction projects. Eng Manage J. 19(3):30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Durdyev S, Ismail S, Kandymov N. 2018. Structural equation model of the factors affecting construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(4):04018007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdyev S, Mbachu J. 2018. Key constraints to labour productivity in residential building projects: evidence from Cambodia. Int J Constr Manage. 18(5):385–393.
   Google Scholar
• El-Hendawy S, Al-Suhaibani N, Elsayed S, Refay Y, Alotaibi M, Dewir YH, Hassan W, Schmidhalter U. 2019. Combining biophysical parameters, spectral indices and multivariate hyperspectral models for estimating yield and water productivity of spring wheat across different agronomic practices. PloS One. 14(3):e0212294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everingham Y, Sexton J, Skocaj D, Inman-Bamber G. 2016. Accurate prediction of sugarcane yield using a random forest algorithm. Agron Sustain Dev. 36(2):27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezeldin AS, Sharara LM. 2006. Neural networks for estimating the productivity of concreting activities. J Constr Eng Manage. 132(6):650–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayek AR, Oduba A. 2005. Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using Fuzzy expert systems. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(8):938–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayek AR, Tsehayae AA. 2012. Modeling construction labour productivity using fuzzy logic and exploring the use of fuzzy hybrid techniques. In: Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), 2012 Annual Meeting of the North American. Berkeley, CA, USA: IEEE, p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gerek IH, Erdis E, Mistikoglu G, Usmen M. 2015. Modelling masonry crew productivity using two artificial neural network techniques. J Civil Eng Manage. 21(2):231–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Majumdar SK. 2011. Modeling blast furnace productivity using support vector machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 52(9-12):989–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golnaraghi S, Zangenehmadar Z, Moselhi O, Alkass S. 2019. Application of artificial neural network (s) in predicting formwork labour productivity. Adv Civ Eng. 2019:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrum PM, Zhai D, Yasin MF. 2009. Relationship between changes in material technology and construction productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(4):278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundecha MM. 2013. Study of factors affecting labor productivity at a building construction project in the USA: web survey
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Kansal R. 2014. Improvement of construction labor productivity in Chambal Region. Int J Res Eng Technol. 3:34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan DW, Demsetz LA, Brown JD, Pace CB. 1994. Action-response model and loss of productivity in construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 120(1):47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza M, Shahid S, Bin Hainin MR, Nashwan MS. 2019. Construction labour productivity: review of factors identified. Int J Constr Manage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1627503.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna AS, Chang C-K, Sullivan KT, Lackney JA. 2008. Impact of shift work on labor productivity for labor intensive contractor. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(3):197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna AS, Taylor CS, Sullivan KT. 2005. Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(6):734–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbsman Z, Ellis R. 1990. Research of factors influencing construction productivity. Construction Manage Econ. 8(1):49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hiyassat MA, Hiyari MA, Sweis GJ. 2016. Factors affecting construction labour productivity: a case study of Jordan. Int J Constr Manage. 16(2):138–149.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga FH, Broer P. 2004. Wage moderation and labour productivity. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Vol. 263, No. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Soh CK. 2013. Trade-level productivity measurement: Critical challenges and solutions. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(11):04013013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM, Al Balushi RA, Raveendranath P. 2015. Determinants of construction labour productivity in Oman. Int J Constr Manage. 15(4):332–344.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks GF. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. International yearbook of cartography 7; p. 186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kaming PF, Holt GD, Kometa ST, Olomolaiye PO. 1998. Severity diagnosis of productivity problems—a reliability analysis. Int J Project Manage. 16(2):107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kauhanen A, Maliranta M. 2019. The roles of job and worker restructuring in aggregate wage growth dynamics. Rev Income Wealth. 65(1):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazaz A, Ulubeyli S. 2004. A different approach to construction labour in Turkey: comparative productivity analysis. Build Environ. 39(1):93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D-W, An S-H, Cho H, Jeong J-W, Lee B-H, Doh NL, Kang K-I. 2009. Development of conceptual model of construction factory for automated construction. Build Environ. 44(8):1634–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Lee H-S, Park M, Ahn CR, Hwang S. 2015. Productivity forecasting of newly added workers based on time-series analysis and site learning. J Constr Eng Manage. 141(9):05015008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein N. 2012. Real wage, labor productivity, and employment trends in South Africa: a closer look. Vol. 12–92. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach KA. 1987. What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers. Bus Horiz. 30(5):58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Lee C-K. 2003. Classification of multiple cancer types by multicategory support vector machines using gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 19(9):1132–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Lee C-W, Kim J-C. 2019. Groundwater productivity potential mapping using logistic regression and boosted tree models: the case of Okcheon City in Korea. In: Advances in remote sensing and geo informatics applications. Tunisia: Springer; p. 305–307.
   Google Scholar
• Lema NM. 1996. Construction labour productivity analysis and benchmarking: the case of Tanzania. © Ninatubu Mbora Lema. United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Lim EC, Alum J. 1995. Construction productivity: issues encountered by contractors in Singapore. Int J Project Manage. 13(1):51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Song Y, Yi W, Wang X, Zhu J. 2018. Comparing the random forest with the generalized additive model to evaluate the impacts of outdoor ambient environmental factors on scaffolding construction productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(6):04018037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu C, Mills A. 2016. Construction labor productivity convergence: a conditional frontier approach Engineering. Eng, Const and Arch Manage. 23(3):283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machwitz M, Gessner U, Conrad C, Falk U, Richters J, Dech S. 2015. Modelling the gross primary productivity of West Africa with the Regional Biomass Model RBM+, using optimized 250 m MODIS FPAR and fractional vegetation cover information. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 43:177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia AG, Sakamoto A. 2018. Does wage reflect labor productivity? A comparison between Brazil and the United States Brazilian. Brazil J Polit Econ. 38:629–649.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney WF, McFillen JM. 1985. Valence of and satisfaction with job outcomes. Constr Eng Manage. 111(1):53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoliadis O. 2011. Labour productivity benchmarking in Greek projects Organization, technology & management in construction. Int J. 3:221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Mao H. 1999. Estimating labour productivity using Fuvy set theory. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Momade MH, Hainin MR. 2018a. Problems affecting squatter settlements in Nampula. Mozambique Int J Eng Technol. 7:5022–5025.
   Google Scholar
• Momade MH, Hainin MR. 2018b. Review of sustainable construction practices in Malaysian construction industry. Int J Eng Technol. 7:5018–5021.
   Google Scholar
• Momade MH, Hainin MR. 2019. identifying motivational and demotivational productivity factors in Qatar construction projects engineering. Technol Appl Sci Res. 9:3945–3948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moselhi O, Assem I, El-Rayes K. 2005. Change orders impact on labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage . 131(3):354–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moselhi O, El-Rayes K. 2002. Analyzing weather-related construction claims. Cost Eng. 44:12.
   Google Scholar
• Muqeem S, Idrus A, Khamidi MF, Ahmad JB, Zakaria SB. 2012. Construction labor production rates modeling using artificial neural network. ITCON. 16:713–726.
   Google Scholar
• Nasirzadeh F, Nojedehi P. 2013. Dynamic modeling of labor productivity in construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 31(6):903–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oduba AO. 2004. Predicting industrial construction productivity using fuzzy expert systems. United States.
   Google Scholar
• Olomolaiye PO. 1988. An evaluation of bricklayers’ motivation and productivity. © Paul Olaniyi Olomolaiye. United Kingdom: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Pan N-F. 2005. Assessment of productivity and duration of highway construction activities subject to impact of rain expert systems with. Applications. 28:313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Jiang J, Wang R, Cao H. 2008. Advantages of support vector machine in QSPR studies for predicting auto-ignition temperatures of organic compounds. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 92(2):169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panas A, Pantouvakis J-P. 2018. On the use of learning curves for the estimation of construction productivity. Int J Constr Manage. 18(4):301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy M, Murugasan R, Vasan R. 2018. Modelling manpower and equipment productivity in tall residential building projects in developing countries. J S Afr Inst Civil Eng. 60(2):23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovici N, Moraru C, Munteanu I. 2019. The relationship between earnings and labour productivity in textile industry. DE Redactie. 9. Romania: The National R&D Institute for Textiles and Leather - INCDTP 16.
   Google Scholar
• Portas J, AbouRizk S. 1997. Neural network model for estimating construction productivity. Constr Eng Manage. 123(4):399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour SH, Shahid S, Chung E-S, Wang X-J. 2018. Model output statistics downscaling using support vector machine for the projection of spatial and temporal changes in rainfall of Bangladesh. Atmos Res. 213:149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman IA, Memon AH, Memon AQ, Shaikh MA, Siddiqui F. 2019. Factors Affecting the Labour productivity in construction projects of Pakistan. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, p. 05010
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP. 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 67:93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozante JR, Vila DA, Chiquetto JB, Fernandes AD, Alvim DS. 2018. Evaluation of TRMM/GPM blended daily products over Brazil. Remote Sens. 10(6):882.
   Google Scholar
• Shashank K, Hazra S, Pal KN. 2014. Analysis of key factors affecting the variation of labour productivity in construction projects. p. 152–160.
   Google Scholar
• Shiwani H, Saunderson C, Anwar MM, Kon M, Bulugahapitiya S. 2016. 011 Role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in chest pain evaluation in females. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society. Washington, USA: Hearts.
   Google Scholar
• Sofia Lopes A, Teixeira P. 2013. Productivity, wages, and the returns to firm-provided training: fair shared capitalism?. Int J of Manpower. 34(7):776–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf A, Kerle N. 2011. Combining Random Forests and object-oriented analysis for landslide mapping from very high resolution imagery. Procedia Environ Sci. 3:123–129. doi:https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.02.022.
   Google Scholar
• Sweis RJ, Sweis GJ, Hammad AAA, Rumman MA. 2009. Modeling the variability of labor productivity in masonry construction. Jordan Civil Eng. 3:197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Tang S, Chen C, Zhan H, Zhang T. 2008. Determination of ocean primary productivity using support vector machines. Int J Remote Sens. 29(21):6227–6236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas HR, Yiakoumis I. 1987. Factor model of construction productivity. Constr Eng Manage. 113(4):623–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsehayae AA. 2015. Developing and optimizing context-specific and universal construction labour productivity models. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Tsehayae AA, Fayek AR. 2016. System model for analysing construction labour productivity. Constr Innov 16(2):203–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsehayae AA, Fayek AR. 2018. Context adaptation of fuzzy inference system-based construction labor productivity models. Adv Fuzzy Syst. 2018:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USBLS 2016. Productivity law and legal definition. United States.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. 2013. The nature of statistical learning theory. USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN, Vapnik V. 1998. Statistical learning theory. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F. 2005. On-Site labor productivity estimation using neural networks. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Concordia University.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins M, Mukherjee A, Onder N, Mattila K. 2009. Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(7):657–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt MS, Dash JP, Watt P, Bhandari S. 2016. Multi-sensor modelling of a forest productivity index for radiata pine plantations. NZ J Sci. 46(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Westover JH, Westover AR, Westover LA. 2010. Enhancing long-term worker productivity and performance: The connection of key work domains to job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Int J Prod Perf Manage. 59(4):372–387.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler D, Mody A. 1992. International investment location decisions: The case of US firms. J Int Econ. 33(1/2):57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmot CG, Mei B. 2005. Neural network modeling of highway construction costs. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(7):765–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JM, Chan AP, Chiang Y. 2007. Forecasting construction manpower demand: A vector error correction model. Build Environ. 42(8):3030–3041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai D, Goodrum PM, Haas CT, Caldas CH. 2009. Relationship between automation and integration of construction information systems and labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(8):746–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Zhu G. 2000. Location factors and country-of-origin differences: an empirical analysis of FDI in China Multinational. Bus Rev. 8:60.
   Google Scholar