Development of risk misallocation causal networks using interpretive judgement in the construction industry

References

• Albino V, Garavelli AC. 1998. A neural network application to subcontractor rating in construction firms. Int J Project Manage. 16(1):9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Algahtany M, Alhammadi Y, Kashiwagi D. 2016. Introducing a new risk management model to the Saudi Arabian construction industry. Procedia Eng. 145:940–947.
   Google Scholar
• Alsalman AA, Sillars D. 2012. Construction risk allocation: Optimal Risk allocation decision support model [PH.D. thesis]. USA: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alsalman A, Sillars D. 2013. Modelling the effects of sub-optimal risk allocation in the construction industry. USA: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2006. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2006, for the period 2006. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2007. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2007, for the period 2007. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2008. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2008, for the period 2008. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2009. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2009 for the period 2009. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2010. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2010, for the period 2010. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2011. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2011, for the period 2011. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2012. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2012, for the period 2012. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2013. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2013, for the period 2013. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General’s Office. 2016. Report of the Auditor General on the accounts of the Republic for the financial year ended 31st December 2016, for the period 2016. Zambia, Lusaka. [accessed 2015 January 12]. www.ago.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Bakr AF, Khaled HE, Ayda RN. 2012. Heuristic approach for risk assessment, EPCCM application. Alexandra Eng J. 51 (4):305–323.
   Google Scholar
• Barlish K, Marco D, Thaheem A. 2013. Construction Risk Taxonomy: An International Convergence of Academic and Industry Perspectives. Am J Appl Sci. 10 (7):706–713.
   Google Scholar
• Bedenekoff AP, Steven LL. 2011. Risk allocation is a general phenomenon: A reply to Beauchamp and Raxton. Am Nat. 177(1):147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello AW, Odusami TK. 2013. Weak management of the predictability of contigency allowance in construction projects in Nigeria. In: Smith SD and Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, editors. Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM conference, 2–4 September 2013; Reading (UK): Association of Researchers in Construction Management, p. 969–978.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. 1991. A method of analysising interview transcript in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today. 11(6):461–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cagliano AC, Grimaldi S, Rafele C. 2015. Choosing project risk management techniques. A theoretical framework. J Risk Res. 18(2):232–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Construction review online. 2019. Top construction companies in Zambia. [accessed 2019 June 24]. https://constructionreviewoline.com/2018/07/top-construction-companies-in-zambia/.
   Google Scholar
• Dziadosz A, Rejment M. 2015. Risk analysis in construction project in chosen methods. Procedia Eng. 122:258–265.
   Google Scholar
• Fidan G, Dikmen I, Tanyer AM, Birgonul MT. 2011. Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overruns in international projects. J Comput Civ Eng. 25(4):302–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray E. 2009. Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna A, Thomas G, Swanson J. 2013. Construction risk identification and allocation: A cooperative approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(9):1098–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeah W, Guikema S. 2009. Managing construction projects using the advanced programmatic risk analysis and management model. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(8):772–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarkas AM, Haupt CT. 2015. Major construction risk factors considered by general contractors in Qatar. J Eng Des Tech. 13(1):165–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin XH, Zhang G. 2011. Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks. Int J Project Manage. 29(5):591–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen IL, Rausand M. 2014. Define complexity for risk assessment of sociotechnical and conceptual framework. J Risk Reliab. 228(3):227–290.
   Google Scholar
• Kang BG, Fazlie MA, Goh BH, Song MK, Zhang C. 2015. Current practice of risk management in the Malaysia construction industry-The process and tools/techniques. IJSCER. 4(4):371–377.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy MM, Matthews J. 2000. Improved subcontractor selection employing partnering principles. ASCE J Manage Eng. 16(3):47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedy PD, Ormorod JE. 2014. Practical research planning and design. International ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtiranta L. 2014. Risk perceptions and approaches in multi-organisations: A critical review 2000–2012. Int J Project Manage. 32(4):640–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester A. 2017. Project management, planning and control: Managing engineering, construction and manufacturing projects to PMI, APM and BSI standards. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore M, McCarthy C. 2008. Perceptions of contractual risk allocation on construction supply chains. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 134(1):95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbwa B, Muya M. 2013. Ethics in the construction industry in Zambia. Int J Constr Manage. 13(2):43–65.
   Google Scholar
• Polat G, Kaplan B, Bingol NB. 2015. Subcontractor selection using generic algorithm. Procedia Eng. 123:432–440.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI). 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 4th ed. PA: PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI). 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 5th ed. PA: PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (PMI). 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge: global standard. 6th ed. USA: PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Renault BY, Agumba JN, Ansary N. 2016. A theoretical review of risk identification: perspective of construction industry. In: Mojekwu, J.N., Nani, G., Atepor, L., Oppong, R.A., Adetunji, M.O., Ogunsumi, L., Tetteh, U.S., Awere, E., Ocran, S.P., and Bamfo-Agyei, E, editors. Proceedings 5th Applied Research Conference in Africa. (ARCA) Conference; 25–27 August 2016; Cape Coast, Ghana. p. 773–782.
   Google Scholar
• Renault BY, Agumba NJ. 2016. Risk management in the construction industry: A new literature review. MATEC Web Conf. 66:8.
   Google Scholar
• Rostami A. 2016. Tools and techniques in risk identification: A research within SMEs in the UK construction industry. UJM. 4(4):203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Marco AD, Rafefele C, Thaheem MJ. 2016. Dynamic management of risk contingency in complex design build projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(2): 4015080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead P. 2007. Current trends in risk allocation in construction projects and their Implications for the industry. Constr Law J. 23:23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MNDP). 2017. National development plan 2017–2021. Lusaka: MNDP. www.mndp.gov.zm.
   Google Scholar
• Muya M, Kaliba C, Sichombo B, Shakantu W. 2013. Causal factors of cost escalation, schedule overruns and quality shortfalls in construction projects in Zambia. Inter J Constr Manage. 13(1):53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Salah A, Moselhi O. 2016. Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory. Can J Civ Eng. 43(5):429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell A, Ferrada X, Rubio L, Arauzo S. 2015. Evaluating risk management practices in construction organisations. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 194:201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Serpella AF, Ferrada X, Howard R, Rubio L. 2014. Risk management in construction projects: A knowledge based approach. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 119:653–662.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanyama G, Muya M, Kaliba C. 2012. An overview of construction claims: a case study of the Zambian construction industry. Int J Constr Manage. 12(1):65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Smith N, Merna T, Jobling P. 2014. Management of risk in construction projects. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski P. 2017. Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Eng. 208:174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Turner and Townsend. 2018. International construction market survey. [accessed 2019 June 24]. https://www.turnerandtownsend.com/media/3352/international-construction-market-survey-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz A, Dikmen I, Birgonol M, Ercoskun K, Alten S. 2012. Risk mapping in construction projects. In: Engineering Project Organization Conference; July 10–12; Rheden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Zambia Development Agency. 2017. Annual report. [accessed 2019 June 21]. www.zda.org.zm/?=contents/publications%annual%report%2017%20.
   Google Scholar
• Zambia Invest. 2019. Zambia construction. https://www.zambiaivest.com/construction on 10 May 2019.
   Google Scholar