722
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of institutional frameworks on implementation of PPP projects: a comparative perspective in Australia and India

, &

References

  • Acemoglu D , Robinson J . 2008. The role of institutions in growth and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Alam Q , Kabir MH , Chaudhri V . 2014. Managing infrastructure projects in Australia. a shift from a contractual to a collaborative public management strategy. Admin Soc. 46(4):422–449.
  • Almarri K . 2018. Comparative analysis of the value for money factors of PPPs between the UAE and the UK. Int J Constr Manage. 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1544450.
  • Althubaiti A . 2016. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 9:211–217.
  • Ana E , Tony H . 2016. A comparison of public and private partnership models for urban commercial revitalization in Canada and Spain. Can Geogr / Le Géographe canadien. 60(1):107–122.
  • Andrade D , Roy G . 1984. Cultural meaning systems. In: Shweder RA , Vine RAL , editors. Culture theory: essay on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 88–119.
  • Andrews R , Esteve M , Ysa T . 2015. Public–private joint ventures: mixing oil and water? Public Money Manage. 35(4):265–272.
  • ASCE . 2017. Infrastructure report card: a comprehensive assessment of America's infrastructure. Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers.
  • Athanasakis D . 2009. Arbitration for supply chain and money supply cause disputes in PPP projects: distilling comparative economic interests from the Greek legal system. Int J Constr Manage. 9(1):93–105.
  • Auditor-General . 2006. Auditor-General's report performance audit: the cross city tunnel project. Sydney: New South Wales, Audit Office.
  • Australian Government . 2008. National public private partnership guidelines: overview. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development.
  • Australian Government . 2015. National public private partnership policy framework. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development.
  • Badewi A, Shehab E. 2016. The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: neo-institutional theory perspective. Int J Proj Manage. 34(3):412–428.
  • Barry K , Maryann K . 2013. Private firms, public entities, and microeconomic incentives: public private partnerships (PPPs) in Australia and the USA. Int J Organ Anal. 21(2):176–197.
  • Beckert J . 2010. Institutional isomorphism revisited: convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociol Theory. 28(2):150–166.
  • Biesenthal C, Clegg S, Mahalingam A, Sankaran S. 2018. Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects. Int J Proj Manage. 36(1):43–54.
  • Bouma G . 1998. Distinguishing institutions and organisations in social change. J Sociol. 34(3):232–245.
  • CAG . 2009. Public private partnerships in infrastructure projects: public auditing guidelines. New Delhi: Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  • Cannadi J , Dollery B . 2005. An evaluation of private sector provision of public infrastructure in Australian local government. Aust J Pub Admin. 64(3):112–118.
  • Casady CB , Erikssonb K , Levitt RE , Scott WR . 2017. A ‘new governance’ approach to public-private partnerships: lessons for the public sector. Stanford (CA): Global Projects Center.
  • Casile M , Davis-Blake A . 2002. When accreditation standards change: factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations. Acad Manage J. 45(1):180–195.
  • Chan A , Lam P , Chan D , Cheung E . 2008. Risk-sharing mechanism for PPP Projects - the case study of the Sydney cross city tunnel. Surv Built Environ. 19(1):67–80.
  • Chi CSF , Nicole Javernick‐Will A . 2011. Institutional effects on project arrangement: high‐speed rail projects in China and Taiwan. Constr Manage Econ. 29(6):595–611.
  • Chileshe N , Njau CW , Kibichii BK , Macharia LN , Kavishe N . 2020. Critical success factors for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure and housing projects in Kenya. Int J Constr Manage. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1736835.
  • Cui C , Liu Y , Hope A , Wang J . 2018. Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. Int J Project Manage. 36(5):773–794.
  • Dansoh A , Frimpong S , Ampratwum GD , Oppong G , Osei-Kyei R . 2020. Exploring the role of traditional authorities in managing the public as stakeholders on PPP projects: a case study. Int J Constr Manage. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1725722.
  • Dassiou X , Stern J . 2009. Infrastructure contracts: trust and institutional updating. Rev Ind Organ. 35(1–2):171–216.
  • de Jong M , Mu R , Stead D , Ma Y , Xi B . 2010. Introducing public–private partnerships for metropolitan subways in China: what is the evidence? J Transport Geogr. 18(2):301–313.
  • Delhi VSK , Mahalingam A . 2013. A framework for post award project governance of public- private partnerships in infrastructure projects. Engineering Project Organization Conference; Colorado.
  • Devkar GA , Mahalingam A , Deep A , Thillairajan A . 2013. Impact of private sector participation on access and quality in provision of electricity, telecom and water services in developing countries: a systematic review. Utilities Policy. 27:65–81.
  • Dewulf G , Garvin M , Duffield C . 2012. What are the benefits of standardised PPP procurement processes? Joint CIB W070, W092 & TG72 International Conference on Deliverying Value to the Community; Cape Town.
  • DiMaggio PJ , Powell WW . 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev. 48(2):147–160.
  • Dimitriou HT , Low N , Sturup S , Zembri G , Campagnac E , Kaparos G , Skayannis P , Muromachi Y , Iwakura S , Itaya K , et al. 2014. What constitutes a “successful” mega transport project?/Leadership, risk and storylines: The case of the Sydney Cross City Tunnel/The case of the LGV Méditerranée high speed railway line/Dealing with context and uncertainty in the development of the Athens Metro Base Project/What constitutes a “successful” mega transport project? Lessons from the Metropolitan Expressway in Tokyo/The RandstadRail project: A case study in decision-making strategies under uncertainty/Constructive conflicts in the case of the Öresund Link/Perspectives on “success” from the UK Channel Tunnel Rail Link Project/Some concluding remarks. Plann Theory Pract. 15(3):389–430.
  • Doh JP , Ramamurti R . 2003. Reassessing risk in developing country infrastructure. Long Range Plann. 36(4):337–353.
  • Dong Z , Wang M , Yang X . 2016. Comparative study of China and USA public private partnerships in public transportation. J Mod Transport. 24(3):215–223.
  • Donnelly D , Ng N , Donaldson B . 2015. Australia. In: Werneck B , Saadi M , editors. The Public-private partnership law review. London: Law Business Research Ltd; p. 10–19.
  • Dowling J , Pfeffer J . 1975. Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pac Sociol Rev. 18(1):122–136.
  • Duffield CF . 2005. PPPs in Australia. The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Conference Public Private Partnerships - Opportunities and Challenges; 22nd February; Hong Kong.
  • Dunstan P , Oppenheim P . 2007. The Pacific link: comparing Australian PPP and Canadian P3 markets. Vancouver: Plenary Group.
  • Dutz M , Harris C , Dhingra I , Shugart C . 2006a. Public-private partnership units: What are they, and what do they do? Washington D.C: World Bank.
  • Dutz M , Harris C , Dhingra I , Shugart C . 2006b. India - building capacities for public private partnerships. New York: World Bank.
  • Edelenbos J , Klijn E-H . 2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. J Public Admin Res Theory. 16(3):417–446.
  • Edelenbos J , Meerkerk v. I , van Leeuwen C . 2015. Vitality of complex water governance systems: condition and evolution. J Environ Policy Plann. 17(2):237–261.
  • Edelenbos J , Van Buuren A , Klijn E-H . 2013. Connective capacities of network managers. Public Manage Rev. 15(1):131–159.
  • Eggers WD , Dovey T . 2007. Closing America's infrastructure gap: the role of public private partnerships. USA: Deloitte Services LP.
  • Eisenhardt KM . 1989. Building theories from case study research. AMR. 14(4):532–550.
  • EIU . 2012. Evaluating the environment for public private partnerships in Asia-Pacific: the 2011 infrascope - findings and methodology. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd.
  • EIU . 2015. Evaluating the environment for public private partnerships in Asia-Pacific: the 2014 Infrascope - a report by The Economist Intelligence Unit. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd.
  • EIU . 2019. The 2019 Infrascope - evaluating the environment for public-private partnerships in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York: The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd.
  • English LM . 2006. Public private partnerships in Australia: an overview of their nature, purpose, incidence and oversight. Univ New South Wales Law J. 29(3):250–262.
  • English LM . 2007. Performance audit of Australian public private partnerships: legitimising government policies or providing independent oversight. Financial Acc Man. 23(3):313–336.
  • Esther C , CA PC , Stephen K . 2012. Factors contributing to successful public private partnership projects: comparing Hong Kong with Australia and the United Kingdom. J Facilities Manage. 10(1):45–58.
  • Fedele P , Brusati L , Ianniello M . 2016. Organizational underpinnings of interactive decision making: an empirical inquiry. Int J Public Sec Manage. 29(4):310–326.
  • GoI . 2011. National public private partnership policy - draft for consultation. New Delhi: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
  • GoI . 2013. Environment and forest clearances for national highway projects. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Government of India; p. 1–2.
  • GoI . 2019. Infrastructure policy & finance division. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India; [accessed 2019 July 10]. https://dea.gov.in/divisionbranch/infrastructure-and-energy-division#PPPCell.
  • Government of India . 2011. Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee: Record Note of Discussion of 44th meeting on June 20, 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.
  • Government of India . 2013. Empowered committee approves PPP project for viability gap funding of Rs. 1458 Crores. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance; [accessed 2013 May 7]. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=95762.
  • Guest R . 2010. The proposed privatisation of Queensland motorways. Econ Papers: J Appl Econ Policy. 29(1):23–33.
  • Gurara D , Klyuev V , Mwase N , Presbitero A , Xu XC , Geoffrey B . 2017. Trends and challenges in infrastructure investment in low-income developing countries. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
  • Harisankar KS , Sreeparvathy G . 2013. Rethinking dispute resolution in public–private partnerships for infrastructure development in India. J Infrastruct Dev. 5(1):21–32.
  • Harris C , Tadimalla SK . 2008. Financing the boom in public-private partnerships in Indian infrastructure. Washington, D.C.: Public Private Partnership Advisory Facility.
  • Haughton G , Mcmanus P . 2012. Neoliberal experiments with urban infrastructure: the Cross City Tunnel, Sydney. Int J Urban Reg Res. 36(1):90–105.
  • Hayat A . 2019. Foreign direct investments, institutional quality, and economic growth. J Int Trade Econ Dev. 28(5):561–579.
  • Henisz WJ , Levitt RE . 2010. Regulative, normative and cognitive institutional supports for relational contracting in infrastructure projects. Stanford (CA): Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects.
  • Hodge G , Greve C , Biygautane M . 2018. Do PPP’s work? What and how have we been learning so far? Public Manage Rev. 20(8):1105–1121.
  • Hodge GA , Dufield CF . 2010. The Australian PPP experience: observations and reflections. In: Hodge GA , Greve C , Boardman AE , editors. International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; p. 399–438.
  • IDFC . 2015. Evolving perspectives in the development of India infrastructure. Hyderabad: Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited.
  • Ika L , Saint-Macary J . 2014. Special issue: Why do projects fail in Africa? J Afr Bus. 15(3):151–155.
  • Ika LA . 2012. Project management for development in Africa: Why projects are failing and what can be done about it. Proj Manage J. 43(4):27–41.
  • Ika LA , Donnelly J . 2017. Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. Int J Project Manage. 35(1):44–63.
  • Ika LA , Hodgson D . 2014. Learning from international development projects: blending critical project studies and critical development studies. Int J Project Manage. 32(7):1182–1196.
  • Ineke B , Freek H , Van M C , Jan W . 2013. Public–private partnerships: international audit findings, Public–private partnerships: international audit findings. In: The Routledge companion to public–private partnerships. Abingdon (OX): Routledge.
  • Jin X-H , Zuo J . 2011. Critical uncertainty factors for efficient risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects in Australia. Int J Constr Manage. 11(3):19–34.
  • Johnson D , Humffray H . 2010. Eastlink: redefining the possible. Aust J Civil Eng. 7(1):1–8.
  • Johnston J . 2010. Examining ‘tunnel vision’ in Australian PPPs: rationales, rhetoric, risks and rogues. Aust J Public Admin. 69(s1):S61–S73.
  • Jomo KS , Chowdhury A , Sharma K , Platz D . 2016. Public-private partnerships and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: fit for purpose? New York: Department of Economic & Social Affairs, United Nations.
  • Jooste SF , Scott WR . 2012. The public–private partnership enabling field: evidence from three cases. Admin Soc. 44(2):149–182.
  • Kabir MH , Alam Q . 2010. Managing public private partnerships in infrastructure projects: a collaborative governance model. Annual Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference; Australia.
  • Kabir MH , Alam Q , Chaudhry V . 2010. Public Private partnerships as a collaborative public management model: the experience of east link in Victoria, Australia. 14th International Research Society for Public Management Conference; April 7–9; Berne, Switzerland.
  • Kadefors A . 1995. Institutions in building projects: implications for flexibility and change. Scand J Manage. 11(4):395–408.
  • Kandil M . 2009. Determinants of institutional quality and their impact on economic growth in the MENA region. Int J Dev Issues. 8(2):134–167.
  • Ke Y . 2014. Is public–private partnership a panacea for infrastructure development? The case of Beijing National Stadium. Int J Const Manage. 14(2):90–100.
  • Kelly P . 2016. Preparing a public-private partnership law: observations from the international experience. Metro Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
  • Kevin T . 2005. An institutional approach to service-provision partnerships in South Asia. Dev Pract. 15(3/4):337–348.
  • Kweun JY , Wheeler PK , Gifford JL . 2018. Evaluating highway public-private partnerships: evidence from U.S. value for money studies. Transport Policy. 62:12–20.
  • L&T Metro Rail . 2014. Hyderabad metro rail project: project takeover proposal. Hyderabad: L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Limited.
  • Lee M , Han X , Quising PF , Villaruel ML . 2018. Hazard analysis on public–private partnership projects in developing Asia. Metro Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
  • Lenz T . 2012. Spurred emulation: The EU and regional integration in Mercosur and SADC. West Eur Politics. 35(1):155–173.
  • Ling FYY , Kumaraswamy MM , Dulaimi MF , Khalfan M . 2011. Public Private partnerships: overcoming pre-contract problems faced by public clients and private providers in infrastructure projects in Singapore. Int J Constr Manage. 11(1):63–77.
  • Liu T , Wang Y , Wilkinson S . 2016. Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): a comparative analysis of Australia and China. Int J Project Manage. 34(4):701–716.
  • Mahalingam A , Devkar GA , Kalidindi SN . 2011. A comparative analysis of Public- Private Partnership (PPP) coordination agencies in India. Public Works Manage Policy. 16(4):341–372.
  • Mahoney JT , McGahan AM , Pitelis CN . 2009. The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ Sci. 20(6):1034–1052.
  • Martin MH , Halachmi A . 2012. Public private partnerships in global health: addressing issues of public accountability, risk management and governance. Public Admin Q. 36(2):189–237.
  • Matos-Castaño J , Mahalingam A , Dewulf G . 2014. Unpacking the path-dependent process of institutional change for PPPs. Aust J Public Admin. 73(1):47–66.
  • Matti S . 2013. The global production of transportation public–private partnerships. Int J Urban Regional Res. 37(4):1254–1272.
  • Maxwell JA . 2010. Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inquiry. 16(6):475–482.
  • Michels A , Montfort C . 2013. The governance of public - private partnerships: institutional voids in India and China. Institutional Voids during State Re-Scaling; Rotterdam.
  • Miller R , Lessard DR . 2000. The strategic management of large engineering projects: shaping institutions, risks, and governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Ministry of Finance . 2011. Master list PPP projects in India: as on January 31, 2011. New Delhi: PPP Database, Department of Economic Affairs.
  • Mohammed SA , Colin D , Felix H . 2018. Innovation in Australian publicly operated public–private partnerships. Infrastruct Asset Manage. 6(3):1–12.
  • Morris PWG, Geraldi J. 2011. Managing the institutional context for projects. Proj Manage J. 42(6):20–32.
  • MoRTH . 2014. NHAI approves 9 proposals for deferment of premium. New Delhi: Ministry of Road Transort & Highways, Government of India.
  • Motohashi K . 2015. Comparison of economic institutions in China and India. Global business strategy: multinational corporations venturing into emerging markets. Tokyo, Japan: Springer; p. 57–76.
  • Muhammad Z , Johar F . 2019. Critical success factors of public–private partnership projects: a comparative analysis of the housing sector between Malaysia and Nigeria. Int J Constr Manage. 19(3):257–269.
  • Mukhopadhyay P . 2008. Falling through the cracks: India's failing infrastructure policy. Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania; [accessed 2018 July 7]. https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/iit/mukhopadhyay.
  • Muleya F , Zulu S , Nanchengwa PC . 2019. Investigating the role of the public private partnership act on private sector participation in PPP projects: a case of Zambia. Int J Constr Manage. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1703088.
  • Müller R, Pemsel S, Shao J. 2015. Organizational enablers for project governance and governmentality in project-based organizations. Int J Proj Manage. 33(4):839–851.
  • Müller R, Zhai L, Wang A, Shao J. 2016. A framework for governance of projects: governmentality, governance structure and projectification. Int J Proj Manage. 34(6):957–969.
  • NITI Aayog . 2015. NITI Brief 5: Investment in infrastructure - strengthening PPP policy framework. New Delhi: National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India.
  • North DC . 1992. Institutions and economic theory. Am Econ. 36(1):3–6.
  • OECD . 2010. Dedicated public-private partnership units.
  • OMEGA . 2002. Project profile - Australia: Sydney cross city tunnel. London: OMEGA Centre - Centre for Megaprojects in Transport and Development, Barlett School of Planning, University College London.
  • Osei-Kyei R , Chan A . 2017a. Comparative analysis of the success criteria for public–private partnership projects in Ghana and Hong Kong. Proj Manage J. 48(4):80–92.
  • Osei-Kyei R , Chan A . 2017b. Implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy for public construction projects in Ghana: critical success factors and policy implications. Int Constr Manage. 17(2):113–123.
  • Parsons T . 1951. The social system. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Partnerships Victoria . 2017. Partnerships Victoria: excellence in public private partnerships. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Treasury and Finance, the Victorian Government.
  • Peres M , Ameer W , Xu H . 2018. The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 31(1):626–644.
  • Phibbs P . 2008. Driving alone: Sydney’s Cross City Tunnel. Built Environ. 34(3):364–374.
  • Pratap KV . 2016. The increasing incidence of PPP project cancellations in India. Econ Political Weekly. 51(39):27–29.
  • Radaelli CM . 2000. Policy transfer in the European Union: institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance. 13(1):25–43.
  • Raghuram G , Udayakumar P . 2016. GMR KUAEL: The longest road PPP. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; [accessed 2019 July 12]. http://sk.sagepub.com/cases/gmr-kuael-the-longest-road-ppp.
  • Raisbeck P , Duffield C , Xu M . 2010. Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Constr Manage Econ. 28(4):345–359.
  • Regan M , Smith J , Love P . 2017. Financing of public private partnerships: transactional evidence from Australian toll roads. Case Stud Transport Policy. 5(2):267–278.
  • Robert OK , Dansoh A , Ofori – Kuragu JK . 2014. Reasons for adopting Public–Private Partnership (PPP) for construction projects in Ghana. Int J Constr Manage. 14(4):227–238.
  • Roland G . 2004. Understanding institutional change: fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. St Comp Int Dev. 38(4):109–131.
  • RTA . 2003. Cross City Tunnel: Summary of contracts. Chatswood: New South Wales Roads and Traffic Authority.
  • RTA . 2010. Post implementation review - M& Motorway, Cross City Tunnel and Lane Cove Tunnel. Sydney: Roads and Traffic Authority.
  • Ruef M , Scott WR . 1998. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin Sci Q. 43(4):877–904.
  • Ruiz S , Arvate P , Xavier W . 2017. Superior economic performance in developed and developing countries. Int J Emerging Mkts. 12(1):93–107.
  • Schäferhoff M , Campe S , Kaan C . 2009. Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations: making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results. Int Stud Rev. 11(3):451–474.
  • Scott WR . 2014. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests and identities. 4rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications.
  • SEITA . 2003. Southern and Eastern integrated transport authority act 2003. Melbourne: Southern and Eastern Integrated Transport Authority.
  • Shrivastava KS . 2015. The MoEF-NHAI roadblock: two central government arms fight over de-linking of forest, environment clearances. New Delhi: Society for Environmental Communications; [accessed 2019 July 15]. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/the-moefnhai-roadblock-40198.
  • Siemiatycki M . 2013. The global production of transportation public–private partnerships. Int J Urban Reg Res. 37(4):1254–1272.
  • Sturup S . 2013. A foucault perspective on public-private partnership mega projects. In: Greve C , Hodge G , editors. Rethinking public-private partnerships strategies for turbulent times. New York: Routledge; p. 132–147.
  • Suchitra M . 2015. Court stays works on Hyderabad metro rail corridor: reprimands government for realigning the route without consulting the public. New Delhi: Society for Environmental Communications; [accessed 2019 July 15]. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/court-stays-works-on-hyderabad-metro-rail-corridor-37840.
  • Teicher J , Alam Q , Gramberg BV . 2006. Managing trust and relationships in PPPs: some Australian experiences. Int Rev Admin Sci. 72(1):85–100.
  • Teisman GR , Klijn E-H . 2002. Partnership arrangements: governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Admin Rev. 62(2):197–205.
  • van den Ende L , van Marrewijk A . 2019. Teargas, taboo and transformation: a neo-institutional study of community resistance and the struggle to legitimize subway projects in Amsterdam 1960–2018. Int J Project Manage. 37(2):331–346.
  • Verweij S , Teisman GR , Gerrits LM . 2017. Implementing public–private partnerships: How management responses to events produce (un)satisfactory outcomes. Public Works Manage Policy. 22(2):119–139.
  • Vining AR , Boardman AE . 2008. Public—private partnerships. Public Works Manage Policy. 13(2):149–161.
  • Wagner B , Fain N . 2018. Regulatory influences on innovation in the public sector: the role of regulatory regimes. Public Manage Rev. 20(8):1205–1227.
  • Wang H, Lu W, Söderlund J, Chen K. 2018. The interplay between formal and informal institutions in projects: a social network analysis. Proj Manage J. 49(4):20–35.
  • World Bank . 2016. Benchmarking public-private partnerships procurement 2017. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
  • World Bank . 2017. Private participation in infrastructure: Annual report. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  • World Bank . 2018. Doing business 2018 - Reforming to create jobs. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Yin RK . 2003. Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage Publications.
  • Zhang S , Gao Y , Feng Z , Sun W . 2015. PPP application in infrastructure development in China: institutional analysis and implications. Int J Project Manage. 33(3):497–509.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.