Review on criteria for evaluating unsolicited public–private partnership PPP proposals from 2004 to 2018

References

• Abdel Aziz A, Nabavi H. 2014. Unsolicited proposals for PPP projects: Private sector perceptions in the USA. Constr Research Congress. p. 1349–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel Aziz AM, Nabavi H. 2011. Unsolicited proposals in public-private partnerships projects – Analysis of state regulations in the USA. 3rd International Construction Specialty Conference, the Canadian Society of Civil Engineers, June 14–17, Ottawa, ON, pp. CSC-155-1–CSC-115-10.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Aziz AR. 2001. Unraveling of BOT scheme: Malaysia’s Indah water consortium. J Constr Eng Manage. 127(6):457–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintoye A, Taylor C, Fitzgerald E. 1998. Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects. Eng, Const and Arch Man. 5(1):9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sharif F, Kaka A. 2004. PFI/PPP topic coverage in construction journals. In: Khosrowshahi F, editor. 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1–3 September 2004, Heriot Watt University. Association of Researchers in Constr Manage. 1. p. 711–719.
   Google Scholar
• Angus C. 2017. Unsolicited proposals - Issues backgrounders. Parliamentary Research Service e-brief. New South Wales. [Accessed March 2018]. https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Documents/Unsolicited%20proposals.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Capital Territory Government (ACT). 2016. The partnership framework - guidelines for unsolicited proposals. 2nd ed. Updated September, 2016. Canberra City: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Bakatjan S, Arikan M, Tiong RL. 2003. Optimal capital structure model for BOT power projects in Turkey. J Constr Eng Manage. 129(1):89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Chan DW, Ho KS. 2003. An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econs. 21(5):523–533.
   Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Lam PTI, Chan DWM, Cheung E, Ke Y. 2010. Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure developments: Chinese perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(5):484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau KW. 1997. The ranking of construction management journals. Constr Manage Econs. 15(4):387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung E, Chan APC, Kajewski S. 2012. Factors contributing to successful public private partnership projects: Comparing Hong Kong with Australia and the United Kingdom. J Facilities Management. 10(1):45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chew A. 2015. Use of unsolicited proposals for new projects the approaches in Australia. Eur Procure Public Priv Partnersh Law Rev. 10(1):29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan AP. 2016. “Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat Int. 57:53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwaikat LN, Ali KN. 2016. Green buildings cost premium: A review of empirical evidence. Energy Build. 110:396–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows R, Liu A. 2008. Research methods for construction. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey D, Lewis MK. 2002. Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects. Int J Proj Manage. 20(2):107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey D, Lewis MK. 2005. Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum. 29(4):345–378.
   Google Scholar
• Harris S. 2004. “Public private partnerships: Delivering better infrastructure services.” Proc., Conf.: Investment in Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Second Generation Issues and Perspectives. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges J. 2003. Unsolicited proposals: The issues of private infrastructure projects. World Bank. [March 2017]. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTFINANCIALSECTOR/Resources/2828841303327122200/257Hodge-031103.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges J, Dellacha G. 2007. Unsolicited infrastructure proposals: How some countries introduce competition and transparency, PPIAF Working Paper No. 1. [Accessed March 2018]. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/12/06/000020439_20071206143329/Rendered/PDF/417300Unsolici1als0PPIAF0101PUBLIC1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Chan DW, Chan APC, Yeung JF. 2012. Critical analysis of partnering research trend in construction journals. J Manage Eng. 28(2):82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Chan DW. 2014. Research trend of joint ventures in construction: A two-decade taxonomic review. J of Facilities Management. 12(2):118–141.
   Google Scholar
• Howard GS, Cole DA, Scot ME. 1987. Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. Am Psychol. 42:975–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin XH, Doloi H. 2008. Interpreting risk allocation mechanism in public–private partnership projects: An empirical study in a transaction cost economics perspective. Constr Manage Econs. 26(7):707–721.
   Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Wang S, Chan A. 2010a. Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: comparative study. J Infrastruct Syst. 16(4):343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Wang S, Chan APC, Cheung E. 2009. Research trend of public‐private partnership in construction journals. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(10):1076–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Wang S, Chan APC, Lam PT. 2010b. Preferred risk allocation in China’s Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects. Int J Proj Manage. 28(5):482–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbe RH, Burnett MS. 1991. Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. J Consum Res. 18(2):243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng ST, Xie JZ, Cheung YK, Jefferies M. 2007. A simulation model for optimizing the concession period of public–private partnerships schemes. Int J Project Manage. 25(8):791–798.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2008. Public–private partnerships: In pursuit of risk sharing and value for money. Paris: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan A. 2015. Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. Int J Project Manage. 33(6):1335–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei‐Kyei R, Chan A. 2016. Developing transport infrastructure in Sub‐Saharan Africa through public–private partnerships: Policy practice and implications. Transport Rev. 36(2):170–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei‐Kyei R, Chan A. 2017. Implementation constraints in public‐private partnership: Empirical comparison between developing and developed economies/countries. J Facilities Manage. 15(1):90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC, Dansoh A, Ofori-Kuragu JK, Oppong GD. 2018a. Strategies for effective management of unsolicited public-private partnership proposals. J Manage Eng. 34(3):4018006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC, Dansoh A, Ofori-Kuragu JK, Owusu EK. 2018b. Motivations for adopting unsolicited proposals for public-private partnership project implementation. J Fin Man Prop Cons. 23(2):221–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC, Javed AA, Ameyaw EE. 2017b. Critical success criteria for public-private partnership projects: international experts’ opinion. Int J Strategic Prop Manage. 21(1):87. doi: 10.3846/1648715X.2016.1246388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei‐Kyei R, Dansoh A, Ofori‐Kuragu JK. 2014. Reasons for adopting public–private partnership (PPP) for construction projects in Ghana. Int J Constr Manage. 14(4):227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu EK, Chan APC, Shan M. 2019. Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: An overview. Sci Eng Ethics. 25(1):1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF). 2009. Unsolicited proposals, Module 5: Implementing and Monitoring, Washington, DC: PPIAF. [Accessed March 2018]. https://ppiaf.org/sites/ppiaf.org/files/documents/toolkits/highwaystoolkit/6/pdf-version/5-42.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public–Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF). 2012. Unsolicited proposals, Note 6. Washington, DC; PPIAF. [Accessed March 2018]. http://www.castalia-advisors.com/files/Note-Six-Unsolicited-Proposals.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public–Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF). 2014. Unsolicited proposals–An exception to public initiation of infrastructure PPPs. Washington DC; PPIAF. [Accessed March 2018]. http://ppp.worldbank.org/publicprivatepartnership/sites/ppp.worldbank.org/files/documents/PPIAF_UnsolicitedProposals_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shen LY, Platten A, Deng XP. 2006. Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong. Int J Project Manage. 24(7):587–594.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth H, Edkins A. 2007. Relationship management in the management of PFI/PPP projects in the UK. Int J Proj Manage. 25(3):232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CC, Wen M. 2005. Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. Int J Sci Educ. 27(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). 2001. Legislative guide on privately financed infrastructure project. New York: United Nations. [Accessed April 2018]. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/procurem/pfip/guide/pfip-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verma S. 2010. Government obligations in public-private partnership contracts. J Public Procure. 10(4):564–598.
   Google Scholar
• Wibowo A. 2004. Valuing guarantees in a BOT infrastructure project. Eng, Const and Arch Man. 11(6):395–403.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group and PPIAF. 2017b. Guidelines for the development of a policy for managing unsolicited proposals in infrastructure projects. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. [Accessed April 2018]. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/976121488983070966/Guidelines-fortheDevelopment-of-a-USP-Policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group and PPIAF. 2017c. Review of experiences with unsolicited proposals in infrastructure projects. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. [Accessed April, 2018]. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/246961488983068025/Experience-Review-Report-Final-Draft-March-7-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ye S, Tiong R. 2003. The effect of concession period design on completion risk management of BOT projects. Constr Manage Econs. 21(5):471–482.
   Google Scholar
• Yi H, Wang Y. 2013. Trend of the research on public funded projects. Open Construction Build. Technol J. 7:51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Yi W, Chan A. 2014. Critical review of labor productivity research in construction journals. J Manage Eng. 30(2):214–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC, Chen C, Martek I. 2018. Review of social responsibility factors for sustainable development in public-private partnerships. Sustainable Dev. 26 (6):515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Shen L. 2011. Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Manage. 31(4):670–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun S, Jung W, Han SH, Park H. 2015. Critical organizational success factors for public private partnership projects – a comparison of solicited and unsolicited proposals. J Civil Eng and Manage. 21(2):131–143. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2013.802715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawawi MI, Kulatunga U, Thayaparan M. 2016. Malaysian experience with Public-Private Partnership (PPP): Managing unsolicited proposal. Built Env Proj Asset Manage. 6(5):508–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XQ. 2005. Criteria for selecting the private-sector partner in public–private partnerships. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(6):631–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar