Risk attitudes and the big five personality traits: a study on construction project practitioners in Malaysia

References

• Ajzen I. 2005. Attitudes, personality and behavior. London (UK): Open University Press-McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer AR, Fasolo B, De Graeff PA, Hillege HL. 2015. Risk attitudes and personality traits predict perceptions of benefits and risks for medicinal products: A field study of European medical assessors. Value Health. 18(1):91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger N, Schilling EA. 1991 Sep. Personality and the problems of everyday life: the role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J Personality. 59(3):355–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong HY, Low TS. 2014. Accidents in Malaysian construction industry: Statistical data and court cases. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 20(3):503–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR, Dye DA. 1991. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality Individual Differences. 12(9):887–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Jr., PT, Widiger TA. 2012. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Elisabet Rutström E, Harrison GW. 2008. Risk aversion in the laboratory. Bingley (UK): Emerald Group Publishing Limited; p. 41–196.
   Google Scholar
• Etemadinia H, Tavakolan M. 2018. Using a hybrid system dynamics and interpretive structural modeling for risk analysis of design phase of the construction projects. Int J Constr Manage. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1511235.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira de Araújo Lima P, Crema M, Verbano C. 2020. Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. Eur Manage J. 38(1):78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske DW. 1949. Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. J Abnorm Psychol. 44(3):329–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder D, Sneed C. 1993. Behavioral manifestations of personality: an ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. J Personality Soc Psychol. 64(3):479–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh S, Abdul-Rahman H. 2013. The identification and management of major risks in the Malaysian construction industry. J Constr Dev Countries. 18(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2011. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory Pract. 19(2):139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. 2016. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind Manage Data Syst. 116(1):2–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillson D, Murray-Webster R. 2008. Managing group risk attitude. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillson D, Murray-Webster R. 2005. Understanding and managing risk attitude. [accessed 2019 Nov 28]. https://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/events/finalpapers/Hillson%20+%20Murray-Webster.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK. 2005. Risk aversion and incentive effects: new data without order effects. Am Econ Rev. 95(3):902–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S. 1999. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP, editors. Handbook of personality: theory and research. Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press; p. 102–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kang BG, Fazlie MA, Goh BH, Song MK, Zhang C. 2015. Current practice of risk management in the malaysia construction industry–the process and tools/techniques. IJSCER. 4(4):371–377.
   Google Scholar
• Khodeir LM, Nabawy M. 2019. Identifying key risks in infrastructure projects – case study of Cairo Festival City project in Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J. 10(3):613–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King L. 1995. Wishes, motives, goals, and personal memories: relations of measures of human motivation. J Personality. 63(4):985–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPKT. 2019. Initiatives for people. [accessed 2019 Nov 28]. http://www.kpkt.gov.my/.
   Google Scholar
• Leary MR, Hoyle RH. 2009. Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. Ann Phys (USA). 42(2):624–624.
   Google Scholar
• Leva MC, Balfe N, McAleer B, Rocke M. 2017. Risk registers: structuring data collection to develop risk intelligence. Saf Sci. 100:143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist J-E, Verkasalo M, Walkowitz G, Wichardt PC. 2015. Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: task or ask? An empirical comparison. J Econ Behav Organ. 119:254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 52(1):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR. Costa PT. 1997. Chapter 31 - Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S, editors. Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; p. 825–847.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae R, John O. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Personality. 60(2):175–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee RL, Ehrler DJ, Buckhalt JA, Phillips C. 2012. The relation between five-factor personality traits and risk-taking behavior in preadolescents. Psychology. 3(8):558–561.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed O, Abd-Karim SB, Roslan NH, Mohd Danuri MS, Zakaria N. 2015. Risk management: Looming the modus operandi among construction contractors in Malaysia. Int J Constr Manage. 15(1):82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Nabawy M, Khodeir LM. 2020. A systematic review of quantitative risk analysis in construction of mega projects. Ain Shams Eng J. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman W. 1967. 800 personality trait descriptors: normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor: Michigan University, College of Literature, Science, and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Ogwueleka AC, Udoudoh FP. 2018. The impact of risk and reward dynamics in incentive compensation plans in the Nigerian construction industry. Int J Constr Manage. 18(3):247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson MN, Russell RLQ, Rohrmann GF. 2002. Functional analysis of a conserved region of the baculovirus envelope fusion protein, LD130. Virology. 304(1):81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrmann B. 2005 Jan. Risk attitude scales: concepts, questionnaires, utilizations. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; p. 21–21.
   Google Scholar
• Taofeeq DM, Adeleke AQ, Lee C-K. 2020. The synergy between human factors and risk attitudes of Malaysian contractors’: moderating effect of government policy. Saf Sci. 121:331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiga Z, Emes M, Smith A. 2016. Attitudes to risk in petroleum projects. Proc Comput Sci. 100:305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiga Z, Emes M, Smith A. 2017. Implementation of a risk management simulation tool. Proc Comput Sci. 121:218–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wang CM, Xu BB, Zhang SJ, Chen YQ. 2016. Influence of personality and risk propensity on risk perception of Chinese construction project managers. Int J Project Manage. 34(7):1294–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Blais A-R, Betz NE. 2002. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J Behav Decis Making. 15(4):263–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KK. 2013 May 28. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Market Bull. 24:1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar