2,048
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Corruption in the construction industry: a review of recent literature

, &

References

  • Ameyaw EE, Pärn E, Chan AP, Owusu-Manu DG, Edwards DJ, Darko A. 2017. Corrupt practices in the construction industry: survey of Ghanaian experience. J Manage Eng. 33(6):05017006.
  • Arewa AO, Farrell P. 2015. The culture of construction organisations: the epitome of institutionalised corruption. CEB. 15(3):59–71.
  • Brown J, Loosemore M. 2015. Behavioural factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry. Eng, Const Arch Man. 22(4):372–389.
  • Buertey JT, Dadadzogbor E, Atsrim F. 2018. Procurement path influencing factors in Ghana: managing the challenge of cultural shift. Int J Constr Manage. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1508803.
  • Campos PH. 2019. Os efeitos da crise econômica e da operação Lava-jato sobre a indústria da construção pesada no Brasil: falências, desnacionalização e desestruturação produtiva. [The effects of the economic crisis and of the Car Wash Operation over the heavy construction industry in Brazil]. Mediac Rev Cien Soc. 24(1):127–153. Portuguese.
  • Castro A, Ansari S. 2017. Contextual ‘readiness’ for institutional work. A study of the fight against corruption in Brazil. J Manag Inq. 26(4):351–365.
  • Cavazotte F, Cohen M, Brunelli M. 2018. Corporate social responsibility in Brazil. Springer, Cham. Part IV, Business ethics in Brazil: analyzing discourse and practice of the Brazilian contractors involved in Operation Lava Jato; p. 251–275.
  • Chan AP, Owusu EK. 2017. Corruption forms in the construction industry: a Literature review. J Constr Eng Manag. 143(8):04017057-01–04017057-12.
  • Chen Z. 2019. Grand challenges in construction management. Front Built Environ. 5:1–22.
  • Costa MC, de Passos GA, Ryngelblum AL. 2019. Gradual institutional change and media influence: the case of Petrobras in Brazil. J Public Aff. 20(1):e1969.
  • Dall’Acqua C. 2009. Pan American Federation of Engineering Societies. Leadership Manage Eng. 9(3):136–138.
  • Damoah IS, Kumi DK. 2018. Causes of government construction projects failure in an emerging economy: evidence from Ghana. Int J Managing Projects in Bus. 11(3):558–582.
  • Evangelinos K, Skouloudis A, Jones N, Isaac D, Sfakianaki E. 2016. Exploring the status of corporate social responsibility disclosure in the UK building and construction industry. IJGENVI. 15(4):377–399.
  • Farias A, de B Junior CM, Silva d, Messias MM, Furlaneto M, CJ. 2019. Reestruturação do compliance em construtora envolvida em escândalo de corrupção [Restructuring compliance in building involved in corruption scandal]. RAGC. 7(30):31–46. Portuguese.
  • Henry WP. 2009. Addressing corruption in our engineering/construction industry. Int J Appl Eng Res. 47(1):52–58.
  • Ibrahim Z, Hamzah N, Azry KM. 2019. Pesquisa sobre condutas e práticas antiéticas entre profissionais da indústria da construção [Research about antiethic practices and conducts among professionals of the construction industry]. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 8(2 Edição Especial 3):1130–1136. Portuguese.
  • Le Y, Shan M, Chan AP, Hu Y. 2014. Investigating the causal relationships between causes of and vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector. J Constr Eng Manage. 140(9):05014007.
  • Liu J, Zhao X, Li Y. 2017. Exploring the factors inducing contractors’ unethical behavior: Case of China. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 143(3):04016023.
  • Locatelli G, Mariani G, Sainati T, Greco M. 2017. Corrupção em projetos públicos e megaprojetos: Há um elefante na sala! [Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: there is an elephant in the room!]. Revista Internacional de Gerenciamento de Projetos. 35(3):252–268. Portuguese.
  • Loosemore M, Lim BTH. 2016. Intra-organisational injustice in the construction industry. Eng, Const and Arch Man. 23(4):428–447.
  • Lu W, Ye M, Flanagan R, Ye K. 2016. Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business: trends and prospects. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(1):04015053.
  • Manu P, Agyekum K, Mahamadu AM, Olomolaiye P, Adinyira E. 2019. Diferenças na capacidade das partes interessadas em abordar práticas antiéticas: insights da profissão de pesquisador [Differences in the capacity of stakeholders in elaborating antiethical practices: Insights from the research profession]. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 145(4):04019011. Portuguese.
  • Matheson VA, Schwab D, Koval P. 2018. The Palgrave handbook on the economics of manipulation in sport. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 14, Corruption in the bidding, construction, and organisation of mega-events: An analysis of the Olympics and World Cup; p. 257–278.
  • Mavis CP, Richter A, Landau C, Schmidt SL, Simons T, Steinbock K. 2018. What happens when companies (do not) do what they said they would? Stock market reactions to strategic integrity. Eur Manag Rev. 16(3):1–17.
  • Mwelu N, Davis PR, Ke Y, Watundu S. 2018. Compliance within a regulatory framework in implementing public road construction projects. Constr. CEB. 18(4):1–23.
  • Oladinrin TO, Ho CMF. 2014. Barriers to effective implementation of ethical codes in construction organizations: an empirical investigation. Int J Constr Manag. 15(2):117–125.
  • Owusu EK, Chan AP. 2019. Barriers affecting effective application of anticorruption measures in infrastructure projects: disparities between developed and developing countries. J Manage Eng. 35(1):04018056.
  • Saenz C, Brown H. 2018. The disclosure of anti-corruption aspects in companies of the construction sector: main companies worldwide and in Latin America. J Clean Prod. 196:259–272.
  • Sarue B. 2018. Quando grandes projetos urbanos acontecem? Uma análise a partir do Porto Maravilha no Rio de Janeiro [When do major urban projects take place? An analysis from Porto Maravilha in Rio de Janeiro]. Dados. 61(3):581–616. ]. Portuguese.
  • Shan M, Chan AP, Le Y, Hu Y. 2015a. Investigating the effectiveness of response strategies for vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector. Sci Eng Ethics. 21(3):683–705.
  • Shan M, Chan AP, Le Y, Hu Y, Xia B. 2017b. Understanding collusive practices in Chinese construction projects. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 143(3):05016012.
  • Shan M, Chan AP, Le Y, Xia B, Hu Y. 2015b. Measuring corruption in public construction projects in China. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 141(4):05015001.
  • Shan M, Le Y, Yiu KT, Chan AP, Hu Y. 2017a. Investigating the underlying factors of corruption in the public construction sector: evidence from China. Sci Eng Ethics. 23(6):1643–1666.
  • Signor R, Love PE, Olatunji O. 2016. Determining overpricing in Brazilian infrastructure projects: a forensic approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(9):06016001.
  • Signor R, Love PE, Olatunji O, Vallim JJCB, Raupp A. 2017. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: forensic engineering. ICE Publishing. Collusive Bidding in Brazilian Infrastructure Projects. 170(3):113–123.
  • Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Scavarda AJ. 2016. Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Prod Plan Control. 27(5):408–420.
  • Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Management. 14(3):207–222.
  • Transparência Internacional Brasil. 2019. Índice de Percepção da Corrupção CPI-2018 [accessed 20 Oct 2019]. https://ipc2018.transparenciainternacional.org.br.
  • Yap JBH, Lee KY, Rose T, Skitmore M. 2020. Corruption in the Malaysian construction industry: investigating effects, causes, and preventive measures. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1728609.
  • Yu Y, Martek I, Hosseini MR, Chen C. 2019. Demographic variables of corruption in the Chinese construction industry: association rule analysis of conviction records. Sci Eng Ethics. 25(4):1147–1165.
  • Zhang B, Le Y, Xia B, Skitmore M. 2017. Causes of business-to-government corruption in the tendering process in China. J Manage Eng. 33(2):05016022.
  • Zulu S, Muleya F. 2019. A student perspective of ethics in the Zambian construction industry. J Eng, Design Tech. 17(2):266–282.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.