Assignment of engineers to constructions project teams based on Person-Team Fit

References

• Ahadzie DK, Proverbs DG, Sarkodie-Poku I. 2014. Competencies required of project managers at the design phase of mass house building projects. Int J Project Manage. 32(6):958–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniadis D. 2012. Complexity and the process of selecting project team members. J Adv Perform Inf Value. 4(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden BK, Price AD. 2011. The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. Int J Project Manage. 29(2):129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, González-Cruz MC, Fernández-Diego M. 2012. Human resource allocation management in multiple projects using sociometric techniques. Int J Project Manage. 30(8):901–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, Phua FTT, Mora-Melià D. 2019. Human resource allocation to multiple projects based on members’ expertise, group heterogeneity, and social cohesion. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(2):04018134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell ST, Brown SG. 2015. Selecting and composing cohesive teams. Team cohesion: advances in psychological theory, methods and practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; p. 181–209.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Edwards JR. 2004. Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. J Appl Psychol. 89(5):822–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardy RL, Dobbins GH. 1996. Human resource management in a total quality organizational environment: shifting from a traditional to a TQHRM approach. J Qual Manage. 1(1):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Che Ibrahim CKI, Costello SB, Wilkinson S. 2017. Validation of a team integration assessment tool in road infrastructure alliance projects. Int J Constr Manage. 17(2):151–164.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva IE, Krohling RA. 2018. A fuzzy sociometric approach to human resource allocation. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Rio de Janeiro, p. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2018.8491535
   Google Scholar
• De Cooman R, Vantilborgh T, Bal M, Lub X. 2016. Creating inclusive teams through perceptions of supplementary and complementary person–team fit: examining the relationship between person–team fit and team effectiveness. Group Organ Manage. 41(3):310–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR. 1996. An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Acad Manage J. 39(2):292–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt K, Ragins BR. 2019. Relational attachment at work: a complementary fit perspective on the role of relationships in organizational life. Acad Manage J. 62(1):248–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans CR, Dion KL. 1991. Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 22(2):175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick EL, Askin RG. 2005. Forming effective worker teams with multi-functional skill requirements. Comput Ind Eng. 48(3):593–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford R, Standing C. 2014. Construction industry productivity and the potential for collaborative practice. Int J Project Manage. 32(2):315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilan SS, Sebt MH, Shahhosseini V. 2012. Computing with words for hierarchical competency based selection of personnel in construction companies. Appl Soft Comput. 12(2):860–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glew DJ. 2012. Effects of interdependence and social interaction-based person-team fit. Adm Sci. 2(1):26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez JH, Astudillo CA, Ballesteros-Pérez P, Mora-Melià D, Candia-Véjar A. 2016. The multiple team formation problem using sociometry. Comput Oper Res. 75:150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herkes J, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Pomare C, Braithwaite J. 2019. How people fit in at work: systematic review of the association between person-organisation and person-group fit with staff outcomes in healthcare. BMJ Open. 9(5):e026266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu S-C, Weng K-W, Cui Q, Rand W. 2016. Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modeling. Int J Project Manage. 34(1):82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kereri JO, Harper CM. 2019. Social networks and construction teams: literature review. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(4):03119001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof‐Brown AL, Seong JY, Degeest DS, Park WW, Hong DS. 2014. Retracted: collective fit perceptions: a multilevel investigation of person–group fit with individual‐level and team‐level outcomes. J Organ Behav. 35(7):969–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Seong JY, Degeest DS, Park W-W, Hong D-S. 2019. Collective fit perceptions: a multilevel investigation of person–group fit with individual-level and team-level outcomes: Retraction. J Organ Behav. 40(4):522.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof‐Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. 2005. Consequences of individuals'fit at work: a meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Pers Psychol. 58(2):281–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwofie TE, Alhassan A, Botchway E, Afranie I. 2015. Factors contributing towards the effectiveness of construction project teams. Int J Constr Manage. 15(2):170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière V, Gingras Y, Sugimoto CR, Tsou A. 2015. Team size matters: collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 66(7):1323–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S. 1979. Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 37(6):822–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CS, Kristof‐Brown AL, Nielsen JD. 2019. Fitting in a group: theoretical development and validation of the multidimensional perceived person–group fit scale. Pers Psychol. 72(1):139–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Miller J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: a comparative analysis of relation networks. Adm Sci Q. 24(2):181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Ning Y, Chang YH, Zhang Z. 2018. Human resource management practices to improve project managers’ job satisfaction. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 25(5):654–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer I. 2010. How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: the impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. Int J Project Manage. 28(7):629–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno JL. 1941. Foundations of sociometry: an introduction. Sociometry. 4(1):15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Muchinsky PM, Monahan CJ. 1987. What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. J Vocat Behav. 31(3):268–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Fried Y. 2016. Job design research and theory: past, present and future. Org Behav Hum Decis Process. 136:20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Kozlowski SW. 2006. Organizational socialization as a learning process: the role of information acquisition. Pers Psychol. 45(4):849–874.
   Google Scholar
• Piasentin KA, Chapman DS. 2007. Perceived similarity and complementarity as predictors of subjective person‐organization fit. J Occup Org Psychol. 80(2):341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack J, Matous P. 2019. Testing the impact of targeted team building on project team communication using social network analysis. Int J Project Manage. 37(3):473–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porntepkasemsant P, Charoenpornpattana S. 2015. Factor affecting construction labor productivity in Thailand. 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Dubai, p. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093749.
   Google Scholar
• Raiden AB, Dainty AR, Neale RH. 2004. Current barriers and possible solutions to effective project team formation and deployment within a large construction organisation. Int J Project Manage. 22(4):309–316.
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Goodwin GF. 2009. The wisdom of collectives in organizations: an update of the teamwork competencies. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, editors. The organizational frontiers series. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. NewYork/London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; p. 39–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi T. 2006. How organizations promote person-environment fit: using the case of Japanese firms to illustrate institutional and cultural influences. Asia Pacific J Manage. 23(1):47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Senaratne S, Gunawardane S. 2015. Application of team role theory to construction design teams. Archit Eng Des Manage. 11(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong JY, Kristof-Brown AL, Park W-W, Hong D-S, Shin Y. 2015. Person-group fit: diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. J Manage. 41(4):1184–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahhosseini V, Sebt MH. 2011. Competency-based selection and assignment of human resources to construction projects. Sci Iran. 18(2):163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuffler ML, Diazgranados D, Maynard MT, Salas E. 2018. Developing, sustaining, and maximizing team effectiveness: an integrative, dynamic perspective of team development interventions. Acad Manage Ann. 12(2):688–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerville J, Dalziel S. 1998. Project teambuilding—the applicability of Belbin's team-role self-perception inventory. Int J Project Manage. 16(3):165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Takey SM, de Carvalho MM. 2015. Competency mapping in project management: an action research study in an engineering company. Int J Project Manage. 33(4):784–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry R. 2000. Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2000(88):27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman BW. 1965. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull. 63(6):384–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vianen AE. 2017. A review of person—environment fit research: prospects for personnel selection. In Evers A, Anderson N, Voskuijl O, editors. The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; p. 419–439.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel RM, Feldman DC. 2009. Integrating the levels of person-environment fit: the roles of vocational fit and group fit. J Vocat Behav. 75(1):68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbel JD, Johnson DJ. 2001. The use of person–group fit for employment selection: a missing link in person–environment fit. Human Resource Management: published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration. Hum Resour Manage. 40(3):227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Zhao X, Zuo J, Zillante G. 2019. Effects of team diversity on project performance in construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 26(3):408–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young Seong J, Kristof-Brown AL. 2012. Testing multidimensional models of person-group fit. J Manage Psychol. 27(6):536–556.
   Google Scholar