Latin hypercube sampling-based NSGA-III optimization model for multimode resource constrained time–cost–quality–safety trade-off in construction projects

References

• Afshar A, Dolabi HRZ. 2014. Multi-objective optimization of time–cost–safety using genetic algorithm. Int J Optim Civil Eng. 4(4):433–450.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Abtahi AR, Damghani KK. 2013. Solving a generalised precedence multi-objective multi-mode time–cost–quality trade-off project scheduling problem using a modified NSGA-II algorithm. IJSOM. 14(3):355–372.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos KP, Kotsikas L. 2010. Experimental evaluation of simulated annealing algorithms for the timecost trade-off problem. Appl Math Comput. 217(1):260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu AJG, Suresh N. 1996. Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations. Eur J Oper Res. 88(2):320–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beşikci U, Bilge Ü, Ulusoy G. 2015. Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem. Eur J Oper Res. 240(1):22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier J, Moukrim A. 2015. Storage resources. In: Handbook on project management and scheduling, Vol. 1; p. 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Das I, Dennis JE. 1998. Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim. 8(3):631–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Agrawal RB. 1994. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Syst. 9(2):115–148.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Goyal M. 1996. A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design. Comput Sci Inform. 26(4):30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Jain H. 2014. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach. Part I: Solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 18(4):577–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deblaere F, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W, 2011. Reactive scheduling in the multi-mode RCPSP. In: Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 38, No. 1; p. 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Elbeltagi E, Ammar M, Sanad H, Kassab M. 2016. Overall multiobjective optimization of construction projects scheduling using particle swarm. Eng, Const Arch Man. 23(3):265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby SE. 1977. Activity networks: project planning and control by network models. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• El-Rayes K, Kandil A. 2005. Time–cost–quality trade-off analysis for highway construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(4):477–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Rayes K, Khalafallah A. 2005. Trade-off between safety and cost in planning construction site layouts. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(11):1186–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah-Mehdipour E, Bozorg Haddad O, Rezapour Tabari MM, Mariño MA. 2012. Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects: application and adaptation of NSGA-II and MOPSO. Expert Syst Appl. 39(3):2794–2803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C-W, Liu L, Burns SA. 1997. Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time–cost trade-off problems. J Comput Civ Eng. 11(3):184–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira JC, Fonseca CM, Gaspar-Cunha A. 2007. Methodology to select solutions from the pareto-optimal set: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of GECCO 2007: genetic and evolutionary computation conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fu F, Zhang T. 2016. A new model for solving time–cost–quality trade-off problems in construction. PLoS One. 11(12):e0167142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golenko-Ginzburg D, Gonik A, Baron A. 2006. Resource constrained project scheduling models under random disturbances. In: International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Vol. 92; p. 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Habibi F, Barzinpour F, Sadjadi SJ. 2018. Resource-constrained project scheduling problem: review of past and recent developments. 3:55–88.
   Google Scholar
• Habibi F, Barzinpour F, Sadjadi SJ. 2017. A multi-objective optimization model for project scheduling with time-varying resource requirements and capacities. J Indus Syst Eng. 10(November): pp. 92–118. http://www.jise.ir/article_53352_9042ef5d84a68e667971a9b64eb6985d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann S, Briskorn D. 2010. A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res. 207(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalhor E, Khanzadi M, Eshtehardian E, Afshar A. 2011. Stochastic timecost optimization using non-dominated archiving ant colony approach. Autom Constr. 20(8):1193–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili-Damghani K, Tavana M, Abtahi A-R, Santos Arteaga FJ. 2015. Solving multi-mode time–cost–quality trade-off problems under generalized precedence relations. Optimization Methods Softw. 30(5):965–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khang DB, Myint YM. 1999. Time, cost and quality trade-off in project management: a case study. Int J Project Manage. 17(4):249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Köppen M, Yoshida K. 2007. Many-objective particle swarm optimization by gradual leader selection. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Berlin: Springer; p. 323–331.
   Google Scholar
• Kosztyán ZT, Szalkai I. 2018. Hybrid time–quality–cost trade-off problems. Oper Res Perspect. 5(August):306–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis TS, Kopanos GM, Georgiadis MC. 2012. MILP formulations for single- and multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Comp Chem Eng. 36:369–385.
   Google Scholar
• Luong D-L, Tran D-H, Nguyen PT. 2018. Optimizing multi-mode time–cost–quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple objective difference evolution. Int J Construct Manage. 0(0):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mungle S, Benyoucef L, Son Y-J, Tiwari MK. 2013. A fuzzy clustering-based genetic algorithm approach for time–cost–quality trade-off problems: a case study of highway construction project. Eng Ap-pl Artif Intell. 26(8):1953–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabipoor Afruzi E, Roghanian E, Najafi AA, Mazinani M. 2013. A multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time–cost tradeoff problem solving using an adjusted fuzzy dominance genetic algorithm. Sci Iran. 20(3):931–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar A, Jha KN. 2019. A many-objective optimization model for construction scheduling. Construct Manage Econ. 37(12):727–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar A, Tripathi KK, Jha KN. 2019. A qualitative framework for selection of optimization algorithm for multi-objective trade-off problem in construction projects. ECAM. 26(9):1924–1945.
   Google Scholar
• Poles S, Fu Y, Rigoni E. 2009. The effect of initial population sampling on the convergence of multi-objective genetic algorithms. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst. 618:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Santos MA, Tereso AP. 2011. On the multi-mode, multi-skill resource constrained project scheduling problem: a software application. Adv Intell Soft Comput. 96:239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Senouci AB, Eldin NN. 2004. Use of genetic algorithms in resource scheduling of construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 130(6):869–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahriari M. 2016. Multi-objective optimization of discrete time–cost tradeoff problem in project networks using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. J Ind Eng Int. 12(2):159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Singh G, Ernst AT. 2011. Resource constraint scheduling with a fractional shared resource. Oper Res Lett. 39(5):363–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari S, Johari S. 2015. Project scheduling by integration of time cost trade-off and constrained resource scheduling. J Inst Eng India Ser A. 96(1):37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Trade-Offs in Economics: Definitions and Examples. 2015. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/trade-offs-in-economics-definition-examples.html.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bergh F, Engelbrecht AP. 2010. A convergence proof for the particle swarm optimiser. Fundam Inform. 105(4):341–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Kuang Y. 2008. Applying an ant colony optimization algorithm-based multiobjective approach for timecost trade-off. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(2):153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang IT. 2007. Using elitist particle swarm optimization to facilitate bicriterion timecost trade-off analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 133(7):498–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahraie B, Tavakolan M. 2009. Stochastic timecostresource utilization optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm and discrete fuzzy sets. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(11):1162–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Li H. 2010. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for construction timecost tradeoff problems. Construct Manage Econ. 28(1):75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Xing F. 2010. Fuzzy-multi-objective particle swarm optimization for time–cost–quality tradeoff in construction. Autom Construct. 19(8):1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H. 2017. The bi-level optimization research for time–cost–quality–environment trade-off scheduling problem and its application to a construction project. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 502:745–753.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Love PED, Wang X, Teo KL, Irani Z. 2013. A review of methods and algorithms for optimizing construction scheduling. J Oper Res Soc. 64(8):1091–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar