Strategic analysis of barriers and solutions to development of sustainable buildings using PESTLE technique

References

• Afshari H, Issa MH, Peng Q. 2013. Barriers to the design, construction, operation and maintenance of green buildings: a state-of-the-art review. Proceedings of CSCE Annual General Meeting and Conference; May 29–June 1; Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn YH, Pearce AR, Wang Y, Wang G. 2013. Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Develop. 4(1):35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye A. 2000. Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Construct Manage Econ. 18(1):77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ampratwum EA. 2017. Green BIM: Adaptation of green building design concept with BIM into a new construction market–Ghana in the AEC/FM industry [master’s thesis]. Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Apine A, Escobar Valdés FJ. 2017. Risk management in sustainable projects in the construction industry: cases of Swedish companies [master's thesis]. Denmark: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Arashpour M, Arashpour M. 2012. A collaborative perspective in green construction risk management. 37th Annual Conference of the Australasian Universities Building Educators Association (AUBEA). p. 1–11. UTS Publishing/University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Ashuri B, Durmus-Pedini A. 2010. An overview of the benefits and risk factors of going green in existing buildings. Int J Facil Manage. 1(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azeem S, Naeem MA, Waheed A, Thaheem MJ. 2017. Examining barriers and measures to promote the adoption of green building practices in Pakistan. Smart Sustain Built Environ. 6(3):86–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi M, Fassman E, Wilkinson S. 2011. Risks associated in implementation of green buildings. Auckland: Department of Civil Environmental Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Chamikara P, Perera BS, Rodrigo MN. 2020. Competencies of the quantity surveyor in performing for sustainable construction. Int J Constr Manag.. 20(3):237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AP, Darko A, Ameyaw EE, Owusu-Manu D-G. 2017. Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. J Manage Eng. 33(3):04016057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EH, Qian QK, Lam PT. 2009. The market for green building in developed Asian cities—the perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy. 37(8):3061–3070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover WJ. 1999. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk BC. 2008. How to use SPSS: a step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan A. 2017. Review of barriers to green building adoption. Sust Dev. 25(3):167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC. 2018. Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. Build Environ. 130:74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC, Ameyaw EE, He B-J, Olanipekun AO. 2017. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: the United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy Build. 144:320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan AP, Owusu-Manu D-G, Ameyaw EE. 2017. Drivers for implementing green building technologies: an international survey of experts. J Cleaner Prod. 145:386–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon W. 2010. The impacts of construction and the built environment. Briefing Notes.
   Google Scholar
• Eichholtz P, Kok N, Quigley JM. 2009. Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. Am Econ Rev. 100(5):2494–2511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh SM, Manjikian S, Ibrahim A, Abouelyousr A, Jabbour R. 2018. Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manage. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Energy and Resources Institute (ERI) and Institut Catalá d'Energia, Asia Urbs Programme. 2004. Sustainable building – design manual: sustainable building design practices. New Delhi: Energy and Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest K, Samuel AS, Agyemang DY, Daniel O, Caleb D. 2020. Identification of factors influencing the pricing of sustainable construction materials in developing countries: views of Ghanaian quantity surveyors. Int J Constr Manage. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli A, Jalaei F, Khanzadi M, Banihashemi S. 2019. BIM-integrated TOPSIS-Fuzzy framework to optimize selection of sustainable building components. Int J Constr Manage. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Forthofer RN, Lee ES, Hernandez M. 2007. Biostatistics (2nd ed.). Massachusetts (MA): Academic Press. Chapter 9: Nonparametric tests; p. 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler K, Rauch G. 2008. Assessing green building performance: a post-occupation evaluation of 12 GSA buildings. US General Services Administration Report.
   Google Scholar
• Gao H, Koch C, Wu Y. 2019. Building information modelling based building energy modelling: a review. Appl Energy. 238:320–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgun AP, Bayhan HG, Polat G, Turkoglu H. 2018. Schedule risk assessment in green building projects, in Euro-Med-Sec-2. The Second European and Mediterranean Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: Responsible Design and Delivery of the Constructed Project; Istanbul, ISEC; Vol. 5, No. 1; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen T, Belloni K. 2011. Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Build Res Inf. 39(3):239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselbach L. 2010. The engineering guide to LEED–new construction: sustainable construction for engineers (GreenSource): sustainable construction for engineers. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG. 2018. Chapter 13: risk assessment and mitigation measures for green construction projects. Performance and improvement of green construction projects. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; p. 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG. 2018a. Performance and improvement of green construction projects: management strategies and innovations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG. 2018b. Performance and Improvement of Green Construction Projects. Butterworth-Heinemann. Chapter 14: risk management for green retrofit, residential, and commercial construction projects; p. 235–281.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Ng WJ. 2013. Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges. Int J Project Manage. 31(2):272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Shan M, Phua H, Chi S. 2017. An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustainability. 9(7):1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Tan JS. 2012. Sustainable project management for green construction: challenges, impact and solutions. World Construction Conference; June 28–30; Colombo, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhao X, See YL, Zhong Y. 2015. Addressing risks in green retrofit projects: the case of Singapore. Project Manage J. 46(4):76–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency [IEA]. 2013. Transition to sustainable buildings: strategies and opportunities to 2050. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2019. World Energy Investment 2019. Paris: IEA [accessed 2020 May 31]. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ismael D, Shealy T. 2018. Sustainable construction risk perceptions in the Kuwaiti Construction Industry. Sustainability. 10(6):1854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain G, Gupta V, Pandey M. 2016. Case Study of Construction Pollution Impact on Environment. Int J of Emer Tech in Eng Res. 4(6):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Jalaei F, Jrade A. 2015. Integrating building information modeling (BIM) and LEED system at the conceptual design stage of sustainable buildings. Sustain Cities Soc. 18:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin R. 2019. Sustainable construction technologies: current management approach. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 29–92.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Whittington R, Regner P, Scholes K, Angwin D. 2017. Exploring strategy: text and cases. 11th ed. Harlow (UK): Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai N, Jabbour CJC. 2014. Barriers to green buildings at two Brazilian Engineering Schools. Int J Sustainable Built Environ. 3(1):87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kirpensteijn H. 2017. Planning for green building design and technology in New Zealand [master's thesis]. New Zealand: Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Wu Z, Chang R, Li Y. 2017. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions. Autom Constr. 83:134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese S, Tagliabue LC, Cecconi FR, Pasini D, Manfren M, Ciribini AL. 2017. Sustainability assessment through green BIM for environmental, social and economic efficiency. Procedia Eng. 180:520–530.
   Google Scholar
• Mosly I. 2015. Barriers to the diffusion and adoption of green buildings in Saudi Arabia. JMS. 5(4):104.
   Google Scholar
• Moughtin C. 1996. Urban design: green dimensions. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan TD, Mollaoğlu-Korkmaz S, Cotner R, Goldsberry AD. 2014. Public policy and impacts on adoption of sustainable built environments: Learning from the construction industry playmakers. J Green Build. 9(2):182–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HT. 2018. Formulating supportive instruments for green building development in Vietnam [dissertation]. Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Oke A, Aigbavboa C, Khangale T. 2018. Effect of skills shortage on sustainable construction. In: Charytonowicz J, editors. Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; July 17–21; Los Angeles (CA), Vol. 600. Cham: Springer; p. 303–309.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 2003. Environmentally sustainable buildings challenges and policies: challenges and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ott RL, Longnecker MT. 2015. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Boston (MA): Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2011. Survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pheng Low S, Gao S, Lin Tay W. 2014. Comparative study of project management and critical success factors of greening new and existing buildings in Singapore. Struct Surv. 32(5):413–433.
   Google Scholar
• Polat G, Turkoglu H, Gurgun AP. 2017. Identification of material-related risks in green buildings. Procedia Eng. 196:956–963.
   Google Scholar
• Qian QK, Chan EH. 2010. Government measures needed to promote building energy efficiency (BEE) in China. Facilities. 28(11/12):564–589.
   Google Scholar
• Qian QK, Fan K, Chan E. 2016. Regulatory incentives for green buildings: gross floor area concessions. Build Res Inform. 44(5/6):675–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Mo Y, Jing L. 2016. Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China. J Cleaner Prod. 126:148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi N, Trivedi M. 2016. PESTLE technique–a tool to identify external risks in construction projects. Int Res J Eng Technol. 3(1):384–388.
   Google Scholar
• Razali NM, Wah YB. 2011. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. J Statist Model: Analyt. 2(1):21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rizqa EY. 2016. Promoting green building by investigating sustainability concepts in building projects with regard to economic, environment, social, and technical goals [master's thesis]. Gaza: The Islamic University–Gaza.
   Google Scholar
• Robichaud LB, Anantatmula VS. 2011. Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. J Manage Eng. 27(1):48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JRA. 1999. Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. J Ext. 37(2):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Shan M, Hwang BG, Wong KSN. 2017. A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks. Tunnel Underground Space Technol. 70:19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan M, Liu WQ, Hwang BG, Lye J-M. 2020. Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(8):8310–8313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Zuo J, Huang R, Huang J, Pullen S. 2013. Identifying the critical factors for green construction–an empirical study in China. Habitat Int. 40:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VY, Le KN. 2019. Sustainable construction technologies: life-cycle assessment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Teng J, Zhang W, Wu X, Zhang L. 2016. Overcoming the barriers for the development of green building certification in China. J Hous and the Built Environ. 31(1):69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollin HM. 2011. Green building risks: it's not easy being green. Environ Claims J. 23(3/4):199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Usman AU, Khamidi MF. 2012. Determined the level of green building public awareness: application and strategies. In: International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE 2012), Jun. 12–14 June, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SQ, Tiong RL, Ting S, Ashley D. 2000. Evaluation and management of foreign exchange and revenue risks in China's BOT projects. Constr Manage Econ. 18(2):197–207.
   Google Scholar
• World Green Building Council [WGBC]. 2019. The benefits of green buildings [accessed 2020 Aug 29]. https://www.worldgbc.org/benefits-green-buildings#:∼:text=Green%20buildings%20can%20not%20only,own%20energy%20or%20increasing%20biodiversity.
   Google Scholar
• Worzala E, Bond S. 2011. Barriers and drivers to green buildings in Australia and New Zealand. J Prop Inv Finance. 29(4/5):494–509.
   Google Scholar
• Wu P, Low SP. 2012. Lean management and low carbon emissions in precast concrete factories in Singapore. J Archit Eng. 18(2):176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Yang J. 2012. Critical factors of promoting market demand of sustainable housing in Australia. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Business Management; United States of America: Scientific Research Publishing; p. 1627–1631.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X. 2015. Green real estate development in China: State of art and prospect agenda—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 47:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Shen L, Tam VW, Lee WWY. 2012. Barriers to implement extensive green roof systems: a Hong Kong study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 16(1):314–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Shen L, Wu Y. 2011. Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study. J Cleaner Prod. 19(2/3):157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Hwang BG, Gao Y. 2016. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singapore's green projects. J Cleaner Prod. 115:203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Couani P. 2012. Managing risks in green building supply chain. Architect Eng Design Manage. 8(2):143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Zhang G, Wang J. 2007. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Project Manage. 25(6):601–614.
   Google Scholar