Identification and assessment of risk in construction projects using the integrated FMEA-SWARA-WASPAS model under fuzzy environment: a case study of a construction project in Iran

References

• Abdelgawad M, Fayek AR. 2010. Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(9):1028–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi M, Behzadian K, Ardeshir A, Kapelan Z. 2016. Comprehensive risk management using fuzzy FMEA and MCDA techniques in highway construction projects. J Civil Eng Manage. 23(2):300–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boral S, Howard I, Chaturvedi SK, McKee K, Naikan V. 2020. An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA. Eng Fail Anal. 108:104195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman C, Ward S. 1996. Project risk management: processes, techniques and insights. Chichester, UK: John Wiley; 344 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cheraghi E, Khalilzadeh M, Shojaei S, Zohrehvandi S. 2017. A mathematical model to select the risk response strategies of the construction projects: case study of Saba Tower. Procedia Comput Sci. 121:609–616.
   Google Scholar
• Dehnavi A, Aghdam IN, Pradhan B, Varzandeh MHM. 2015. A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena. 135:122–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsanifar M, Hemesy M. 2019. A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to prioritize risks in the construction process under fuzzy environment (case study: the Valiasr Street underpass project). Int J Constr Manage. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Farughi H, Alaniazar S, Mousavipour S, Moradi V. 2017. A practical framework based on fuzzy FMEA to diagnose causes of delay in construction projects. J Ind Manage Stud. 15:145–175.
   Google Scholar
• Fattahi R, Khalilzadeh M. 2018. Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended Multimoora, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Saf Sci. 102:290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoushchi SJ, Yousefi S, Khazaeili M. 2019. An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Appl Soft Comput. 81:105505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh M, Gheidar Khaljani J. 2013. A review of methods for detecting product design risks. Standard management and quality. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ilbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, Kahraman C. 2018. A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety usin g Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf Sci. 103:124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keršuliene V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J Bus Econ Manage. 11(2):243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, You J-X, Ding X-F, Su Q. 2015. Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 32(7):763–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C. 2016. FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods. Singapore: Springer; p. 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mardani A, Nilashi M, Zakuan N, Loganathan N, Soheilirad S, Saman MZM, Ibrahim O. 2017. A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Appl Soft Comput. 57:265–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavi RK, Goh M, Zarbakhshnia N. 2017. Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 91(5-8):2401–2418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miler J. 2005. A method of software project risk identification and analysis [Ph.D. thesis]. Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańsk Univ. of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Mohaghar A HDS, Arab A. 2017. Investigation and evaluation of Project risks based on BWM. Org Resourc Manage Res. 7(2):157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Omidvar M, Nirumand F. 2017. Risk assessment using FMEA method and on the basis of MCDM, fuzzy logic and grey theory: A case study of overhead cranes. Health Saf Work. 7(1):63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil SK, Kant R. 2014. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst Appl. 41(2):679–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi Y, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Iranmanesh SH, Vaez-Alaei M. 2018. Hybrid approach to construction project risk management with simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/evolutionary algorithms: empirical optimization study. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(6):04018043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani P, Mishra AR, Pardasani KR. 2020. A novel WASPAS approach for multi-criteria physician selection problem with intuitionistic fuzzy type-2 sets. Soft Comput. 24(3):2355–2367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari H, Faraji Z, Majidian S. 2016. Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. J Intell Manuf. 27(2):475–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatis DH. 2003. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. 2nd ed. American Society for Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakolan M, Mohammadi A. 2018. Risk management workshop application: a case study of Ahwaz Urban Railway project. Int J Constr Manage. 18(3):260–274.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Z-p, Wang J-q, Zhang H-y. 2018. An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Appl Soft Comput. 72:636–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J, Kosareva N. 2015. A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. Int J Comput Commun. 10(6):113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani B, Salimi M, Charkhchian M. 2015. A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 77(1-4):357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wideman RM. 1992. Project and program risk management: a guide to managing project risks and opportunities. [Ph.D. thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Zegordi S, Nazari A, Rezaee Nik E. 2014. Project risk assessment by a hybrid approach using fuzzy-anp and fuzzy-topsis. Sharif J Ind Eng Manage. 29(1):3–14.
   Google Scholar