Competitiveness framework of local contractors in the Malaysian construction industry towards globalisation and liberalisation

References

• Abidin NZ, Adros NA, Hassan H. 2014. Competitive strategy and performance of quantity surveying firms in Malaysia. J Constr Develop Countr. 19(2):15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Birgonul MT, Ozdogan D. 2000. Competitiveness of Turkish contractors in international markets. 16th Annual ARCOM Conference; p. 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• BIS. 2012. Benchmarking UK competitiveness in the global economy. London.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley PJ, Pass CL, Prescott K. 1988. Measures of international competitiveness: a critical survey. J Market Manage. 4(2):175–200.
   Google Scholar
• Budiwibowo A, Trigunarsyah B, Abidin IS, Soeparto HG. 2009. Competitiveness of the Indonesian Construction Industry. J Constr Dev Countr. 14(1):51–68.
   Google Scholar
• CIDB. 2016. Overseas project undertaken by Malaysian contractors. The Construction Industry Development Board. https://www.cidb.gov.my/.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analyses for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbauni Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Debrah YA, Ofori G. 2005. Emerging managerial competencies of professionals in the Tanzanian construction industry. Int J Hum Resour Manage. 16(8):1399–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbari SA, Ng SI, Aziz YA, Ho JA. 2016. An investigation of key competitiveness indicators and drivers of full service airlines using Delphi and AHP techniques. J Air Transp Manage. 52:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Simmons B, Garrett G. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annu Rev Sociol. 33:449–472.
   Google Scholar
• Deng F, Liu G, Jin Z. 2013. Factors formulating the competitiveness of the Chinese construction industry: an empirical investigation. J Manage Eng. 29(4):435–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Diraby TE, Costa J, Singh S. 2006. How do contractors evaluate company competitiveness and market attractiveness? The case of Toronto contractors. Can J Civ Eng. 33(5):596–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Karriri A El. 2010. Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision in the Palestinian construction industry. J Financ Manage Prop Constr. 15(2):118–142.
   Google Scholar
• EPU. 2010. Tenth Malaysian Plan 2011–2015. Putrajaya: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson S, Henricsson P, Jewell C. 2005. Understanding construction industry competitiveness: the introduction of the Hexagon framework. Proceedings of the 11th Joint CIB International Symposium Combining Forces – Advancing Facilities Management and Construction through Innovation, p. 188–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz J, Kupfer D, Iootty M. 2004. Industrial competitiveness in Brazil. Cepal Rev. 82:91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K. 1994. Defining competitiveness: a holistic approach. Manage Decis. 32(2):49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan R, Jewell C, Ericsson S, Henricsson P. 2005. Measuring construction competitiveness in selected countries. Final Report, School of Construction Management and Engineering, the University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan R, Lu W, Shen L, Jewell C. 2007. Competitiveness in construction: a critical review of research. Constr Manage Econ. 25(9):989–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Geroski PA, Mata J, Portugal P. 2010. Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strateg Manage J. 31:510–529.
   Google Scholar
• Green SD, Larsen GD, Kao C. 2008. Competitive strategy revisited: contested concepts and dynamic capabilities. Constr Manage Econ. 26(1):63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Gunhan S, Arditi D. 2005. Factors affecting international construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(3):273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2011. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory Pract. 19(2):139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Henricsson JP, Ericsson S, Flanagan F, Jewell CA. 2004. Rethinking competitiveness for the construction industry. ARCOM 20th Annual Conference, Vol. 1, 1–3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Ho PHK. 2016. Analysis of competitive environments, business strategies, and performance in Hong Kong’s construction industry. J Manage Eng. 32(2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail R, Sulaiman N, Abidin SHTZ. 2012. Globalisation and total factor productivity in the selected malaysian construction sector. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke VII; Hotel Kinta Riverfront, Ipoh, Perak. 1:400–408.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal EM, Flanagan R. 2012. Understanding absorptive capacity in Malaysian small and medium sized (SME) construction companies. J Eng Des Technol. 10(2):180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Kolhatkar MJ, Dutta AB. 2013. Financial risks and construction projects. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage. 2(11):235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz S, Messner JI. 2008. Competitive positioning and continuity of construction firms in international markets. J Manage Eng. 24(4):207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 30(3):607–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall S. 2001. Competitiveness, technology and skills. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laryea S. 2010. Challenges and opportunities facing contractors in Ghana. West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference; p. 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis TM. 2007. Impact of globalization on the construction sector in developing countries. Constr Manage Econ. 25(1):7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Li QM, Shen LY. 2002. Parameters assessing construction company's competitiveness in China. J Constr Econ. 3:8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Hoi L. 2006. Risks faced by Singapore firms when undertaking construction projects in India. Int J Project Manage. 24(3):261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Li S, Low SP, Ofori G. 2012. Mathematical models for predicting Chinese A/E/C firms’ competitiveness. Autom Constr. 24:40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W. 2006. A system for assessing and communicating contractor’s competitiveness [PhD thesis]. Hung Hom, Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Lu W, Shen L, Asce M, Yam MCH. 2008. Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study. J Constr Eng Manage. 134:972–982.
   Google Scholar
• Lu W, Li H, Shen L, Asce M, Huang T. 2009. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of Chinese construction companies in the global market. J Manage Eng. 25(4):166–176.
   Google Scholar
• Majid S, Bakar RA, Sieh L, Sieh P, Mei L. 2004. Impact of AFTA on ACF member countries. The ASEAN Construction Federation (ACF).
   Google Scholar
• Miller DC. 1991. Handbook of research design and social measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Momaya K, Selby K. 1998. International competitiveness of the Canadian construction industry: a comparison with Japan and the United States. Can J Civ Eng. 25(4):640–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodley K, Smith N, Preece CN. 2008. Stakeholder matrix for ethical relationships in the construction industry. Constr Manage Econ. 26(6):625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Moon CH, Rugman AM, Verbeke A. 1995. The generalized double diamond approach to international competitiveness. In: Beyond the diamond. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; p. 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Moon HC, Rugman AM, Verbeke A. 1998. A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore. Int Bus Rev. 7(2):135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ofori G. 2003. Frameworks for analysing international construction. Constr Manage Econ. 21(4):379–391.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco FA, Serpell AF, Molenaar KR. 2011. Competitiveness factors and indexes for construction companies: findings of Chile. Revista de la Constr. 10(1):91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco FA, Serpell AF, Molenaar KR, Forcael E. 2014. Modeling competitiveness factors and indexes for construction companies: findings of Chile. J Constr Eng Manage. 140(4):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyewobi LO, Windapo AO, Cattell KS. 2014. Competitiveness of construction organisations in South Africa. Constr Res Congr. 2063–2073.
   Google Scholar
• Öz Ö. 2001. Sources of competitive advantage of Turkish construction companies in international markets. Constr Manage Econ. 19(2):135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Pananond P. 2007. The changing dynamics of Thai multinasionals after the Asian economic crisis. J Int Manage. 13:356–375.
   Google Scholar
• Pilinkiene V. 2016. Trade openness, economic growth and competitiveness. the case of the Central and Eastern European Countries. Eng Econ. 27(2):185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME. 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York (NY): The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Seaden G, Manseau A. 2001. Public policy and construction innovation. Build Res Inform. 29(3):182–196.
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, Lu W, Yam MCH. 2006. Contractor key competitiveness indicators: a China study. J Constr Eng Manage. 132(4):416–424.
   Google Scholar
• Shi J, Li P. 2006. An initial review of policies for SMEs in the US, Japan and China. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology; p. 270–274.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG. 2010. The competitiveness of SMEs in a globalized economy: observations from China and India. Manage Res Rev. 33(1):54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh S, Egbu C. 2007. The role of knowledge capture for improved competitiveness in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry: an empirical study. 3rd International Conference - Information and Knowledge Management – Helping the Practitioner in Planning and Building, Stuttgart, Germany; p. 194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y. 2008. Contractor’s competitiveness and competitive strategy in Hong Kong [PhD thesis]. Hung Hom, Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Shen L, Langston C. 2012. Competition environment, strategy, and performance in the Hong Kong construction industry. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(3):352–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Shen L-Y, Yam MCH, Lo AAC. 2007. Contractor key competitiveness indicators (KCIs): a Hong Kong study. Survey Built Environ. 18(2):33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Shen L-Y, Langston C. 2011. A fuzzy approach for assessing contractors’ competitiveness. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 18(3):234–247.
   Google Scholar
• Tung J. 2012. A study of product innovation on firm performance. Int J Organ Innov. 4(3):84–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Xu Y, Li Z. 2009. Research on project selection system of pre-evaluation of engineering design project bidding. Int J Proj Manage. 27:584–599.
   Google Scholar
• Yu LW. 2003. A study of the competitiveness of local contractors in Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar