A multi-criteria decision-making model using socio-technical attributes for transportation bridge maintenance prioritisation

References

• Andrade C, Martinez I. 2009. Use of indices to assess the performance of existing and repaired concrete structures. Constr Build Mater. 23(9):3012–3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakura Y, Kashiwadani M. 1996. Traffic assignment in a road network with degraded links by natural disasters. J Eastern Asia Soc Transport Stud. 1(3):1135–1152.
   Google Scholar
• ATC 1983. Seismic Retrofitting Guidelines for Highway Bridges. (Technical Report ATC-6-2). Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Basoz N, Kiremidjian AS. 1995. Prioritization of Bridges for Seismic Retrofitting. (Technical Report NCEER-95-0007). Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Bocchini P, Frangopol DM. 2013. Connectivity-based optimal scheduling for maintenance of bridge networks. J Eng Mech. 139(6):760–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukhsh ZA, Stipanovic I, Klanker G, O’Connor A, Doree AG. 2018. Network level bridges maintenance planning using multi-attribute utility theory. J Struct Infrastruct Eng Maintenance Manage Life-Cycle Des Perform.
   Google Scholar
• Chen A, Yang H, Lo HK, Tang WH. 1999. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. ATR. 33(2):183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras-Nieto C, Shan Y, Lewis P, Hartell JA. 2019. Bridge maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process and fusion tables. Autom Constr. 101:99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabous SA. 2008. A Decision Support Methodology for Rehabilitation Management of Concrete Bridges Concordia University. (Doctoral Thesis). Identification Number: LE 3 C66B85P, 2008 A28.
   Google Scholar
• Desgagné-Lebeuf A, Lehoux N, Beauregard R. 2020. Scheduling tools for the construction industry: overview and decision support system for tool selection. Int J Construct Manage.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Z, Nicholson A. 1997. Degradable transportation systems: sensitivity and reliability analysis. Transportation Res Part B: Methodol. 31(3):225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsanifar M, Hemesy M. 2019. A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to prioritize risks in the construction process under fuzzy environment (case study: the Valiasr Street underpass project). Int J Construct Manage.
   Google Scholar
• Elbehairy H, Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Soudki K. 2006. Comparison of two evolutionary algorithms for optimization of bridge deck repairs. Comput-Aided Civil Eng. 21(8):561–572..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhey D. 2015. Operational structural performances of bridge types by deterioration trends. J Perform Constr Facil. 29(2):04014056.. (ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gade AN, Jensen RL, Larsen TS, Nissen SB, Andresen I. 2019. Value-based decision making in the pre-design stage of sustainable building renovation projects – exploring two methods for weighting criteria. Int J Construct Manage. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y. 2010. Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration. J Perform Constr Facil. 24(6):597–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang CL, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple attributes Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kiremidjian A, Moore J, Fan YY, Yazlali O, Basoz N, Williams M. 2007. Seismic risk assessment of transportation network systems. J Earthquake Eng. 11 (3):371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Frangopol DM. 2005. Balancing connectivity of deteriorating bridge networks and long-term maintenance cost through optimization. J Bridge Eng. 10 (4):468–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid T, Yousefi A. 2012. Prioritization of highway bridges for seismic retrofitting using multi criteria decision making. In 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Conference Paper (PDF Available), Lisbon, Portugal: World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Morcous G, Rivard H, Hanna A. 2002. Case-based reasoning system for modeling infrastructure deterioration. J Comput Civ Eng. 16(2):104–114..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munasinghe M, Clarke CL. 1995. Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development. (Report Number 14593). Washington D.C.: The World Bank Group/The International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR), ISBN: 0-8213-3212-0.
   Google Scholar
• Nojma N. 1998. Performance-based prioritization for upgrading seismic reliability of a transportation network. J Nat Disaster Sci. 20(2):57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nurani AI, Pramudyaningrum AT, Fadhila SR, Sangadji S, Hartono W. 2017. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP, and TOPSIS for determining bridge maintenance priority scale in Banjarsari, Surakarta. Int J Sci Appl Sci: Conf Ser. 2(1):60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Orcesi AD, Cremona CF. 2010. A bridge network maintenance framework for Pareto optimization of stakeholders/users costs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 95 (11):1230–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patidar V, Labi S, Sinha KC, Thompson P. 2007. Multiobjective optimization for bridge management systems. (NCHRP Rep. 590). Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Robak A, Monkman D, Gilberston T, Bush S, O'Connor B, Blakemore R, … Holdt CV. 2015. IIMM international infrastructure management manual. 5th ed. Sydney, Australia: Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia (IPWEA).
   Google Scholar
• Rokneddin K, Ghosh J, Dueñas-Osorio L, Padgett JE. 2013. Bridge retrofit prioritisation for ageing transportation networks subject to seismic hazards. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 9(10):1050–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer WT, Glagola DM. 1994. Markovian models for bridge maintenance management. J Transp Eng. 120(1):37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobanjo JO. 2000. Cost estimation under uncertainty: issues in bridge management. Transportation (Research Circular 498). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela S, Solminihac Hd, Echaveguren T. 2010. Proposal of an integrated index for prioritization of bridge maintenance. J Bridge Eng. 15(3):337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam KH, Nikolic I, Lukszo Z. 2012. Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. New York/London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang N. 2017. Bridge network maintenance prioritization under budget constraint. Struct Saf. 67:96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Gao H. 2012. Determining an optimal maintenance period for infrastructure systems. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng. 27(7):543–554..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar