BIM feasibility for small and medium-sized contractors and subcontractors

References

• Ahankoob A, Manley K, Abbasnejad B. 2019. The role of contractors’ building information modelling (BIM) experience in realising the potential values of BIM. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1639126.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja R, Sawhney A, Jain M, Arif M, Rakshit S. 2020. Factors influencing BIM adoption in emerging markets – the case of India. Int J Constr Manag. 20(1):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1462445.
   Google Scholar
• Awwad KA, Shibani A, Ghostin M. 2020. Exploring the critical success factors influencing BIM level 2 implementation in the UK construction industry: the case of SMEs. Int J Constr Manag. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1744213.
   Google Scholar
• Benzazoua Bouazza A, Ardjouman D, and Abada O. 2015. Summary for policymakers. Am Int J Soc Sci. 4(2):101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema P, Gluch P. 2019. Challenging construction project management institutions: the role and agency of BIM actors. Int J Constr Manag. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1602585.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema P, Isaksson A, Lennartsson M, Linderoth HCJ. 2017. Barriers and facilitators for BIM use among Swedish medium-sized contractors - “we wait until someone tells us to use it”. Vis Eng. 5(1), Article number: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0040-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty A, Leiringer R, Fernie S, Harty C. 2017. BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Build Res Inf. 45(6):696–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie R, Browne M, Odeyinka H, McKeown C, McNiff S. 2013. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: an analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Ayyash A, Choudhry RM. 2016. BIM for construction safety improvement in Gaza strip: awareness, applications, and barriers. Int J Constr Manag. 16(3):249–265.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2003. EU Recommendation 2003/361, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/sme-definition_en
   Google Scholar
• Fountain J, Langar S. 2018. Building Information Modeling (BIM) outsourcing among general contractors. Autom Constr. 95:107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Hammad AWA, Akbarnezhad A. 2019. Impact of organization size and project type on BIM adoption in the Chinese construction market. Constr Manag Econ. 37(11):675–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Hammad AWA, Sepasgozar S, Akbarnezhad A. 2019. BIM adoption model for small and medium construction organisations in Australia. ECAM. 26(2):154–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Sepasgozar SME, Ahmadian AFF, Akbarnezhad A. 2016. Factors influencing BIM adoption in small and medium sized construction organizations. ISARC 2016 - 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, (ISARC). p. 452–461.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini M, Pärn EA, Edwards DJ, Papadonikolaki E, Oraee M. 2018. Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: competitive dynamics perspective. J Manage Eng. 34(5):05018008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin R, Hancock CM, Tang L, Wanatowski D. 2017. BIM investment, returns, and risks in China’s AEC Industries. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(12):04017089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenley R. 2014. Productivity improvement in the construction process. Constr Manage Econ. 32(6):489–494.
   Google Scholar
• Lam TT, Mahdjoubi L, Mason J. 2017. A framework to assist in the analysis of risks and rewards of adopting BIM for SMEs in the UK. J Civil Eng Manag. 23(6):740–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le PL, Chaabane A, Dao TM. 2019. BIM contributions to construction supply chain management trends: an exploratory study in Canada. Int J Constr Manag. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1639124.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yu J. 2016. Comparative study of BIM acceptance between Korea and the United States. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(3):05015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Mathews N, Yoders J. 2014. The business value of BIM for construction in major global markets. https://www.icn-solutions.nl/pdf/bim_construction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lex - 32003H0361 - en. (n.d.). [accessed 2021 March 08]. http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6ca8d655-126b-4a42-ada4-e9058fa45155.0004.01/DOC_1.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Zheng S, Si H, Xu K. 2019. Critical challenges for BIM adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from China. Adv Civ Eng. 2019:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Teo EAL. 2019. Managing critical drivers for building information modelling implementation in the Singapore construction industry: an organizational change perspective. Int J Constr Manag. 19(3):240–256.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S-L, Sexton MG, Abbott C. (No Dates). Key Characteristics of Small Construction Firms: A United Kingdom Perspective, CIB W065/055 Commissions: Transformation through Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Malacarne G, Toller G, Marcher C, Riedl M, Matt DT. 2018. Investigating benefits and criticisms of bim for construction scheduling in SMEs: an Italian case study. Int J Sustain Dev Plan. 13(01):139–150. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N1-139-150.
   Google Scholar
• Mirarchi C, Trebbi C, Lupica Spagnolo S, Daniotti B, Pavan A, Tripodi D. 2019. BIM methodology and tools implementation for construction companies (Green BIM project). In: Daniotti B, Gianinetto M, Della Torre S, editors. Digital transformation of the design, construction and management processes of the built environment. Research for development. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Kim KP, Tam VWY, Rahnamayiezekavat P. 2020. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers, and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int J Constr Manag. 20(2):146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Muneeswaran G, Manoharan P, Awoyera PO, Adesina A. 2018. A statistical approach to assess the schedule delays and risks in Indian construction industry. Int J Constr Manag. 20(5):450–461.
   Google Scholar
• Noruwa BI, Arewa AO, Merschbrock C. 2020. Effects of emerging technologies in minimising variations in construction projects in the UK. Int J Constr Manag. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1772530.
   Google Scholar
• Okakpu A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Haar J, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Rehman AU. 2020. Risk factors that influence adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for refurbishment of complex building projects: stakeholders’ perceptions. Int J Constr Manag. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1795985.
   Google Scholar
• Okoro CS, Musonda I, Agumba JN. 2020. Exploring the underlying structures of sustainability performance measures: a study of transportation projects in South Africa. Int J Constr Manag. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1729932.
   Google Scholar
• Olawale O, Oyedele L, Owolabi H, Gbadamosi A-Q, Kusimo H. 2020. Project reputation in construction: a process-based perspective of construction practitioners in the UK. Int J Constr Manag. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1783598.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers FM. 1995. The diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toriola-Coker LO, Alaka H, Agbali M, Bello WA, Pathirage C, Oyedele L. 2020. Marginalization of end-user stakeholder’s in public private partnership road projects in Nigeria. Int J Constr Manag. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1766189.
   Google Scholar
• Tranchant A, Beladjine D, Beddiar K. 2017. BIM in French smes: from innovation to necessity. WIT Trans Built Environ. 169:135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Tsado AJ, Shakantu WWM, Alumbugu PO. 2020. Construction micro, small, and medium enterprises (CMSMEs) innovations. J Eng Proj Prod. 10(1):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Wang P, Cao D, Luo X. 2020. Predicting behavioural resistance to BIM implementation in construction projects: an empirical study integrating technology acceptance model and equity theory. J Civ Eng Manag. 26(7):651–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar